₦airaland Forum

ValeeLove:
so?

Cam’ron responds to Roman Reigns calling him a washed up rapper, challenges The Usos at SummerSlam

(IG) pic.twitter.com/K5ZInkmnE2

— WrestlePurists (@WrestlePurists) April 22, 2026

CoolUsername:
Because a site where regular people can rate matches but has such little turnout is not an authoritative or representative source by any stretch of the imagination.

ValeeLove:
well then create or pick your authoritative source. They've been doing it for years and many people like them and respect their opinion.
And 93 is not little.

wait she’s good asf in the ring i might have to stan 😭 pic.twitter.com/7Me0sMZ4Kj

— 𝓙𝓸𝓱𝓷 (@TwistedJohnX) April 22, 2026

wait she’s good asf in the ring i might have to stan 😭 pic.twitter.com/7Me0sMZ4Kj

— 𝓙𝓸𝓱𝓷 (@TwistedJohnX) April 22, 2026

CoolUsername:
The fact that they've been doing it for years and still can't get more than 93 voters is honestly embarrassing

ValeeLove:
this is just straw grasping. Oya bring the legit platform now let's compare.

CoolUsername:
Legit platform? How about having an independent opinion?

ValeeLove:
well I independently think Cagematch is legit. You can independently think otherwise but I'll independently disagree.

CoolUsername:
Bro rest. It's obvious you didn't even watch the match. You first did everything to avoid giving Jade Cargill any credit, now you've resorted to using Cagematch (a small of group of forks) ratings as a crutch

ValeeLove:
well I independently think Cagematch is legit. You can independently think otherwise but I'll independently disagree.

samistry:
Let's not act like cagematch is 100% legit without troll or bias. Remember the TNA fiasco last year?

https://www.reddit.com/r/SquaredCircle/comments/1m64dux/cagematchnet_releases_a_statement_regarding_the

ValeeLove:
it's not like if I watch and drop my opinion you'd respect it anyway, and now when a reverred platform drops theirs you still want to find a way to deligitimize them. Drop your legit platform now you dey gaslight.

ValeeLove:
93 people cannot be biased now, haba. Oya bring the unbiased now let's examine it. You guys cannot continue to mention problems without at least preferring solutions.

MARK DAVIS WAS GONNA FINISH OFF OSPREAY BUT THE DEATH RIDERS STOPPED HIM!

MOX ACTUALLY SAVED OSPREAY! #AEWDynamite pic.twitter.com/2S5KI3gFxD

— WrestlePurists (@WrestlePurists) April 23, 2026

CoolUsername:
I don't care about or need a "legit" platform to tell me how to feel about a match I watched.
That said, Cagematch is not a revered platform. It is a small number of pro wrestling smarks circlejerking their favourites. If you didn't watch the match, cool. You just don't get to have an opinion about it that can be taken seriously by me and Cagematch is not a replacement for that.

samistry:
What is this one saying or do you like arguing for argument sake? Folks were down voting and trolling TNA show last year to a hyperbolic degree. It got so bad the mods there had to put measures in place.

There was another incident there with folks trolling over summerslam last year.
https://www.cagematch.net/?id=555&nr=2772

That means it's not "100% unbiased" without flaws as a group of bad actors can band together to influence decisions.
Imagine folks rating Evil NJPW matches 6.66 just for the lols.

You can view historical data of who wrestled who and when but don't take it as the 100% perfect accurate review. It's same for movie review sites too.

I use reddit and twitter to gauge reactions more than cagematch.

ValeeLove:
I haven't even had an opinion. My first claim was even if it was good, it was probably just heavily choreographed and she had a pro to follow hence she may not be able to replicate it. Then I checked Cagematch (a reverred platform) and saw a 6. You guys say it's propaganda but still can't bring a non-propaganda platform to juxtapose; gaslighting much? And to end the argument, it doesn't matter if I watched the match and gave my true to God honest opinion because at the end of the day no one takes me serious right?
It's also funny how you guys reference Cagematch when it suits your agenda but call it political when it doesn't. Hypocrite much?

ValeeLove:
I haven't even had an opinion. My first claim was even if it was good, it was probably just heavily choreographed and she had a pro to follow hence she may not be able to replicate it. Then I checked Cagematch (a reverred platform) and saw a 6. You guys say it's propaganda but still can't bring a non-propaganda platform to juxtapose; gaslighting much? And to end the argument, it doesn't matter if I watched the match and gave my true to God honest opinion because at the end of the day no one takes me serious right?
It's also funny how you guys reference Cagematch when it suits your agenda but call it political when it doesn't. Hypocrite much?

CoolUsername:
When have I ever not dunked on Cagematch? Cagematch wishes it was propaganda, it's actually just a circlejerk of dorks that nobody cares about. It doesn't move the needle in anyway.
I have a simple rule, if you didn't watch it, your opinion on it is disregarded.
The reason why I don't take your opinions seriously is because you don't watch (or at least claim not to), get all your info from smark sources like Cagematch and then think parroting the opinions of dorks on the shit you didn't watch should hold any weight.

samistry:
If you're referencing the 3 star match Willow and Kamille had on cagematch. Folks were already shi*ting on that match on reddit. On a sub that leaned much towards AEW.
I called out cagematch last year on this thread when the TNA controversy came out.
I no know which hypocrisy you dey refer

ValeeLove:
pick a side! Are you referencing it in the future or not?

ValeeLove:
Deal, i don't have an opinion and probably won't not until I watch it in the future. My point is she should do it again and again and again; and if she can't then most likely Jade Cargill sucks.
I'm not a fan, but if it's news worthy I'll see it. When Cargill won her first title I watched it and even gave her compliments (Samistry can bear me witness) but I watched others and they weren't impressive. At least you need to be consistent for me to believe that you've actually improved so I hold my opinion till I see change.

And no, you don't take me seriously because I said gimmicks and storylines don't work - my completely independent opinion, that's why I called you a hypocrite. It doesn't matter what I do, you'll condemn it.

CoolUsername:
The fact that you came up with an opinion on your own doesn't mean I have to agree with it.

samistry:
Good thing is I always have receipts.
Bad thing for those who admit they don't watch, lack comprehension but are ever in the mood to argue.
I already explained myself about the Willow vs Kamille match. Folks on reddit were dunking on that match. Cagematch only validated opinions I saw on Reddit. A sub which is kinder to AEW.

You can say reddit and twitter have biased takes. Aggregate the sources and come up with your opinions.
I've already presented two reports earlier that proved cagematch can be flawed. It's not absolute objectivity as you propose.

By the way. Another stinker match dropped on Dynamite this week. I didn't need cagematch or reddit to know bcoz I watched the show unlike you .

CoolUsername:
WWE releases so far:

Nikki Cross
Zoey Stark
Andre Chase
Alba Fyre
Dexter Lumis
Joe Gacy
Bo Dallas
Erick Rowan
Dante Chen

ValeeLove:
dude, it's simple, since Cagematch isn't legit don't reference them anymore.

Don't worry, I'll watch it and I'll have my objective view.