₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,326,445 members, 8,426,567 topics. Date: Sunday, 14 June 2026 at 01:21 PM

Toggle theme

Adoke: Excessive Election Litigation Weakening Nigeria’s Democracy - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsAdoke: Excessive Election Litigation Weakening Nigeria’s Democracy (1272 Views)

Poll: After Heavy and Obvious Rigging at the polls, the APC will boldly tell you to "GO TO COURT" because they have the Judiciary in their pockets and payroll. True or False ?

True 100% (6 votes)
False 0% (0 votes)
This poll has ended

1 Reply (Go Down)

Adoke: Excessive Election Litigation Weakening Nigeria’s Democracy by SlavaUkraini(op): 7:10am On May 21
Mohammed Adoke, former attorney-general of the federation (AGF) and minister of justice, says Nigeria’s excessive dependence on courts to resolve electoral disputes is gradually eroding the democratic process and weakening the role of voters in determining political outcomes.

Adoke spoke in Abuja on Wednesday while delivering the keynote address at the 2026 annual law week of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Federal Capital Territory (FCT) branch, themed “Safeguarding Nigeria’s democratic process”.

The former AGF said the country’s electoral process has become excessively “judicialised”, with politicians increasingly relying on the courts rather than the electorate to determine electoral victories.

“The increasing reliance on the courts to determine electoral outcomes is concerning,” he said.

He referenced comments by former President Goodluck Jonathan, who recently warned against the judiciary’s deepening involvement in electoral disputes.

“Recently, former President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, GCFR, expressed significant concerns about the judiciary’s heavy involvement in Nigeria’s electoral disputes, arguing that ‘the ballot paper, rather than the court, should determine winners’,” Adoke said.

“I couldn’t agree more with him. Nigeria’s electoral circles are preceded and followed by a litany of cases to determine whether a candidate was duly nominated or has been duly elected.

“Consequently, the electorate’s participation in determining their choices for the relevant political offices is gradually eroding.

“The phrase ‘go to court’ has become a silent reminder to the electorate that judges and courts determine who is actually nominated and/or elected.

“While judicial review is essential, excessive reliance on the courts to determine election outcomes risks undermining electoral legitimacy.”


Adoke said while Nigeria has sustained democratic rule since 1999, the credibility of the electoral process continues to decline.

“Democracy in Nigeria has endured since 1999. That, in itself, is no small achievement,” he said.

“But let us be honest: endurance is not the same as excellence, and continuity is not the same as credibility.

“A democracy is not measured merely by how often it holds elections but by how deeply its people trust the outcomes of those elections.”

The former AGF warned that democracy often deteriorates gradually when public confidence in elections disappears.

“Because when the process loses credibility, democracy does not collapse overnight; it erodes. Slowly. Quietly. Almost imperceptibly. Until one day, participation becomes routine, but belief has already left the room,” he said.

He said the 2023 elections worsened public distrust in the democratic process, citing violence, voter apathy and controversies surrounding the conduct of the polls.

‘POLITICAL PARTIES REPLACING INDIRECT PRIMARIES WITH CONSENSUS CANDIDATE’

The former AGF also criticised political parties for undermining internal democracy through candidate imposition and excessive monetisation of politics.

He said the high cost of nomination forms has excluded many Nigerians from the political process.

“On average, the expression of interest and nominations forms announced by political parties for the 2027 general elections range from N5 to N100 million,” he said.

The former minister noted that despite the removal of indirect primaries from the Electoral Act 2026, political parties are gradually replacing the old practice with what he called the “coronation” of candidates through consensus arrangements.

“Care should be taken not to replace them with the ‘coronation’ of candidates through the instrumentality of the consensus arrangement,” he said.

Adoke asked the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to do more to rebuild public trust.

“A situation where the credibility of the electoral management body is called into question (rightly or wrongly), as is the case today, does not augur well for Nigeria’s democratic process,” he said.

“INEC must be manifestly seen by the electorate and the political parties it regulates as operationally independent.”

“Its decisions and actions must not give the impression that it aligns with other vested interests in the political process.”

He urged Nigerians to defend democratic institutions and reject ethnic, religious and financial inducements during elections.

“The electorate must be alive to their responsibilities of determining who governs them,” he said.

“The point is that considerations such as stomach infrastructure, the candidate’s religion, ethnic base, etc. should not play a significant role in the election of candidates.”

He said democracy cannot survive if institutions become weak or compromised.

“If INEC is weak, if the judiciary is compromised, if the legislature is silent, then democracy is rendered bare,” he said.

“Democracy is not preserved by constitutions alone, nor by INEC, nor by the courts. It is preserved by a people who refuse to let it die.”
https://www.thecable.ng/adoke-excessive-election-litigation-weakening-nigerias-democracy/

Re: Adoke: Excessive Election Litigation Weakening Nigeria’s Democracy by Parachoko: 7:48am On May 21
SlavaUkraini:
Mohammed Adoke, former attorney-general of the federation (AGF) and minister of justice, says Nigeria’s excessive dependence on courts to resolve electoral disputes is gradually eroding the democratic process and weakening the role of voters in determining political outcomes.

Adoke spoke in Abuja on Wednesday while delivering the keynote address at the 2026 annual law week of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Federal Capital Territory (FCT) branch, themed “Safeguarding Nigeria’s democratic process”.

The former AGF said the country’s electoral process has become excessively “judicialised”, with politicians increasingly relying on the courts rather than the electorate to determine electoral victories.

“The increasing reliance on the courts to determine electoral outcomes is concerning,” he said.

He referenced comments by former President Goodluck Jonathan, who recently warned against the judiciary’s deepening involvement in electoral disputes.

“Recently, former President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, GCFR, expressed significant concerns about the judiciary’s heavy involvement in Nigeria’s electoral disputes, arguing that ‘the ballot paper, rather than the court, should determine winners’,” Adoke said.

“I couldn’t agree more with him. Nigeria’s electoral circles are preceded and followed by a litany of cases to determine whether a candidate was duly nominated or has been duly elected.

“Consequently, the electorate’s participation in determining their choices for the relevant political offices is gradually eroding.

“The phrase ‘go to court’ has become a silent reminder to the electorate that judges and courts determine who is actually nominated and/or elected.

“While judicial review is essential, excessive reliance on the courts to determine election outcomes risks undermining electoral legitimacy.”


Adoke said while Nigeria has sustained democratic rule since 1999, the credibility of the electoral process continues to decline.

“Democracy in Nigeria has endured since 1999. That, in itself, is no small achievement,” he said.

“But let us be honest: endurance is not the same as excellence, and continuity is not the same as credibility.

“A democracy is not measured merely by how often it holds elections but by how deeply its people trust the outcomes of those elections.”

The former AGF warned that democracy often deteriorates gradually when public confidence in elections disappears.

“Because when the process loses credibility, democracy does not collapse overnight; it erodes. Slowly. Quietly. Almost imperceptibly. Until one day, participation becomes routine, but belief has already left the room,” he said.

He said the 2023 elections worsened public distrust in the democratic process, citing violence, voter apathy and controversies surrounding the conduct of the polls.

‘POLITICAL PARTIES REPLACING INDIRECT PRIMARIES WITH CONSENSUS CANDIDATE’

The former AGF also criticised political parties for undermining internal democracy through candidate imposition and excessive monetisation of politics.

He said the high cost of nomination forms has excluded many Nigerians from the political process.

“On average, the expression of interest and nominations forms announced by political parties for the 2027 general elections range from N5 to N100 million,” he said.

The former minister noted that despite the removal of indirect primaries from the Electoral Act 2026, political parties are gradually replacing the old practice with what he called the “coronation” of candidates through consensus arrangements.

“Care should be taken not to replace them with the ‘coronation’ of candidates through the instrumentality of the consensus arrangement,” he said.

Adoke asked the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to do more to rebuild public trust.

“A situation where the credibility of the electoral management body is called into question (rightly or wrongly), as is the case today, does not augur well for Nigeria’s democratic process,” he said.

“INEC must be manifestly seen by the electorate and the political parties it regulates as operationally independent.”

“Its decisions and actions must not give the impression that it aligns with other vested interests in the political process.”

He urged Nigerians to defend democratic institutions and reject ethnic, religious and financial inducements during elections.

“The electorate must be alive to their responsibilities of determining who governs them,” he said.

“The point is that considerations such as stomach infrastructure, the candidate’s religion, ethnic base, etc. should not play a significant role in the election of candidates.”

He said democracy cannot survive if institutions become weak or compromised.

“If INEC is weak, if the judiciary is compromised, if the legislature is silent, then democracy is rendered bare,” he said.

“Democracy is not preserved by constitutions alone, nor by INEC, nor by the courts. It is preserved by a people who refuse to let it die.”

https://www.thecable.ng/adoke-excessive-election-litigation-weakening-nigerias-democracy/
I don't agree with him.

Going to Court to get things strengthen out is making our Democracy stronger
Re: Adoke: Excessive Election Litigation Weakening Nigeria’s Democracy by FineUsername(m): 9:06am On May 21
Do the right thing, let people have a 50-70% trust in the systems.


The systems are forked up!
Re: Adoke: Excessive Election Litigation Weakening Nigeria’s Democracy by Iran2025: 9:11am On May 21
Only the people want the progress of Nigeria that can conduct a credible elections not the criminals we have currently as leaders.

Count and upload results from the polling units. The idea of INEC selecting leaders for us has to stop.
Re: Adoke: Excessive Election Litigation Weakening Nigeria’s Democracy by DomPerignon: 9:14am On May 21
I will prefer that INEC is placed under the Judiciary and it's board headed by retired Supreme and Appeal court judges and all returning officers be from retired High Court judges.

The Judiciary are the ones who administered the oath of office and since 1999, the Judiciary has overturned the outcome of several elections too numerous to mention.

The Judiciary headed by the NJC under the guidance of the CJN should be the ones to constitute the board for INEC without interference from the Presidency and the only body to approve the list of members of it's board and returning officers should be the Senate.
Re: Adoke: Excessive Election Litigation Weakening Nigeria’s Democracy by duro4chang(m): 9:22am On May 21
Where was he , when he was in power? Why didn't he talk then?
Re: Adoke: Excessive Election Litigation Weakening Nigeria’s Democracy by DomPerignon: 10:41am On May 21
Parachoko:
I don't agree with him.

Going to Court to get things strengthen out is making our Democracy stronger
Thomas Massie lost the GOP primaries to return to Congress due to blatant and obvious voter fraud through mail in ballots that came in late at night when he was leading by a landslide. Over 10,000 mail in votes appeared in the dead of the night to give his opponent a last minute victory.

Trump had been declaring and threatening to remove Massie from Congress for his anti Israel stance. AIPAC and powerful Jewish billionaires pooled over $15 million in just AD revenues to have Massie lose the primaries but all that didn't work so they relied on mail in votes to rig Massie out of the race.

The rigging was so obvious and brazen and never in the history of American politics has there been a sitting President who openly declared his intention to use all his political influence to oppose the emergence of his own party's candidate .

Despite everything proving that Massie was cheated, Massie did not go to court to challenge the mail in votes which I may add was the same thing Trump claimed was used to rig him out in his first second term bid .

American courts always refuse to hear any issue on election matters other than the Al Gore Vs Bush election case.

The US courts have warned that they should not be involved in anyway in election matters as they claim that American politicians will prefer litigation to get into power. This is America that is the most litigated country on the planet.
Re: Adoke: Excessive Election Litigation Weakening Nigeria’s Democracy by anonimi: 11:30am On May 21
Wicked, ologogoro, land grabbing not only has the courts in his pockets, he even brags about it with reckless impunity.

iwaeda:
Wike Boasts Of Helping APC Use Judiciary To Kill Osun LG Funds Case, Warns Party Leaders Against Ingratitude

Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, has openly boasted that he assisted certain elements within the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in deploying the judiciary to frustrate the Osun State local government allocation lawsuit.

In a video now circulating widely on social media and obtained by SaharaReporters, Wike made the claim while addressing a crowd in Port Harcourt, Rivers State.

The former Rivers governor accused the APC National Secretary, Senator Ajibola Basiru, of benefitting from judicial actions against the Osun State Government without knowing those who did the work behind the scenes.

The suit in question led to the withholding of local government funds in Osun State, a development widely seen as targeting the administration of Governor Ademola Adeleke as opposition in the state.

Wike, who spoke angrily, suggested that the court action supporting the APC’s position against the Osun government did not happen by chance, boasting that powerful political forces worked quietly to ensure the outcome.

“Don’t take our support for Mr President for granted,” Wike warned, in an apparent message to APC leaders defending Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara. “You have to be careful about the statements you make. You have to be very careful.”

He accused Basiru of political ingratitude, claiming the APC was enjoying in Osun State without understanding who engineered their advantage.

“Today, you are enjoying in Osun. You don’t know those who did the work,” Wike said. “You are opening your mouth to talk about Rivers State.”

https://saharareporters.com/2026/01/08/wike-boasts-helping-apc-use-judiciary-kill-osun-lg-funds-case-warns-party-leaders

Re: Adoke: Excessive Election Litigation Weakening Nigeria’s Democracy by numericalguy(m): 11:51am On May 21
Na OBIDIENTS people like litigation so much because dem no dey agree even when it is clear they lost
1 Reply

Offem Uket: EFCC Sacks Prosecutor Accused Of Taking Bribe From Olanipekun, AdokeElection Litigation: Can Peter Obi Again Alter Nigeria’s Election Calendar?EFCC Threatened Me To Implicate Ex-President Jonathan, Adoke - Witness234

I Cease To Be Known As An ObidientPower Shift!Ibb Is Like A Wet Blanket In The Winter?