₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,328,806 members, 8,437,500 topics. Date: Wednesday, 01 July 2026 at 11:05 PM

Toggle theme

Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsLow VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case (10243 Views)

Poll: Do You Agree That The South East Contributes Meaningfully To Nigeria's Economy Other Than Through VAT?

Yes 64% (211 votes)
No 35% (115 votes)
This poll has ended

1 2 3 4 5 6 Reply (Go Down)

Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by givedemwotowoto(op): 7:47pm On Jan 31
Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case

I’ve been seeing repeated posts comparing VAT contributions from different regions, with some arguments implying that higher VAT automatically equals higher economic contribution. That conclusion is misleading, and it needs clarification.

In the U.S., for example, there is this well-known pattern: Republican-controlled states generally prefer lower income taxes and smaller government, while Democrat-controlled states tend to impose higher taxes to fund more public services. Neither of these models is superior — they simply reflect different economic structures and policy priorities.

The same logic applies when discussing VAT contributions in Nigeria, especially in the South East.

The South East contributes heavily to the economy through low unemployment driven by entrepreneurship, not through heavy consumption or large government-funded spending. The region’s economy is dominated by traders, manufacturers, transporters, artisans, and small business owners who are actively producing, distributing, and creating value that circulates throughout the country.

To be clear, VAT is a consumption tax, not a productivity tax. It is generated when goods and services are purchased through formal retail channels. Regions with large retail chains, high consumer spending, and concentrated government expenditure will naturally generate more VAT.

Regions with more emphasis on production, capital reinvestment, informal and semi-formal trade networks, and business expansion will generate less VAT — even when economic activity is high.

This clarification is important.

Many Nigerians on the one hand have been arguing in favor of resource control so that states with more natural resources can develop locally, while states with fewer natural resources compete through tourism, hospitality, trade, and business incentives. That diversity of economic models is normal in any federation.

VAT figures alone cannot — and should not — be used to rank economic value or contribution.

Low VAT is not evidence of low economic activity. It is evidence that economic activity is structured differently.

Finally, we must move away from this persistent attempt to demonize the South East and Igbos, usually orchestrated by a well known group of people. Economic debates should focus on facts, not stereotypes or selective metrics designed to push a an agenda.

By Givedemwotowoto

Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by givedemwotowoto(op):
Don’t forget to vote on the poll at the top
SE contributes heavily through low unemployment from entrepreneurship, not by heavy consumption and big government spending.
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by david22uu(m): 8:12pm On Jan 31
let me park here and wait for the gbas gbos that will come
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by RichBoy247: 8:13pm On Jan 31
Explanation don start even when nobody ask you, abi who ask you? You go explain tire.

Shey baby factory merchants dey pay VAT ni?
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by bigdammyj: 8:14pm On Jan 31
Noted.

more characters needed.
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Nwaokunkpara: 8:14pm On Jan 31
Twenty more characters
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by zacchybros(m): 8:15pm On Jan 31
Bring it on. Let's reduce the noise out there
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Ebinpawo1: 8:16pm On Jan 31
Using VAT remittance to determine economic contribution be very controversial.

Understand the principles behind VAT deductions and the Administration of VAT will help one with better understanding.

No doubt that Lagos houses the head office for most of the multi national companies and banks and other national big entities. But the products and services of those companies are consumed nationwide, while the VAT is collected and remitted centrally at the head office, just for convenient administrative sake.

So relying only on VAT contribution per region or state could be misleading. Rather a step should be taken further to breakdown the rate of consumption or propensity to consume by each region/state enhance understanding.
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by kollog: 8:16pm On Jan 31
You guys Sha like justifying things that didn't favour or go the way of SE.

So this justification now, what has it added to the VAT contributed.

Let all of us learn to embrace whatever is our reality and strive to improve in every aspect.

My 50 Cent.
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by OnionBandit(f):
lol! you go explain and defend tire. We all know you wouldnt have put this up if it were your favourite "leeches" at the bottom of the table 😂

The simple reasons the south East will forever be at the bottom of the table are :

1. They are everywhere, scattered like broken beads. Most of their businesses aren't located in the East

2. The south East is not attractive for investment. Insecurity, intolerance and so on..

This is saying it as it is!
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by RichBoy247: 8:17pm On Jan 31
kollog:
You guys Sha like justifying things that didn't favour or go the way of SE.

So this justification now, what has it added to the VAT contributed.

Let all of us learn to embrace whatever is our reality and strive to improve in every aspect.

My 50 Cent.
.

Shey fake drugs manufacturing kiosks dey pay VAT ni?
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Igbophobia:
This is a non issue considering Igbo are the most enterprising tribe in Africa. Africa o...not Nigeria.

You don't compare apples with oranges.

What confuses many of you Igbos listening to Nigerian government's anti-Igbo rhetoric and marginalization is you're unaware that there's nothing like Southeast with respect to Igbo nation. Nigeria politically sequestered marginal Igbo clans into 8 different states to minify Igbo influence and cheat us with fake statistics and data. But a day of reckoning is coming.

Spreading the igbo nation into 13 states with only central Igbo land termed SE is their cheat sheet. Igbo considering decades of punitive action juxtaposed with our accomplishment are head and shoulders ahead of our adversaries.

Igbo haters from the SW would tell you there are no Igbo in the so-called SS, but if you ask them why they joined Fulani to hate on Igbo and call the January 66 coup led by a SS Igbo an Igbo coup, they'll be confused. No be confused entities them be?

Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Akwamkpuruamu: 8:18pm On Jan 31
VAT simply means U de tax Ur people too much
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by SonOfDSoil01: 8:18pm On Jan 31
grin Una go explain tire……..until you clowns start putting your money where your mouth is, you clowns will remain a joke…….ndi billionaire wey no fit show working but just empty noise of being the richest, the most this, the most that😂
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Nextjs: 8:18pm On Jan 31
I have been seeing the comparison since APC came into power.

Very disturbing
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by chicfarmer: 8:19pm On Jan 31
Nice explanation. Great perspective. Well done.
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by RichBoy247: 8:19pm On Jan 31
Akwamkpuruamu:
VAT simply means U de tax Ur people too much
.
Go school, una no go hear. See as you dey disgrace yourself for internet now
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Walai(m): 8:19pm On Jan 31
We need to add some IQ test before allowing people to comment here. Comments from these dundies are getting irritating


RichBoy247:
Explanation don start even when nobody ask you, abi who ask you? You go explain tire.

Shey baby factory merchants dey pay VAT ni?
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by givedemwotowoto(op): 8:20pm On Jan 31
kollog:
You guys Sha like justifying things that didn't favour or go the way of SE.

So this justification now, what has it added to the VAT contributed.

Let all of us learn to embrace whatever is our reality and strive to improve in every aspect.

My 50 Cent.
Wealth reinvested into business expansion reduces unemployment and directly adds to production. School no be scam.
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by AdolfHitlerxXx: 8:22pm On Jan 31
cheesy

the same content many times.
19. Don't
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by inoki247: 8:22pm On Jan 31
Lol with how you guys always attribute ehn Economic hub, the biggest market in West Africa...


So in one word all the big this and that are just big for nothing without adding anything to the purse...


If truly you guys are the economic hub and the biggest market in West Africa it will show on your Vat cause you can't be the biggest and be selling and Govt won't take out of it....
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by timbabng(m): 8:22pm On Jan 31
You can't defend with fake statistics. According to NBS, the south east has the highest unemployment rate in Nigeria, with Abia being the highest at 18.7% in 2023.
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by christejames(m): 8:23pm On Jan 31
Allow Agbadoes to be gloating grin
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Tenses: 8:25pm On Jan 31
kollog:
You guys Sha like justifying things that didn't favour or go the way of SE.

So this justification now, what has it added to the VAT contributed.

Let all of us learn to embrace whatever is our reality and strive to improve in every aspect.

My 50 Cent.
It's convenient for you lot to keep mouthing how the SE has the lowest population but you want that same low population to generate the highest VAT in the country. Because of the geographical advantage of Lagos the Igbo invested massively and generate vat for lagos state. All the goods being sold in SE pay vat to Lagos state. Even all the banks and multinational companies in SE pay vat to lagos, Abuja or portharcourt where their head office is situated.

Igbos pay substantial vat in major cities like Kano, Ibadan, Asaba, Sapele, warri, Ogun etc..

This is one discussion you lot don't wanna have because it doesn't fit into your narratives.
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by ClassicMan202(m): 8:25pm On Jan 31
Grammar only
.. make we separate make everybody go their separate ways
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Christlike01: 8:26pm On Jan 31
Hmmmm… these people, sha! They always like to take the first position in everything so they can brag about it, and when it doesn’t go their way, they start giving all forms of explanations and excuses!
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Razzness(m):
The person who wrote this clearly doesn't know what he is saying; comparing state government-imposed taxes by Republican and Democrat parties in their respective states to the Federal government VAT, which is the same 7.5% in every state in Nigeria, is not even related. They are two different types of taxes.

They say VAT is a consumption tax; you are talking about entrepreneurship. In that case, what of the millions of tons of agricultural produce from the North that does not have VAT? So should the northerners also come out and be wailing that their VAT was not calculated well?
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Image123(m): 8:33pm On Jan 31
Spin it like spinach darling. No be you? The perennial self acclaimed victim claims the data is demonizing. A data that shows the whole country regions.
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Irony1: 8:35pm On Jan 31
RichBoy247:
.

Shey fake drugs manufacturing kiosks dey pay VAT ni?
Now is not the time for kiddies jokes this is grown up stuff go and do your homewitk and stop commenting on issues above your thought process.
Re: Low VAT Doesn’t Mean Low Economic Contribution: The South East Nigeria Case by Reference(m): 8:35pm On Jan 31
I disagree.
Consumption is CRITICAL to economic development.

I remember when China started it's massive economic expansion, the fears then was very low domestic consumption (as a result of many factors) and the Chinese Communist Party had to deliberately policy it's way to opening up the domestic market because that is what guaranteed sustainable economic expansion. Today the Chinese are the top ten consumers of most articles in the global marketplace.

In a nutshell if you are not consuming your production will stall down the line as soon as inventories overwhelm the supply chain.

Moreover in the very economically advanced countries consumption, spending, as a metric is a barometer of economic health and a predictor of future economic growth.

If states in the Eastern part of this country are saying they produce lots of stuff but do not consume much, there is something fundamentally wrong with that. It simply means such production is not creating wealth.

I can understand the argument that what is called 'west' is essentially Lagos and to some extent Ogun, both of which are highly cosmopolitan, urbane states and contain residents of all tribes and tongues living, intermingling and conducting business far removed from the sectarian pictures those who love tribalism love to paint.

But one cannot divorce consumption from productivity. If you produce you create wealth and wealth finds expression in what and how much you spend.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Reply

Northern States Show Strong Economic Contribution In Latest VAT Report, ChallengHow Did Peter Obi Catapult A Barely Known Political Party in Nigeria? Case StudyISWAP Training Child Soldiers In North-East Nigeria (Photo)234

Blogger Jamil Mabai Remanded In PrisonFood Looting: Police, NEMA Tighten Security At Warehouses, MallsKano Govt Charges Ganduje, Wife With $413,000, ₦‎1.38 Billion Bribery