₦airaland Forum

pu7pl3:
She isn't putting anyone over abeg
She is just dropping the titles she unnecessarily picked up

samistry:
Nobody is placing baggage on TK. You were the one blindly worshipping the streaming app, terming it as innovation. Without looking up what the word meant or the circumstances that led to it.
Last I checked, AEW isn't Pyongyang, criticisms are welcome.

pu7pl3:
interacted more with the wrestlers, build up their visibility and then drop the title to them.
That's how to put someone over but we all know that wasn't her plan in the first place.

samistry:
If she wants to put them over, she can lose to them flat without the 50-50 title wins.

ValeeLove:
that's what they did. You think the matches happened without a build?

pu7pl3:
Which build? Graphic designs ahead of time?

ValeeLove:
it is innovative to them, it hasn't happened before for them. Why will I say it's the first of it's kind when the WWE network came in 2014. My gripe with your argument is you seem to believe this initiative in inspired by bad business or low success in AEW when there's no evidence to back up whatsoever. Grasping at straws, being unnecessarily antagonistic, whatever; this is a good initiative and there's nothing wrong with it.

ValeeLove:
you take your biggest star and give them an 80/20 loss against midcard talent, then you can critique this.

samistry:
I'm being antagonistic because you gauffed when by terming it innovative. The news source said it came about as a reaction to their streaming partner having financial troubles. Abi is Meltzer who reported it also antagonistic towards AEW? Never go full sicko.

samistry:
Nobody forced her to have those matches and belts. TK also paid her for those appearances.
Those belts were nothing more than a prop for her image. The wrestlers were nothing more than a footnote in her quest to be Ultimo Dragon reborn.
What you're doing is blindworship without any room for criticism at the end of the day.
You've gone full APC bro.

ValeeLove:
their streaming partner not TK. Triller not AEW. If Triller is going out of business how is it TK's (a customer) fault. This is grasping at straws abeg.
I can't shout.

ValeeLove:
bro, you've not made any strong point. A main-eventer should never lose to a midcarder, Mercedes did it. A megastar should never lose to an indy wrestler, Mercedes did that! And still you all (her antagonizers) have blatantly refused to give her her accolades, instead you all choose to continually shift the goal post and give shallow points to try to buttress your claim that she is proud.
I'm not doing back and forth. I have made my point, if you have yours, let's hear it.

samistry:
What has she done that other wrestlers haven't which demand accolades ?
AJ Styles lost to an indy wrestler Kevin Steen in 2005.
Will Ospreay lost to an indy wrestler, Michael Oku in 2024.
Eddie Guerrero lost to an indy wrestler, CM Punk in 2002.
There are many more cases if you do the research. Those wrestlers didn't go on a vanity spree, requiring supporters like you shamefully glazing it as a novel concept.

ValeeLove:
AJ losing to Steen, okay. Though he wasn't a mega star then. Ospreay gave that loss as his effort for the company before leaving them (it's a wrestling tradition). Punk and Guerrero, now that's close (he wasn't in WWE at that time). That being said, that doesn't mean they should have done it and they didn't do it multiple times as Mercedes.

samistry:
It was a reaction to their streaming partner going out of business. Meaning if Triller was doing fine, they wouldn't have launched their app.
They were already streaming on Triller, what they're going to do on the app is nothing new(streaming).
How is it hard to comprehend? Go practice some Eddie chops against the wall until you get the point.

samistry:
I don't want to know the reasons but they all lost to indy talents abi they no lose? So why should we praise Mone like it's a new thing?
Like I said they're many of such instances but you won't know as you never make efforts to research. Your ignorance illuminates beautifully.

ValeeLove:
no dey lie again, you dey hear me so? Abi no be you be Samistry?👇🏿 "Airstrikes his TV deal", in other words insinuating that AEW is doing bad business and it won't be profitable for Paramount to continue to promote the show. When I countered that argument you immediately swooped in with Triller forgetting that argument has holes in it as it didn't concern TK. Now you're acting as if you were just critiquing the streaming site and not actually AEW. If it had nothing to do with TK why did you bring it up? I caught you right?

ValeeLove:
I didn't say praise her, give her her accolades by admitting you misjudged her by calling her proud and saying she won't put anyone over. Will you do that?

samistry:
I will not because she didn't put those wrestlers over. They merely reclaimed what was lost in the first place.
I dn type tire hand dey pain me sef.

ValeeLove:
Na wa o. Okay at least accept that you were wrong when you said she won't lose to anyone.

samistry:
When they call you guys AEW cultists, you pick offence but you reason as one. I never declared Jihad against your favourite promotion.

I said Tony had the app as a backup in case Paramount airstrikes their deal.
(Similar happened to WCW when AOL/Time Warner merged). The new leadership didn't care for wrestling.

Did I mention it was about AEW doing badly or lack of profitability in our argument?

You never countered any argument about AEW losing it's TV deal. All you said was the app was innovative.
I questioned what was innovative about a streaming app coming out when competitors had theirs out for years.
I brought up the reason for innovating(launching the app) as you call it was tied to Triller having issues.

Isn't Triller issue related to the topic of discourse which is the app?

The bulk of that argument was centred on this innovation you claim was being brought.
There's a chain of flow and logic in that argument.

At the end of the day.
AEW can lose afford to lose its WB TV deal and shop for another network as Tony has enough funds to support it. No one said it's going to die. Rivalry is good for the business and wrestlers.

samistry:
Valee, you win o. I was wrong, please let this arguments die.( I know how much I for dn bill client on this case for my former life,if I dn dey shout like this since morning).

ValeeLove:
it's a free world.

ValeeLove:
my argument was not about a possibility of a bad business, but your CERTAINTY that it was bad business that fueled them. Forget about Triller, the original quote was Paramount. I said "or it is innovative", and you replied "innovative indeed" claiming CERTAINTY that it was due to bad business. The very act was innovative regardless whether that was the original reason or not, let's know that.

Again, "innovative" can be used to define a personal growth and major change, regardless whether it's been done before elsewhere. I think that's where the problem in your arguement lies.

CoolUsername:
How can people be saying Jade Cargill's promo was shit and then be glazing this😭

ValeeLove:
😂😂😂
Acknowledge Mercedes. E remain make una acknowledge Thekla.

THE JUDGMENT DAY TURNS ON FINN BALOR 😱

WHAT JUST HAPPENED! pic.twitter.com/zROkvUJQNr

— WWE (@WWE) March 10, 2026

Fro5t:
It's the JD siding with Judgement Day against Finn angle that messed it up. Just didn't make sense and it came out of nowhere.

Fro5t:
It's the JD siding with Judgement Day against Finn angle that messed it up. Just didn't make sense and it came out of nowhere.

Fro5t:
How is this much better than a Jade Cargill promo abeg?

Ayomid3h:
scripted