“Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million - Celebrities (4) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Entertainment › Celebrities › “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million (29509 Views)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Reply (Go Down)
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by Eniitankorede: 9:04am On Jan 03 |
Sirmwill:Stop talking the nonsense. All over the world they collect VAT. Government must regulate price inflation, that’s all. Some of the VAT goes to the business, some to government. |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by morikee: 9:05am On Jan 03 |
seunmsg:Does Nigeria works like the saner clime do you even have benefits like they do watch as corruption eat it all and stories when it comes to accountability. |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by sonnie10: 9:05am On Jan 03 |
This tax issue is what will awaken Nigerians. You can’t pay so much in tax just for someone to use the money to develop just their own region. It will never happen. Time shall tell. |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by seunmsg(m): 9:06am On Jan 03 |
vanbonattel:Every Nigerian has been paying 7.5% VAT on vatable goods since 2020. Me, you, her, everyone of us. It’s either she has not been paying attention to her receipts previously or she’s just being deliberately mischievous. I suspect the later. And yes, why should you be angry that the law is now being more enforced than before? Is that not the right thing to do? Why should enforcement not be total? Compliance rate for all laws should be total. |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by seunmsg(m): 9:07am On Jan 03 |
morikee:Okay. Let’s just cancel all taxes then. Nobody should pay taxes again. Let your state governor run your state with his family money. Smh. |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by ufotunang: 9:07am On Jan 03 |
callmeDDD:..is at pos |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by fadre5(m): 9:07am On Jan 03 |
Is this not the same Corper Raye and the smelling Lagos saga? Am I the only one seeing this as clouth chasing? It's her way of attention seeking 7.5 wey don dey since almost post covid.. people who run transactions in millions understand better. |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by wallrichy: 9:08am On Jan 03 |
Exactly correct. We have always paid VAT when we make some categories of purchase. However, people should be careful of exploitation because not everything you buy is VATABLE. There are things you buy that doesn't need VAT payment by you. Many marketers/Sellers would want to take the advantage of the present Tax Reforms to exploit you, please be aware and be alert. I believe this girl VAT isn't supposed to be paid but some people would want to show off and rather scream on the social media to gather more crowd/traffic especially content creator instead of protesting against the exploitation immediately before paying. Companies have charged me VAT severally and I cancelled it by paying the principal amount. Be careful, many companies are out to exploit you based on the new system which of course ain't made to suffer you unjustly. See below Goods that are exempted from Value Added Tax Goods Exempt 1. All medical and pharmaceutical products. 2. Basic food items. 3. Books and educational materials. 4. Baby products. 5. Locally produced fertilizer, agricultural and veterinary medicine, farming machinery and farming transportation equipment. 6. All exported goods. 7. Plant and machinery imported for use in the Export Processing Zone. 8. Plant, machinery, and equipment purchased for the utilization of gas in downstream petroleum operations. 9. Tractors, ploughs, agricultural equipment and implements purchased for agricultural purposes. 10. Locally manufactured sanitary towels, pads and tampons. 11. Commercial aircraft, commercial aircraft engines commercial aircraft spare parts. Services Exempt 1. Medical services; 2. Services rendered by Microfinance Banks, People’s Banks, and Mortgage Institutions; 3. Plays and performances conducted by educational institutions as part of learning; and 4. All exported services. 5. Tuition relating to the nursery, primary, secondary and tertiary education. 6. Airline transportation tickets issued and sold by commercial airlines registered in Nigeria. 7. Hire, rental or lease tractors, ploughs and other agricultural equipment for agricultural purposes. Practical Implications There were seven exempted goods and three exempted services at inception. Initially, the trend was to extend the exempted goods and services from time to time ostensibly in response to the lobby from interest groups. However, following the Finance Acts 2019 and 2020, the number of exempt goods was increased to eleven while exempt services were increased to seven. The Finance Act 2019 defined essential food items to include additives (honey), bread, cereals, cooking oils, culinary herbs, fish, flour and starch, fruits (fresh or dried), live or raw meat and poultry, milk, nuts, pulses, roots, salt, vegetables, water (natural water and table water). Others included in the Act are locally manufactured sanitary towels, pads or tampons. It also included services rendered by microfinance banks, tuition fees relating to a nursery, primary, secondary and tertiary education. Disputes have arisen in recent times between the FIRS and taxable persons as to what constitutes the definition or explanation of the items in some categorizations. A very recent case in reference is the one in respect of what the definition of ‘basic food item’ is as the VAT Act in previous times did not provide such answers in terms of explanations or definitions. This lacuna gave rise to several attempts to define the concept of basic food for a better understanding of the impact and issues on basic food items as used in the VAT Act. For example, an author defined food as any nutritious substance that people or animals eat or drink or that plants absorb to maintain life and growth. Food is also defined as an edible or potable substance (usually of animal or plant origin), consisting of nourishing and nutritive components such as proteins, fats, carbohydrates, vitamins, and essential minerals, which (when ingested and digested) provides growth, generates energy and sustains life. While many foods can be eaten raw, many also undergo some forms of preparation for reasons of flavour, safety, palatability, or texture. This may involve cutting, washing, trimming, or adding other ingredients, such as spices at the simplest state. It may also involve mixing, heating or cooling, pressure cooking, fermentation, or combination with other food. As a response to the concerns as to what constitutes basic food items, FIRS released an information circular in 2009 on VAT exemption which defined basic food items as follows: “any unprocessed staple food item, whether or not it is packaged.” This, to FIRS, means that for a food item to be exempted from VAT, it must be a staple food item, and it must be unprocessed. What then does “staple food” mean? It is the name given to food that can be easily stored, and eaten throughout the year by a dominant part of a population. Early civilizations usually ate staple foods because they could be stored for an extended period without having to worry about them going bad. Some examples of staple foods include carbohydrates, wheat, barley, rice, potatoes, tinned food, milk, and things that do not need to be refrigerated. Staple foods are regularly eaten even daily since they supply a significant proportion of nutritional and energy requirements. A staple food, in other words, is a fundamental food item in the typical diet of a group of individuals. Dwelling on the foregoing clarifications, it is apparent that the factors to bear in mind when ascertaining whether a food item is a staple or not is not the level or form of processing the food has undergone; instead, it is the nature of consumption, nutrients formulation, and proportion of the populace that routinely consume the food item. There were other concerns, especially as relates to the ambiguity in FIRS’ application of the “processed and unprocessed” rule. For example, FIRS included semi-milled or wholly milled rice as part of the recognized VAT exempt food items. However, in another instance, FIRS attempted to assess some companies involved in the production of cassava-based flour to VAT. In a further scenario, FIRS sought to classify this ‘non-special bread commonly referred to as ‘Agege loaf of bread’, preferred by the low-income earning class, as an essential food item while classifying sliced loaf as non-basic, which is typically preferred by the high-income or middle class. Worthy of note, however, is that there is no evidence in the Act to show that the applicability of the VAT Act does not lay any specific emphasis on luxury items or services and goods that the rich or poor in the society consume. In a FIRS Information Circular released in 1997, the basic food item was later described to include “any unprocessed staple food item, whether or not it is packaged.” However, the Federal High Court Coram Honourable Justice Ibrahim Buba in its 2015 ruling in Lagos in the case between Warm Spring Waters Nigeria Ltd & Ors. v FIRS held that FIRS cannot amend the provisions of a statute by issuing a circular. It also held that water is a basic food item and therefore exempt from VAT regardless of whether it has been processed or packaged. Contrarily, Justice Adamu Hobon had earlier given judgment in a 2004 ruling in the case of Monamer Khod Enterprise v FIRS which was said to have “erroneously focused exclusively on the question whether packaged water was a manufactured good and therefore taxable, rather than on the more relevant inquiry whether water is a basic food item within the meaning of paragraph 2 of Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the VAT Act.” The judgment also was even though FIRS argued bottled water is a luxury good and was not exempted by the VAT Act. This coupled with FIRS’ predisposition that all luxury items should be taxed the VAT was not primarily targeted at the low-income earners in Nigeria. Thus, the two judgments are conflicting, but neither of them aligns with the FIRS Circular’s bid to choose one mode of packaging over another in determining where to apply VAT. In view of the fact that the content of the FIRS Circular does not bound taxpayers, it goes to show that taxpayers could justify the notion of basic food items using other acceptable means. For example, the dictionary definition of ‘basic’ means ‘fundamental’, and as highlighted earlier, basic food items are fundamental food items in the typical diet of a group of people; often eaten at every meal, and consumed in large quantities. In the absence of a clear definition of what constitutes a basic food item, the Finance Act 2019 had extended the list of goods and services exempted from VAT and has included clarifications on basic food items to include milk, nuts, bread, cereals, water (natural water and table water), among others. Nonetheless, FIRS is encouraged to further look into its current position and application thereon to enable a more realistic and settled treatment around the concept of basic food items as exceptions to the imposition of VAT, for example, the application of natural and table water in the Finance Act 2019. This will ensure that the target beneficiaries of this exemption are not excluded via a strained interpretation or application of the provisions of the VAT Act. Medical services are also at the centre of the controversy in Nigeria’s VAT policy. In the case of medical services, the VAT Act or the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) circulars failed to explain the scope of the term. Recent breakthroughs in the world of medical technology have brought about an increase in cosmetic surgeries and procedures. A general exemption of medical services is no longer sufficient in light of these developments. Conclusion While a review has been made on some of the areas shrouded in ambiguity in the Finance Acts 2019 and 2020, this has not completely laid to rest the many controversies surrounding the administration of the tax. With lapses here and there and taxpayers having studied the loopholes inherent in the VAT, legislation has continued to capitalize on these to evade the payment of VAT. The consequence of failure to provide enough clarification and other crucial delimitation is the frequent dissension between FIRS and taxpayers. This is even worrying because an amendment was made as recent as 2020 with the introduction of the Finance Act. To this end, FIRS and other concerned entities should make efforts to galvanize the views of the numerous stakeholders in the tax practice and administration chain and further make attempts to provide clarity on the subject matter. However, this should not be at the neglect of necessary legislative amendments as ambiguities in tax laws, once identified, are best solved by legislative amendments. In this regard, it is also crucial that taxpayer education and enlightenment as parts of the roles and functions of the Federal Inland Revenue Service should be improved. This should be done by emphasizing the recent amendments such as the introduction of a VAT exemption threshold for businesses with a turnover of less than N25 million per annum and the expansion of the list of VAT exempt items and services to include locally manufactured sanitary towels, pads and tampons as well as tuition relating to the nursery, primary, secondary and tertiary education. Related posts May 9, 2024 CITN: 2024 NIGERIA ECONOMIC OUTLOOK AND PERFORMANCE Read more September 8, 2023 FIRST HALF OF 2023 NIGERIA’S MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCE Read more September 8, 2023 GLOBAL DISRUPTION, TAXATION AND DIGITALISATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Read more 1 Comment Reuben Dadar says: August 25, 2021 at 9:20 pm Weldon CITN for this. It makes one more updated. Thank you. Membership My CITN CITN Membership Student Membership Join CITN CITN Materials Careers CITN About CITN Approved Rates Professional Syllabus Code of Ethics Privacy Policy © 2023 CITN. All Rights Reserved. This website uses cookies. For further information on how we use cookies you can read our Privacy policy and Cookie notice Close Hallams: |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by Eniitankorede: 9:09am On Jan 03 |
vanbonattel:You should learn everything, not half way. If your company is not making 100 million and above, you don’t pay tax. Over 90% of SMEs don’t fall above that. |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by Sermwell(m): 9:10am On Jan 03 |
Dogalmighty17:Go and get some education if you don't know the meaning of influencer! Gooosh!! ![]() |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by anonimi: 9:13am On Jan 03 |
alphonsojidebab:If Tinubu’s TAX monster plan is successful in holding 20 million Lagosians captive since 1999 why change it for 200 million Nigerian mumus? Lagos tax burden, IGR and budget have increased 100 times but the state is a mess of smelly waterless shithole, because the master strategist steals money that should employ workers to make ordinary water available to every household. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5v-F81hNTs |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by Exousiang01(m): 9:13am On Jan 03 |
Riskymarvelous:The same country where people have not being paying tax? Is it not when the tax is paid you can ask what the money is used for? The subsidy was removed. Are th governors (even those in the opposition) not opening their own mouth to confess that they are getting record sums for allocation? Why don't you pay the tax first. You are not even paying tax yet you are complaining Do you even have a job or business? |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by Berankis: 9:13am On Jan 03 |
You see... This Government doesn't fully realise what they are getting themselves into. The more tax burden you inflict on the people the more reawakened them become about holding you to account. There is going to be a day they will come out to ask questions about how their taxes are being spent, that day is when we see things like burning cities, burning Government buildings etc. all hell will break loose except the Government hold themselves to account first and come to equity with the people. |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by Minjim: 9:14am On Jan 03 |
These people have come with theirs propaganda again. Just to trend |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by anonimi: 9:14am On Jan 03 |
Eniitankorede:Where do your SMEs get their products and services from? Don’t they get anything from the big companies that are taxed ![]() |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by Sermwell(m): 9:16am On Jan 03 |
humberjade:Stop being naive! These useless politicians will loot everything! You better wake up! |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by anonimi: 9:18am On Jan 03 |
Exousiang01:Why do you think that someone needs to have a job or busines to pay tax in its different forms, which includes VAT on goods and services as well as levies, rates, fines, fees etc ![]() Moreover, if extreme poverty paupers don’t work for the rich then how will the rich generate income for Tinubu to tax ![]() |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by ponziponzi(m): 9:22am On Jan 03 |
vanbonattel:VAT has not changed, it the same 7.5%. She would have paid the same amount a year ago. |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by anonimi: 9:22am On Jan 03 |
symbianDON:The Emperor is raising more money for his reelection and 3rd term agenda to be Nigeria’s first life president, with the support of France like Cameroon’s Biya. Who will stop the Lagos TAX monster planner, in the way that Atiku led other patriotic Nigerians to stop Obasanjo in 2007, despite his Ghana must go bags of bribes to NASS members ![]() https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPytmuhYDAU |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by djseanjohn77: 9:24am On Jan 03 |
vanbonattel:Same false alarm under pretense that Nigerians are known for - She has garnered the attention she is seeking as an influencer - that is their work. |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by Misterone: 9:25am On Jan 03 |
Since when did VAT become a new tax ![]() |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by Fuckingmallam45(m): 9:29am On Jan 03 |
anonimi:Anini, you're more learner than this, sometimes, leave propaganda and say the truth. Don't politicizes everything. |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by djseanjohn77: 9:29am On Jan 03 |
dfrost:God bless you - you see one thing synonymous with this generation, we have too many ignorant people who parade themselves as knowledgeable people- these ae people who were back-benchers in their school days, people who couldn't understand basic things, lacks comprehension- But have found their voice behind the keyboard where they air idiotic comments and nonsensical contributions. Engage them on a one vs one discussion, you will understand how ignorant they are. |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by Jayce242: 9:30am On Jan 03 |
Hmm |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by AsgardKing: 9:31am On Jan 03 |
Thank you for addressing the sentimental BS that's everywhere. seunmsg: |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by advanceDNA: 9:33am On Jan 03 |
humberjade:Thats never going to happen in Nigeria ..... |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by tollyboy5(m): 9:33am On Jan 03 |
vanbonattel:Use common sense. Vat has been 7.5 all these while. I'm not seeing new tax in what she posted. What I see is an olodo girl living large |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by anonimi: 9:34am On Jan 03 |
Fuckingmallam45:If you’re learned and not the one politicising the narrative, you should point out the propaganda that you read in the post you quoted to reply. Politicising everything like the winchious ![]() https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eukKEOSi-8 |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by blingxx(m): 9:40am On Jan 03 |
vanbonattel:Pointless talk … travel abroad and don’t pay their tax nah |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by Mirasteel: 9:40am On Jan 03 |
Nigerian youths will never protest this. They only know how to make noise without any action. |
| Re: “Tax Don Start” — Influencer Cries Out After Paying ₦487,500 VAT On ₦6.5 Million by Winnin009: 9:41am On Jan 03 |
vanbonattel:Bro, keep calm... if you didn't know, simply talk. VAT has been 7.5 for a while now. This isn't new. Perhaps, this is the first time she's paying this much, or she's simply doing it for traction on her socials; she's an influencer after all. |
Una Don Start With Dis Una Camera, Na U Dey Cast Me - Wizkid Says As He Step Out • Caroline Danjuma Laments About Traffic In Banana Island After Paying N3bn • Kemi Olunloyo: Davido Is Broke After Paying $15million To Trend In US • 2 • 3 • 4
Timaya Steps Out In Style With A Powerful Message On His Instagram Page(photo) • Asians Beg For Selfie With D’banj - Vanguard • See This Photo Of D’banj & Dotun Cool Fm Few Years Ago

