₦airaland Forum

DeepSight:
+
Are you sure you really know this experiment and all the stages it went through from Inception? Because if you did, you would not say this, because there was observation by humans as well and when that was surprising in terms of the results they started trying other forms of indirect observation.

Read the screenshot I just added.

LordReed:
Dude listen again to Dr James from 1:28. He says in response to Tyson's question: "Into the equations that we want to use to describe the cosmos." This is not an admission the matter is made up of code. He saying the equations that were used to decribe the cosmos has those codes. Listen properly and don't jump to unfounded conclusions.

+
I only gave you this clip to save your time. Do you want the full video? And then YOU listen properly.

LordReed:
Read the screenshot I just added.

+
I did. It's completely misplaced. Completely. Also those behind it are either not wearing their thinking caps or what they are saying is simply different from what I am saying.

DeepSight:
+
You are wildly wrong in this matter and I repeat, no human can ever calculate the level of kind of energy involved outta simulation.

But you cannot provide me with any evidence that the calculations are wrong or that such energy production is possible or even provide any idea of the amount of energy required. At this point you are on trust me bro level. LoLz.

DeepSight:
+
I did. It's completely misplaced. Completely. Also those behind it are either not wearing their thinking caps or what they are saying is simply different from what I am saying.

+
LordReed, sorry, here I am referring to the attachment on your other post.

As regards the slit experiment, are you not aware that it went through stages of human observation first?

DeepSight:
+
I did. It's completely misplaced. Completely. Also those behind it are either not wearing their thinking caps or what they are saying is simply different from what I am telling you.

LoLz. Please provide a peer review science paper that says double slit experiment is affected by human consciousness. I am waiting (but not holding my breath).

LordReed:
But you cannot provide me with any evidence that the calculations are wrong or that such energy production is possible or even provide any idea of the amount of energy required. At this point you are on trust me bro level. LoLz.

+
Oh no!

I am not that guy.

I have already resolved to open a thread with my arguments on this issue laid out step by step just for you my guy.

DeepSight:
+
LordReed, sorry, here I am referring to the attachment on your other post.

As regards the slit experiment, are you not aware that it went through stages of human observation first?

It only changed when detectors were introduced. Just provide what I asked for.

LordReed:
LoLz. Please provide a peer review science paper that says double slit experiment is affected by human consciousness. I am waiting (but not holding my breath).

+
Hian!

Oga this sounds like you don't know of the experiment at all oh.

I will do a thread.

LordReed:
It only changed when detectors were introduced. Just provide what I asked for.

+
Hang on a second. When you say detectors, are you referring to instruments of observation? And if so, observation by who?

DeepSight:
+
I only gave you this clip to save your time. Do you want the full video? And then YOU listen properly.

You can do that but it won't change it. Dr James used equations that were made by humans. I found an elaboration of the method he used and some interesting comments. The last one is just like this discussion I am having with you.

LordReed:
Dude listen again to Dr James from 1:28. He says in response to Tyson's question: "Into the equations that we want to use to describe the cosmos." This is not an admission the matter is made up of code. He saying the equations that were used to decribe the cosmos has those codes. Listen properly and don't jump to unfounded conclusions.

+
If you can't watch the full video, why not Google the actual conclusions?

I gave you an extract from Gemini which summarises. You know very well the clip I gave you for brevity ended mid sentence. So just Google the conclusions yourself.

LordReed:
You can do that but it won't change it. Dr James used equations that were made by humans. I found an elaboration of the method he used and some interesting comments. The last one is just like this discussion I am having with you.

+
I think you need to watch the full video rather than rely on comments.

DeepSight:
+
Hang on a second. When you say detectors, are you referring to instruments of observation? And if so, observation by who?

Yes instruments. You realise that the only thing that changed was the introduction of the instruments, humans were present in both experiments.

DeepSight:
+
I think you need to watch the full video rather than rely on comments.

The comments provide more context. And by his own admission it is not fundamental code he found rather code he was using to describe the universe.

LordReed:
Yes instruments. You realise that the only thing that changed was the introduction of the instruments, humans were present in both experiments.

+
This issue is interesting enough to warrant a thread especially as this is not the only angle I will come from.

Pick thy sword and shield, and meet me on the meadow tomorrow, come with honour and prepare to be slaughtered.

DeepSight:
+
Hian!

Oga this sounds like you don't know of the experiment at all oh.

I will do a thread.

I welcome it.

LordReed:
The comments provide more context. And by his own admission it is not fundamental code he found rather code he was using to describe the universe.

+
In a sense it is the same thing. I will explain in my thread.

DeepSight:
+
This issue is interesting enough to warrant a thread especially as this is not the only angle I will come from.

Pick thy sword and shield, and meet me on the meadow tomorrow, come with honour and prepare to be slaughtered.

Bring it on bruv!

LordReed:
Bring it on bruv!

+


On the morrow!

*Gallops off

DeepSight:
+
In a sense it is the same thing. I will explain in my thread.

It isn't. That would be like saying the earth is flat because maps are flat.

LordReed:
It isn't. That would be like saying the earth is flat because maps are flat.

+
Nah. I will explain why. There are other areas to this including the pixelation of reality. Several other angles.

I will play you several Zidane bicycle kicks you will see. Get a good goal keeper on your side.

LordReed:
Yeah right. Jump off a 16 storey building unaided by any safety device, walk away unhurt then I'll believe you that this world is an illusion.

Lol so shallow you are

When you play gta isn't the character limited to the game?

My physical body is limited to the illusion but my higher body is not

If I fall from a 16 story building my soul would work out of my body unscathed
And I would still be conscious because consciousness never dies

Kayouzka:
Lol so shallow you are

When you play gta isn't the character limited to the game?

My physical body is limited to the illusion but my higher body is not

If I fall from a 16 story building my soul would work out of my body unscathed
And I would still be conscious because consciousness never dies

lol. Na your family members I pity

Ourtruth247:
I'm going to be sharing the summary of everything I know about our world

I honestly don't care if you don't believe what I say. And I won't be responding to any insults or derailing arguments

Feel free to reject everything I say. The most important thing is that I've fulfilled my duty of sharing knowledge with people on this side of the world

Created by ‘advanced consciousness’. 😆

Nairaland should find a way to create an option to ban some people from threads. Our truth please where are you, don't mind these guys that love to hear themselves talk, come back and finish. Thanks

Kayouzka:
Lol so shallow you are

When you play gta isn't the character limited to the game?

My physical body is limited to the illusion but my higher body is not

If I fall from a 16 story building my soul would work out of my body unscathed
And I would still be conscious because consciousness never dies

Rather it reveals how shallow you are. In a videogame all characters and npcs can be reset and can be brought back. Increase your depth of thinking, you are still in the kiddie pool.

LordReed:
Rather it reveals how shallow you are. In a videogame all characters and npcs can be reset and can be brought back. Increase your depth of thinking, you are still in the kiddie pool.

+
Are you aware of the video game angle which argues that our reality is only spawned as observed. In other words, in a video game, the next room only spawns when you open it.

LordReed:
Yeah right. Jump off a 16 storey building unaided by any safety device, walk away unhurt then I'll believe you that this world is an illusion.

+
This is NOT what it takes to confirm that the world is an illusion.

Dekadet:
Nairaland should find a way to create an option to ban some people from threads. Our truth please where are you, don't mind these guys that love to hear themselves talk, come back and finish. Thanks

+
But we are discussing the topic he raised. Simulation Theory.

DeepSight:
+
Are you aware of the video game angle which argues that our reality is only spawned as observed. In other words, in a video game, the next room only spawns when you open it.

I see those as solipsistic traps because you are assuming the other humans are not experiencing their own environments without you.

DeepSight:
+
This is NOT what it takes to confirm that the world is an illusion.

It would to me.