₦airaland Forum

God1000 d Igede Iranian citizen, we are waiting for u

This whooping sum of compensation fund for rebuilding shows huge losses incurred by Iran during war.U.S. knows its way in term of robbing Peter to pay Paul that is the game being played by
the superpowers.

Thinking again. USA just outsmarted Iran by leaving Isreal out of this. is can’t attack Iran or Lebanon, but Isreal can. So US can attack through Isreal. Smart move.

Okay. Good . Peace is all we need

Fundango:
Wait till after Election he would reduce the price

will the house rent my landlord increased 3 weeks ago be reduced?
because that's his excuse for increment

Stop using this words in a public domain, it's brings insult to Nigeria. No general stopped Trump. Iran told them he has something somewhere that will shock him and the entire world hence Trump use in sense.

LagosOrigin:
Trump almost erased Iran from civilization but he was stopped by a general whom I've forgotten his name , you can read it up on Google.

Iran get lucky

Helinuse:
The Arabs are warning the US,
The Israelis are warning the US,
But the US feels that scientific assumptions work with jeehardeests.

E pain am.

madridguy:
Only if Trump will be a man enough to come out publicly to say what he sees in the hand of Iran.

Those guys caused damages worth billions of dollars.

If they caused so much damages then why did Tinubu invite Trump to kill innocent northerners on Christmas day, under the guise of looking for Muslim terrorists accused of Christian genocide

Do you know what Trump saw in the hands of Tinubu?

Razzness:
Credit where credit is due abeg. Iran just came up against two nuclear powers and displayed strength to the entire world; Now they are getting a deal that even Khamenei would not have dreamed of when the war started.

Strength by losing almost everything and surviving?
Is that strength?

Does that mean the Taliban are stronger than them, too?

madridguy:
Only if Trump will be a man enough to come out publicly to say what he sees in the hand of Iran.

Those guys caused damages worth billions of dollars.

Trump is nothing and he knows it,
it's just gra gra,
if it was Clinton, George bush 1 &2 or Obama
Iran for dey beg now, these ones sabi how to lobby other countries to go to war with them,
Trump is just a noise maker

I think this thread is about Iran and the USA?

anonimi:
If they caused so much damages then why did Tinubu invite Trump to kill innocent northerners on Christmas day, under the guise of looking for Muslim terrorists accused of Christian genocide

Do you know what Trump saw in the hands of Tinubu?

Flangelo12:
E pain am.

Na me lose my supreme leader?
Na me fayt war wey I no take down even one Israeli soldier?

Na me e go come pain?

Iran is just like a humiliation factory. Dem really humiliate PONTUS so tey the guy beg

Well, Trump didn't ask why other presidents didn't go to war with Iran. I like the fact he test Iran's might and now he knows better.

Mind you, no one will ever join Trump to attack Iran, the risk is too much. They are failed miserably going to Afghanistan and they will never commit such a blunder again.

ceejay80s:
Trump is nothing and he knows it,
it's just gra gra,
if it was Clinton, George bush 1 &2 or Obama
Iran for dey beg now, these ones sabi how to lobby other countries to go to war with them,
Trump is just a noise maker

mysticwarrior:
For decades, the United States has proudly proclaimed, "We do not negotiate with terrorists." It has branded Iran a sponsor of terrorism, imposed crippling sanctions, rallied allies against it, and used that label to justify years of political and economic pressure.

Yet today, the same United States finds itself sitting across the negotiating table from the very nation it has spent decades condemning.

So what became of the principle that America claimed was non-negotiable? Was it truly a matter of principle, or merely a convenient slogan invoked when it served strategic interests and quietly abandoned when circumstances demanded otherwise?

If negotiating with Iran is now acceptable, then the world is left to ask: was the policy ever about terrorism at all, or has it always been about power, leverage, and political convenience?

WORD.

madridguy:
Only if Trump will be a man enough to come out publicly to say what he sees in the hand of Iran.

Those guys caused damages worth billions of dollars.

can u b sincere which side suffered more damage

GOVERNORR:
Trump has indeed effected change in global history..

Eliminating the tyrant and having Iran now willing to be in business with the Western world.

That's some serious geopolitics

jajaja i know you must come with sometin weh go reduce your pain

ceejay80s:
Trump is nothing and he knows it,
it's just gra gra,
if it was Clinton, George bush 1 &2 or Obama
Iran for dey beg now, these ones sabi how to lobby other countries to go to war with them,
Trump is just a noise maker

Imagine insulting and threatening your allies and expecting them to join you to fight.

LagosOrigin:
Trump almost erased Iran from civilization but he was stopped by a general whom I've forgotten his name , you can read it up on Google.

Iran get lucky

Almost erased Iran from civilization"? That's a strange achievement for someone who was supposedly stopped by a general whose name you can't even remember.

Extraordinary claims require evidence, not "Google it." History isn't written with forgotten names and imaginary victories.

gassbee:
can u b sincere which side suffered more damage

Is that what determines the winner here?

No country lost more than Russia in WW2 and yet they were on the winning side.

Helinuse:


Na me lose my supreme leader?
Na me fayt war wey I no take down even one Israeli soldier?

Na me e go come pain?

Yet you are on this thread talking about what one party lost.

E pain am.

Flangelo12:
Yet you are on this thread talking about what one party lost.

E pain am.

E no pain me pass the people who lose.
But sure, wetin pain me be say, dem survive.



Because, to una, na that survival be victory.

Helinuse:
E no pain me pass the people who lose.
But sure, wetin pain me be say, dem survive.



Because, to una, na that survival be victory.

Cry more.

Emeskhalifa:
This is no deal, so long Isreal isn't part of the deal.

The fight was between Iran and Israel, before America jumped into it in other to support Isreal, so how come Isreal is not part of the deal?

This gives room for Israel to attack Iran in the nearest future

same way it leaves room for Iran to respond in equal measure without usa intervention.

Mattswaggz:
Israel and Iran are sworn enemies.....so chances of them fighting is always high.

if bibi continues being stubborn, their next war with iran, the US wont get involved and iran is going to embarrass isreal militarily

Flangelo12:
Cry more.

My dear, no tears again.
Dem survive, na the tin wey pain me be taht.

But I trust Iran.
They will always listen to Nigerian Iranians.
They will poke the bear in Israel.
Now there won't be an America to tie Israel's hands.

Is this a joke or what? Did Iran attack the US before? Iran will continue to attack Israel and other Gulf countries Israel is attacking them from

wellmax:
Thinking again. USA just outsmarted Iran by leaving Isreal out of this. is can’t attack Iran or Lebanon, but Isreal can. So US can attack through Isreal. Smart move.

TimeMachine2:
Which isreal? Those ones can only fight women and children. Little Isreal.

Little Israel that supleme leather, that killed almost all Hamas top leaders, that have eliminated almost all top Hezbollah top leaders and Iranian top leadey.

Una go come online dey cho cho cho anyhow for social media.

Joker's!!

mysticwarrior:
For decades, the United States has proudly proclaimed, "We do not negotiate with terrorists." It has branded Iran a sponsor of terrorism, imposed crippling sanctions, rallied allies against it, and used that label to justify years of political and economic pressure.

Yet today, the same United States finds itself sitting across the negotiating table from the very nation it has spent decades condemning.

So what became of the principle that America claimed was non-negotiable? Was it truly a matter of principle, or merely a convenient slogan invoked when it served strategic interests and quietly abandoned when circumstances demanded otherwise?

If negotiating with Iran is now acceptable, then the world is left to ask: was the policy ever about terrorism at all, or has it always been about power, leverage, and political convenience?

Only if you know the kind of shege US experienced during that period.

Your analysis is on point, I totally agree 💯

Ironfaceman:
Dr Orlando owoh's song comes to mind
( E get as E bi)

With this signing Trump has vindicated Obama.
In as much as the war was meaningless to the US. I feel Netanyahu manipulated Trump so much.

Now Trump afraid that Republicans will lose November elections with the rising cost of fuel in the US. $8 as against $2, in bidens Era. have made a deal with the devil.

in other words, u r saying if d USA pays 2 dollar for a litre of fuel but now it's 8 dollar for same litre ...what then will be d fate of Tinubu who met fuel at.....let me not even talk

mysticwarrior:
For decades, the United States has proudly proclaimed, "We do not negotiate with terrorists." It has branded Iran a sponsor of terrorism, imposed crippling sanctions, rallied allies against it, and used that label to justify years of political and economic pressure.

Yet today, the same United States finds itself sitting across the negotiating table from the very nation it has spent decades condemning.

So what became of the principle that America claimed was non-negotiable? Was it truly a matter of principle, or merely a convenient slogan invoked when it served strategic interests and quietly abandoned when circumstances demanded otherwise?

If negotiating with Iran is now acceptable, then the world is left to ask: was the policy ever about terrorism at all, or has it always been about power, leverage, and political convenience?

the issue from day one is Iran must not have nuclear weapons and must stop uranium enrichment, trump ensured that now, so let there be peace.

mysticwarrior:
For decades, the United States has proudly proclaimed, "We do not negotiate with terrorists." It has branded Iran a sponsor of terrorism, imposed crippling sanctions, rallied allies against it, and used that label to justify years of political and economic pressure.

Yet today, the same United States finds itself sitting across the negotiating table from the very nation it has spent decades condemning.

So what became of the principle that America claimed was non-negotiable? Was it truly a matter of principle, or merely a convenient slogan invoked when it served strategic interests and quietly abandoned when circumstances demanded otherwise?

If negotiating with Iran is now acceptable, then the world is left to ask: was the policy ever about terrorism at all, or has it always been about power, leverage, and political convenience?

So you still believe this terrorism slogan when USA itself created ISIS ALQAEDA BOKO HARAM

To still believe USA till now you must be a Christian cos as a Muslim we have passed the level where one person will lie to us

If Iran attack any Christian nation today we Muslim will condemn Iran but you see Christians 90% of you people will call devil an angel as long as it is against Muslims and Islam