₦airaland Forum

BlueRayDick:
As they cannot share rice in the UK nko? They have no choice but to share pounds na.

Over the weekend , a friend on his status posted the video of Tunde Bakare cussing Jonathan for removing subsidy at the ojota protest ground in 2012. Omo, that video was so bad.....It was repulsive seeing Tunde Bakare, Gani Fawehinmi's son(who is now late) , Femi Kuti and the rest of them hurling cuss at Jonathan and said it's either subsidy is returned or the country would be grounded.

Like these current APC leadership used the people's pains & sufferings to run their political agenda back then, today the same people's pain & suffering is not their concern. Their only solution to the mess they have made is to share rice ! . They go from one state to the other to share rice, they have made rice sharing a national policy.

O chim!

raumdeuter:
Did Adeboye hold anyone from protesting

Realmrsean:
didn't age well

Ballzproblemm:
God hates evil men ,all those money he has made is meaningless, enternal damnation awaits.

Dying mysteriously is no accident,it's divine judgement and it's just the beginning.

diggz:
Why him and him crew dey look like say Tiefnubu led government never wan finish the country? Wetin happen to him voice? And, why him no fit push people enter road to protest?

nihilistjnr:
If it turns out that Trump was lying about speaking to Iran, then you have to ask yourself why Trump felt the need to announce it that he had spoken to them.

All he had to do was not say anything and not bomb any more Iranian power plants.

The clue is literally in the screenshot you posted. Read it well. Iran's own foreign ministry are telling you that not only did Trump lie about speaking with them, but that they consider the announcement itself to be a setup.

Sean try dey watch this thing with open eyes na?

raumdeuter:
Na only him dey the country? If you enter say you wan protest he wont stop you

Realmrsean:
You no go chicken 🐔 out ke

Islamic republic na your mate

Sportsweb:
https://x.com/i/status/2036061389156925799

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
Two weeks ago this man dey said there will be no deal with Iran until Iran unconditionally surrender. We told their fanboys here there's no pathway to victory for them, dem no gree. Dem celebrate assassination. Winning battle is different from winning a war.

Israel is very lucky that they don't share direct land border with Iran. Iran would have invaded and annexed ISREEEAL. It's not over yet. If they successfully drive out NATO/US forces in Iraq, next agenda will be on how to take over Syria. That way they will create a land bridge to Israel.

diggz:
No be only him dey the country; make him organise the same crew wey him use the last time take run am again. My influence no reach him own. Plus, we actually need our father/fathers in the lord to epp us make the protest strong like the one of Jonathan time 😀

Sportsweb:
No be only invade Israel 🤣🤣🤣😂. Is like you guys create fantasy in your head and cum over it

Stoplying:
Yea, you're right, Jehovah would have jumped down from heaven and told the Iranians to go back home. That is why Iran can't possibly invade Israel even if there were a land border between them and even though Iranian soldiers are mostly career soldiers and battle tested.

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
I've stopped responding to people who have decided to suspend their brain and common sense especially on matter concerning Israel

FEGEITOK:
Had a long battle with cancer.

And lost.

Ballzproblemm:
hand money to access to best healthcare and lost 🤷

raumdeuter:
There are over a thousand fathers in the Lord who can take over Adeboye is already over 84yrs, make the other ones sef join body. Why must he help you after he has done in the past

diggz:
This! Make him tell him people to run am for us.

BlueRayDick:
@Iamoyindamola wassup with all these American TV series nowadays with the way they casually introduce LGBTQ agenda from nowhere?

Is it that the financiers of those series always insist they build in LGBTQ agenda into the movie/series plot before they give them access to funds or what?

For example, Designated Survivor; when they premiered the first season was pure political drama that was enjoyable without any agenda evident in its plot. By the third season they had introduced a Trans sister-in-law of the president and one black LGBTQ guy who works directly with the president creating content for him. They had started showing us video of the guy's same-sex relationship with another guy....etc.

I'm just like: "where is this coming from"?

This Tyler Perry's "Beauty in Black" too, one can tell he actually put serious efforts into developing the LGBTQ characters in the series; even when it's obvious the series would still make sense without all the LGBTQ characters in the series sef.

Not like there's anything one can do to change it o, but I'm curious as to whether it's the financiers that insist they carry the LGBTQ community along with their series/movies or whether it's the networks like Netflix, Amazon Prime, HBO etc that makes it mandatory for them.

BlueRayDick:
@Iamoyindamola wassup with all these American TV series nowadays with the way they casually introduce LGBTQ agenda from nowhere?

Is it that the financiers of those series always insist they build in LGBTQ agenda into the movie/series plot before they give them access to funds or what?

For example, Designated Survivor; when they premiered the first season was pure political drama that was enjoyable without any agenda evident in its plot. By the third season they had introduced a Trans sister-in-law of the president and one black LGBTQ guy who works directly with the president creating content for him. They had started showing us video of the guy's same-sex relationship with another guy....etc.

I'm just like: "where is this coming from"?

This Tyler Perry's "Beauty in Black" too, one can tell he actually put serious efforts into developing the LGBTQ characters in the series; even when it's obvious the series would still make sense without all the LGBTQ characters in the series sef.

Not like there's anything one can do to change it o, but I'm curious as to whether it's the financiers that insist they carry the LGBTQ community along with their series/movies or whether it's the networks like Netflix, Amazon Prime, HBO etc that makes it mandatory for them.

izzou:
The Beauty in Black own too much

Ballzproblemm:
hand money to access to best healthcare and lost 🤷

iamoyindamola:
Una they use Tyler Perry play
Why do you think ibime para for me for all the queen's men

Cc BlueRayDick

izzou:
It's not as if the plot had anything to do with sexual preferences

Just forcing men's nyash in our faces over nothing

BlueRayDick:
@Iamoyindamola wassup with all these American TV series nowadays with the way they casually introduce LGBTQ agenda from nowhere?

Is it that the financiers of those series always insist they build in LGBTQ agenda into the movie/series plot before they give them access to funds or what?

For example, Designated Survivor; when they premiered the first season was pure political drama that was enjoyable without any agenda evident in its plot. By the third season they had introduced a Trans sister-in-law of the president and one black LGBTQ guy who works directly with the president creating content for him. They had started showing us video of the guy's same-sex relationship with another guy....etc.

I'm just like: "where is this coming from"?

This Tyler Perry's "Beauty in Black" too, one can tell he actually put serious efforts into developing the LGBTQ characters in the series; even when it's obvious the series would still make sense without all the LGBTQ characters in the series sef.

Not like there's anything one can do to change it o, but I'm curious as to whether it's the financiers that insist they carry the LGBTQ community along with their series/movies or whether it's the networks like Netflix, Amazon Prime, HBO etc that makes it mandatory for them.