₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,329,382 members, 8,440,339 topics. Date: Monday, 06 July 2026 at 07:40 PM

Toggle theme

ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement - Politics (10) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement (32251 Views)

1 2 3 ... 7 8 9 10 Reply (Go Down)

Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by 8starmember: 9:10pm On Apr 30
goslowgoslow:
Tell me which government wey una don ever like?
Are you not in Nigeria

Ask yourself that question
Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by LottiOk: 9:33pm On Apr 30
Gbam‼️🙋🏿
The same folks who danced and sang along to Edris Abdulkarim-Nigeria Jaga Jaga to demonize d OBJ government will lie and shamelessly gaslight you that it wasn't as bad as this then.

I gave up on trying to understand the crazy reasoning pattern of the average hate filled Nigerian citizen after Buhari was relected in '19🙆🏿 😲😁😅😂🤣

Government after Government has been vilified,castigated and branded as the worst, so PBAT's own won't be the 1st nor the last.

My joy is that PBAT is the 1st to do what all his predecessor couldn't do and watching those who had previously bleed 9ja dry can't do more that try to fuel the inbred hate in the heart of some set of Nigerian for their country.

Abegi, leave them, their hate has never achieved anything in their favor, and those they hate keep making progress and outlives many of them.



goslowgoslow:
Tell me which government wey una don ever like?
Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by bigpicture001: 9:34pm On Apr 30
I am so dieing with latter...so u guyz DNT know this judgement is rendered as directed by tinubu?

Okay, u think SC just did judgement just like that...see the rhetorics from.the northern state is UNREST if ADC is disqualified...

That means tinubu wen to the plan B simple!
Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Emzedz: 9:43pm On Apr 30
Useless n incompetent tinibu should prepare his handover notes
Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by kennyz247(m): 9:57pm On Apr 30
Vision101:
The SC asked them to go back to the FHC. The case will continue. Any decision taken by Mark and company if they lose Zamfara situation will happen to them even if they win any election. There's nothing to celebrate here. Any politician contesting under ADC is gambling. The mines are laid.
APC narration
Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by pavoda: 10:06pm On Apr 30
According to the affidavit filed by INEC official, the commission received a letter from ADC on July 4, 2025, inviting it to monitor the party’s NEC meeting scheduled for July 29, 2025, at its global campus in Abuja.

INEC officials attended and monitored the meeting, after which they submitted a report at the commission’s headquarters. The report confirmed that during the NEC meeting, changes were made to the party’s leadership, with Mark appointed as Caretaker/interim National Chairman and Aregbesola as National Secretary pending a valid convention.

Following this development, INEC updated its website to reflect the new leadership, including the full list of national officers.

The affidavit further argues that:
* The NEC meeting had already been held.
* The former leadership resigned and new officers were appointed.
* INEC has already recognized and published the new leadership.

It also states that:
* A court injunction cannot stop actions that have already been completed.
* The matter concerns internal party affairs.
* Courts generally do not interfere in such political questions unless it involves party primaries.

In essence, INEC is saying the issue is already settled administratively and falls within the party’s internal processes, not something for the court to reverse at this stage.


Cyberterror:
No it didn't affirm Mark's faction. It only says that it monitored the Congress that brought the Mark faction into office which doesn't legitimize it when the foundation is faulty. If it was siding with Mark, it would have asked the court to strike the case down.
Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Orinechi: 10:19pm On Apr 30
koning:
The supreme court did declare Mark the authentic chairman. If you can learn to read between the lines and decipher coded language.

The supreme court nullified a decision from the court of appeal which is a higher appellate court to the high courts.

The FHC cannot come to any other decision when and if it hears the case again. Only people who support evil are opposing the supreme court judgement.
If this news is anything to go by, there is no where where it stated that Mark was declared the authentic leader of the party rather the case was sent back to trial court for determination. The case is still open. It can still go either way.
Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by qtx(m): 10:21pm On Apr 30
Cyberterror:
The Supreme Court has made it clear that INEC should not obey any court order at all regarding the internal affairs of a party. Simply because it is INEC's prerogative to be the arbiter.
You got it wrong. Supreme court is saying no court and not even the INEC has the power to interfere in the internal issues of a democratic party, you know why? BC the party itself is governed by its own constitution. Of course if the courts are not permitted to, why would INEC be doing it? INEC has her own responsibility but not in arbitrating on internal affairs of a party. If it's still hard for you to get, ask a lawyer to explain more.
Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by goslowgoslow(m): 10:25pm On Apr 30
8starmember:
Are you not in Nigeria

Ask yourself that question
Why are you using question to answer question?
Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Ibehchizzy: 11:17pm On Apr 30
Cyberterror:
The court never said that David Mark is the authentic chairman. INEC still has the constitutional right to decide the authentic ADC leadership.
see as u dey cry
Hide your head in shame
Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by pavoda: 11:37pm On Apr 30
INEC has done the right thing Sir
Cyberterror:
No it didn't affirm Mark's faction. It only says that it monitored the Congress that brought the Mark faction into office which doesn't legitimize it when the foundation is faulty. If it was siding with Mark, it would have asked the court to strike the case down.
Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Akungitit: 12:05am On May 01
Looks to me like nobody in ADC has sense,why celebrate when there's already another high court judgement nullifying ADC convention. The best thing for these displaced ADC people is to look for another platform.
Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by Scamburster(m): 12:58am On May 01
PenSniper:
Very bad news for Giringori Peter Obi the packaged fraud.

Now, he has no excuse whatsoever to jump ship.

With or without the ADC ticket, he is stuck in there.
Anyway, the ticket is already labeled.
What concerns po here, evil 😈 people.
Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by ufotunang: 5:27am On May 01
Shantyken:
The thing shock me to see ADC members celebrating oooo.
.. and them going back to the trial court will waste their time to meet up with INEC deadline and primaries..so it's better they defect to another party a party like NDC party
Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by ogascomax: 7:31am On May 01
MasterTeeUSA:
Since you want to educate me, how do you remove the bottlenecks in that part of the constitution? What did ADC constitution say about changing the constitution of the party? You do it without all stakeholders on board? Even ADC had issues with the previous National Chairman whose tenure had expired. Maybe you have not been following ADC before now.
Understand something, those people denying now that they were not present when the NWC rectified it were present then. They are all playing to the galaxy now.
Re: ADC: Supreme Court Upholds David Mark's Appeal, nullifies ante bellum judgement by MasterTeeUSA: 12:32pm On May 02
Still doesn't change the fact that ADC David Mack didnt plan very well. When I buy simple land, I record the handover signing of documents and signatures. How do you take over a party and also want to take over the State Chapters without negotiation
..reason Ireti Kingibe was removed by Abuja chapter only to be reinstated by David Mack and the Ward Chairman removed.




ogascomax:
Understand something, those people denying now that they were not present when the NWC rectified it were present then. They are all playing to the galaxy now.
1 2 3 ... 7 8 9 10 Reply

Ante Bellum: ADC Supporters Celebrate At The Supreme Court (video)ADC Crisis: Supreme Court Hears David Mark’s Appeal On TuesdayAppeal Court Dismisses David Mark’s Appeal In ADC Leadership Dispute234

Court Halts Impeachment Move Against FayoseGunmen Declare 10-Day Sit-At-Home In Enugu Communities, Order Markets To Shut24/7 Power Supply In Port-Harcourt