₦airaland Forum

TimeManager:
Justice Lifu acted lawfully and justiciably. He had already announced June 15 as the date of judgement before the Appeal Court gave her own order of stay of proceeding days after. And there's no law stopping any court from delivering its judgement under any circumstances.
Besides, if Accord party obtained an order from the Appeal Court, how is that applicable to ADC, AA, ZLP and APP who were not joined in the suit?. Only Accord party can hold on to the order of the Appeal Court, others have to be deregistered.

-Kiss the truth!

That is not true. His ruling on the case is meant to be adjourned indefinitely pending the ruling of a higher court.

fergie001:
No matter when.
Once a superior Court gives an order, it must be obeyed.
Even if it is less than 12 hours apart.

Gbamsulotey hahaha mucheche Hahaha 😂

fergie001:
The Supreme Court has been emphatic, that a judgement is the finality of a legal proceeding (the reason and order) must be read by the Judge in open Court ( see Ikedi Ohakim vs Rochas Okorocha). Unless that has happened, reserved or no reserved, written addresses or no written addresses, no judgement has taken place.

The questions to ask is: Does a judgement that has been reserved or final written addresses taken, said to be the final ruling of a suit? The answer is a direct NO.

Now pray tell me what is ambiguous in stay all further proceedings until the determination of the appeal? All actions temporarily are on hold, When the judgement is read, it becomes functus officio but this is not the situation.

Now it begs us to ask, what defines a proceeding?

Proceeding: In a general sense, the form and manner of conducting judicial business before a Court or judicial officer, regular and ordered process in form of law, including all possible steps in an action from its commencement to the execution of judgment (Black Laws Dictionary)

Proceeding: the word may be used synonymously with action or suit to describe entire course of an action at law or suit on equity from the issuance of the writ or filing of the complaint until the entry of final judgment.. per Ogunbiyi JCA (as she then was) Bello Vs Attorney -General of Lagos

So, it is clear from the foregoing that Lifu is a Judicial rascal.

Akpakomiza2
politics today
Truths9ja

Listen to your irrational statement, how can an appeal court review a judgement that had not been read and therefore a certified true copy not been issued by the clerk. Just admit that stay of proceedings was against judicial discipline.

The appeal court should never have stayed the proceedings because the defence never gave a reasonable account of why they may suffer irreparable jeopardy if the judgement for which they date had been set came to be delivered as scheduled.


The stay of execution however is in order as that is legitimate to stop irreparable damage if the parties were to be deregistered as is the case for Accord who have elections in a very short window

MrSly:
That is not true. His ruling on the case is meant to be adjourned indefinitely pending the ruling of a higher court.

Indefinite stay which the supreme court and NJC had ruled to be judicial rascality.

Nigerian truly don't deserve to be rescued, it is the same indefinite stay of judgements that has caused so much injustice that you are now defending

AMINDA:
It didn't bother you that the Wike-affiliated Judge gave his judgement in spite of an appeal Court judgement to the contrary? It also didn't bother you that the litigants were a body put together by the president's Chief of Staff and who had only recently, endorsed the president? Noted. I can tell you that Wike and Gbaja's brashness will be the undoing of Tinubu. Let them continue.

It's an abuse of court process for a superior court to interfere in the constitutional duties of the trial court. I am more worrimed that the appeal court actually attempted to stop the trial court from giving judgement in a matter in which judgement date has been fixed. That is completely troubling.

Whether those that went to court were put together in Agulu or jada makes no difference. What's important is the validity of their claim. They went to court and made their arguments to a judge. So, why should that trouble anyone? Why should I be bothered about a case that will enrich our jurisprudence? If the parties haven't met the constitutional requirements to remain registered, then they should be deregistered as required by the law. Rule of law, buddy.

Afrojuju2017:
You are confusing a stay of proceedings with a stay of execution. One is before the fact the other after.

I am not, I know the difference.

By the time the appellate court gave a stay of proceedings on may 22 the prayers of both the parties had been heard and both had closed their cases and a date for judgement had been set, from what I understand nobody at that stage can hold the judgement hostage.

So a superior Court gives an order, and the Judge should flout it.
It is at the discretion of that Court, right or wrong but once they give that order, it should be obeyed.

In fact I find the idea of a stay of proceedings unjustifiable as anyone who seeks justice must want legal proceedings to clear the courts ASAP rather than these permanent arrest of court procedures using funny contradictory judgements.

So since the judgement was given, what should have happened?
Are you aware the same Forum of Legislators have already filed their suit at the Supreme Court before Lifu's judgement? That is to say, they recognised the judgement and are preparing to challenging it, yet the Judge didn't want to entertain same.

What is the purpose of the stay of proceedings in this case if not to arrest any further movement in a case where all prayers had been heard.
All parties have the opportunity to take any distress from the high court judgement to the appellate courts so why try arrest the high court judgement, what was the period granted for which the stay would be implemented and what then happens after the stay is vacated by time as a stay can't be permanent it's only meant to be used where there is irreversible jeopardy if the judgement is implemented while an appeal is ongoing.

What is the permanent jeopardy at hand if the high court judgement is implemented, what has happened now is the proper way to arrest jeopardy which the parties find themselves is what they have now which is a temporal stay of execution of any judgements while the parties seek redresss at the appellate court.

The NJC needs to discipline those appeal court judges for granting a stay of proceedings in an high court case where the judgement date had been set.

The NJC will discipline Appeal Court Judges then leave the man who flouts the hierarchy of the Courts?[/quote]What is the injury the Forum will suffer for filing the suit?
The onus is on the plaintiff to show cause why.
The plaintiff cannot show, they are former and are not even contesting, they should be heavily fined.

You haven't even asked for once: Why did Accord file an interlocutory appeal?
An interlocutory appeal was entered May 1st week.
He was now asked to hands off the case, this was Lifu's statement as at May 20, 2026.

It is my considered view not to grant the stay except otherwise decided by the upper court,”
https://guardian.ng/news/court-rejects-adeleke-three-others-bid-to-join-adc-accord-deregistration-suit/

Judgement was entered May 22 and he refused.

The case has been suspended till further notice.
Lifu is a well-known HouseForHire Judge.

MrSly:
That is not true. His ruling on the case is meant to be adjourned indefinitely pending the ruling of a higher court.

That's arrant nonsense. It's so sad seeing folks like you defend the irresponsible behavior of the appeal court. No court should stop another court from performing its constitutional duties. Not even the Supreme Court should be able to do that.

Imagine the appeal court staying the judgment of an electoral panel indefinitely. That indefinitely can be four years or more. That is what you guys are advocating. Sadly, the opposition who are promoting this nonsense will be the biggest losers if the ruling party is to start doing what Accord tried to do.

seunmsg:
It's an abuse of court process for a superior court to interfere in the constitutional duties of the trial court. I am more worrimed that the appeal court actually attempted to stop the trial court from giving judgement in a matter in which judgement date has been fixed. That is completely troubling.

The Appeal Court did not arrest the judgement.
Why did Accord go on an interlocutory appeal?
Why do litigants go on interlocutory appeal?
When you put an application before a judge and he rejects it, you have to ensure you protect your suit.

This appeal was filed May 5.
Justice Lifu was told to stay all proceedings since the matter was already entered , he refused....and this was his comment on 20th May...

It is my considered view not to grant the stay except otherwise decided by the upper court,”
https://guardian.ng/news/court-rejects-adeleke-three-others-bid-to-join-adc-accord-deregistration-suit/

The Appeal Court now gave the order on 22nd May, he rejected, that's an assault. Again, when the Forum of Legislators heard about the stay by the Appeal Court, they announced they will challenge it at the Supreme Court.

So, should Lifu had gone ahead to pronounce judgement?

What did you say when PDP went on with the Convention after this Lifu told them not to go on except with Lamido present. The Supreme Court agreed that it was an internal affair and the Court has no business with it but PDP flouted a court order and that is disobedience. Did you not support it?

fergie001:
I am not, I know the difference.


So a superior Court gives an order, and the Judge should flout it.
It is at the discretion of that Court, right or wrong but once they give that order, it should be obeyed.

So since the judgement was given, what should have happened?
Are you aware the same Forum of Legislators have already filed their suit at the Supreme Court before Lifu's judgement? That is to say, they recognised the judgement and are preparing to challenging it, yet the Judge didn't want to entertain same.

The NJC will discipline Appeal Court Judges then leave the man who flouts the hierarchy of the Courts?
What is the injury the Forum will suffer for filing the suit?
The onus is on the plaintiff to show cause why.
The plaintiff cannot show, they are former and are not even contesting, they should be heavily fined.

You haven't even asked for once: Why did Accord file an interlocutory appeal?
An interlocutory appeal was entered May 1st week.
He was now asked to hands off the case, this was Lifu's statement as at May 20, 2026.

It is my considered view not to grant the stay except otherwise decided by the upper court,”
https://guardian.ng/news/court-rejects-adeleke-three-others-bid-to-join-adc-accord-deregistration-suit/

Judgement was entered May 22 and he refused.

The case has been suspended till further notice.
Lifu is a well-known HouseForHire Judge.

You have still failed to give a reason why the appeal court would seek to arrest a judgement that was already assigned a date with a stay of proceedings when the prayers had been heard and the "proceedings" had been all but concluded.

The legislative council has a locus as Nigerian citizen to petition INEC as to why the electoral laws was not being followed per party registration and or deregistration, what they can't interfere with is party organisation and activity if they are not members of that party, a political party is otherwise considered a public entity, and in this case INEC is the first respondent not ADC, Accord etc.

The appeal court ideally should have dismissed the request for stay of proceedings and allowed the high court to rule, then grant a stay of execution pending appeal by the injured parties.

The NJC has already faulted the use of stays of proceedings to arrest the judicial process, congesting the courts, delaying the legal process and forestalling progress so why any sane Nigerian would advocate for the continuation of the most serious matter that undermines judicial practice is something that baffles me.

Also the supreme jury can dismiss any entreaties by the legislative council because they also have no reason to seek redress as no appeals court judgement had been offered, all parties in this case are doing what the politically exposed have done to rubbish our judicial process, and it's the duty of the presidents of the respective courts and the NJC to enforce discipline and show courage.

seunmsg:
It's an abuse of court process for a superior court to interfere in the constitutional duties of the trial court. I am more worrimed that the appeal court actually attempted to stop the trial court from giving judgement in a matter in which judgement date has been fixed. That is completely troubling.

Whether those that went to court were put together in Agulu or jada makes no difference. What's important is the validity of their claim. They went to court and made their arguments to a judge. So, why should that trouble anyone? Why should I be bothered about a case that will enrich our jurisprudence? If the parties haven't met the constitutional requirements to remain registered, then they should be deregistered as required by the law. Rule of law, buddy.

Except that the parties all met the constitutional requirements as attested to by INEC itself. In spite of these, the Litigants, having realised that they had no locus standi, sought to amend their case without an Order of court. And they were granted leave to do so by Justice Lifu which was procedurally wrong. It was this anomaly that was appealed and the Appeal Court rightfully ordered for a stay until the appeal was heard on its merit. Only for justice Lifu to still go ahead to deliver judgement. All these are a travesty and is clearly being done to appease a paymaster somewhere. This is the justicial rascality that you lot support today after running on June 12 sentiments. All these are being documented and posterity will be the ultimate judge.

AMINDA:
Except that the parties all met the constitutional requirements as attested to by INEC itself. In spite of these, the Litigants, having realised that they had no locus standi, sought to amend their case without an Order of court. And they were granted leave to do so by Justice Lifu which was procedurally wrong. It was this anomaly that was appealed and the Appeal Court rightfully ordered for a stay until the appeal was heard on its merit. Only for justice Lifu to still go ahead to deliver judgement. All these are a travesty and is clearly being done to appease a paymaster somewhere. This is the justicial rascality that you lot support today after running on June 12 sentiments. All these are being documented and posterity will be the ultimate judge.

The appeal court still faulted by providing a stay when the judgement had been set to be heard, they should have waited for the judgement, issued a stay of judgement allows all injured parties to appeal and if they see fit vacate the judgement of the high duty based on the technicality you have sons observed.

You are trying ot argue that an irresponsible judicial action by the high court in allowing the prayers by the legislative council be altered should be followed by another travesty which is a stay of proceedings when a judgment was to be read.

If the leads to an indefinite induction, please do tell how does that help the judicial process

Ofunaofu:
Under every comment you make, you append the footnote, -Kiss the Truth!. Yet you have never stood on the side of truth, integrity, or credibility. You have been notoriously aligned with impunity, rascality, and brigandage.


-Kiss the truth! may sound noble, but your record here tells a very different story.

My guy

More ink to your pen.
Dere-Gawa

The judiciary will set this country on fire one day.

Just one day.

fergie001:
https://www.channelstv.com/2026/06/16/court-suspends-execution-of-judgment-on-deregistration-of-adc-others/?fbclid=IwY2xjawSebFNleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAwzNTA2ODU1MzE3MjgAAR6hB7vHox84utTiPcaRb8CPV-rkdYuJ0UGoa-wN_RUCxTtwk4g_2Tiq2O1B9w_aem_S8Z4Yi2VARM1Gwr3Mqawzg

Las las, it is the judiciary that will throw this country into confusion and anarchy

Afrojuju2017:
You have still failed to give a reason why the appeal court wouot seek to arrest a judgement that was already assigned a date.

You have still not given a reason why a FHC Judge will flout an order of a superior Court?

The order of a stay is no more discretionary?
Why did Lifu not grant the stay then if his head was not in a predetermined outcome?
You didn't read the bolded when he admitted to bowing to the upper court, so what happened?
I am shocked you are not even worried that the Attorney-General of the Federation who is a defendant, will turn around to become the plaintiff. Should that not worry you more?

Forum of former legislators how does it sound?
What locus do they have?

It ks a PL litigation because INEC is a public organisation for the interests of all Nigerians, also the AGF was petitioned... What are grounds for locus standi in PL suits: I will not go all over, you know that one.

OriOko88:
It was him order yet suspended from any court hearing after that judgement. Dey whine ursef

And he was later reinstated and cleared of any wrongdoing

That corrupt judge Lifu should never be allowed to escape scot-free for his consistent brazen disregard for judicial ethos and rabid gluttony for Wike's bribe.

We must return back capital punishments like firing squad for corrupt politicians and judges. They have fed so fat and have grown so much in confidence when taking bribes in broad day light, while telling Nigerians to do their worst or go to hell.

Peter Lifu will not end well.

APC just dey embarrass themselves here than there, now and then
Wetin dey sup to these set of homo sapiens self

Afrojuju2017:
Listen to your irrational statement, how can an appeal court review a judgement that had not been read and therefore a certified true copy not been issued by the clerk. Just admit that stay of proceedings was against judicial discipline.

You are being emotional, calm down! 😂
Now I understand your issue that the Appeal Court was wrong, so allow those who lost go to Supreme Court as they said they will nah.

The appeal court should never have stayed the proceedings because the defence never gave a reasonable account of why they may suffer irreparable jeopardy if the judgement for which they date had been set came to be delivered as scheduled..
he stay of execution however is in order as that is legitimate to stop irreparable damage if the parties were to be deregistered as is the case for Accord who have elections in a very short window

You are now contradicting yourself.

The defence never gave a reasonable account why they may suffer irreparable damage, when is Ekiti election again? The Accord Candidiate was refused a joinder, it's not irreparable damage.

Adeleke whose election is August is not irreparable damage? These people have a direct interest and you say they shouldn't join the suit.

When you see evil, say it......don't disguise.
1. This suit was against the ADC & 2 Ors

2. Midway, they added APP, Accord, ZLP, etc

3. The AGF who was a defendant, turned himself to been plaintiff.

4. Llifu denied Adeleke from joining the suit.

5.. Lifu himself said iif he got the enrolled order from a higher Court he will halt proceedings .

6. On May 20, Lifu fixed judgement for June 5.

7. On May 22, Appeal Court found merit in Adeleke's appeal and ruled.

8. Forum of Legislators learnt of the judgement & said they will head to the Supreme Court.

9. On June 5, Lifu refused to give judgement and suspended ruling indefinitely.

10. He gave his perverse judgement.

In all of these, you hold the Appeal Court responsible, you must be an interested party to say Adeleke has no jeopardy or sufficient interest.

TimeManager:
Justice Lifu acted lawfully and justiciably. He had already announced June 15 as the date of judgement before the Appeal Court gave her own order of stay of proceeding days after. And there's no law stopping any court from delivering its judgement under any circumstances.
Besides, if Accord party obtained an order from the Appeal Court, how is that applicable to ADC, AA, ZLP and APP who were not joined in the suit?. Only Accord party can hold on to the order of the Appeal Court, others have to be deregistered.

-Kiss the truth!

When you get the brain to study law, pass the bar. Come we can analyse issues for now stop exposing your ignorance online

AMINDA:
"the highest form of judicial impertinence and rascality..."

Where are all those morally flexible Tinubu lackeys that where celebrating this travesty of justice, thinking it will offer their tin-god a political advantage? What a disgrace! In a country where things work as they should, Justice Lifu will be de-robed and barred from ever sitting on a case. Tinubu must subject himself to the ballot and face his impending defeat!

The rogue justice Lifu would not just be derobed and barred in the countries we japa to, he would be imprisoned. If he was a judge in China, he would be executed, most likely.

Is this why our leaders looters are using Pandora to hide money in these japa countries? Money that should employ civil servants here to make water available to all households and make basic education free for all children

thewinning101:
PANDORA PAPERS: Buhari visited Tinubu in corruption-tainted London villa acquired by Oyetola

Governor Oyetola, a relative of Mr Tinubu, may have sabotaged his own country by buying the exotic property as Nigeria made to seize it.

ByNicholas IbekweandTaiwo-Hassan Adebayo October 7, 2021 in Headline Stories, Pandora Papers Reading Time: 8 mins read

It was a meeting of two of Nigeria’s most influential politicians in London – President Muhammadu Buhari was visiting political kingmaker and senior member of his ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), Bola Tinubu.

In July, the presidency announced that Mr Buhari was heading to London for an education summit. The office also added that the president would also see his doctors for “medical check-up”.

Coincidentally, Mr Tinubu, who had travelled to London earlier, was also receiving treatment for an undisclosed ailment in the British capital. So, a perfect setting for both men to meet was created.

https://www.premiumtimesng.com/pandora-papers/488537-pandora-papers-buhari-visited-tinubu-in-corruption-tainted-london-villa-acquired-by-oyetola.html?tztc=1

@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@

anonimi:
OCTOBER 4, 2021

Report: How Peter Obi as Anambra governor failed to declare assets kept in tax havens

Peter Obi, former governor of Anambra state, kept secret assets in tax havens, a series of leaked documents has shown.

The leaked files which were retrieved from 14 offshore services firms around the world were revealed in a Pandora Papers project led by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), and which Premium Times is a part of.

In his response, the former governor told Premium Times: “I don’t declare what is owned with others. If my family owns something I won’t declare it. I didn’t declare anything I jointly owed with anyone.”

In 2010, more than four years after Obi became governor, he reportedly set up his first discreet company in the British Virgin Island, and named the company Gabriella Investments Limited, after his daughter.

To set up what has now become a convoluted business structure, Obi, Premium Times reported first approached Acces International, a secrecy enabler in Monaco, France, to help him incorporate an offshore entity in one of the world’s most notorious tax havens noted for providing conduits for wealthy and privileged corrupt political elites to hide stolen cash.

According to the newspaper, Obi also paid Acces International to provide nominee directors for the company — these directors are residents of tax havens paid to sit on boards of companies to hide the identities of real owners of offshore firms.

Acces International officials, who reportedly took briefs from Obi and or his representatives, headed to the British Virgin Island where they contracted a local registered agent – Aleman Cordero Galindo & Lee Trust (BVI) Limited (Alcogal) — to set up Gabriella Investments Limited for the former governor.

https://www.thecable.ng/report-how-peter-obi-as-anambra-governor-failed-to-declare-assets-kept-in-tax-havens/amp/

Dalohad:
That corrupt judge Lifu should never be allowed to escape scot-free for his consistent brazen disregard for judicial ethos and rabid gluttony for Wike's bribe.

We must return back capital punishments like firing squad for corrupt politicians and judges. They have fed so fat and have grown so much in confidence when taking bribes in broad day light, while telling Nigerians to do their worst or go to hell.

Peter Lifu will not end well.

Peter Lifu is not the only person who won’t end well.

The ologogoro, FCT land grabber who builds houses for judges while owing teachers salaries and keeping children out of school won’t end well also, just as Ali Modu Sheriff predicted several years ago.



https://www.nairaland.com/5534927/pdp-matters-reference#117544611




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqFMCgRREXg&pp=0gcJCU8Co7VqN5tD&ra=m

iwaeda:
Wike Boasts Of Helping APC Use Judiciary To Kill Osun LG Funds Case, Warns Party Leaders Against Ingratitude

Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, has openly boasted that he assisted certain elements within the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in deploying the judiciary to frustrate the Osun State local government allocation lawsuit.

In a video now circulating widely on social media and obtained by SaharaReporters, Wike made the claim while addressing a crowd in Port Harcourt, Rivers State.

The former Rivers governor accused the APC National Secretary, Senator Ajibola Basiru, of benefitting from judicial actions against the Osun State Government without knowing those who did the work behind the scenes.

The suit in question led to the withholding of local government funds in Osun State, a development widely seen as targeting the administration of Governor Ademola Adeleke as opposition in the state.

Wike, who spoke angrily, suggested that the court action supporting the APC’s position against the Osun government did not happen by chance, boasting that powerful political forces worked quietly to ensure the outcome.

“Don’t take our support for Mr President for granted,” Wike warned, in an apparent message to APC leaders defending Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara. “You have to be careful about the statements you make. You have to be very careful.”

He accused Basiru of political ingratitude, claiming the APC was enjoying in Osun State without understanding who engineered their advantage.

“Today, you are enjoying in Osun. You don’t know those who did the work,” Wike said. “You are opening your mouth to talk about Rivers State.”

https://saharareporters.com/2026/01/08/wike-boasts-helping-apc-use-judiciary-kill-osun-lg-funds-case-warns-party-leaders

Minister Wike has warned the National Secretary of the APC, Ajibola Basiru to stay clear of Rivers State.
Lol 😆 https://t.co/sNKjJfb8qn pic.twitter.com/E9SgSwASil

— Emma ik Umeh (Tcee )🇳🇬 (@emmaikumeh) January 5, 2026

fergie001:
You are being emotional, calm down! 😂
Now I understand your issue that the Appeal Court was wrong, so allow those who lost go to Supreme Court as they said they will nah.


You are now contradicting yourself.

The defence never gave a reasonable account why they may suffer irreparable damage, when is Ekiti election again? The Accord Candidiate was refused a joinder, it's not irreparable damage.

Adeleke whose election is August is not irreparable damage? These people have a direct interest and you say they shouldn't join the suit.

When you see evil, say it......don't disguise.
1. This suit was against the ADC & 2 Ors

2. Midway, they added APP, Accord, ZLP, etc

3. The AGF who was a defendant, turned himself to been plaintiff.

4. Llifu denied Adeleke from joining the suit.

5.. Lifu himself said iif he got the enrolled order from a higher Court he will halt proceedings .

6. On May 20, Lifu fixed judgement for June 5.

7. On May 22, Appeal Court found merit in Adeleke's appeal and ruled.

8. Forum of Legislators learnt of the judgement & said they will head to the Supreme Court.

9. On June 5, Lifu refused to give judgement and suspended ruling indefinitely.

10. He gave his perverse judgement.

In all of these, you hold the Appeal Court responsible, you must be an interested party to say Adeleke has no jeopardy or sufficient interest.

You are still not speaking the truth just joining all the parties in their rascality
.
My lord justice Lifu, the plaintiffs, defence and the supreme court justices all failed in their duty.

But the stay of proceedings was inappropriate because it doubled down on an inappropriate run of play.

The appeal court should never have assisted in arresting an high court judgement no matter how faulty the process is given the constitution gives the parties involved the access to the same apllelate court to seek redress and review of a judgement at a lower court.

That there is my arguement , you'll see I have not faulted the stay of execution pending the review of the appeal court, the parties if still not satisfied can proceed to the SC.

But it seems that the legislative council thou as citizen have the locus to petition INEC as to their regulatory duties in deregistration of parties that fall foul of the law are engaging in rascality by approaching the SC when there is no substantive appeal court judgement on the matter at hand.

seunmsg:
That's arrant nonsense. It's so sad seeing folks like you defend the irresponsible behavior of the appeal court. No court should stop another court from performing its constitutional duties. Not even the Supreme Court should be able to do that.

Imagine the appeal court staying the judgment of an electoral panel indefinitely. That indefinitely can be four years or more. That is what you guys are advocating. Sadly, the opposition who are promoting this nonsense will be the biggest losers if the ruling party is to start doing what Accord tried to do.

You are right. They have performed their duty and the money induced judgement has been stayed once again. Let then perform another duty.