₦airaland Forum

AlbertNewton:
Most of the information of NDC on INEC's portal has a "By Court Order" appended in front of it, in parentheses. If you understand properly/legally why this is the case and what it implies, kindly explain.

Chucks13:
Honestly I don't care what it means but one thing is certain at a very die minute we will deregister NDC and if they attempt any appeal the court I'll nly give NDC hearing after May 2027 and NDC dead.

We warned Dickson not to align with that baggages carrier he didn't listen we will do you a very strong thing die minute to the general election, I swear eyes go turn you all.

Kukutente23:
It means their registration get K-leg and they will soon be served hot fried BATmeat peppersoup with Hero beer to wash it down

Just wait for Lifu & Co

DomPerignon:
Dickson approached INEC in 2017 to register his party, the NDC.

INEC for reasons best known to them refused to accept Dickson's application on the flimsy excuse that the NDC logo looked like another registered party's logo .

Dickson took them to court and INEC was stalling using every legal loophole and trick to postpone or adjourn the hearings.

The court got fed up with INEC and called for accelerated hearings.

When INEC could not present a registered party in their records bearing similar logo, they then went to manufacture a fake entity with same logo that was not even representing itself as a political party. INEC claimed copyright infringement as to why they can't register NDC.

The judge requested further information of the entity bearing similar logo as per CAC registration but INEC could not provide this in court.

The court then ruled that INEC had no right to stop NDC from being registered citing copyright infringement of a non existing entity and ordered INEC to register NDC immediately.

The reason INEC is affixing "by court order" next to NDC is because the ruling was retroactively applied to NDC to be registered as at 2017 before the electoral ammended Act of 2022 came into law in 2023.

NDC did not meet the conditions for a new party that will seek registration under the 2023 Act but since they were denied by INEC to be registered on flimsy excuse in 2017, the judge ruled that NDC should be registered under pre 2022 Act since they met all the conditions back then.


This is to avoid other parties taking INEC and NDC to court seeking the NDC being deregistered for not meeting the conditions of being registered as a new party under the ammended electoral Act of 2022.

Hope this explains this to you in the simplest form.

Chucks13:
Honestly I don't care what it means but one thing is certain at a very die minute we will deregister NDC and if they attempt any appeal the court I'll nly give NDC hearing after May 2027 and NDC dead.

We warned Dickson not to align with that baggages carrier he didn't listen we will do you a very strong thing die minute to the general election, I swear eyes go turn you all.

Chucks13:
Honestly I don't care what it means but one thing is certain at a very die minute we will deregister NDC and if they attempt any appeal the court I'll nly give NDC hearing after May 2027 and NDC dead.

We warned Dickson not to align with that baggages carrier he didn't listen we will do you a very strong thing die minute to the general election, I swear eyes go turn you all.

Kanwulia:
Is Tinubu not president by “Supreme Court Order”?😂

DomPerignon:
Did Tinubu become President based on a Supreme court order or was the appeal by Atiku and Giringori challenging INEC declaring him winner which was thrown out filed by Tinubu against his emergence ?

Kanwulia:
Tinubu was NEVER elected. He is a Supreme Court Prezdent! Not a Nigerian President. A machination of the corrupt judiciary in Nigeria.🍷

esnbrutality:
Total jargons and arrant hubris

DomPerignon:
God bless you.

Dickson approached INEC in 2017 to register his party, the NDC.

INEC for reasons best known to them refused to accept Dickson's application on the flimsy excuse that the NDC logo looked like another registered party's logo .

Dickson took them to court and INEC was stalling using every legal loophole and trick to postpone or adjourn the hearings.

The court got fed up with INEC and called for accelerated hearings.

When INEC could not present a registered party in their records bearing similar logo, they then went to manufacture a fake entity with same logo that was not even representing itself as a political party. INEC claimed copyright infringement as to why they can't register NDC.

The judge requested further information of the entity bearing similar logo as per CAC registration but INEC could not provide this in court.

The court then ruled that INEC had no right to stop NDC from being registered citing copyright infringement of a non existing entity and ordered INEC to register NDC immediately.

The reason INEC is affixing "by court order" next to NDC is because the ruling was retroactively applied to NDC to be registered as at 2017 before the electoral ammended Act of 2022 came into law in 2023.

NDC did not meet the conditions for a new party that will seek registration under the 2023 Act but since they were denied by INEC to be registered on flimsy excuse in 2017, the judge ruled that NDC should be registered under pre 2022 Act since they met all the conditions back then.


This is to avoid other parties taking INEC and NDC to court seeking the NDC being deregistered for not meeting the conditions of being registered as a new party under the ammended electoral Act of 2022.

Hope this explains this to you in the simplest form.

Ayopercent:
You need a medical attention.

esnbrutality:
Cry Blood

Chucks13:
Honestly I don't care what it means but one thing is certain at a very die minute we will deregister NDC and if they attempt any appeal the court I'll nly give NDC hearing after May 2027 and NDC dead.

We warned Dickson not to align with that baggages carrier he didn't listen we will do you a very strong thing die minute to the general election, I swear eyes go turn you all.