₦airaland Forum

udemzyudex:
She was told that if she can provide evidence that she did business with him, she'll be given #1bn.

So why didn't she provide evidence and collect the money instead of the $70k she collected.

cr7lomo:
She did all she did out of trust and desperation right from the beginning of the transaction 12 yrs ago...the only reason she failed to get her money years ago is because she denied umahi her body and he felt insulted.... the man took advantage of the situation knowing she supplied goods based on Trust and familiarity....

Imagine a friend of urs that u usually hang around with telling u to supply 10 cartons of Fanta for her child's birthday....u just do it without documentation or receipts....even if there were receipts, u wud even dump them somewhere...believing that ur friend wudnt disappoint ... only for story to enter the matter after months and maybe a couple of years of "u will get the money " ...."let me settle down ", "I will give u more transactions"... as per Governor...she relaxed thinking more benefits will come thru thats why she never opened up all these years ...they fell apart when she refused umahi sex and he promised not to pay her money cos he knew she had no evidence...

This is a strong lesson to people ....umahi is a demon... that lawyer has collected his share ..now the case has turned against her... the reason political elites wanna make sure this country is forever in poverty is because of situations like this .. so that they can control the system... Police, lawyers, activists , judges ...all will bow to what they want so that they dont go hungry... they will gain better supporting umahi than the woman ...thats why justice is dead in Nigeria

alpharoyalty:
She collected $70,000 but wanted more .
She is greedy and should not be trusted.

Islie:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQzl06fwYPQ?si=ZDPSqzeT9yEGtG-0




https://dailytrust.com/businesswoman-i-was-promised-70k-to-retract-claims-against-umahi/

Lamasta:
The woman is a greedy woman and a manipulator at the same time, after collecting $70k

SisterAnn:
Can you dash out 70k dollars to someone you didn't know from Adams who came out to lie against you?

BrokenTV:
Go make your own full detailed research on that case not a fan of Umahi or the deadly APC but if that woman is not careful she is going to prison.

udemzyudex:
It's obvious you don't want to listen, the question is why does she want to return the money? How did it get to her in the first place.
She made a video retracting what she said about Umahi and went on to collect #70k, how did it happen?

SisterAnn:
My post was from an uniformed position, now I have all the info. Pardon please. She's something else and not a nice person.

This still doesn't exonerate umahi from the allegations.

SisterAnn:
Why? For fallen for their deceit?

alpharoyalty:
She collected $70,000 but wanted more .
She is greedy and should not be trusted.

brolinderick:
She doesn't have proof to tender.
The court works on evidence and they can't take her by her words because anybody can say anything

SmartPolician:
That woman deserves to be thrown into prison!

Islie:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQzl06fwYPQ?si=ZDPSqzeT9yEGtG-0



By Seun Adeuyi


Businesswoman Tracyniter Nicholas Ohiri has alleged that her earlier retraction of claims against the Minister of Works, David Umahi, was scripted and made under pressure, insisting she was promised $70,000 that was never paid.

In a fresh video circulating online, Ohiri said a lawyer, Marshal Abubakar, coerced her into recording the retraction and assured her that Umahi had agreed to compensate her before the video was made public.

“Marshal, you gave me a script… you forced me to do this video. You said the person told you he was willing to pay me and compensate me for even arresting me and body-shaming me in public,” she said.

She alleged that the agreement was that payment would be made before the video was released, but claimed that did not happen.

“You told me that I will receive my payment before you release the video. How did you release the video without me collecting my money?” she asked.

Ohiri further alleged that she was isolated and intimidated during the process.

“You made sure I did not speak to anybody… you kept on threatening me,” she said, calling on the Nigerian Bar Association to investigate Abubakar’s conduct, which she described as unethical.

Ohiri had earlier accused Umahi of owing her about N250 million for promotional and printing services she claimed to have rendered during his 2015 governorship campaign in Ebonyi State. She also alleged sexual harassment and intimidation after she demanded payment, claims the minister has consistently denied.

She was later arrested in Lagos over allegations of cyberbullying linked to her social media posts and transferred to Abuja, where she was detained at the FCT police command. She was subsequently arraigned before a magistrate court in Wuse on a defamation charge and granted bail.

The matter gained public attention after activist and former presidential candidate Omoyele Sowore confronted the minister at the police headquarters, criticising what he described as the criminalisation of a civil dispute.

Umahi, in his response, denied both the allegation of indebtedness and the claims of sexual harassment, describing them as baseless.

“As party chairman, I owed nobody… I presided over both men and women, and nobody ever said I harassed them,” he said, adding, “What you read on social media, I’m not worried about it… it’s just to make social media alive.”

Amid the controversy, Ohiri had released a video retracting her allegations and apologising to the minister and his family, saying the decision followed consultations with her family, friends and legal team. In that video, she stated that there was no formally signed agreement between her and the minister and suggested that any materials she supplied may have been used by aides without his knowledge.

However, her latest claims challenge that retraction, as she now insists it was made under duress and tied to a promise of financial settlement that was not fulfilled.

Responding on his Facebook page, Abubakar denied coercing Ohiri or withholding any payment, describing her allegations as false.

He said he had supported her during her arrest by mobilising assistance, engaging activists and helping to secure her bail. According to him, attempts were made to mediate between Ohiri and the minister, who maintained that he was not indebted to her.

“He insisted that he wasn’t owing her and wouldn’t pay unless she can establish the existence of a contract,” Abubakar said.

He added that he found no evidence to support her claims during the mediation process.

“There was no single real evidence of any contractual agreement… no evidence that the minister ever engaged her,” he said.

Abubakar said Ohiri eventually agreed to retract her allegations as part of efforts to resolve the dispute, adding that the $70,000 mentioned was provided by a third party, Joseph Ekumankama, not as compensation or an admission of liability, but to facilitate peace.

He denied benefiting financially from the arrangement and alleged that Ohiri later demanded a significantly higher sum.

“She promised to drag my name online unless I meet them to pay her N300 million,” he said, adding that he is considering legal action over the claims made against him.

https://dailytrust.com/businesswoman-i-was-promised-70k-to-retract-claims-against-umahi/

ufotunang:
..she should had first collect the money before doing the video

SisterAnn:
She made the retraction on the strength that umahi has agreed to settle her though by a third party. Her lawyer assured her the video would only be aired after full payment of agreed sum, apparently, after paying her 70k USD, the lawyer released the video, this led her to believe the lawyer must have benefitted from the other party.

She should let the matter rest.

udemzyudex:
So what's stopping her from hiring another lawyer and taking them to court?
Even without a lawyer didn't she know that there was suppose to be a written agreement and signed by both parties concerning the agreement?

alpharoyalty:
She collected $70,000 but wanted more .
She is greedy and should not be trusted.

SisterAnn:
I have edited my post after more information emerged.

She should let sleeping dogs lie at this point.

Umahi has tried for her. He gave her 70k USD because he knows what went down.

She didn't have records of the transaction and even if she tried to produce any, as long as umahi didn't sign it, it's not credible.

She should let the matter rest, whether her lawyer outsmarted her or not.