₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register β€’ Login β€’ With Google β€’ Trending β€’ Recent β€’ New

Stats: 3,329,429 members, 8,440,553 topics. Date: Tuesday, 07 July 2026 at 09:01 AM

Toggle theme

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live - Foreign Affairs (4356) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum β€Ί Nairaland General β€Ί Politics β€Ί Foreign Affairs β€Ί Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live (2689376 Views)

1 2 3 ... 4353 4354 4355 4356 4357 4358 4359 ... 5381 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriterrNg:
Icktioaxen:
Nice try Einstein

I've already seen how this goes.

If i say "no" then you'll brag about how the US can't build nuclear powered icebreakers.

If i say "yes" then you ask "then why haven't they built their own nuclear powered icebreakers".

If i counter with "they have no need for a nuclear powered icebreakers" then you'll retort with "Russia has no need for nuclear powered aircraft carriers".

The ultimate gotcha moment for you.

Oga go and rest. No amount of cope won't ever put Russian low budget navy on par with US Navy. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸš’


The low budget Navy is currently building Navy ships for 2 world powers.

While the almighty US Navy is going around looking for who will build their ships for them. They're asking Turkey and Finland to build ships for them.
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriterrNg: 10:51pm On Feb 03
⚑Trump on Ukraine:

The pause was for Sunday to Sunday.

It opened up and Putin hit them hard right now.

Putin kept his word on that. One week is a lot, we will take anything.


Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Kingsnairaland(m): 10:52pm On Feb 03
I found out that the major reason why USA builders are losing their ability to build things that are not weapons related is because any one can make money from investing in the military industry

Why will you suffer to build things when you can make easy money buying stocks from USA military industry...

grin grin
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriterrNg: 10:52pm On Feb 03
⚑Iranian oil replaced Venezuelan oil in China, the overthrow of Venezuela was a strange victory for Iran - Reuters

Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by dermmy(m): 11:13pm On Feb 03
WriterrNg:
⚑Iranian oil replaced Venezuelan oil in China, the overthrow of Venezuela was a strange victory for Iran - Reuters
Trump be like, how we go blockade this stubborn Iran now. embarassed
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Gerrard59(m):
LordAdam16:

I wanted to seek your thoughts on the latest moves by the US and its allies in aggressively diversifying its sources and refining of rare earth minerals. Other commentators are welcome as well.

You have here: https://www.afr.com/world/north-america/us-pressures-allies-to-break-china-s-hold-on-rare-earths-20260130-p5ny6q
and here: https://archive.md/2026.02.03-013023/https://www.ft.com/content/0a27adbc-1c8b-4361-9c57-c9f7f53f49d3 (US to launch $12BN fund for critical minerals) and recently a French minister visited Malaysia to assess the rare earth refinery there. In Pakistan, the US is funding the extraction of those minerals for export. Rubio will host a meeting of allied countries and mineral rich nations (many from our continent, too). Here: https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/just-what-we-need-us-calls-key-countries-together-on-critical-minerals/
Here, the EU aims to partner with the US on critical minerals so as to by-pass the dependence on China: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-02-03/eu-to-offer-us-critical-minerals-partnership-to-counter-china

Na why I no dey fazed with the so-called division between the US and the EU. They are one and together. Trump's "mean tweets" mean nothing in the fight against China. In Vietnam, leaders are preparing for a war with the US because they fear being used to counter China s Ukraine was against Russia.

In DRC, the govt ordered a miner to sell hitherto shipped copper to China to the US. I think the mining firm is even Chinese. And we know the sudden bromance between its president and Trump. The US is now buddies with Mongolia and Cambodia.

So, the race to break China's dominance in sourcing and refining is on.

How should or would the Chinese react? If the US-led West succeeds (long time though since the latest refining technologies were developed and perfected by the Chinese, who also have the intellect), how would China respond to coordinated attacks and sanctions, since that retaliating option has been reduced?
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriterrNg: 7:21am On Feb 04
⚑When the devil himself said Trump is dangerous.

β€œI have met some very bad peopleβ€”none as bad as Trump. Not one decent cell in his body. So yes, dangerous.” β€” Epstein

Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriterrNg: 7:22am On Feb 04
⚑The US military has sent a small team of troops to Nigeria, according to Reuters report.
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriterrNg: 7:23am On Feb 04
WriterrNg:
⚑The US military has sent a small team of troops to Nigeria, according to Reuters report.


Only dvmmies go think say this na to fight ISIS.

Dem dey there to fight Burkina Faso, Niger and Mali.
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriterrNg: 7:23am On Feb 04
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriterrNg: 7:28am On Feb 04
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Jovi10:
Icktioaxen:
Sounds like you're indirectly agreeing that Russian ships are not that sophisticated. grin

They are probably even less sophisticated than Turkish ships. grin
American ships are only sophisticated on paper. They have not fought any war with a formidable foe since ww2. The one they fought Serbia their so called stealth bomber was shot down.

They have only fought against slippers wearing goat herders 🀣🀣🀣🀣so they can brag that their ships are sophisticated. Let them fight a formidable foe then we will know how strong their ships are.

Ukraine will take on any European country or any NATO member of given the weapons needed and will defeat them hands down.
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Nobody:
More troubles for families of shoodboi2. American troops are here with gunz ablazing. πŸ₯³πŸ₯³

Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by WriterrNg: 8:08am On Feb 04
⚑Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed rejects President Donald Trump’s claim that the US funded Ethiopia’s new mega-dam, stating that no foreign loans or financial aid were received for the project.

Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Appleyard(m): 9:14am On Feb 04
WriterrNg:
Russia get more ships and specialized vessels but dem go wan dey use tonnage confuse gullible ones.

Wetin concern weight of ships to size of Navy?

That na the only metric US dey use rank their Navy as number 1.

Russia and China get more ships, larger fleets than US but trust Google to put their own country (America) as number one.

Russia dey build more ships and submarines but dem go wan whine person with "tonnage"
I know it's always hard for our mendacious brothers on the other side to admit the fact that the supposed almighty US is seeking external help from allies to support its ailing shipbuilding needs. But, this is the reality. There is nothing wrong with asking for help from your allies, but it's factual the US no longer compete in modern shipbuilding. The reasons are obvious. Again, you just can't compare US and Russian sea power based on sheer size and numbers of vessels possessed --- each country's strategic interest and geopolitical posturing plays the key role in determining what vessel type, tonnage, and quantity to build.

Here is a report on how the US and Russian ship building industry fairs currently.


As of early 2026, the US and Russian shipbuilding industries are facing sharply contrasting situations: the US is struggling with capacity bottlenecks, high costs, and urgent modernization needs, while Russia, despite sanctions, has significantly increased its shipbuilding pace, particularly in the Arctic and for its navy, even while grappling with severe industrial efficiency issues
.
US Shipbuilding Industry (2025–2026)

The US shipbuilding sector is experiencing what analysts call a "real crisis" or the "worst in 25 years," characterized by a severe lack of capacity and significant delays.
Capacity & Delays: Roughly 37 of 45 battle-force ships under construction as of December 2025 faced delays, with major programs like the Constellation-class frigate years behind schedule.


Production Bottlenecks: The US has largely lost its commercial shipbuilding sector, and its remaining yards are specialized, high-cost, and unable to produce ships at the speed needed to counter competitors.

Strategic Shift: To combat this, the US is looking to partner with South Korea and Japan to build or repair US ships, and in late 2025/early 2026, initiated plans to build icebreakers in Finland.


Future Outlook: The 2025 plan aims to grow the fleet to 390 ships by 2054, but faces a near-term dip to 283 ships by 2027.


Russian Shipbuilding Industry (2025–2026)
Russia has accelerated its shipbuilding pace, outpacing the United States in speed over the last five years and focusing on both military strength and Arctic capabilities.

Record Production: In 2025, Russian shipyards delivered 129 to 132 civilian vessels, a 10-year high, while maintaining a steady pace of military production, including submarines and surface combatants.

Massive Investment: The government has launched a $6 billion-plus plan to build over 1,600 vessels by 2036, aimed at bolstering its merchant fleet and securing the Northern Sea Route.

Sanctions & Challenges: Despite successes, the industry is struggling with the impact of Western sanctions, which have caused a shortage of critical components and technological, economic, and logistical bottlenecks.

Workforce & Efficiency: The industry suffers from "chronic financial weakness" and low efficiency, leading to planned, massive layoffs (up to 70% in some key yards) as part of a restructuring to improve productivity.

Key Comparisons
Arctic Dominance: Russia holds a massive advantage in the Arctic, with 57 icebreakers compared to a very small US fleet.
Strategic Focus: The US is attempting to pivot toward "distributed maritime operations" with smaller, autonomous ships to counter China, while Russia is expanding its capacity for both large-tonnage naval vessels and industrial, specialized ships.


International Partnerships: The US is turning to foreign allies (South Korea, Japan, Finland) to build capacity, while Russia is increasingly looking for alternative supply routes to bypass sanctions.

Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Appleyard(m): 9:43am On Feb 04
WriterrNg:


Oga.

Aircraft carrier wey useless. Aircraft carrier wey still need those "cheap improvised" ships to defend itself?

Aircraft carrier na just glorified air base wey dem use asphalt pour on top so dem fit pack jets..

E no dey serve any purpose other than to launch aircrafts and house troops. Very slow moving and easy target crap.
grin you no lie, the post dey harsh but e talk plenty truth.

Aircraft carrier really na glorified air base for water. Just pour asphalt on steel, pack jets, and pray say nothing go reach am. The whole hype dey come from how expensive e be, not because e be invincible.


And the fact say e need plenty β€œcheap improvised” ships to survive already tell you everything. If the thing strong by itself, why e need escort of destroyers, frigates, submarines, supply ships, plus aircraft on top again? One carrier no fit move alone without forming convoy like Nigerian state governors.

For modern war, carrier slow, big, and broadcast itself like lighthouse. With today’s:

--hypersonic missiles
--long-range anti-ship ballistic missiles
--cheap drones and swarm tactics
--satellites tracking every movement


that big flat deck just dey shout β€œaim here.” China and Iran don already build their entire doctrine around killing carriers, not fighting them head-on. When the Russian MoD said na just one Zircon seabased hypersonic missile dem go use take decommission the British new Carrier 'HMS Queen Elizabeth', dem no dey joke.

And yes, the only real job of a carrier na to launch aircraft and house troops. If you already get land bases nearby, the carrier suddenly lose value fast. That’s why near peer conflicts no dey rely on them the way Cold War movies show.

The carrier matter pass only when:
--enemy weak
--air defenses poor
--missiles limited
--or you dey bully smaller states


Against a serious opponent? E turn to political symbol and liability. Lose one and the psychological, financial, and political damage go pass the military benefit.

So yeah, aircraft carrier no be useless for everything β€” but for modern high-end war, e dey look more like an expensive relic trying to survive in a missile age.

Big, slow, flashy… and constantly hiding behind escorts.

Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Appleyard(m): 9:50am On Feb 04
LordAdam16:
one must always display premium madness
when dealing with the hegemony

-Lord
Now, Iran has the excuse to also shoot down their drones over the Strait and damn the consequences.
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by LordAdam16: 10:53am On Feb 04
Gerrard59:
LordAdam16:

I wanted to seek your thoughts on the latest moves by the US and its allies in aggressively diversifying its sources and refining of rare earth minerals. Other commentators are welcome as well.

You have here: https://www.afr.com/world/north-america/us-pressures-allies-to-break-china-s-hold-on-rare-earths-20260130-p5ny6q
and here: https://archive.md/2026.02.03-013023/https://www.ft.com/content/0a27adbc-1c8b-4361-9c57-c9f7f53f49d3 (US to launch $12BN fund for critical minerals) and recently a French minister visited Malaysia to assess the rare earth refinery there. In Pakistan, the US is funding the extraction of those minerals for export. Rubio will host a meeting of allied countries and mineral rich nations (many from our continent, too). Here: https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/just-what-we-need-us-calls-key-countries-together-on-critical-minerals/
Here, the EU aims to partner with the US on critical minerals so as to by-pass the dependence on China: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-02-03/eu-to-offer-us-critical-minerals-partnership-to-counter-china

Na why I no dey fazed with the so-called division between the US and the EU. They are one and together. Trump's "mean tweets" mean nothing in the fight against China. In Vietnam, leaders are preparing for a war with the US because they fear being used to counter China s Ukraine was against Russia.

In DRC, the govt ordered a miner to sell hitherto shipped copper to China to the US. I think the mining firm is even Chinese. And we know the sudden bromance between its president and Trump. The US is now buddies with Mongolia and Cambodia.

So, the race to break China's dominance in sourcing and refining is on.

How should or would the Chinese react? If the US-led West succeeds (long time though since the latest refining technologies were developed and perfected by the Chinese, who also have the intellect), how would China respond to coordinated attacks and sanctions, since that retaliating option has been reduced?
in panso's thread i have called the new era one of great power rivalry

the us and the eu will do their best to break china's stranglehold on rare earth
china has retaliated already by heavily curtailing export of refining know how and tech
much like they did for silk for a thousand years

but i wouldn't bet against the efforts of the hegemony
because this is the 21st century and if china can beat western export controls
i expect the hegemony to have some success beating china's export controls as well

china will retain some control over key rare earths for the foreseeable future
but its dominance over the entire industry will reduce significantly




i try not to discount xi's performance on china's domestic rise
he has kept that boat afloat and beaten the 5% mark every year
but he has been operating a template left by his predecessors

the time has come for him to actually leave his mark
set the stage for the next century of chinese dominance
against a hegemony that now sees china as its primary foe

and so far, i'm sorry to say, i'm unimpressed
all we get are summits, pronouncements, and photo ops

i will change my assessment about xi when i see something concrete
something with his own defining signature
if we don't, then you'd see china lose some of its leverage, still retain its might, and become increasingly defensive
until a new emperor comes to power

lots of low hanging fruit for xi that he hasn't bothered to pluck
there is no defensible reason why north korea isn't as rich as malaysia
that is a canvas right on his border where he can test every measure devised by his billion high-iq minds on sanctions-busting
sanctions is the ace card of the hegemony
but he has made barely any progress on that
there are about a dozen other markers you can check to see that the man is slacking

-Lord
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by obedience4(m): 11:01am On Feb 04
Jovi10:
American ships are only sophisticated on paper. They have not fought any war with a formidable foe since ww2. The one they fought it Vietnam their so called stealth bomber was shot down.

They have only fought against slippers wearing goat herders 🀣🀣🀣🀣so they can brag that their ships are sophisticated. Let them fight a formidable foe then we will know how strong their ships are.

Ukraine will take on any European country or any NATO member of given the weapons needed and will defeat them hands down.
Ask the fellow to tell you the stealth bomber shut down in Vietnam he will start running amok aimlessly.

Go and read your history books son, read up the US navy battles in the Pacific!!


The flagship of Russia famed black sea fleet is currently chilling under the sea, sank by a country with no functional navy using ingenious anti sea weapons..The weapon that took one of the most sophisticated navy vessel of the Russian navy was a Ukrainian weapon made and developed by Ukrainians.
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by obedience4(m): 11:06am On Feb 04
Scorpio99:
More troubles for families of shoodboi2. American troops are here with gunz ablazing. πŸ₯³πŸ₯³
Sweet!! Next move should creation and deployment of a drone FOB in the north.. Abuja, Nasarawa, and Taraba would be a suitable location!!

They are Welcome. Go break a leg troops!!
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Jovi10: 11:11am On Feb 04
obedience4:
Ask the fellow to tell you the stealth bomber shut down in Vietnam he will start running amok aimlessly.

Go and read your history books son, read up the US navy battles in the Pacific!!


The flagship of Russia famed black sea fleet is currently chilling under the sea, sank by a country with no functional navy using ingenious anti sea weapons..The weapon that took one of the most sophisticated navy vessel of the Russian navy was a Ukrainian weapon made and developed by Ukrainians.
Lol American stealth bomber was shot down in Kosovo in 1999 πŸ€£πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚. It shock the USA their eyes first do blur blur blur 🀣🀣🀣
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by obedience4(m): 11:12am On Feb 04
One fellow is wailing out because of the small contigent of US troops being deployed to Nigeria!!!

You go cry tire!!πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Russia troops is OK in Burkina Faso and Mali but US troops in Nigeria is a taboo!!!

If Tinubu really want to checkmate terrorism..He should get the Africom to site a drone forward operating base in the North.. and allow those beautiful "beasts" send Shoodboi2 relatives to paradise!!
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by obedience4(m): 11:13am On Feb 04
Jovi10:
Lol American stealth bomber was shot down in Vietnam by rice farmers πŸ€£πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
Running amok as expected!!

Adieu oooo!!
🀝
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Jovi10: 11:16am On Feb 04
obedience4:
Running amok as expected!!

Adieu oooo!!
🀝
The so called invincible F117 nighthalk. Them shoot werey commot from the sky and that was in 1999 o imagine now when there are better advanced missiles and air defence systems. Make them they whine Una say any aircraft dey invincible dey go.
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Jovi10: 12:00pm On Feb 04
Jovi10:
The so called invincible F117 nighthalk. Them shoot werey commot from the sky and that was in 1999 o imagine now when there are better advanced missiles and air defence systems. Make them they whine Una say any aircraft dey invincible dey go.
To rub pepper and salt on NVB wounds . Guess which countries missile was used to shoot down this stealth bomber? πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Obedience40: 12:00pm On Feb 04
Jovi10:
The so called invincible F117 nighthalk. Them shoot werey commot from the sky and that was in 1999 o imagine now when there are better advanced missiles and air defence systems. Make them they whine Una say any aircraft dey invincible dey go.
So the F117 was shut in Vietnam!!
🀝
Adieu!!!
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Jovi10: 12:09pm On Feb 04
Obedience40:
So the F117 was shut in Vietnam!!
🀝
Adieu!!!
The correction is on the first post already..
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Obedience40: 12:11pm On Feb 04
https://www.nairaland.com/8611868/escape-die-african-men-say

How many gullible unsuspecting africans will Russia sacrifice in Ukraine?? All to satisfy Putin's imperialism!!!

Iya Russia is using Africans as cannon fodders!!
Re: Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live by Obedience40: 12:11pm On Feb 04
Jovi10:
The correction is on the first post already..
OK!!
1 2 3 ... 4353 4354 4355 4356 4357 4358 4359 ... 5381 Reply

Video Of A Congolese Soldier’s Final Moments On The Battlefield Surfaces Online β€’ World News! Events Happening Around The World β€’ Russia - Ukraine War Tension: Live Updates (Pictures) β€’ 2 β€’ 3 β€’ 4

American Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President! β€’ Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . β€’ Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?

Viewing this topic: melicent, LordAdam16 and 8 guest(s)