₦airaland Forum

The current state of Nigeria under President Bola Tinubu's leadership has raised concerns among citizens, prompting calls for his impeachment. With the country grappling with hunger, bad governance, and economic instability, it's imperative for lawmakers to reassess the president's performance and consider taking drastic measures.

The 1999 Nigerian Constitution provides clear guidelines for impeachment proceedings. Section 143(1) states that the president can be removed from office for "gross misconduct". Given the widespread discontent with Tinubu's administration, lawmakers must evaluate whether his actions constitute gross misconduct.

President Tinubu's inability to effectively address hunger and economic instability has exacerbated the suffering of Nigerians. The recent nationwide protests against hunger and bad governance underscore the need for urgent action. Lawmakers must consider whether Tinubu's leadership has violated the constitution and compromised the well-being of citizens.

To initiate impeachment proceedings, a simple majority vote is required in the House of Representatives, followed by a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate. Lawmakers must prioritize the nation's interests over party affiliations and take decisive action.


Nigerian lawmakers have a constitutional duty to ho6ld the president accountable. We urge them to:

1. Assess President Tinubu's performance: Evaluate his leadership and determine whether it constitutes gross misconduct.
2. Initiate impeachment proceedings: Follow constitutional guidelines to remove the president from office.
3. Prioritize national interests: Put the needs of Nigerians above party loyalty.

The time for action is now. Lawmakers must demonstrate their commitment to the nation's well-being and take bold steps to address the current leadership crisis.

That can't happen with the current senate. Just 2 weeks ago the senate president was even commending the president's and telling his colleagues why it is better to borrow. Impeach Jagaban? that doesn't sound Nigerian, and very impossible.

Jakarta:
That can't happen with the current senate. Just 2 weeks ago the senate president was even commending the president's and telling his colleagues why it is better to borrow. Impeach Jagaban? that doesn't sound Nigerian, and very impossible.

Nobody said it’s happening tomorrow. But ‘impossible’ is what they said about Buhari defeating PDP in 2015. Politics changes fast. Senate today, different tomorrow.
Senate presidents commend presidents all the time — that’s their job. But remember: Saraki and Lawan both clashed with their presidents. Senate loyalty isn’t forever.
It sounds ‘un-Nigerian’ because we’ve never done it. But the constitution says it’s possible. If Nigerians are angry enough, even the ‘impossible’ becomes real.

You’re right — today it looks impossible. The Senate President is backing Tinubu, and borrowing is the current plan. But the constitution doesn’t require ‘Nigerian’ to impeach. It requires 2/3 of Senate and House. If Tinubu breaks the law, ignores the National Assembly, or triggers mass protests, the math changes.

Radicalwarrior:
Nobody said it’s happening tomorrow. But ‘impossible’ is what they said about Buhari defeating PDP in 2015. Politics changes fast. Senate today, different tomorrow.
Senate presidents commend presidents all the time — that’s their job. But remember: Saraki and Lawan both clashed with their presidents. Senate loyalty isn’t forever.
It sounds ‘un-Nigerian’ because we’ve never done it. But the constitution says it’s possible. If Nigerians are angry enough, even the ‘impossible’ becomes real.

You’re right — today it looks impossible. The Senate President is backing Tinubu, and borrowing is the current plan. But the constitution doesn’t require ‘Nigerian’ to impeach. It requires 2/3 of Senate and House. If Tinubu breaks the law, ignores the National Assembly, or triggers mass protests, the math changes.

This senate that sings on your mandate up and down can't impeach Tinubu. Buhari hd the US support when he wanted to contest so it was evident he will win.

OneCandleAway:
This senate that sings on your mandate up and down can't impeach Tinubu. Buhari hd the US support when he wanted to contest so it was evident he will win.

So because the Senate is singing now, Tinubu can’t be impeached? That’s like saying a referee who claps for a player can’t give him a red card. The rules don’t care about the song. They care about the offense.
True, this Senate is pro-Tinubu now. But impeachment isn’t about singing. It’s about the law. If Tinubu violates the constitution, or if the economy collapses, that same Senate will change tune. Remember: The same Senate that sang ‘Buhari till 2023’ was the one that voted against his loan requests and blocked some of his nominees. When interest changes, the song changes. ‘Singing on your mandate’ is not in the constitution — 2/3 votes is.

Tinubu could be in the same spot. If he delivers, no one will talk impeachment. If he doesn’t, even his singers will leave the choir.


Buhari had US support in 2015, but that didn’t win him the election — Nigerians did. If Buhari could lose 3 times before winning, then nothing is ‘evident’ until votes are counted. Tinubu’s US backing doesn’t stop a Nigerian from beating him if people are tired.

Radicalwarrior:
The current state of Nigeria under President Bola Tinubu's leadership has raised concerns among citizens, prompting calls for his impeachment. With the country grappling with hunger, bad governance, and economic instability, it's imperative for lawmakers to reassess the president's performance and consider taking drastic measures.

The 1999 Nigerian Constitution provides clear guidelines for impeachment proceedings. Section 143(1) states that the president can be removed from office for "gross misconduct". Given the widespread discontent with Tinubu's administration, lawmakers must evaluate whether his actions constitute gross misconduct.

President Tinubu's inability to effectively address hunger and economic instability has exacerbated the suffering of Nigerians. The recent nationwide protests against hunger and bad governance underscore the need for urgent action. Lawmakers must consider whether Tinubu's leadership has violated the constitution and compromised the well-being of citizens.

To initiate impeachment proceedings, a simple majority vote is required in the House of Representatives, followed by a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate. Lawmakers must prioritize the nation's interests over party affiliations and take decisive action.


Nigerian lawmakers have a constitutional duty to ho6ld the president accountable. We urge them to:

1. Assess President Tinubu's performance: Evaluate his leadership and determine whether it constitutes gross misconduct.
2. Initiate impeachment proceedings: Follow constitutional guidelines to remove the president from office.
3. Prioritize national interests: Put the needs of Nigerians above party loyalty.

The time for action is now. Lawmakers must demonstrate their commitment to the nation's well-being and take bold steps to address the current leadership crisis.

lol

You now see BAT doing a solid second term of 4ys and so that's what motivated you to post this AI assisted bullcrap.

Pathetic,

Radicalwarrior:
So because the Senate is singing now, Tinubu can’t be impeached? That’s like saying a referee who claps for a player can’t give him a red card. The rules don’t care about the song. They care about the offense.
True, this Senate is pro-Tinubu now. But impeachment isn’t about singing. It’s about the law. If Tinubu violates the constitution, or if the economy collapses, that same Senate will change tune. Remember: The same Senate that sang ‘Buhari till 2023’ was the one that voted against his loan requests and blocked some of his nominees. When interest changes, the song changes. ‘Singing on your mandate’ is not in the constitution — 2/3 votes is.

Tinubu could be in the same spot. If he delivers, no one will talk impeachment. If he doesn’t, even his singers will leave the choir.


Buhari had US support in 2015, but that didn’t win him the election — Nigerians did. If Buhari could lose 3 times before winning, then nothing is ‘evident’ until votes are counted. Tinubu’s US backing doesn’t stop a Nigerian from beating him if people are tired.

You can't compare a saraki to akpabio. They are worlds apart.

Radicalwarrior:
The current state of Nigeria under President Bola Tinubu's leadership has raised concerns among citizens, prompting calls for his impeachment. With the country grappling with hunger, bad governance, and economic instability, it's imperative for lawmakers to reassess the president's performance and consider taking drastic measures.

The 1999 Nigerian Constitution provides clear guidelines for impeachment proceedings. Section 143(1) states that the president can be removed from office for "gross misconduct". Given the widespread discontent with Tinubu's administration, lawmakers must evaluate whether his actions constitute gross misconduct.

President Tinubu's inability to effectively address hunger and economic instability has exacerbated the suffering of Nigerians. The recent nationwide protests against hunger and bad governance underscore the need for urgent action. Lawmakers must consider whether Tinubu's leadership has violated the constitution and compromised the well-being of citizens.

To initiate impeachment proceedings, a simple majority vote is required in the House of Representatives, followed by a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate. Lawmakers must prioritize the nation's interests over party affiliations and take decisive action.


Nigerian lawmakers have a constitutional duty to ho6ld the president accountable. We urge them to:

1. Assess President Tinubu's performance: Evaluate his leadership and determine whether it constitutes gross misconduct.
2. Initiate impeachment proceedings: Follow constitutional guidelines to remove the president from office.
3. Prioritize national interests: Put the needs of Nigerians above party loyalty.

The time for action is now. Lawmakers must demonstrate their commitment to the nation's well-being and take bold steps to address the current leadership crisis.

The MOD need to van this guy spreading fake news and misleading people here please.☹️

FSBoperator:
lol

You now see BAT doing a solid second term of 4ys and so that's what motivated you to post this AI assisted bullcrap.

Pathetic,

Lol

BAT is doing his second term? 2027 hasn’t happened yet. Calling it ‘AI assisted bullcrap’ doesn’t change the fact that the South East is asking for equity. If you think that’s pathetic, then democracy itself is pathetic to you.

You can laugh, but laughing doesn’t cancel the constitution. ‘AI assisted bullcrap’ is what people said about Obi in 2023 too. Look how that ended. You can’t insult your way out of a zoning debate.

Tinubu is a one term president because Nigerians have rejected him.

A Tinubu vs Atiku vs Peter Obi vs Kwankwanso on 2027 Ballots Will Produce The Same Results Like We Had in 2023.
Kwankwanso Doesn't Look Ready to deputize Obi Going By His Press Statements Yesterday,

OneCandleAway:
You can't compare a saraki to akpabio. They are worlds apart.

Saraki and Akpabio are worlds apart — I agree. But both were Senate Presidents who didn’t always bow to their president. Saraki clashed with Buhari. Akpabio is clashing with no one now. The point isn’t who they are, it’s that Senate loyalty isn’t permanent. It shifts when interests shift.

If they’re worlds apart, then your argument falls apart. You can’t say ‘Saraki did it’ to prove it’s possible, then say ‘but Akpabio is different’ to prove it’s impossible. Either the Senate can act independently or it can’t. Which is it?

Hehehehehe

You idealists sef! Which national assembly is going to initiate impeachment proceedings and successfully impeach Tinubu? Is it the Akabio led one that's firmly in Tinubus' pocket?

Antoeni:
A Tinubu vs Atiku vs Peter Obi vs Kwankwanso on 2027 Ballots Will Produce The Same Results Like We Had in 2023.
Kwankwanso Doesn't Look Ready to deputize Obi Going By His Press Statements Yesterday,

You said ‘Tinubu vs Atiku vs Obi vs Kwankwaso will produce same result’. But in 2023 you were saying ‘Obi can’t win’. So now Obi is a threat enough to guarantee Tinubu wins? Make up your mind. If he’s not a factor, why mention him?


You can’t say ‘same result’ when the conditions are different. In 2023, Tinubu had the incumbent advantage, PDP was split, and Obi was new. In 2027, Tinubu will be incumbent with economic hardship. People don’t vote the same way when their stomachs are empty. So no, it won’t be the same.

Radicalwarrior:
Nobody said it’s happening tomorrow. But ‘impossible’ is what they said about Buhari defeating PDP in 2015. Politics changes fast. Senate today, different tomorrow.
Senate presidents commend presidents all the time — that’s their job. But remember: Saraki and Lawan both clashed with their presidents. Senate loyalty isn’t forever.
It sounds ‘un-Nigerian’ because we’ve never done it. But the constitution says it’s possible. If Nigerians are angry enough, even the ‘impossible’ becomes real.

You’re right — today it looks impossible. The Senate President is backing Tinubu, and borrowing is the current plan. But the constitution doesn’t require ‘Nigerian’ to impeach. It requires 2/3 of Senate and House. If Tinubu breaks the law, ignores the National Assembly, or triggers mass protests, the math changes.

Lol!! I don't think you understood the Nigerian context here. Given the Nigerian factor it is impossible for the current senate to impeach Tinubu. It is the Nigerian factor that made the legislators to defend the actions of the executive. Same legislators that are already singing on your mandate we stand for Tinubu? Bro abeg wakeup from sleep.

IGBOSON1:
Hehehehehe

You idealists sef! Which national assembly is going to initiate impeachment proceedings and successfully impeach Tinubu? Is it the Akabio led one that's firmly in Tinubus' pocket?

Hehe. Akpabio is ‘firmly in Tinubu’s pocket’ today. But Saraki was ‘firmly in Buhari’s pocket’ until 2018. Lawan was ‘firmly in Buhari’s pocket’ until APC primaries. The pocket changes when interest changes. That’s politics.


So because Akpabio is loyal now, Tinubu can’t be impeached? That’s like saying ‘my referee is my friend, so I can’t get a red card’. Impeachment is in the constitution, not in Akpabio’s loyalty. If Tinubu breaks the law, even his pocket will be emptied.


You idealists? Lol. In 2018, the same APC senators that were ‘firmly in Buhari’s pocket’ were threatening impeachment and defecting. So which one is it? Is it only idealistic when it’s not your man?

OneCandleAway:
You can't compare a saraki to akpabio. They are worlds apart.

Sure, they're oceans apart (apologies to Richard Marx), but both are essentially still your average self-centred Nigerian politician!

Jakarta:
Lol!! I don't think you understood the Nigerian context here. Given the Nigerian factor it is impossible for the current senate to impeach Tinubu. It is the Nigerian factor that made the legislators to defend the actions of the executive. Same legislators that are already singing on your mandate we stand for Tinubu? Bro abeg wakeup from sleep.

Bro, I’m awake. You’re the one sleeping on history. ‘Singing on your mandate’ was the same song for Buhari in 2015. By 2018, those same legislators were trying to impeach him. The Nigerian factor is loyalty to interest, not loyalty to one man. When interest changes, the song changes.

The ‘Nigerian factor’ is what made Saraki’s Senate threaten Buhari with impeachment in 2018. Same factor made Lawan’s Senate block Buhari’s loan request. So which ‘Nigerian factor’ are you talking about? The one that works for Tinubu today, or the one that worked against Buhari yesterday?

So the ‘Nigerian factor’ means the Senate can’t impeach Tinubu, but it could threaten Buhari? Or is the Nigerian factor only when it’s your man? The constitution doesn’t say ‘Nigerian factor’. It says 2/3. If Tinubu breaks the law, that same Senate will act. Watch.

Both HOR and senate lack basic human conscience.
Their insatiable appetite for the collective commonwealth is the only thing that drives them.

They're of no use to the new Nigeria struggling to emerge and will be remembered for their treachery.

BrickandLace:
Both HOR and senate lack basic human conscience.
Their insatiable appetite for the collective commonwealth is the only thing that drives them.

They're of no use to the new Nigeria struggling to emerge and will be remembered for their treachery.

I get the anger. But saying they all lack conscience is how we excuse ourselves from acting. Not every HOR or Senate member is corrupt. Some are trying. The problem is we don’t protect the good ones when they stand up. If we want a new Nigeria, we have to start by voting out the treacherous ones, not by writing everyone off.

That’s how people felt about Buhari in 2011. ‘All politicians are the same’. Then 2015 happened. If we keep saying ‘they’re useless’, we’re giving them permission to keep being useless. The new Nigeria starts when we treat elections like war, not like prayer.

Radicalwarrior:
Bro, I’m awake. You’re the one sleeping on history. ‘Singing on your mandate’ was the same song for Buhari in 2015. By 2018, those same legislators were trying to impeach him. The Nigerian factor is loyalty to interest, not loyalty to one man. When interest changes, the song changes.

The ‘Nigerian factor’ is what made Saraki’s Senate threaten Buhari with impeachment in 2018. Same factor made Lawan’s Senate block Buhari’s loan request. So which ‘Nigerian factor’ are you talking about? The one that works for Tinubu today, or the one that worked against Buhari yesterday?

So the ‘Nigerian factor’ means the Senate can’t impeach Tinubu, but it could threaten Buhari? Or is the Nigerian factor only when it’s your man? The constitution doesn’t say ‘Nigerian factor’. It says 2/3. If Tinubu breaks the law, that same Senate will act. Watch.

In all your ranting you couldn't even name one Nigerian civilian president that the legislators has successfully impeached. I guessed you are the one that stopped those impeachment moves you made mentioned of. If Obj had these same sets of legislators who are at Tinubu's beck and call, he would have actualised his 3 tenures plan.

Your if Tinubu breaks the law he will be impeached narrative is a weak attempt of you running away from reality. Your assumptions of Tinubu being my man, tells a lot about how you think. Ogbeni dey there they dream why reality dey press your neck.

Jakarta:
In all your ranting you couldn't even name one Nigerian civilian president that the legislators has successfully impeached. I guessed you are the one that stopped those impeachment moves you made mentioned of. If Obj had these same sets of legislators who are at Tinubu's beck and call, he would have actualised his 3 tenures plan.

Your if Tinubu breaks the law he will be impeached narrative is a weak attempt of you running away from reality. Your assumptions of Tinubu being my man, tells a lot about how you think. Ogbeni dey there they dream why reality dey press your neck.

Lol
So because no one has been impeached, we should just assume it’s impossible? That’s like saying ‘no one has died from smoking’ until they do. I’m not running away from reality. I’m refusing to be held hostage by your ‘it’s never happened’ nonsense. If Tinubu breaks the law, he’ll be the first. That’s how history is made.

Obj didn’t actualize 3rd term because the Senate said no. Same Senate you say is ‘at Tinubu’s beck and call’. So even when legislators were loyal to OBJ, they still stopped him. That means the Senate can say no. So your argument collapses: if they could stop OBJ, they can stop Tinubu too.

You want me to name a Nigerian civilian president that was impeached? I’ll name one when it happens. But let’s not pretend ‘it hasn’t happened’ means ‘it’s impossible’. You’re confusing ‘hasn’t’ with ‘won’t’. The constitution doesn’t care about your ‘reality’. It cares about 2/3. If Tinubu breaks the law, the Senate will act — or Nigeria will act on the Senate.

Can SATAN cast out SATAN?😁
We don’t need impeachment.
We need the smelling, mandate-thief OUT of Aso Rock!

Simple.

Kanwulia:
Can SATAN cast out SATAN?😁
We don’t need impeachment.
We need the smelling, mandate-thief OUT of Aso Rock!

Simple.

SATAN can cast out SATAN!

Impeaching tinubu is possible.

Hehe. So 'Satan can't cast out Satan' but 'we need the mandate-thief out'? Bro, you're basically saying 'I want the house to be clean but I don't want to sweep'. Impeachment is the sweep. You either want the job done or you just want to complain.

So 'we don't need impeachment' but 'we need him out'? Make up your mind. If you want him out, then impeachment is literally the constitutional way to do it. Or are you suggesting we use 'Nigerian factor' to remove him? Because that's called a coup, not democracy.

Radicalwarrior:
Lol
So because no one has been impeached, we should just assume it’s impossible? That’s like saying ‘no one has died from smoking’ until they do. I’m not running away from reality. I’m refusing to be held hostage by your ‘it’s never happened’ nonsense. If Tinubu breaks the law, he’ll be the first. That’s how history is made.

Obj didn’t actualize 3rd term because the Senate said no. Same Senate you say is ‘at Tinubu’s beck and call’. So even when legislators were loyal to OBJ, they still stopped him. That means the Senate can say no. So your argument collapses: if they could stop OBJ, they can stop Tinubu too.

You want me to name a Nigerian civilian president that was impeached? I’ll name one when it happens. But let’s not pretend ‘it hasn’t happened’ means ‘it’s impossible’. You’re confusing ‘hasn’t’ with ‘won’t’. The constitution doesn’t care about your ‘reality’. It cares about 2/3. If Tinubu breaks the law, the Senate will act — or Nigeria will act on the Senate.

You are sounding very inconsistent, and without direction. So far has Tinubu flaunt any of Nigeria's law, if YES Why then is he still occupying his seat? If NO why not wait till Tinubu break's the law and watch what happens next, instead of ranting carelessly?

Talking about laws, does Nigeria laws gives the president powers to suspend a sitting governor, and a state's house of assembly members? Is it not an offence for police to demand money for bail?

You are a poor student of history, go and read more about Nigeria's past presidents, and their legislators, and you will notice which of the president's has enjoyed loyal support from the senate more. Your current senate President once said that the National Assembly is "2000 percent behind Tinubu and that they are standing on his mandate".

In closing nobody is arguing that Tinubu can't be impeached, but the reality is, given the Nigerian factor, it is more possible for the head of a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than Tinubu impeachment proceedings even if you rant from now till thy kingdom come lol!!!

Radicalwarrior:
SATAN can cast out SATAN!

Impeaching tinubu is possible.

Hehe. So 'Satan can't cast out Satan' but 'we need the mandate-thief out'? Bro, you're basically saying 'I want the house to be clean but I don't want to sweep'. Impeachment is the sweep. You either want the job done or you just want to complain.

So 'we don't need impeachment' but 'we need him out'? Make up your mind. If you want him out, then impeachment is literally the constitutional way to do it. Or are you suggesting we use 'Nigerian factor' to remove him? Because that's called a coup, not democracy.

How many months of impeachment drama?😁 I want a humiliating defeat. Please, aim higher.

Disillusioned OP posting rubbish with his fellow Short sighted people, impeachment ko imperial ni ! 4 +4 =8 president tinubu till 2031 inshallah