₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,329,499 members, 8,440,929 topics. Date: Tuesday, 07 July 2026 at 06:17 PM

Toggle theme

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live - Foreign Affairs (4329) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsRussia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live (2691049 Views)

1 2 3 ... 4326 4327 4328 4329 4330 4331 4332 ... 5381 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by LordAdam16: 5:31pm On Jan 28
OkpaNsukkaisBae:
E come be like 47 dey fear to give the final order to attack. Na d same POTUS wey been dey bomb civilian fishing boats in Venezuelan waters, dey seize oil tanker in international sea lane. I was expecting them to shoot down that Iranian drones shadowing Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier. International water=international airspace.
guy if you open google earth look the geography
you go pity the us navy

iran has a long coastline and the persian gulf is a liquid cul de sac
the strait of hormuz is narrow and it is firmly within iran's coastline
any enemy ship that crosses the strait enters a trap
because there is no where to run to
which is different from the situation versus the houthis

no where to run to
there is a naval base in bahrain but docking to reload essentially makes you a sitting duck
because it is literally across from iran
within iran's drone and short-range missile range
and all the ships have limited munitions
with the atrocious failure rate that we just witnessed in nigeria

on top of that
iran has hypersonics

the us lincoln don reach gulf of oman since sunday
we never still get update whether dem don cross strait of hormuz
to cross the strait of hormuz dey fear dem
in fact just crossing it could lead to the worst naval loss of lives since ww2 if iran chooses to pre-emptively strike

as iran has underwater naval bases
not hearsay
they already showed the interior on iranian media

iranian drone dey deploy round the clock around the carrier strike group
you carry 4 ships + one submarine dey intimidate persia
for their house
when you have no legroom

the drone is also a trap
you shoot it down
it is an act of war and iran attacks the fleet in retaliation with everything they've got

they should have jejelly focused on their aerial assets in crete, jordan, and diego garcia
not delivering hostages to iran's doorstep atop indefensible naval platforms

all the countries surrounding the persian are neutral, pro-iran, or want to go unnoticed
india (whose deputy nsa just met larijani today), pakistan that backed iran in the 12d war
then you have neutral oman, uae that just declared neutrality, bahrain that's inconsequential, neutral qatar, saudi that just declared neutrality, iraq that is pro-iran, and kuwait that is inconsequential and does not want to be noticed

my only guess is that they're trying to goad iran into believing the naval fleet will be a significant part of the initial attack
where persia holds a distinct advantage
when they plan on exclusively using air assets as during the 12d war

the problem with this plan is that naval assets are the only way to carry out a quick, sudden strike
the mobilization through the air from jordan and crete will be seen from a mile off
like they were on january 14 when the us called off the attack after jets were already in the air and on their way to iraq
and in a total war, iran could still sink the fleet anyway without waiting for it to join the party in a major way
because in their attempt to intimidate they just put a giant bullseye on the backs of the poor sailors

you look at the 12d war and the walloping israel received
you lose two naval jets against the houthis
and then you bring less than half a dozen highly visible, highly prized targets to within a few dozen miles off iran
is that not suicide?




that trump statement
almost reads like he is begging for persia to give him an off ramp
that is why he said no nuclear weapons instead of no enrichment
and he did not include the other 3 conditions that iran has declared as non-starters

he should offer the jcpoa deal + removal of uranium enriched to or past 60%
iran will take that deal
and he'll walk out of this a hero

but he is himself a hostage to israeli interests
so we will get the war
and he'd get the shock of his life
when he realizes he was a dispensable pawn for moves that go back four decades

personally i don't even want iran to agree to any deal before the total war
because trump will not honor the deal unless the persians impose a high cost first
there is still 3 years to go
so a deal however great or bad that comes without a heavy price on the american side could be thrashed within a month when they find an opening

-Lord
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by 23jerryking(m): 5:44pm On Jan 28
sainttwist1:
the third one

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I tell you man, that was the peak of it. 😂😂😂.
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Mikasaobi: 6:01pm On Jan 28
Obedience40:
Oga stop arguing nonsense man, with the technology advancement and size of the US. They will absorb a first nuclear strike.


A nuclear fallout via the contaminating of the soil and air by radiation can be easily curtained.. There have been some nuclear stations malfunction in Japan and I think Ukraine and the fall-out was curtained.

The US and the Soviet Union during the cold war era have times run numerous Nuclear fallout scenarios..

One nuclear strike in let say the southern part of the US won't destroyed the entire US.. via the initial blast nor through the fallout via radioactive poisoning of the ecosystem. Thousands will die, more will also die via the fallout but saying there's no survivability especially if the it is just a single nuclear warhead. Try they use brain this boy

You keep arguing like a kid!!! Nuclear winter!! Japan which is ten times less the size of the US survived two atomic bombs..

When we talk about nuclear war, survival simply means the ability to absorb a nuclear hit and retaliate!! That's the first step of survival in any nuclear war..The ability to respond is the first approach of survival in a nuclear war

The US white house has underground structures designed to survive the effects of a nuclear weapon.. Not a direct hit but the effects of a nuclear weapon... why build structures if there's no first strike survivability??

Billionaires in the US are building Nuclear bunkers, why build bunkers if there's zero chance fo survivability if there is a nuclear hit?? Do you know more than a dozen US billionaires building nuclear bunkers??

So countries like China who has a policy of no first strike.. you are smarter that the Chinese.. will the Chinese adopt a nuclear approach which says they will not fire a nuclear weapon except they are attacked?? Who will adopt a no first strike policy If there's no survivability of a first strike??.
I knew sooner or later you’ll show up, birds and feathers. I didn’t expect the whole circus 🤡 🤡 to come on stage to defend another 🤡😂.

Bro nobody will use a single nuclear strike as a first strike, that’s probably a tactical nuke. A first strike mission is to completely eliminate all enemies and prevent a retaliatory strike.

This is why it’s called MAD( mutually assured destruction). If Russia detects a first strike from USA, they are unleashing all they can to destroy USA. Nobody get time to count.

As for china, they won’t strike first but they’ll detect any incoming and retaliate immediately.

No need to discuss the radiation fallout, let’s move on.

Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Mikasaobi: 6:11pm On Jan 28
LordAdam16:
guy if you open google earth look the geography
you go pity the us navy

iran has a long coastline and the persian gulf is a liquid cul de sac
the strait of hormuz is narrow and it is firmly within iran's coastline
any enemy ship that crosses the strait enters a trap
because there is no where to run to
which is different from the situation versus the houthis

no where to run to
there is a naval base in bahrain but docking to reload essentially makes you a sitting duck
because it is literally across from iran
within iran's drone and short-range missile range
and all the ships have limited munitions
with the atrocious failure rate that we just witnessed in nigeria

on top of that
iran has hypersonics

the us lincoln don reach gulf of oman since sunday
we never still get update whether dem don cross strait of hormuz
to cross the strait of hormuz dey fear dem
in fact just crossing it could lead to the worst naval loss of lives since ww2 if iran chooses to pre-emptively strike

as iran has underwater naval bases
not hearsay
they already showed the interior on iranian media

iranian drone dey deploy round the clock around the carrier strike group
you carry 4 ships + one submarine dey intimidate persia
for their house
when you have no legroom

the drone is also a trap
you shoot it down
it is an act of war and iran attacks the fleet in retaliation with everything they've got

they should have jejelly focused on their aerial assets in crete, jordan, and diego garcia
not delivering hostages to iran's doorstep atop indefensible naval platforms

all the countries surrounding the persian are neutral, pro-iran, or want to go unnoticed
india (whose deputy nsa just met larijani today), pakistan that backed iran in the 12d war
then you have neutral oman, uae that just declared neutrality, bahrain that's inconsequential, neutral qatar, saudi that just declared neutrality, iraq that is pro-iran, and kuwait that is inconsequential and does not want to be noticed

my only guess is that they're trying to goad iran into believing the naval fleet will be a significant part of the initial attack
where persia holds a distinct advantage
when they plan on exclusively using air assets as during the 12d war

the problem with this plan is that naval assets are the only way to carry out a quick, sudden strike
the mobilization through the air from jordan and crete will be seen from a mile off
like they were on january 14 when the us called off the attack after jets were already in the air and on their way to iraq
and in a total war, iran could still sink the fleet anyway without waiting for it to join the party in a major way
because in their attempt to intimidate they just put a giant bullseye on the backs of the poor sailors

you look at the 12d war and the walloping israel received
you lose two naval jets against the houthis
and then you bring less than half a dozen highly visible, highly prized targets to within a few dozen miles off iran
is that not suicide?




that trump statement
almost reads like he is begging for persia to give him an off ramp
that is why he said no nuclear weapons instead of no enrichment
and he did not include the other 3 conditions that iran has declared as non-starters

he should offer the jcpoa deal + removal of uranium enriched to or past 60%
iran will take that deal
and he'll walk out of this a hero

but he is himself a hostage to israeli interests
so we will get the war
and he'd get the shock of his life
when he realizes he was a dispensable pawn for moves that go back four decades

personally i don't even want iran to agree to any deal before the total war
because trump will not honor the deal unless the persians impose a high cost first
there is still 3 years to go
so a deal however great or bad that comes without a heavy price on the american side could be thrashed within a month when they find an opening

-Lord
That’s a very good catch. No nuclear weapons instead of no enrichment. Maybe we might get a deal.
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Obedience40: 6:15pm On Jan 28
So many military generals with there 3 billion years of military expertise!!

If Iran is so confident of sinking a carrier in two seconds like our in-house seasoned military experts has said , why don't they take the first shot?? Why wait till you are attacked?? Shouldn't the confident one take the initiative by striking first??.


For over 6 months we have a clown here who has been taking about Iranian pre-emptive strikes!! The same gormless fella is now waiting for the US to strike first

The US is afraid of striking Iran?? The same Iran that Israel strucked for sports the last time, The same Iran that US bombed and lay waste to her nuclear facilities..

Why is the Iran the supposedly superior entity waiting to be attacked before striking?? Country way our friends say beg Iran for ceasefire they approach your coastal line.. you know fire ballistic missiles. Wetin you they wait for... You can wipe out an entire battle group in 2 seconds..Yet you they wait make dem first kpia you first


But wait oooo, na so them talk aay Iran was wining the last war, yet them beg them for ceasefire and they agree?? Them kill 70% of your top military echelon..kill hundreds of your civilians..yet them come still beg you for ceasefire and you agreed?? 😂😂😂😂.. imagine the allies on the march to victory in Europe during WW2..come later say we dey win but make we just chill for ceasefire aggrement!!
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Nobody: 6:17pm On Jan 28
Mikasaobi:
I knew sooner or later you’ll show up, birds and feathers. I didn’t expect the whole circus 🤡 🤡 to come on stage to defend another 🤡😂.

Bro nobody will use a single nuclear strike as a first strike, that’s probably a tactical nuke. A first strike mission is to completely eliminate all enemies and prevent a retaliatory strike.

This is why it’s called MAD( mutually assured destruction). If Russia detects a first strike from USA, they are unleashing all they can to destroy USA. Nobody get time to count.

As for china, they won’t strike first but they’ll detect any incoming and retaliate immediately.

No need to discuss the radiation fallout, let’s move on.
I want to believe you saw "successful" in your own post. I knew you would show up with another angle of stoop!d!t!
According to what you posted, we can simply define:
A "first strike" as a surprise, preemptive attack designed to destroy an enemy's nuclear arsenal and command structures, preventing a retaliatory "second strike". It seeks to cripple the enemy's ability to respond, often targeting missile silos, submarines, and leadership centers.

Now, with the vast ability of the US or Russian military command, tell me how that is possible. Because, when I brought up the issue of needing almost one thousand Tsar bombs to achieve the purpose of first strike, you started foaming in the mouth.

In your d@ftn€ss, you assumed the "first strike" was going to be successful and arrived at no nation surviving a first strike. Definition says designed to, Mikasaobi assumed it will just because he thinks US is no bigger than his hamlet.
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by LordAdam16: 6:22pm On Jan 28
axios

trump to give iran 24 hour deadline to give up its nuclear and missile programs

war is a go
friday night the most likeliest date now

-Lord
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 6:26pm On Jan 28
⚡Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the US sold $500 million worth of Venezuela's oil, with $300 million going to the Venezuelan government.
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Obedience40: 6:27pm On Jan 28
Mikasaobi:
I knew sooner or later you’ll show up, birds and feathers. I didn’t expect the whole circus 🤡 🤡 to come on stage to defend another 🤡😂.

Bro nobody will use a single nuclear strike as a first strike, that’s probably a tactical nuke. A first strike mission is to completely eliminate all enemies and prevent a retaliatory strike.

This is why it’s called MAD( mutually assured destruction). If Russia detects a first strike from USA, they are unleashing all they can to destroy USA. Nobody get time to count.

As for china, they won’t strike first but they’ll detect any incoming and retaliate immediately.

No need to discuss the radiation fallout, let’s move on.
You really dull sha.. The same fella who said first strike isn't about retaliation!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Is now echoing what we have been trying to say along that survivability of a nuclear first strikes is all about the ability to retaliate!!

Omo people brain no they work sha!!


So please tell me how does a Russia first strike eliminates the US ability to respond?? When the US has a third leg of of her nuclear deterrence under the sea, her submarines??🙄


No body is using a single missile as a first strike..that's rich coming from the Mikasaobi the commander of Russia strategic nuclear strike force!!


All I have tried to do is educate you that the US have the ability to survive a nuclear strike.. that's all . And my hypothesis was based on a single nuclear warhead.. it was clearly stated in my posts.. Which was what the pleader was taking about, after you were caught up in your delusions..Your fall back is now 40 million nuclear missiles strikes😂😂😂😂😂
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 6:27pm On Jan 28
LordAdam16:
axios

trump to give iran 24 hour deadline to give up its nuclear and missile programs

war is a go
friday night the most likeliest date now

-Lord


When the markets close, then the action begins.
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Nobody: 6:30pm On Jan 28
Mikasaobi:
I knew sooner or later you’ll show up, birds and feathers. I didn’t expect the whole circus 🤡 🤡 to come on stage to defend another 🤡😂.

Bro nobody will use a single nuclear strike as a first strike, that’s probably a tactical nuke. A first strike mission is to completely eliminate all enemies and prevent a retaliatory strike.

This is why it’s called MAD( mutually assured destruction). If Russia detects a first strike from USA, they are unleashing all they can to destroy USA. Nobody get time to count.

As for china, they won’t strike first but they’ll detect any incoming and retaliate immediately.

No need to discuss the radiation fallout, let’s move on.
I go leave you to argue with all the sources here that AI has used to conclude that the US will survive a first strike.

Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by LordAdam16: 6:31pm On Jan 28
WriteerNg:


When the markets close, then the action begins.
you know the drill

odds are still significant they may strike sooner
ya know they always prefer surprise operations

so iran must remain vigilant
even though the weekend is likeliest because of the oil price angle

-Lord
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Nobody: 6:32pm On Jan 28
Obedience40:
You really dull sha.. The same fella who said first strike isn't about retaliation!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Is now echoing what we have been trying to say along that survivability of a nuclear first strikes is all about the ability to retaliate!!

Omo people brain no they work sha!!


So please tell me how does a Russia first strike eliminates the US ability to respond?? When the US has a third leg of of her nuclear deterrence under the sea, her submarines??🙄


No body is using a single missile as a first strike..that's rich coming from the Mikasaobi the commander of Russia strategic nuclear strike force!!


All I have tried to do is educate you that the US have the ability to survive a nuclear strike.. that's all . And my hypothesis was based on a single nuclear warhead.. it was clearly stated in my posts.. Which was what the pleader was taking about, after you were caught up in your delusions..Your fall back is now 40 nuclear missiles strikes😂😂😂😂😂
I think I know the problem.
Just ask him if China will survive a first strike. I can bet my balls that his answer will be "yes" 😂😂😅😅
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 6:32pm On Jan 28
⚡Rubio on Iran:

The protests may have ebbed, but they will spark up again in the future because this regime, unless they are willing to change and or leave, have no way of addressing the legitimate and consistent complaints of the people of Iran who deserve better.


Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 6:37pm On Jan 28
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Obedience40: 6:41pm On Jan 28
Scorpio99:
I go leave you to argue with all the sources here that AI has used to conclude that the US will survive a first strike.
First of all it is not even possible that Russia will destroy the entire US landbased strategic missiles in a first strike on the US.. That's not even practical!!

Dude doesn't even know the concept behind MAD mutual assured destruction.. the concept isn't about destruction per sa.. The concept is that when you fire a ballistic missile at me.. I will always posses the ability to respond..The ability to respond is what the MAD is talking about.

Countries like the US, China and Russia have MAD because they posses the triad means of retaliation.. especially the Submarine platform which is able to deliver destruction at a moment notice from any where in the world.

That dude is something else he is like the genetic enhanced version of Kingsnairaland!!
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 6:43pm On Jan 28
🇷🇺 🛢️ 🇮🇳 ➡️ 🇪🇺

Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by OkpaNsukkaisBae(m): 6:43pm On Jan 28
WriteerNg:
⚡Secretary of State Marco Rubio says the US sold $500 million worth of Venezuela's oil, with $300 million going to the Venezuelan government.
Looks like Maduro VP no wan play ball with Washington. Hence, they're out to discredit her government.
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 6:47pm On Jan 28
⚡China auto exports in 2025

Total exports: 8.32M vehicles (+30% YoY)
NEV exports: 3.43M (+70% YoY)

Top destinations (vehicles):

🇲🇽 Mexico — 625k
🇷🇺 Russia — 583k
🇦🇪 UAE — 572k
🇬🇧 UK — 336k
🇧🇷 Brazil — 322k
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia — 302k
🇧🇪 Belgium — 300k
🇦🇺 Australia — 297k
🇵🇭 Philippines — 257k
🇰🇿 Kazakhstan — 212k
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 6:53pm On Jan 28
⚡Rubio on the Middle East:

We have 30,000 to 40,000 American troops stationed across eight or nine facilities in that region.

All are within the reach, in reality, of an array of thousands of Iranian, one-way UAVs and Iranian ballistic missiles that threaten our troop presence.

We have to have enough force and power in the region just on a baseline to defend against the possibility of an Iranian attack.

The President always reserves the preemptive defensive option.

Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by OkpaNsukkaisBae(m): 6:56pm On Jan 28
WriteerNg:
⚡China auto exports in 2025

Total exports: 8.32M vehicles (+30% YoY)
NEV exports: 3.43M (+70% YoY)

Top destinations (vehicles):

🇲🇽 Mexico — 625k
🇷🇺 Russia — 583k
🇦🇪 UAE — 572k
🇬🇧 UK — 336k
🇧🇷 Brazil — 322k
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia — 302k
🇧🇪 Belgium — 300k
🇦🇺 Australia — 297k
🇵🇭 Philippines — 257k
🇰🇿 Kazakhstan — 212k
+70% Year over Year export for New Energy Vehicles. That's massive. Country like Nigeria that solely depends on oil export should be thinking ahead. Better start diversifying her economy. Oil economy go cast in the near future. Electric Vehicles, lithium etc will soon takeover
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 6:56pm On Jan 28
⚡The US is pushing Israel and Syria to finalise a security agreement by March, with talks close to completion.

The main obstacle is Israel’s refusal to withdraw troops from Mount Hermon, which it considers a “red line.”

Trump told Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa he has given Netanyahu a month to conclude the deal and said he wants a unified Syria.

Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 6:59pm On Jan 28
⚡Ali Shamkhani, senior advisor to Khamenei:

“Limited strike” is an illusion. Any military action by the United States, from any origin and at any level, will be considered the start of war, and its response will be immediate, comprehensive, and unprecedented, targeting the heart of Tel Aviv and all those who support the aggressor.

Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by LordAdam16: 6:59pm On Jan 28
[quote author=WriteerNg post=138289736]]



bessent claimed during na interview that carney walked back his speech in private

so carney had to repost it again in public to prove bessent is talking out of his a$$

-Lord
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by FoolishBoy419: 7:00pm On Jan 28
⚡️BREAKING

Iran has just executed a top Mossad Agent who planned to sabotage missile production facilities
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 7:00pm On Jan 28
WriteerNg:
⚡Ali Shamkhani, senior advisor to Khamenei:

“Limited strike” is an illusion. Any military action by the United States, from any origin and at any level, will be considered the start of war, and its response will be immediate, comprehensive, and unprecedented, targeting the heart of Tel Aviv and all those who support the aggressor.


Israel killed this guy at least twice during the 12-day war.
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by LordAdam16: 7:07pm On Jan 28
WriteerNg:
🇷🇺 🛢️ 🇮🇳 ➡️ 🇪🇺
kinda smart of the eu

they know the us will keep looking for ways to f*ck with direct russia-eu energy trade
so introducing india which both sides trust to play middleman is a nice workaround

russia to europe direct deals were cheap
russia to india deal will similarly be discounted
india pockets the difference

europe pays higher than their former direct deal
but the new rate will still be close to the standard market price

good for india
their fence sitting finally pays off handsomely

-Lord
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by LordAdam16: 7:09pm On Jan 28
FoolishBoy419:
⚡️BREAKING

Iran has just executed a top Mossad Agent who planned to sabotage missile production facilities
the execution was this morning after fajr prayers

-Lord
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Michaeltreasure(m): 7:12pm On Jan 28
Appleyard:
The Russians wins again.

What's good for India - EU trade is good for the Russians.

If you know, you know. cool
This is why I wrote earlier that the present crop of European leaders are extremely dumb. grin grin cheesy Imagine saying you want to fight Russia and still funding Russia. cheesy cheesy Who do Europe like this? 🙆🙆

Chai!
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Michaeltreasure(m): 7:33pm On Jan 28
Jovi10:
Brethren 2nd leg is upon us. Usrael Vs Iran. Between now and Sunday. We will have our rematch.

Get your seats . The popcorn will come when it's go time so that it can be served hot😁😁😁😁
Are you guys not tired? 😴😴 Since December, you've been predicting a war between Israel and Iran. Till today. 😩😩😩
I wonder if you have a direct link to Tehran and Jerusalem. You all seem to know more than the leaders of both countries...
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 7:46pm On Jan 28
⚡IRGC:

We have operational plans for all possible enemy scenarios and maintain full monitoring of its movements.
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 7:47pm On Jan 28
⚡IRGC:

The reality on the ground is different from the enemy’s media propaganda.
1 2 3 ... 4326 4327 4328 4329 4330 4331 4332 ... 5381 Reply

Video Of A Congolese Soldier’s Final Moments On The Battlefield Surfaces OnlineWorld News! Events Happening Around The WorldRussia - Ukraine War Tension: Live Updates (Pictures)234

American Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President!Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?

Viewing this topic: Samueldodo781(m), Holla911(m), hamzeiy and 3 guest(s)