₦airaland Forum

LordAdam16:
iranians themselves admit it was a mistake

-Lord

Sulele04:
Why is it a mistake exactly can't they build one now ? Aren't they enriching Uranium again ?

Sulele04:
Why is it a mistake exactly can't they build one now ? Aren't they enriching Uranium again ?

Interviewer: The Kremlin is claiming that Ukraine is trying to get a nuclear weapon via Britain and France. Is that the case?

Zelensky: I didn’t have proposition… but with pleasure.

Interviewer: So we can put that to bed. That’s not happening at all?

Zelensky: No. It’s not… pic.twitter.com/Ti2d76X8fv

— Clash Report (@clashreport) February 27, 2026

Zelensky:

If we withdraw from this territory like you said — for example Kramatorsk, Sloviansk — at this very moment 200,000 people who are there now will be occupied by Russians who say to Russians that these people are ready to be Russian people, and if they don’t, they will… pic.twitter.com/mJa8HLxrQn

— Clash Report (@clashreport) February 27, 2026

Zelensky:

I’m not playing games with Putin. I’m ready to meet and I’m ready to speak.

But not in Russia and not Belarus, because they are allies during this war. Belarus is a passive aggressor. They attacked us from the territory of Belarus. pic.twitter.com/AWaCWLySUy

— Clash Report (@clashreport) February 27, 2026

WriteerNg:

---

The mumus for don dey test nukes by now.

Now their fate is sealed. Religion is a disease.

Gaza go be like paradise after this war.

Because they're being gunned from every angle. Even internally.

Zelensky:

For Americans, it’s difficult to understand the Russian mentality — when they lie and when they tell the truth.

I said once to Jared and to Steve, honestly, it’s more simple to recognize that they lie every time. pic.twitter.com/2K578tlFTS

— Clash Report (@clashreport) February 27, 2026

Zelensky:

Why are elections in Ukraine so important for Russians and Americans — and not important for Ukrainians? pic.twitter.com/a5abNQMxYV

— Clash Report (@clashreport) February 27, 2026

WriterrNg:

---

He's 80 years plus.

You might not live up to half his age. And I'm very certain of it.

The evil you support will haunt you to ur gravvee

WriteerNg:

---

The mumus for don dey test nukes by now.

Now their fate is sealed. Religion is a disease.

Gaza go be like paradise after this war.

Because they're being gunned from every angle. Even internally.

LordAdam16:

---

mk dem check e phone
open browser, enter nairaland

e fit b one of our nvb 🤡🤡

-Lord

WriteerNg:

---

I just tire.

Enriching uranium for over 25 years, yet unable to build even one bomb.

WriteerNg:
If IRAN does not strike first, they will not survive.

Taking out US aircrafts parked in airfields could hamper their plans.

Kingsnairaland:
Who told you Iran don't have nukes you think every one makes noise when they build it

Gbadebo19:
The USS Gerald R. Ford is not parked near Iran. It is parked off Israel. And nobody is asking the only question that matters: why.

The $13.3 billion crown jewel of the US Navy, the largest warship ever constructed, just positioned itself off Haifa. Not in the Arabian Sea where the Lincoln sits 850 kilometers from Iranian shores loaded for offensive operations. Not in the Gulf where strike range is optimal. Off Israel. Defending Israel.

This is not redundancy. This is architecture.

Two carriers. Two missions. Two entirely different strategic functions. The Lincoln is the sword, positioned to launch strike packages into Iranian airspace within hours of an order. The Ford is the shield, its Aegis missile defense systems creating an umbrella over Israeli population centers against the retaliation that follows the first Tomahawk.

America just split its carrier doctrine into offense and defense simultaneously. That has not happened since the Pacific theater in 1945.

But the positioning reveals something deeper than tactics. When Iran retaliates, and every wargame says Iran retaliates, its missiles and drones fly toward Israel. They will fly through the same airspace where a US carrier strike group is now stationed. Every Iranian missile aimed at Tel Aviv or Haifa must traverse the Ford’s defensive envelope. Shooting at Israel means shooting at, around, and through an American carrier group.

Iran cannot retaliate against Israel without engaging American naval assets. The Ford’s position makes that physically impossible. The carrier is not defending Israel as a favor. It is positioned so that any Iranian response to American strikes automatically becomes an attack on American forces, triggering the full unrestrained weight of US military response without a single additional political decision required.

This is escalation insurance written in steel and seawater. If the campaign goes longer than planned, if munitions run thin in 7 to 10 days, if allies hesitate, the Ford’s position ensures that Iranian retaliation does the political work Washington cannot do alone: it transforms a limited American strike into an act of self-defense that no ally can refuse to support.

You do not park a $13.3 billion carrier where the enemy’s return fire will hit it unless you want the enemy’s return fire to hit it.

The Ford is not there to prevent escalation. The Ford is there to guarantee that if escalation comes, it comes on terms that make American restraint politically impossible and allied participation politically unavoidable.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

FoolishBoy419:
Iran will very much survive it. Even if Iran had zero means of retaliating, airstrikes alone cannot win wars. Iran will face intense bombardment for sure, especially in the first few days before the USA starts getting what she deserves

Gbadebo19:
The USS Gerald R. Ford is not parked near Iran. It is parked off Israel. And nobody is asking the only question that matters: why.

The $13.3 billion crown jewel of the US Navy, the largest warship ever constructed, just positioned itself off Haifa. Not in the Arabian Sea where the Lincoln sits 850 kilometers from Iranian shores loaded for offensive operations. Not in the Gulf where strike range is optimal. Off Israel. Defending Israel.

This is not redundancy. This is architecture.

Two carriers. Two missions. Two entirely different strategic functions. The Lincoln is the sword, positioned to launch strike packages into Iranian airspace within hours of an order. The Ford is the shield, its Aegis missile defense systems creating an umbrella over Israeli population centers against the retaliation that follows the first Tomahawk.

America just split its carrier doctrine into offense and defense simultaneously. That has not happened since the Pacific theater in 1945.

But the positioning reveals something deeper than tactics. When Iran retaliates, and every wargame says Iran retaliates, its missiles and drones fly toward Israel. They will fly through the same airspace where a US carrier strike group is now stationed. Every Iranian missile aimed at Tel Aviv or Haifa must traverse the Ford’s defensive envelope. Shooting at Israel means shooting at, around, and through an American carrier group.

Iran cannot retaliate against Israel without engaging American naval assets. The Ford’s position makes that physically impossible. The carrier is not defending Israel as a favor. It is positioned so that any Iranian response to American strikes automatically becomes an attack on American forces, triggering the full unrestrained weight of US military response without a single additional political decision required.

This is escalation insurance written in steel and seawater. If the campaign goes longer than planned, if munitions run thin in 7 to 10 days, if allies hesitate, the Ford’s position ensures that Iranian retaliation does the political work Washington cannot do alone: it transforms a limited American strike into an act of self-defense that no ally can refuse to support.

You do not park a $13.3 billion carrier where the enemy’s return fire will hit it unless you want the enemy’s return fire to hit it.

The Ford is not there to prevent escalation. The Ford is there to guarantee that if escalation comes, it comes on terms that make American restraint politically impossible and allied participation politically unavoidable.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

ichuka:
I
Very correct bro,
But they won't listen or understand.
The middle east is already in the box, just like south America, the next will be Africa

Mikasaobi:
https://www.airandspaceforces.com/life-death-yemen-f-16-pilots-sambush/

Along with multiple B-2 Spirit bombers and other aircraft, they were part of a complex mission to strike Houthi ballistic missile production facilities in Yemen on March 27, 2025. The B-2s dropped their bombs, the F-16s peeled away from their targets, hoping to soon be “feet wet” over the Red Sea.

But suddenly, they were targets. Spotting a flash from the ground below, Parks and Blea realized they were in the crosshairs of an incoming surface-to-air missile, the hunter now becoming the hunted.

The Air Force granted Air & Space Forces Magazine interviews with Parks and Blea to discuss their harrowing mission, for which each earned a Silver Star

This is called SAMbush. You switch off your radar, let the jets in, switch it on and fire. Iran is not Yemen.