₦airaland Forum

Kukutente23:
How is that different from Christianity

Christianity developed as a human-constructed system after the death of Jesus. When the Roman Empire later adopted it, many elements of existing pagan traditions were absorbed into the faith. Core doctrines were shaped by church leaders during councils, where theological positions were debated and decided by majority agreement, and the views that prevailed were formalized as official Christian beliefs.

All the things you do today as Christians would be strange to jesus

FreeIgboho:
Have you been following? Osimhen is insisting he must leave camp and people are telling him good riddance to bad rubbish

.

Did you hear him say so,or naw media dey carry the fuzz,did you listen nor watch any interview where he said so?....

Anyway the team naw "soldier go,soldier come...."

2020 was COVID. Not one of these so called Prophets or Seers saw it or anything close to it. That was the last time I took any of them serious.

jehoha696:
.

Did you hear him say so,or naw media dey carry the fuzz,did you listen nor watch any interview where he said so?....

Anyway the team naw "soldier go,soldier come...."

The point is that the same Lookman that this Elijah guy said shouldn't be included in the team (which makes no sense) is the reason for all this!

NOETHNICITY:
Christianity developed as a human-constructed system after the death of Jesus. When the Roman Empire later adopted it, many elements of existing pagan traditions were absorbed into the faith. Core doctrines were shaped by church leaders during councils, where theological positions were debated and decided by majority agreement, and the views that prevailed were formalized as official Christian beliefs.

All the things you do today as Christians would be strange to jesus

Which religion does not have elements of paganism in it?
All religions have their doctrines developed by their leaders
What do Christians do today that will be strange to Jesus

judewrites:
The sooner people know that prophesies are conditional, the better.

It is not every prophecy that will come to pass.

The same pastor Adeboye said that he received a prophesy that he would be involved in a plane crash. Truly as prophesied, the plane began to malfunction in the air, but pastor Adeboye handled everything to God and slept.

Spiritual things can be manipulated by faith and earlier prophesies nullified.

Who told you about the plane story?

Kukutente23:
Which religion does not have elements of paganism in it?
All religions have their doctrines developed by their leaders
What do Christians do today that will be strange to Jesus

Jesus never celebrated 25th December as his birthday
Jesus never named any religion Christianity
Jesus never mentioned the word ‘trinity’.
Jesus never said ‘I’m fully God and fully man’.
Jesus never said humans inherited the original sin
Jesus never hinged salvation on death, rather he emphasized repentance and belief in one God
Jesus never set up clergy hierarchy (pope, bishop)
Jesus never encouraged the set up of your today church building and structure
Jesus does not know anything about the images of him you erect
Jesus never ate pork
Jesus warned against not following the laws
Etc
Let me just stop here for now

NOETHNICITY:
Jesus never celebrated 25th December as his birthday
Jesus never named any religion Christianity
Jesus never mentioned the word ‘trinity’.
Jesus never said ‘I’m fully God and fully man’.
Jesus never said humans inherited the original sin
Jesus never hinged salvation on death, rather he emphasized repentance and belief in one God
Jesus never set up clergy hierarchy (pope, bishop)
Jesus never encouraged the set up of your today church building and structure
Jesus does not know anything about the images of him you erect
Jesus never ate pork
Jesus warned against not following the laws
Etc
Let me just stop here for now

You didn't answer the first question though
All you listed are practices that have roots in the Bible which is the word of God so I don't know why you think because you assumed Jesus never did them means they are pagan.

Kukutente23:
You didn't answer the first question though
[b]All you listed are practices that have roots in the Bible [/b]which is the word of God so I don't know why you think because you assumed Jesus never did them means they are pagan.

Jesus ate pork in the Bible?
Jesus built a church in the Bible?
Jesus mentioned the word trinity?
Did Jesus say there are 3 Gods

To answer your first question, Islam doesn’t have elements of paganism

FaAbData:
Who told you about the plane story?

Go to dove media and hear from the GO himself.

NOETHNICITY:
Jesus ate pork in the Bible?
Jesus built a church in the Bible?
Jesus mentioned the word trinity?
Did Jesus say there are 3 Gods

To answer your first question, Islam doesn’t have elements of paganism

Which part of the bible forbids eating of pork
Are you by any chance saying Christians are only allowed to eat what Jesus ate? Which religion is there that only eats what their leader ate? How do you know that Jesus never ate pork when there were people who reared pork for a living then

Jesus did not build a church but he used churches or are you saying Christians are only allowed to build what Jesus built

Jesus mentioned Trinity. Trinity is a word that defines what Jesus already explained about his relationship with God and the holy spirit

Christianity never said there are 3 Gods either

I see you're a Muslim as I suspected. Islam is about the most deficient religion in the world but you guys are quick to judge and condemn others most times out of ignorance. If the weakness of your Islam is brought to the fore now you'll run away. Imagine claiming that Islam doesn't have elements of paganism. What was the Kaaba and black stone used for before Muhammad?

Kukutente23:
Which part of the bible forbids eating of pork
Are you by any chance saying Christians are only allowed to eat what Jesus ate? Which religion is there that only eats what their leader ate? How do you know that Jesus never ate pork when there were people who reared pork for a living then

Jesus did not build a church but he used churches or are you saying Christians are only allowed to build what Jesus built

Jesus mentioned Trinity. Trinity is a word that defines what Jesus already explained about his relationship with God and the holy spirit

Christianity never said there are 3 Gods either

I see you're a Muslim as I suspected. Islam is about the most deficient religion in the world but you guys are quick to judge and condemn others most times out of ignorance. If the weakness of your Islam is brought to the fore now you'll run away. Imagine claiming that Islam doesn't have elements of paganism. What was the Kaaba and black stone used for before Muhammad?

Jesus observed the law which forbids eating pork. Jesus commands his followers to observe the laws as well. How are you a follower of Jesus when you do the opposite of what he did?

Jesus mentioned trinity?
Can you please provide clear reference where stated that trinity?

If Jesus is god, the father is god, and the HS is also god, how many do you count? Why is it that when it comes to Christianity clearly defined counting methods does not apply.
You say Jesus is the son of god. I say the word sonship can only be used in 3 different situations.
1, if you biologically begets a male child.
2, if you adopt a males child
3, in the form of endearment (people who are not father called me their son to show affection)

Now what category does Jesus fall into

We know that the Bible describes several prophets as sons of God, and those sonship are clearly defined as righteous created beings who serve God.

You talked about Islam as being deficient, I thought so too before I became Muslim. What you need is to know more it before it before you can criticize it effectively or objectively. But you clearly don’t. For instance you mentioned the Kaaba. Islam did not adopt pagan rituals because they were pagan; it retained certain practices because Muslims believe they pre-dated paganism and originated with Abraham, and Islam redefined them strictly for monotheism (tawḥīd). The Kaaba predates the Arabs.

judewrites:
Go to dove media and hear from the GO himself.

Oh!
He's the one that said it? He said his own story?
But you can't be a judge in your own case.

FaAbData:
Oh!
He's the one that said it? He said his own story?
But you can't be a judge in your own case.

Was I ever a judge?

judewrites:
Was I ever a judge?

You don't get that statement.
It's like an idiomatic expression.

It means someone cannot be telling an issue between himself and someone and same time be passing conclusion to favour himself. The pastor is stylishly throwing jabs at another prophet but his own claims are questionable too.

Like the plane incident now, he's the one telling us the story, you weren't there o wasn't there, no witness - just story

treesun:
https://dailypost.ng/2026/01/04/adeboye-reacts-to-primate-ayodeles-afcon-prophecy-on-ademola-lookman/

antiisiam 😀😀

Just see how your religion is casting in the public ahaaaa

NOETHNICITY:
Jesus observed the law which forbids eating pork. Jesus commands his followers to observe the laws as well. How are you a follower of Jesus when you do the opposite of what he did?

Jesus mentioned trinity?
Can you please provide clear reference where stated that trinity?

If Jesus is god, the father is god, and the HS is also god, how many do you count? Why is it that when it comes to Christianity clearly defined counting methods does not apply.
You say Jesus is the son of god. I say the word sonship can only be used in 3 different situations.
1, if you biologically begets a male child.
2, if you adopt a males child
3, in the form of endearment (people who are not father called me their son to show affection)

Now what category does Jesus fall into

We know that the Bible describes several prophets as sons of God, and those sonship are clearly defined as righteous created beings who serve God.

You talked about Islam as being deficient, I thought so too before I became Muslim. What you need is to know more it before it before you can criticize it effectively or objectively. But you clearly don’t. For instance you mentioned the Kaaba. Islam did not adopt pagan rituals because they were pagan; it retained certain practices because Muslims believe they pre-dated paganism and originated with Abraham, and Islam redefined them strictly for monotheism (tawḥīd). The Kaaba predates the Arabs.

Which law is that which forbids eating pork
Can you quote it?

Read John 10v10 and 15v26 to see where Jesus spoke about the relationship between him, the father and the Spirit of the father

You're not in a position to define how sonship can be used for Christians. Even your Islam does not meet your standards because of it were so, it means your prophet committed an abomination by marrying his adopted son's wife. I hope you won't run away on seeing this fact you brought up by yourself

As for the status of Jesus, he was begotten of God which means he was created from God himself as a part of God. So the closest will be the biological one but it does not fully define it

Yes we become sons of God through Jesus. There's no one who was ever called son of God in the Bible until Jesus came

Muslims cannot provide any evidence that the Kaaba was used to worship Allah by Abraham. What is clear to everyone is that the Kaaba just like the pantheon in Rome was dedicated to the worship of multiple gods. I bet if Constantine had claimed that the pantheon was used by Moses and should thus now be a temple for Christianity, you wouldn't accept it but here you are expecting people to accept that the Kaaba originally belongs to Islam. Anyways, the circumambulation and kissing of the stone were also pagan practices before Islam and it is still retained. How do you explain that as well

Kukutente23:
Which law is that which forbids eating pork
Can you quote it?

Read John 10v10 and 15v26 to see where Jesus spoke about the relationship between him, the father and the Spirit of the father

You're not in a position to define how sonship can be used for Christians. Even your Islam does not meet your standards because of it were so, it means your prophet committed an abomination by marrying his adopted son's wife. I hope you won't run away on seeing this fact you brought up by yourself

As for the status of Jesus, he was begotten of God which means he was created from God himself as a part of God. So the closest will be the biological one but it does not fully define it

Yes we become sons of God through Jesus. There's no one who was ever called son of God in the Bible until Jesus came

Muslims cannot provide any evidence that the Kaaba was used to worship Allah by Abraham. What is clear to everyone is that the Kaaba just like the pantheon in Rome was dedicated to the worship of multiple gods. I bet if Constantine had claimed that the pantheon was used by Moses and should thus now be a temple for Christianity, you wouldn't accept it but here you are expecting people to accept that the Kaaba originally belongs to Islam. Anyways, the circumambulation and kissing of the stone were also pagan practices before Islam and it is still retained. How do you explain that as well

Here's Leviticus 11:7-8 (NIV):

7. "And the pig, though it has a split hoof completely divided, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you.

8. You must not eat their meat or touch their carcasses; they are unclean for you."

Now, I’m just wondering how you read the references (John 10:10 and John 15v26) and interpreted it as trinity. I’m still confused as to how trinity could be derived from the references you dropped

When I defined sonship, I never said it was an Islamic definition of sonship. In Islam, sonship I basically understood as the biological relationship between father and the child he birthed through sexual relations with his wife/female.

You said that no one was ever called the son of God in the Bible? Sorry sir, but you are wrong!

In the Bible, several individuals are referred to as "son of God" or "sons of God"
Adam: Luke 3:38
- Adam is called a "son of God" as he was created by God.

Israel: Exodus 4:22, Hosea 11:1
- Israel is referred to as God's "firstborn son".

Angels: Job 1:6, 2:1, 38:7
- Angels are called "sons of God" as they are created beings serving God.

David was called the begotten son of God.

dofman:
antiisiam 😀😀

Just see how your religion is casting in the public ahaaaa

Same way your religion is casting, abi make I show you some films between your imams?

NOETHNICITY:
Here's Leviticus 11:7-8 (NIV):

7. "And the pig, though it has a split hoof completely divided, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you.

8. You must not eat their meat or touch their carcasses; they are unclean for you."

Now, I’m just wondering how you read the references (John 10:10 and John 15v26) and interpreted it as trinity. I’m still confused as to how trinity could be derived from the references you dropped

When I defined sonship, I never said it was an Islamic definition of sonship. In Islam, sonship I basically understood as the biological relationship between father and the child he birthed through sexual relations with his wife/female.

You said that no one was ever called the son of God in the Bible? Sorry sir, but you are wrong!

In the Bible, several individuals are referred to as "son of God" or "sons of God"
Adam: Luke 3:38
- Adam is called a "son of God" as he was created by God.

Israel: Exodus 4:22, Hosea 11:1
- Israel is referred to as God's "firstborn son".

Angels: Job 1:6, 2:1, 38:7
- Angels are called "sons of God" as they are created beings serving God.

David was called the begotten son of God.

And have you come across this part of the bible in your years of reading it? Acts 10

it were all kinds of four-footed animals of the earth, wild beasts, creeping things, and birds of the air. 13And a voice came to him, “Rise, Peter; kill and eat.”

14But Peter said, “Not so, Lord! For I have never eaten anything common or unclean.”

15And a voice spoke to him again the second time, “What God has cleansed you must not call common.”
16This was done three times. And the object was taken up into heaven again.

You should take your time to read the references. It is clear as day and needs no interpretation except you mean the spirit that proceeds from the father is not of the father or that Jesus that said he's in the father is not of the father

Jesus is the only begotten son of God not a son of God or any other qualification.
Where was David called the begotten son of God? You asked recently how Jesus is God's son. Now you're pointing to references of people being referred to as God's son. Why do you have a problem with Jesus being God's son but not with the others if I may ask?

In your definition are you saying Islam is wrong to not recognise adoption as a valid means of becoming son

I see you've dropped the pagan topic since it's become obvious that Islam is not better in that regard. Pity

Kukutente23:
And have you come across this part of the bible in your years of reading it? Acts 10



You should take your time to read the references. It is clear as day and needs no interpretation except you mean the spirit that proceeds from the father is not of the father or that Jesus that said he's in the father is not of the father

Jesus is the only begotten son of God not a son of God or any other qualification.
Where was David called the begotten son of God? You asked recently how Jesus is God's son. Now you're pointing to references of people being referred to as God's son. Why do you have a problem with Jesus being God's son but not with the others if I may ask?

In your definition are you saying Islam is wrong to not recognise adoption as a valid means of becoming son

I see you've dropped the pagan topic since it's become obvious that Islam is not better in that regard. Pity

Regarding what was declared unclean but later declared clean. The question is why was it declared unclean previously? Was it due to physical uncleanliness? If yes, when a spirit (whatever it was) declared it clean, did that declaration remove the physical uncleanliness from the animal?
Also, I thought you said there is no where in Bible where pig is prohibited?

Regarding David being bigotten by God below is a screenshot attached

I gave you 3 possible definitions of sonship know to mankind. One is to show endearment which I believe all the people in the Bible referred to as son of God relates to! I don’t have a problem with Jesus being called son of God! Just that you are unable to tell us or define what category of sonship you mean.
Also, the Quran is not wrong in abolishing the cultural practice of Arabs taking adopted sons as their biological sons. To extent that adopted sons used to bear the names of their adopted fathers. Islam bloodline is sacred and cannot be changed. As such everyone is supposed to bear the names of their biological parents.

NOETHNICITY:
Regarding what was declared unclean but later declared clean. The question is why was it declared unclean previously? Was it due to physical uncleanliness? If yes, when a spirit (whatever it was) declared it clean, did that declaration remove the physical uncleanliness from the animal?
Also, I thought you said there is no where in Bible where pig is prohibited?

Regarding David being bigotten by God below is a screenshot attached

I gave you 3 possible definitions of sonship know to mankind. One is to show endearment which I believe all the people in the Bible referred to as son of God relates to! I don’t have a problem with Jesus being called son of God! Just that you are unable to tell us or define what category of sonship you mean.
Also, the Quran is not wrong in abolishing the cultural practice of Arabs taking adopted sons as their biological sons. To extent that adopted sons used to bear the names of their adopted fathers. Islam bloodline is sacred and cannot be changed. As such everyone is supposed to bear the names of their biological parents.

I never said there's nowhere that pork was forbidden. I specifically asked for it as concerning Jesus but as usual with islamists, you ran to the old Testament laws which you neither keep nor assent to.

The reason it was declared unclean is given in the verse you quoted. Now the question is why an animal made by God, whom he declared all good at the beginning in Genesis 1 suddenly became unclean? Can you answer that? Why did God create unclean things when he is holy and does not behold unholiness? I'll be waiting for your answer.

If you had read the words of Jesus concerning what goes into a man defiling him, perhaps you might have begun to do some research on why some animals were declared clean or unclean. Read Matt 15v11-16

You did not attach any screenshot to your post so I guess it's safe to admit you don't have any proof of David being called begotten son of God

I already defined the category to you. Maybe you should go back and read it. I said biological sonship is the closest because Jesus came out of God. He was not created but formed from inside God himself. It is close to biological process than any other.

So why do you recognise adoption as a means of becoming sons? You can't have it both ways. If Islam says adoption is wrong, then you as a Muslim should also accept it which in effect means Muhammad was right to take Zainab.

If you on the other hand see adoption as a valid means of becoming son, then it means that Muhammad committed an abominable act

Kukutente23:
I never said there's nowhere that pork was forbidden. I specifically asked for it as concerning Jesus but as usual with islamists, you ran to the old Testament laws which you neither keep nor assent to.

The reason it was declared unclean is given in the verse you quoted. Now the question is why an animal made by God, whom he declared all good at the beginning in Genesis 1 suddenly became unclean? Can you answer that? Why did God create unclean things when he is holy and does not behold unholiness? I'll be waiting for your answer.

If you had read the words of Jesus concerning what goes into a man defiling him, perhaps you might have begun to do some research on why some animals were declared clean or unclean. Read Matt 15v11-16

You did not attach any screenshot to your post so I guess it's safe to admit you don't have any proof of David being called begotten son of God

I already defined the category to you. Maybe you should go back and read it. I said biological sonship is the closest because Jesus came out of God. He was not created but formed from inside God himself. It is close to biological process than any other.

So why do you recognise adoption as a means of becoming sons? You can't have it both ways. If Islam says adoption is wrong, then you as a Muslim should also accept it which in effect means Muhammad was right to take Zainab.

If you on the other hand see adoption as a valid means of becoming son, then it means that Muhammad committed an abominable act

God being the creator of the heavens, doesn’t he have the right to decide what and what is clean or not, and what we should consume and not?

For the records, I don’t recognize adoption as an authentic means becoming a son, I only referred to it because it’s a system you people uphold. I don’t know how someone who is not my son, can become my biological son. That’s plain delusion!

NOETHNICITY:
God being the creator of the heavens, doesn’t he have the right to decide what and what is clean or not, and what we should consume and not?

For the records, I don’t recognize adoption as an authentic means becoming a son, I only referred to it because it’s a system you people uphold. I don’t know how someone who is not my son, can become my biological son. That’s plain delusion!

Well, you initially claimed that the pig was deemed unclean due to some physical attributes
Now you've made it as a wish of the Almighty in which case it becomes the Almighty can also decide to make an unclean animal become clean. You find it hard to adopt a position and stay there. The pig was declared unclean even though it's hoofed like other clean animals while it does not chew the cud
Adoption does not make a child you did not sire your biological son. It is simply giving all the rights to a child you did not birth as yours. That said, if you say adoption is wrong, then it is also wrong to call a man who did not birth you father out of respect of endearment as it's simply a delusion
The screenshot about Psalms 2 is a prophecy about Jesus not David. Go and read the chapter

Kukutente23:
Well, you initially claimed that the pig was deemed unclean due to some physical attributes
Now you've made it as a wish of the Almighty in which case it becomes the Almighty can also decide to make an unclean animal become clean. You find it hard to adopt a position and stay there. The pig was declared unclean even though it's hoofed like other clean animals while it does not chew the cud
Adoption does not make a child you did not sire your biological son. It is simply giving all the rights to a child you did not birth as yours. That said, if you say adoption is wrong, then it is also wrong to call a man who did not birth you father out of respect of endearment as it's simply a delusion
The screenshot about Psalms 2 is a prophecy about Jesus not David. Go and read the chapter

Bro, I’m fatigued by this back and forth. I know I can never convince you otherwise as your mind is already programmed.

You say psalm 2 is a prophecy about Jesus even though there is nothing prophetic about it.

I leave you with the attached

I also want you to know that I admire your respectful attitude. So very unusual for a Christian to engage without getting emotional and resorting to insults

NOETHNICITY:
Bro, I’m fatigued by this back and forth. I know I can never convince you otherwise as your mind is already programmed.

You say psalm 2 is a prophecy about Jesus even though there is nothing prophetic about it.

I leave you with the attached

I also want you to know that I admire your respectful attitude. So very unusual for a Christian to engage without getting emotional and resorting to insults

Lol AI is not in a position to tell anyone about religion
That said, I don't know what you mean by saying Christians resort to insults and emotions. I can tell you that's a preserve of Muslims on this thread. One of you even has a moniker dedicated to antagonising Christians called anti Christian

SixSeven:
2013, Adeboye said the year would be better than the last, that people would make progress and peace would grow, but warned of natural disasters and the need for prayer; breakthroughs in medicine were expected.
Result:
There were everyday events like weather and medical progress, but nothing dramatic that clearly matched the optimism and disaster warnings specifically as predicted, no standout scientific breakthrough tied to the prophecy and no unusual disasters that became defining moments of the year.


2014, the prophecy included things like divine promises beginning to be fulfilled, dominant life changes, narrow escapes from tragedy, and that Nigeria’s future would be determined that year with different “equations” by year‑end.

Result:
2014 did not have a single defining reversal of fortune for Nigeria or a shift that matched the specific language of that forecast. There were ongoing national issues, but no clear, dramatic transformation that fulfilled the prophecy in the ways it was described.


2015, Adeboye said the year would bring harvests from fasting, testimonies, miraculous project completions, scientific and medical breakthroughs, Ebola ending, insurgency weakening, and many disasters to pray against.

Result:
Ebola did decline in West Africa in 2015, and insurgency remained a global concern, but the broad list was too general to point to one clear outcome that matched everything predicted, there weren’t widespread miraculous completions, nor did all the specific global breakthroughs emerge as described. In hindsight, insurgency is what we are discussing today in 2026. It didn't decline just because APC came to power.


In 2016, his list included families receiving generational blessings, life swinging upward, Nigeria getting tougher before getting better, natural disasters worsening, a new sexually transmitted disease surfacing, and a major war being averted.

Result:
There was no confirmed emergence of a new STD as predicted, and evidence does not show natural disasters were dramatically worse globally in ways explained in the prophecy. Improvements or challenges in Nigeria that year were part of ongoing patterns, not clear matches to the specifics.


In 2017, prophecies for this year were similarly broad (reported online as a year of surprises, open to interpretation), but most publicly available lists from RCCG for 2017 are not detailed enough to allow precise fact‑checking, so no specific outcome can be confirmed or denied.

In his 2018 forecast, he included stubborn mountains moving, reclaiming lost ground, saboteurs disgraced, significant goliaths falling, and rays of hope that things will still be well. Nigeria experienced political shifts, but nothing clearly matches all those elements as a specific prediction. There were no globally recognised giant breakthroughs or universally celebrated reversals that clearly fulfilled those statements.


As for 2019, Adeboye chose to “code” the prophecies using Bible verses because it was an election year, saying the nature of the year would be interpreted spiritually rather than through explicit forecasts. Because of that there are no specific, concrete predictions to compare with events that year.

In 2021, his prophecies said some things from 2020 would carry over, that nations needed to admit spiritual truths, and that individuals would experience survival and restoration. These are general spiritual themes, and while COVID‑19 effects did extend into 2021, the broad moral framing makes it hard to link to specific measurable outcomes.

In 2022, Adeboye released a list including forecasts like a drop in infant mortality by at least 50%, emergence of new stars, and two monstrous storms.

Result:
Public health statistics do not show a 50 percent drop in infant mortality in Nigeria in 2022, and while weather events occurred as they do every year, there were no specific storms that matched the dramatic scale described in the prophecy.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCwCKI-R2JA

His 2025 prophecy described 2025 as “a landmark year,” with winds of change, earthly helpers replaced by heavenly ones, and mockers louder and more aggressive with many of them not surviving.

Result:
There is no public evidence of a wave of deaths of critics matching that description, and while local disasters occurred, they weren’t on an extraordinary scale beyond typical patterns for any year.

In 2026, Adeboye has predicted a reduction in hunger in Nigeria, small and medium enterprises flourishing, and Nigerians returning home (“reverse Japa”).

2026 Prophecies: Hear What God Said Would Happen in 2026 - Pastor EA Adeboye

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ju8ItJagTOI

Adeboye's Official Site has some of these prophecies and people here post them every year. Many of the yearly prophecies attributed to Pastor Adeboye mix general hope with spiritual language and warnings about abstract forces. While some broad elements (like health improvements or declines in specific diseases) loosely correlate with real events, the specific, measurable predictions (like a huge drop in infant mortality, a new STD, or mockers dying in 2025) did not occur in ways that clearly match the text of those prophecies when evaluated against public data and widely verifiable events.

So one will not be wrong to say he is a charlatan and conman