Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live - Foreign Affairs (4354) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Foreign Affairs › Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live (2689198 Views)
1 2 3 ... 4351 4352 4353 4354 4355 4356 4357 ... 5381 Reply (Go Down)
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 5:16pm On Feb 03 |
⚡The US warned Iraq it may restrict access to oil revenues if it appoints Nouri al-Maliki as Prime Minister, saying he is too close to Iran.
|
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Dvdpity: 5:18pm On Feb 03 |
WriteerNg:I still don't understand why Russia hasn't hit Ukrainian nuclear plant substations. Force them to shut down permanently. |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 5:18pm On Feb 03 |
⚡US in talks with Turkey to boost naval shipbuilding amid China rivalry. Turkey and the United States have been holding talks since last year on cooperation in naval shipbuilding, as the US Navy seeks to expand its fleet amid growing competition with China, officials told Middle East Eye. Ankara has emerged as a naval powerhouse in recent years. Its shipyards are capable of producing more than 30 ships simultaneously for the Turkish and Pakistani navies. Turkish defence firms have also developed indigenous designs for a wide range of vessels under the Milgem project, Turkey’s national warship programme. According to officials, US representatives explored whether Turkey could supply ship components, while discussions also floated the possibility of Ankara helping the US Navy build additional frigates. The Trump administration wants to both revive US shipbuilding and enlarge the US Navy’s fleet. So far, it has leaned on Asian allies Japan and South Korea for know-how after decades of US underinvestment.
|
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 5:21pm On Feb 03 |
WriteerNg: 🇺🇸 A weak nation that cannot do anything without the entire world supporting it. This is who tonididdy calls "superpower"? Meanwhile the Russians are building sophisticated Navy ships for world powers like India and China. The US is relying on Turkey who is not even a regional power to build it's ships. They also rely on Finland to build nuclear icebreakers. |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 5:23pm On Feb 03 |
⚡Saudi Crown Prince MBS welcomed Turkish President Erdogan with an official ceremony at Al Yamamah Palace in Riyadh.
|
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by LordAdam16: 5:44pm On Feb 03 |
3/3 every average joe and jane understands the primary benefit of nukes the MAD concept is as relevant today as it was in 1949 when the soviets acquired a nuke iran does have an array of advantages on which nukes create a compounding positive effect iran is the security guarantor for the second largest branch of islam iran shares a deep, transcendent connection with the dispatched shia population across the middle east this creates a strategic depth iran is blessed to have virtually no formidable foe with the political will and capacity to come at them the turks, russians, pakistanis, and even afghan who have been historical foes have locked up their beef in a forgotten cabinet their archenemy is a midget outpost with a population of 10m that begged its protector after one week of combat in comparison russia has the entire europe operating on centuries-old hatred and all-consuming desire to balkanize the rus and steal their resources china has no natural allies besides an economically-challenged state on its border with a population of 25m in a pacific war it faces foes from japan to australia this paradigm lends credence to david easton's systems theory the political systems operate as living organisms if turkey, russia, and pakistan were overtly aggressive against iran they would have been adequately incentivized to acquire a nuke regardless of the costs but since all they had to worry about was a chihuahua in israel as the gulf arabs did not have the capacity to confront them they drew a faulty conclusion if they gave up nukes, they could get the us and europe off their backs and then they can adopt the general soleimani plan to create a strategic network of paramilitaries to form a ring of protection and containment against the israelis and any ambitious mf in the region this was the wrong conclusion to make those advantages that supposedly made nukes superfluous actually made nukes the ultimate weapon to beat economic warfare nukes and the concept of mad confers escalation dominance or escalation parity that would allow iran to move from a defensive posture to an offensive posture and leverage the resultant strategic imbalance in the region into securing economic relief in the same way russia is currently attempting to use the smo in ukraine to reset the security architecture of europe there would have been many opportunities defeating isis, israeli adventurism, yemen war, syria/iraq at any time it could find a way to squeeze directly or the interests of the yanks, arabs, israelis, europeans until the hegemony offers economic relief lets run a hypothetical if within the next two weeks iran detonates a nuke and announces it has a dozen or nukes ready to launch what exactly would happen? if it then said it'd intervene if israel doesn't stop violating the ceasefire by killing civilians in lebanon what exactly would happen? at some point there may or may not be a war but backed by the escalation dominance of nukes, any conversation about a deal, ceasefire, or treaty will implicitly carry the promise of sanctions relief with no more than symbolic concessions in fact like egypt, they'll be able to get the us and europe to pay them annual levies to stay on their best behavior the us pays egypt $1.3b annually since 1979 to maintain its treaty with israel iran will also be able to get the gulf arabs to invest a steady minimum level of fdi annually to protect their interests just look at how they've been scrambling to avoid all out war if iran had nukes, iran could ask them to park 10% of their sovereign wealth funds in iranian banks or something something could happen to ships crossing the strait of hormuz and this is ultimately the reason why khamenei is one of the most tragic figures in persian history even if iran secures a deal a nuke offers a strategic depth that is irreplaceable the hegemony desires complete subjugation and they will not stop they will look for an opportunity to f*ck sh*t up and reintroduce sanctions and iran will need to have this dance again and again -Lord |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by LordAdam16: 5:48pm On Feb 03 |
WriteerNg:this one na better "kh-101 was here" signoff -Lord |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 5:53pm On Feb 03 |
⚡U.S flagged tanker approached by Iranian gunboats, in the Strait of Hormuz — CBS
|
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Appleyard(m): 6:01pm On Feb 03*. Modified: 8:23am On Feb 04 |
LordAdam16:Your write-ups always excite the best of geopolitical minds. But, allow me to add to this with some facts. Firstly, Erdogan going to Riyadh and Cairo in the same week is not random. Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt don’t suddenly trust each other—but they all share one interest right now: avoiding a regional war that wrecks trade, energy routes, and cause internal stability. That’s the real driver. Talk of a brand-new “security architecture” sounds promising, but in reality this is about coordination and damage control, not a NATO-style alliance. They have seen the resolve from the Iranian side on this occasion – if we burn, the entire region will burn. They understood Iran’s readiness for total war and they're not prepared for the repercussions. Secondly, I think the idea of a united Shia–Sunni bloc is also overstated. These aforementioned Gulf states are not aligning with Iran ideologically. They’re just hedging. After the 2019 Abqaiq, followed by Gaza, and Red Sea disruptions, they’ve learned that escalation hurts them first and the most affected. Qatar throwing money at Iran fits its usual playbook—cash to buy influence and keep fires away from its backyard. On Iran, you’re very correct. Tehran’s demands haven’t changed since Trump jump ship in 2018: full sanctions relief, release of frozen assets, and iron clad guarantees the US can’t walk away again. Everything else is noise. The 60% → 20% enrichment “concession” sounds big to the public, but technically it changes nothing. As long as enrichment capability exists, levels can be raised again quickly. That’s why Iran has already rejected removing highly enriched uranium—doing so would actually reduce their leverage. Europe being sidelined in all of these is well deserved and self-inflicted. Since 2018, the EU promised Iran economic relief and delivered almost nothing because it couldn’t shield companies from US sanctions. That’s why neither Tehran nor Washington takes European mediation seriously anymore. They made matters worse for themselves recently by designating the IRGC a terrorist organization. Where this really bottlenecks is Israel—but not just as an obstacle. Israel is also the main escalation trigger. As long as talks are ongoing, any unilateral Israeli strike risks being seen as blowing up diplomacy outright. That limits Israel’s freedom of action more than people admit. An attack by Israel now would prompt those Gulf states jostling for peace to respond angrily and make good their commitment to close their airspace and territories in toto. In fact, such a unilateral Israeli spoiler could tear down the Abraham Accord and cause some states to withdraw. So, whichever way this turns out, it won't favour Israel. Except if they can get the Americans to launch the attack. As for the “loudmouth,” this looks less like leadership and more like political insurance. Negotiations buy time and shift blame: If talks fail → Iran refused peace If Israel derails them → Netanyahu’s fault If war goes badly → Pentagon and generals take the hit If something works → he (Trump )takes the credit That's Classic Washington blame-management. Bottom line is, this isn’t about a historic deal or a new Middle East order. It’s about who gets blamed when things go wrong. Until we see what comes out after the weekend, every “leak” about concessions should be treated as positioning, not outright reality. |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 6:14pm On Feb 03 |
Icktioaxen: Same moskva ship wey u dey beg ordinary Turkey to build for you? 😂 😭 Build am alone if e easy. Like say USA no lose 4,000 aircrafts to ordinary Vietnam. And dozens of "sophisticated" drones to barefooted Houthis wey no get airforce. |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by LordAdam16: 6:28pm On Feb 03 |
the us navy shoots down iranian drone that approached the lincoln aircraft carrier for routine surviellance a us-flagged civilian tanker also deliberately veered into iranian territorial waters iranian media is reporting the iranian navy sent gunboats to warn it to leave but the americans are saying the iranians tried to seize the vessels na so escalation go dey start like play as skirmishes until all-out war commences -Lord |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 6:33pm On Feb 03 |
⚡🇷🇺 Russian Mi-28.
|
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Appleyard(m): 6:35pm On Feb 03 |
WriteerNg:Ah yes. The sacred Three-Step Plan™. Because nothing has ever scared a nuclear-armed state like a well-formatted escalation flowchart. Let’s break down why this is comedy, not strategy. ![]() Step 1: Diplomatic warnings within 24 hours Fantastic. Russia violates the ceasefire, and the response is… a strongly worded statement. Maybe two. Possibly with the word “deeply concerned.” Moscow has been living off Western warnings since 2014. At this point they probably document them. ![]() Step 2: European military intervention. This is where the plan really shines. Europe—still debating tank deliveries, ammo production, and who pays for what—is supposed to agree, mobilize, and intervene militarily against Russia in record time? Sure. The same Europe that needs three summits and a translator to agree on lunch. Also, intervene how? Air defense? Troops? Naval assets? “Military intervention” is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Step 3: US-backed military response within 72 hours. This is the best joke of all. The United States does not go to war with Russia because a pre-agreed timer expired. Washington doesn’t even go to war with Iraq on a schedule—let alone a nuclear peer. The idea that the White House will say, “Well folks, the spreadsheet says we’re at Step 3,” is pure fantasy. And the core problem they keep dodging: who decides Russia violated the ceasefire? Was it a drone? Artillery? A proxy unit? A “miscommunication”? Russia will drown every incident in ambiguity. By the time NATO finishes arguing over attribution, the ceasefire violation will be three news cycles old. Clowns. Minsk didn’t fail because it lacked an escalation ladder. It failed because ceasefires don’t work when one side thinks continuing the war is still beneficial. No amount of laminated enforcement plans changes that. So what is this really about? Reassuring Western audiences. Signaling resolve. Giving officials something to point at and say, “This time we mean it.” Moscow isn’t intimidated by press conferences, timelines, or PowerPoint arrows. It’s intimidated by battlefield realities and unavoidable costs—neither of which are created by a 72-hour countdown clock. This is pure comedy, not deterrence. It’s role-playing toughness. And Russia has already skipped the tutorial and moved on to the main game. Clowns. |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 6:35pm On Feb 03 |
⚡North Carolina State Highway Patrol reported 750 collisions statewide spanning from 12am to 6pm on Saturday. According to meteorologist Brian Hurley, some areas of North Carolina will be approaching 18 to 20 inches of snow. Chief of the Greenville Fire Department Brian Horton says they had “more wrecks in the last hour than we had all of last weekend.”
|
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Kingsnairaland(m): 6:35pm On Feb 03 |
Icktioaxen:Can you tell us why, your almighty USA is begging putin for no strike for week so that the poor in Ukraine can breath ![]() |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriteerNg: 6:39pm On Feb 03 |
⚡Ex-NATO Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg with other Norwegian officials are in Epstein's files: "I suffered massive human trafficking. I started as a young child. They made a sexslave in every nation. They tried to kill my brain. The royalties in Norway, Gunnhild Stordalen, Petter Stordalen, Kjell Inge, Rokke, Jens Stoltenberg and others tried to put me into coma and they wanted to make me disabled" — victim claims.
|
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Obedience40: 6:40pm On Feb 03 |
Someone is comparing US shipbuilding capabilities with Russia?? 😂😂😂😂😂 |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriterrNg: 6:43pm On Feb 03 |
Icktioaxen: So Turkish built ships are the best quality according to US standards? Beggar no get choice true true 😂 😭 🤣 Türkiye isn't even top 5 globally. Only US dey beg Turkey, Finland, South Korea to help them build ships. Trump himself don mention am many times. He even talk say he go bring South Korean shipbuilders to the US to teach American engineers how to do it. Enjoy your small shipbuilding industry. Soon you'll be begging Kosovo to build your best ships. |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Obedience40: 6:46pm On Feb 03 |
Icktioaxen:The US is currently doing sea trials for a new aircraft carriers while two are currently being built. With more 2 more already budgeted for. Using Russia that can't even field a capable aircraft carrier to compare with a country which possess the most powerful navy in the world. |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Appleyard(m): 6:46pm On Feb 03 |
Dvdpity:That would be extreme. Radioactive fallout will kill or maim thousands of innocent people. |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Obedience40: 6:47pm On Feb 03 |
WriterrNg:Simple question is Russia shipping industry bigger than the US!!😝😝😝 |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriterrNg: 6:48pm On Feb 03 |
Oh I don forget to renew their bi-monthly subscription. No wonder i dey see that irritating thing as i dey scroll down. |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriterrNg: 6:54pm On Feb 03*. Modified: 7:10pm On Feb 03 |
Russia get more ships and specialized vessels but dem go wan dey use tonnage confuse gullible ones. Wetin concern weight of ships to size of Navy? That na the only metric US dey use rank their Navy as number 1. Russia and China get more ships, larger fleets than US but trust Google to put their own country (America) as number one. Russia dey build more ships and submarines but dem go wan whine person with "tonnage"
|
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by LordAdam16: 6:59pm On Feb 03 |
Appleyard:there are substations connected to the nuclear plants usually a good distance away from the plants russia can strike those and the plant will be forced to shut down since it can't ferry away power but russia has so far been very methodical about degrading the energy infrastructure it appears those will be amongst the last to be hit -Lord |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Obedience40: 6:59pm On Feb 03 |
10 U.S.C. § 8679 is a law in the US It explicitly prohibits the construction of vessels for the U.S. Armed Forces (Navy, Army, Coast Guard) in foreign shipyards. All US military ships are mandated to be built-in the US by US government licenced firms.. You simply can't build a US military ship outside the US The only expectation to this law was the ice breakers being built in Finland .because the US simply do not have the technological knowledge of icebreakers..The guys in Finland are the "Goat" when it comes to icebreakers.. the guys in Finland builds Chinese icebreakers. All US military vessels from the Navy, the Marines the army the coastal guard are all US build ships. One fella is using Russia that can't even field one Nuclear powered aircraft carrier to compare the second largest ship marker outside Asia in the world!!! |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriterrNg: 7:00pm On Feb 03 |
Icktioaxen: And that is why they're going for less sophisticated Turkish ships. That's where their level is. You already answered yourself. Congratulations. |
| Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriterrNg: 7:08pm On Feb 03 |
Icktioaxen: Oga. Aircraft carrier wey useless. Aircraft carrier wey still need those "cheap improvised" ships to defend itself? Aircraft carrier na just glorified air base wey dem use asphalt pour on top so dem fit pack jets.. E no dey serve any purpose other than to launch aircrafts and house troops. Very slow moving and easy target crap. |
Video Of A Congolese Soldier’s Final Moments On The Battlefield Surfaces Online • World News! Events Happening Around The World • Russia - Ukraine War Tension: Live Updates (Pictures) • 2 • 3 • 4
American Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President! • Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . • Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?
Viewing this topic: dermmy(m), Kingsnairaland(m) and 10 guest(s)

