₦airaland Forum

didymario7:
You are talking nonsense. It is on record that Nigeria already attained 100% broadband internet penetration.

Obaofaba:
This is the way to go.

God bless the Nigerian Senate.

God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Burob:
The ADC wailers have already started their wailing.

Obaofaba:
Nigeria does not have the facilities yet to transmit the results nationwide in real time.

Inec irev might even be hacked.

Until we are ready, manual transmission is the only way to go.

Make sure you have agents on ground in all the polling units and ensure they have the signed results sheet.

Police and other law enforcement agents are there too.

Nigeria is not ripe for electronic transmission of results.

When we say have agents on ground, they say it's structure of criminality. You are one minute away from wailing and we are here to get entertained with your tears.

MaziObinnaokija:
lottiok and Flangelo12 don go hunting expedition in Ekwulobia . Make I reach helinues. Yarimo house b4 dem lock their street gate. for cold MALTA without Gala

Eriokanmi:
Details pls....hope the electronic transmission of results from the polling booth is there.

WiszyFraud:
2027 is going to be very interesting

Brendaniel:
If you see the truth as wailing, that's your problem, not mine...

Burob:
Some people no just get shame, just a few days ago u & your ADC wailers were weeping that Akpabio & senate no wan pass the electoral Act?

Make we see wetin una go use wail next.

Burob:
Wail on Wailer, Akpabio & em senators done shock u abi?

Brendaniel:
They rejected mandatory electronic transmission of results, so they are planning to do all those, we will reconvene at 4pm, we are still waiting for Sokoto collation officer, we heard he had an accident along the road, in 2026?

It is well...

I tire o. Banks move huge sums of money electronically. Exams and results are done electronically nowadays but electronic transmission of results is like rocket science according to these senators.

Na wa!!!


Yet you subject little children to use the same technology to write and pass their exams with shorter timeframe than election time even with glitch force them in most cases to accept the outcome with a technology you claim is not full proof or reliable but you are here giving excuse for adults to use the very same technology with a longer time frame, the joke is on you...

Obaofaba:
Nigeria does not have the facilities yet to transmit the results nationwide in real time.

Inec irev might even be hacked.

Until we are ready, manual transmission is the only way to go.

Make sure you have agents on ground in all the polling units and ensure they have the signed results sheet.

Police and other law enforcement agents are there too.

Nigeria is not ripe for electronic transmission of results.

When we say have agents on ground, they say it's structure of criminality. You are one minute away from wailing and we are here to get entertained with your tears.

Burob:
100% broadband internet penetration? Impossible.

WiszyFraud:
2027 is going to be very interesting

WiszyFraud:
2027 is going to be very interesting

Obaofaba:
This is the way to go.

God bless the Nigerian Senate.

God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

TimeManager:
As sophisticated as technology deployed by Telecoms, Banks, others, they do experience technical glitches unannounced and unexpectedly.

In South Africa, there was technical glitches that marred the general election, same as was experienced in Nigeria. Therefore it makes complete sense for INEC to have options going into the the election.

-Kiss the truth!





You are only ranting from a place of ignorance. Technology is not 100% full proof or reliable.

-Kiss the truth!




We saw how glitches marred last JAMB exams that they had to apologize to some students and have them rewrite the exams. No tech is full proof. Even in the last US election, lots of mails were alleged to have been compromised.

-Kiss the truth!

casualobserver:
We are a nation of people whose emotions get the better of them.


What exactly was a mandatory electronic transmission of results supposed to achieve?

Does it mean any result that lands electronically is the authentic official final result? What happens if I employ some Russian, Israeli or Chinese hackers to access and alter the results enroute?

How do you prove the results were not altered?

Did I hear you say you will refer to the paper results from the PU of which every agent and the police have a copy of the original? Does it mean if I transmit an altered result it become the official result? Then what is point of making electronic results mandatory if it is not the original authentic result and authentic final authority of what occurred at polling units ? So the only result that can be relied upon is the paper result from the PU? ….Toh!

Furthermore, when you say electronic transmission is mandatory and some PUs fail to transmit due to network issues, does that mean the elections are void? The word here being “mandatory”. If the law says mandatory then it must be done. If not the election is invalid.

So if the result that lands at the server electronically can be hacked, if it is not the alpha and omega of results, if you cannot Guarantee that all PUs will have transmission capabilities, then what do you achieve by making e transmission mandatory but chaos?

You see how we allow emotions to cloud our thinking?

This is how we started with parliamentary system and regional govt and instead of us to fix ourselves we kept blaming the system, changing and changing the system of govt and now we want to go back to the regional govt we now realize was the best but it is impossible!

casualobserver:
We are a nation of people whose emotions get the better of them.


What exactly was a mandatory electronic transmission of results supposed to achieve?

Does it mean any result that lands electronically is the authentic official final result? What happens if I employ some Russian, Israeli or Chinese hackers to access and alter the results enroute?

How do you prove the results were not altered?

Did I hear you say you will refer to the paper results from the PU of which every agent and the police have a copy of the original? Does it mean if I transmit an altered result it become the official result? Then what is point of making electronic results mandatory if it is not the original authentic result and authentic final authority of what occurred at polling units ? So the only result that can be relied upon is the paper result from the PU? ….Toh!

Furthermore, when you say electronic transmission is mandatory and some PUs fail to transmit due to network issues, does that mean the elections are void? The word here being “mandatory”. If the law says mandatory then it must be done. If not the election is invalid.

So if the result that lands at the server electronically can be hacked, if it is not the alpha and omega of results, if you cannot Guarantee that all PUs will have transmission capabilities, then what do you achieve by making e transmission mandatory but chaos?

You see how we allow emotions to cloud our thinking?

This is how we started with parliamentary system and regional govt and instead of us to fix ourselves we kept blaming the system, changing and changing the system of govt and now we want to go back to the regional govt we now realize was the best but it is impossible!

ogaprime:
Wuru wuru to the answer. Na wa o

Newsgeek24:
https://verynigerian.com/breaking-senate-passes-electoral-act-repeal-enactment-bill-2026/

phonek:
*Why Rejecting the “Mandatory” Electronic Transmission of Results Makes No Sense, and Why Reverting to a Failed Method Is Dangerous.*

APC are arguing that electronic transmission of election results should not be mandatory because it can be hacked. That sounds reasonable, until you think deeper.

First, let us ask a simple question:
Is paper result safe?
No. Paper results can be changed on the road, inside a vehicle, or at the collation centre. People have been rewriting figures for years. We all know this.

Now another question:
Can electronic results be hacked?
Yes, they can. But here is the truth: both systems have problems. There is no perfect system.

So the real question is not “Is electronic transmission risky?”
The real question is:
Which one is easier to protect—paper or electronic?

Paper is easy to change quietly.
Electronic systems leave records, time stamps, and digital traces. If someone tampers with them, it can be detected.

Some people say:
“What if there is no network in the polling unit?”

INEC has already explained this in simple terms:
The result is recorded and snapped at the polling unit immediately voting ends. Even if there is no network, the machine will keep it and upload it automatically once it sees network. So nobody can change it on the road.

Now think again.
If we fear hackers, can a country not also hire experts to protect the system?
If bad people can pay hackers, can government not pay security experts?
That is what serious countries do.

So why are we afraid?
Because the old paper system allows manipulation without evidence.
Electronic transmission makes cheating harder and easier to expose.

The problem is not technology.
The problem is that some people are comfortable with a system that can be bent.
Changing the system will not solve everything overnight, but refusing to improve it will keep us stuck.

Rejecting mandatory electronic transmission makes no sense. Going back to an old method that failed in the last election is dangerous. People have lost trust in INEC, and repeating the same process will not restore confidence. If the old way worked, we wouldn’t be here. To rebuild trust, we must improve the system, not return to one that already failed.

Emotion will not fix elections.
Better systems will.

amazingspiderma:
Definitely an APC mole.
All they do is cast doubt on issues that could help solve Nigeria problems.

Electronic transmission is one of the solutions considering the challenges faced in the last election.

casualobserver:
We are a nation of people whose emotions get the better of them.


What exactly was a mandatory electronic transmission of results supposed to achieve?

Does it mean any result that lands electronically is the authentic official final result? What happens if I employ some Russian, Israeli or Chinese hackers to access and alter the results enroute?

How do you prove the results were not altered?

Did I hear you say you will refer to the paper results from the PU of which every agent and the police have a copy of the original? Does it mean if I transmit an altered result it become the official result? Then what is point of making electronic results mandatory if it is not the original authentic result and authentic final authority of what occurred at polling units ? So the only result that can be relied upon is the paper result from the PU? ….Toh!

Furthermore, when you say electronic transmission is mandatory and some PUs fail to transmit due to network issues, does that mean the elections are void? The word here being “mandatory”. If the law says mandatory then it must be done. If not the election is invalid.

So if the result that lands at the server electronically can be hacked, if it is not the alpha and omega of results, if you cannot Guarantee that all PUs will have transmission capabilities, then what do you achieve by making e transmission mandatory but chaos?

You see how we allow emotions to cloud our thinking?

This is how we started with parliamentary system and regional govt and instead of us to fix ourselves we kept blaming the system, changing and changing the system of govt and now we want to go back to the regional govt we now realize was the best but it is impossible!

MaziObinnaokija:
laughing 😃 😀 😄 in AGULU . .

Make I reach LottiOk,Flangelo12 house go drink palmy with goat meat.
No time