₦airaland Forum

Most Nigerians distrust the country’s electoral process, especially the transmission and collation of results.

Despite the adoption of technologies such as BVAS and IReV, there appear to be loopholes in the legal framework governing the electoral process.

In an effort to strengthen the system, the lower chamber of the National Assembly (NASS) has mandated real-time electronic transmission of results, while the upper chamber has provided an alternative for manual transmission should technology fail.

Finally, President Bola Tinubu signed the electoral acts and it was not stated whether the presiding officer should use electronic transmission or manual transmission.

Therefore, the leadership of Ekimogun Youths Connect (EYC), led by Comrade Famakinwa Lucaskakaki themed their 2nd edition of Monthly Lecture Series towards this issue.

TOPIC: Nigeria Election Results: E-transmission vs Manual

In this edition, Barr. M.M. Bada, a legal practitioner, and public affairs analyst did justice to the burning questions.





Q.1

The proposed reform by the National Assembly Committee on Electoral Matters, Section 60(3), contains three key elements:





Mandatory electronic transmission of election results



Explicit reference to the INEC Results Viewing Portal (IReV); and



Real-time upload of results while collation officers and party agents are present at the polling units.

Section 60(3) was initially rejected outright by the Senate, sparking reactions from civil society organisations before the Senate eventually adopted a modified version of the clause.

Why do you think the Senate rejected this reform in the first place?


Thank you very much for the question.

You will agree with me that the upper chamber, the Senate, is made up of experienced individuals.

When we look at the proposed bill by the House of Representatives, it recommended the immediate adoption of electronic transmission of results.

However, you will also agree that electronic transmission can be manipulated.

There are additional challenges associated with electronic transmission, such as network instability and electricity issues, which could affect its effectiveness.

These are some of the concerns the Senate considered. In its judgment, it proposed that there should be a backup system on which INEC can rely in case electronic transmission fails.

The distrust in Nigeria’s electoral process led many Nigerians to question why the Senate rejected electronic transmission.

However, electronic transmission cannot yet be fully implemented without addressing existing challenges such as electricity supply and network connectivity.

That is why the Senate did not support 100 percent reliance on electronic transmission.



Q.2

The version of Section 60(3) adopted by the Senate provides that results shall be transmitted to IReV and that, in the event of communication failure, Form EC8A (manual transmission) shall serve as the primary source for collation and declaration of results.

However, “communication failure” is not clearly defined, thereby creating ambiguity in the amended clause.

Some senators have reiterated that connectivity in rural areas is limited.

Given the configuration of BVAS, results can be captured and stored without internet connectivity and transmitted automatically once connectivity is restored.

Do you think low connectivity in rural areas justifies retaining manual transmission?

If you examine Section 60 of the Electoral Act recently signed by the President, you will notice that there is no clear provision stating whether the presiding officer must use electronic or manual transmission.

The provision appears ambiguous, as it simply states that the Presiding Officer shall record the results in Form EC8A as specified in Section 60.

First, it is not ideal to amend electoral laws less than a year before a general election. Such amendments should be made at least two years before the election to allow adequate preparation and implementation.

Low connectivity in rural areas should NOT be a sufficient reason to exclude electronic transmission from our electoral laws.

In my view, ICT experts in Nigeria should have advised lawmakers and INEC to develop a reliable system that presiding officers can use to record results.

Such a system could allow results to be entered and verified by the presiding officer, security officials, and party agents.

Where discrepancies arise, manual records could then be used for comparison and correction.

There should be a secure system that receives results in a manner that prevents further alteration.

Low connectivity should NOT be a basis for rejecting electronic transmission.

There are many strategies that can be adopted to combat the falsification of results, which remains a major challenge in our electoral system.

As I have stated, low connectivity in rural areas should NOT be a ground for rejecting electronic transmission.



Q.3

So, you think the risks associated with electronic transmission should be mitigated, since manual collation leaves room for human interference compared to electronic transmission?



The challenges associated with electronic transmission can, in some cases, exceed those of manual transmission.

Electronic systems can also be compromised if not properly secured.



Q.4

Communication failure is the Senate’s primary reason for opposing real-time transmission.

In your view, could this create a loophole for deliberate network sabotage by presiding officers, INEC officials, or politicians, especially since the term is not clearly defined?

Both electronic and manual transmission processes can be manipulated, depending on the integrity and disposition of the individuals handling the results.





Q.5

Let us also consider how election results are transmitted and collated in Ghana and South Africa.

In Ghana, results are transmitted manually from polling units to constituency collation centres and then to regional collation centres before being forwarded to the national collation centre.

In South Africa, votes are counted at polling units and signed by the presiding officer and party agents.

A copy is posted at the polling unit, while results are captured using GPRS-enabled mobile devices or transported to local offices for scanning.

Can we therefore conclude that retaining manual transmission, at least for now, is not necessarily problematic?

It is relatively easy to disrupt network connectivity. Simple devices can interfere with signals within a limited range.

If such interference occurs, electronic transmission may be affected, forcing a return to manual transmission.

We must be honest with ourselves. Addressing the problems affecting Nigeria’s electoral process requires genuine commitment from all stakeholders - lawmakers, politicians, civil servants, security agencies, and citizens alike.

Without that collective resolve, reforms may not achieve their intended impact.



Q.6

As you mentioned, the Electoral Act signed by the President does not clearly state whether the presiding officer must use electronic or manual transmission.

Do you think a presiding officer could deliberately delay transmission, whether electronic or manual?

Do you think this situation could create opportunities for result manipulation?

Or why does South Africa not experience similar controversies as Nigeria?

If a presiding officer is poorly accommodated before an election and depends on politicians for basic needs such as food, questions will naturally arise about independence and impartiality.

In such circumstances, a presiding officer could deliberately delay or frustrate transmission, whether electronic or manual.



Q.7

How do you reconcile the Senate’s position with the repeated assurances by INEC that it has the capacity to deploy technology effectively?

Results can be altered under either system, depending largely on the integrity, belief, and conviction of the presiding officer.

This is why I consistently emphasise the need to build and mentor young people to be patriotic and incorruptible, so that when they occupy positions of responsibility, they cannot be easily influenced.



Q.8

Do you think the Senate should propose a comprehensive cybersecurity framework to strengthen digital transmission instead of limiting its use?

Yes. It is time for lawmakers to enact comprehensive electoral reforms. The “fire brigade” approach to lawmaking must end.



Q.9

Finally, in your opinion, what measures should the National Assembly put in place to ensure that election results are transparent, credible, and widely accepted?

When you attempt to enact strong and effective laws, you may become unpopular with those who benefit from weak ones.

In my view, the process for appointing the INEC Chairman should be reconsidered.

For example, rather than being nominated solely by the President, alternative mechanisms could be explored to ensure greater independence and public confidence.

Secondly, there should be a national conference comprising carefully selected stakeholders to draft comprehensive and enduring electoral laws.

Relying solely on lawmakers who may have political interests may not always produce the most objective reforms.



Conclusion

Thank you once again!

We appreciate your contributions tonight and hope you will join us again when invited.

Dear people of Ondo, we have spent the last hour discussing this important topic: Election Results - Electronic Transmission vs Manual Transmission.

Our guest speaker has been Barrister M.M. Bada, legal practitioner and public affairs analyst.

Of course, I will always be available to answer your call.

Educative lecture for Nigerian youths

@fergie001 @Mynd44

Well explained, what am happy with is the direct primaries.

It returns control to the Parties, not one dollars welding contestants.

Since 1999, Nigerians have always been faced with imposed candidates

omowolewa:
Well explained, what am happy with is the direct primaries.

It returns control to the Parties, not one dollars welding contestants.

Since 1999, Nigerians have always been faced with imposed candidates

Yeah, you're right.

I think if we don't get tired as Nigerians to continue to push for better policies, and also if incorruptible youths start getting into governance, things will gradually get better.

Let me read this newsletter and the come back to comment
With all due respect to Barrister M.M Bada some of your takes are wrong, how can you say manual coalition of result is better than real time transmission, then why are we clamoring for real-time transmission of results. We’re not saying the election should be hundred percent free and fair which I know it’s not possible but at least 80% fairness is all we ask for.

Electronic transmission will eliminate a lot of rigging.

Beside the budget for next year election if properly managed can can can take care of all this problems he stated.


WELL THIS IS NIGERIA!!!
Corruption capital of the world.

Dannieln1:
Let me read this newsletter and the come back to comment
With all due respect to Barrister M.M Bada some of your takes are wrong, how can you say manual coalition of result is better than real time transmission, then why are we clamoring for real-time transmission of results. We’re not saying the election should be hundred percent free and fair which I know it’s not possible but at least 80% fairness is all we ask for.

Electronic transmission will eliminate a lot of rigging.

Beside the budget for next year election if properly managed can can can take care of all this problems he stated.


WELL THIS IS NIGERIA!!!
Corruption capital of the world.

Hmmmmm, you're right, but don't you think they can still tamper with Electronic Transmission, this is naija nah.

President Tinubu frankly said human intervention is required in both methods - humans control tech.

ayufun:
Hmmmmm, you're right, but don't you think they can still tamper with Electronic Transmission, this is naija nah.

President Tinubu frankly said human intervention is required in both methods - humans control tech.

Brother with 0.001% of what was budgeted for this election we can use it to setup one of the best cybersecurity framework to curb hacking

It can be done.
Me and you know that they won’t do it.
Look at our banking system, you hardly hear cases of hacking because the security system is top notch and it won’t cost the governments upto 300million

Infact electronic transmission of result is cheaper and flawless, that’s if they truly want to conduct a free and fair election

Dannieln1:
Brother with 0.001% of what was budgeted for this election we can use it to setup one of the best cybersecurity framework to curb hacking

It can be done.
Me and you know that they won’t do it.
Look at our banking system, you hardly hear cases of hacking because the security system is top notch and it won’t cost the governments upto 300million

Infact electronic transmission of result is cheaper and flawless, that’s if they truly want to conduct a free and fair election

You're right?

ayufun:
You're right?

I time to come we will change the narrative

Dannieln1:
Let me read this newsletter and the come back to comment
With all due respect to Barrister M.M Bada some of your takes are wrong, how can you say manual coalition of result is better than real time transmission, then why are we clamoring for real-time transmission of results. We’re not saying the election should be hundred percent free and fair which I know it’s not possible but at least 80% fairness is all we ask for.

Electronic transmission will eliminate a lot of rigging.

Beside the budget for next year election if properly managed can can can take care of all this problems he stated.


WELL THIS IS NIGERIA!!!
Corruption capital of the world.

Electronic transmission will not stop or reduce rigging. If you ask people exactly how it would, the answers often become vague or inconsistent. Much of the noise around electronic transmission comes from opposition parties that cannot afford to station representatives at every polling unit.

In reality, even with electronic transmission, parties that have a strong presence on the ground will still prevail. Elections are essentially a popularity contest, and ultimately the courts still rely on physical result sheets. This is the same basic principle followed in many electoral systems around the world.

Besides, with the current electoral process, candidates who only have “helicopter money” but lack grassroots presence will find it harder to win primary elections. In a way, that technically returns some power to the people. It also reduces the incentive to deploy large amounts of dollars during elections, since campaigning now requires spending more in naira than in foreign currency. That could be seen as a smart way to limit excessive demand for dollars, which often puts pressure on the naira during election periods.

Dannieln1:
I time to come we will change the narrative

I hope so, that's if more intelligent and sincere people start getting involved in politics

ayufun:
I hope so, that's if more intelligent and sincere people start getting involved in politics

I think we’re gradually having the best of us getting involved in politics

lionshare:
Electronic transmission will not stop or reduce rigging. If you ask people exactly how it would, the answers often become vague or inconsistent. Much of the noise around electronic transmission comes from opposition parties that cannot afford to station representatives at every polling unit.

In reality, even with electronic transmission, parties that have a strong presence on the ground will still prevail. Elections are essentially a popularity contest, and ultimately the courts still rely on physical result sheets. This is the same basic principle followed in many electoral systems around the world.

Besides, with the current electoral process, candidates who only have “helicopter money” but lack grassroots presence will find it harder to win primary elections. In a way, that technically returns some power to the people. It also reduces the incentive to deploy large amounts of dollars during elections, since campaigning now requires spending more in naira than in foreign currency. That could be seen as a smart way to limit excessive demand for dollars, which often puts pressure on the naira during election periods.

Personally, I commend some parts of the amended electoral acts.

I also agree that E-transmission is not free from manipulations.

However, we only need to be sincere, and embrace free and fair elections, but we aren't there yet in Nigeria.

Most leaders are power intoxicated, they are not vying for the positions to serve the populace.