₦airaland Forum

[b][/b]

A reform can sound beautiful in Abuja and still fail inside a crowded camp in Iyana Ipaja, Kubwa, Awgu, or Katsina. That is the first problem with the new NYSC reform approved by the Federal Executive Council. On paper, it sounds ambitious: six weeks of orientation, civilian operational leadership, specialised career streams, skills-based primary assignments, professional certification, a new uniform, and a graduation ceremony to replace the Passing Out Parade. But policy is not judged by the grammar of its announcement. Policy is judged by what happens when it meets water shortage, bad hostels, weak budgets, insecurity, and Nigerian reality.

Let us start with the six-week orientation camp. Extending camp from three weeks to six weeks may look like a serious investment in young people, but it becomes dangerous if the facilities remain the same. Many NYSC camps are already overstretched. In May 2026, as reported by Punch Newpaper, corps members at the Lagos orientation camp complained of persistent water shortage, inadequate storage facilities, irregular electricity, and overcrowding. Some reportedly woke as early as 1 a.m. to queue for water. If three weeks already tests the health and patience of young graduates, six weeks without massive investment in hostels, toilets, water, clinics, ventilation, food, and security is not reform. It is punishment with a policy title.

No young person learns civic values properly while struggling to bathe, sleep, eat, and stay healthy. A hungry corper listening to financial literacy under poor conditions is not being empowered; he or she is merely enduring another Nigerian survival course. If government wants six weeks, then the budget must speak before the slogan speaks. More days in camp means more feeding, more medical care, more staff, more sanitation, more electricity, more security, and more monitoring. Without that, the reform will simply double the duration of discomfort and reduce the quality of welfare.

The second issue is the shift to civilian operational leadership. This is not automatically bad. NYSC was never supposed to be a military barracks. A civilian-led structure can make the scheme more developmental, more flexible, and more aligned with skills and employment. But Nigeria must be honest about one thing: weak civilian systems are easier to bend. The military presence in camp, for all its harshness, gives NYSC a certain immediate discipline. Everyone wakes up early. Everyone lines up. Everyone wears the same white shorts. The child of a politician and the child of a mechanic can both be corrected in the same parade ground.

If that authority is reduced without a strong replacement, camp may become another Nigerian space where connection defeats discipline. Wealthy corps members may lobby their way out of duties. Influential parents may pressure officials. Some may sleep outside camp while ordinary graduates remain under stricter rules. That is why civilian leadership must come with clear enforcement rules, independent monitoring, transparent sanctions, and public reporting. A civilian-led NYSC should not mean a weaker NYSC. It should mean a more accountable one.

There is also a human management question that government should not pretend away. Thousands of young adults living together for six weeks need firm safeguarding, not moral speeches. Even under the existing military-style camp structure, discipline issues still occur. Extending camp to six weeks increases the responsibility of the state to protect corps members from harassment, exploitation, abuse of authority, bribery, and unsafe private arrangements. This is not about policing people’s private lives. It is about making sure power is not abused inside camp. Civilian officials must therefore be trained, monitored, and held accountable. If not, the reform may create new spaces for compromise and misconduct.

The third problem is the illusion of the six-week crash course. Nigeria must stop pretending that a broken education-to-work pipeline can be repaired with short camp training. A graduate who spent four or five years in an underfunded tertiary system cannot become a strong tech professional, agribusiness operator, infrastructure specialist, or entrepreneur because of a few weeks of lectures. Real skills require time, tools, mentorship, practice, assessment, and industry exposure. Germany’s respected dual vocational system, for example, is built around training in both companies and vocational schools, with apprentices employed by companies and trained over two to three and a half years depending on the occupation. That is a system, not a seminar.

If the new NYSC skills streams are serious, they must go beyond PowerPoint slides and certificates. The training must be practical, assessed by real industry standards, and linked to actual employers or enterprise support. Otherwise, Nigeria will produce another certificate economy: more paper, less competence. We must also ask uncomfortable questions. Who designs the curriculum? Who selects the trainers? Who pays the certification bodies? What happens to corps members who fail the assessment? Will they be forced to repeat training? Will certificates become another backdoor business for vendors and politically connected firms?

The certification angle deserves special attention. “Globally recognised professional certification” sounds attractive, but in Nigeria it can quickly become a contract bazaar. If not properly regulated, private training firms may begin to chase NYSC contracts, camp officials may control access, and corps members may be pressured into paying hidden fees. The government must publish the certification partners, selection criteria, cost per corps member, procurement process, assessment method, and complaint channels. A reform that claims to fight unemployment must not become another marketplace for insiders.

The fourth issue is the claim that NYSC can help build a $1 trillion economy. There is nothing wrong with ambition. A country without ambition is already tired. But advanced economies are not built by forcing graduates into state-designed career streams for one year. They are built by fixing basic education, strengthening universities and polytechnics, providing stable electricity, reducing business costs, supporting manufacturing, expanding infrastructure, and allowing the private sector to create real jobs. NYSC can support national development, but it cannot replace economic fundamentals.

The global examples also require care. Singapore has mandatory National Service, but it is rooted mainly in defence and security; full-time National Service is treated as a national security institution. South Korea’s compulsory service is also tied to national defence obligations. Germany’s vocational strength comes from long-term company-school training, not a six-week camp experiment. Nigeria appears to be mixing national mobilisation, civic training, military discipline, civilian administration, professional certification, entrepreneurship, and job placement into one overloaded scheme. That may sound innovative, but it is also risky. When one policy tries to do everything, it often ends up doing little well.

The fifth problem is the PPA reality. Skills-based primary assignment sounds good, but where are the receiving institutions? Many corps members already struggle to secure meaningful places of primary assignment. Some schools, companies, and government offices reject corps members because they lack space, funding, supervision capacity, or willingness to pay local allowance. If an organisation cannot absorb a regular corps member, calling the person “Digital Corps” or “Medical Corps” will not magically create a desk, a supervisor, internet access, equipment, or salary support. The reform must therefore include a serious employer partnership framework. Without that, the new streams will become new labels on old frustration.

The sixth issue is the Passing Out Parade. Scrapping or redesigning POP may look minor, but symbols matter. The POP is one of the few rituals that gives corps members a shared sense of completion. It is not perfect, but it is memorable. Replacing it with a formal graduation ceremony may be useful if the ceremony genuinely reflects skills acquired, projects completed, and communities served. But if it becomes another long government speech day, corps members will simply lose one emotional part of service and gain another boring protocol event.

The biggest weakness in this reform is the apparent distance between policymakers and present-day corps members. Many people designing NYSC reform still carry memories of a different Nigeria: when the scheme was more prestigious, the economy was less punishing, and allowance had real value. Today’s corps member is serving in a country of high living costs, insecurity, weak infrastructure, digital frustration, and deep uncertainty. A policy designed for an imaginary Nigeria will collapse in the real one.

This does not mean the reform should be rejected completely. Some parts are sensible. A technology-driven call-up process can reduce manipulation. Risk-sensitive deployment is necessary in a country facing serious security challenges. Skills-based PPA can make service more meaningful. Civilian leadership can modernise the scheme if properly governed. Camp grading can improve standards if it is transparent and tied to funding. The problem is not the ambition. The problem is the missing foundation.

Before implementation, government should answer five questions clearly:
1. what is the actual additional budget for six-week orientation?
2. Which camps currently meet the minimum standard for six weeks of residence?
3. Who will train, certify, and monitor the specialised streams?
4. What safeguards will prevent corruption, favouritism, and exploitation inside camp?
5. Which employers and institutions have formally agreed to accept corps members under the new PPA model?

Nigeria does not need another reform that looks powerful at announcement and weak at implementation. NYSC is too important to be treated as a laboratory for half-built ideas. If government wants to turn the scheme into a serious national development platform, it must first fix the camp, protect the corps member, fund the programme, involve the private sector, and publish the implementation plan.

A six-week camp without water is not innovation.
A certificate without skill is not empowerment.
A civilian-led system without accountability is not modernisation.
And a $1 trillion economy will not be built by slogans.

It will be built by honest policy, disciplined execution, and respect for the young Nigerians who are always asked to sacrifice first.

Knowing the inherent potential of Nigerians to vehemently go against honest authority,the removal of the military hierarchy will crumble the scheme andbribery and corruption will be (current corruption)⁴

6 weeks should be the idea when insecurity is near zero.

Once again, some dumbos sat and spent taxpayers monies for some board meeting in AC boardrooms and came up with this crappy idea. Smh.

Nothing good can come out of this useless APC government!! . Jubilate over this nonsense at your own peril!!

I dey tell you o .....


I have really analyzed it and seen that it isn't going to be feasible

daveP:
Knowing the inherent potential of Nigerians to vehemently go against honest authority,the removal of the military hierarchy will crumble the scheme an bribery and corruption will be (current corruption)⁴

6 weeks should be the idea when insecurity is near zero.

Once again, some dumbos sat and spent taxpayers monies for some board meeting in AC boardrooms and came up with this crappy idea. Smh.

How is this crappy. One of the best reforms witnessed in any Nigeria institution in recent time. Refocusing youth to more productive programs serves better than the current arrangement.
Let's give this new look a chance

😂 the pessimists yaff come again.. 😂😂😂

Before implementation, government should answer five questions clearly:
1. what is the actual additional budget for six-week orientation?
2. Which camps currently meet the minimum standard for six weeks of residence?
3. Who will train, certify, and monitor the specialised streams?
4. What safeguards will prevent corruption, favouritism, and exploitation inside camp?
5. Which employers and institutions have formally agreed to accept corps members under the new PPA model?


Opportunities for contracts and to spend money my friend.

I think we will lose the reason for national unity et cetera when they make these changes. NYSC in my opinion is still one of the best ways Nigerians get to know their country though it still has its fault but our sense of nationalism is dying everyday and government is not helping it.

You know why most times I don't even bother to take most Nigerians seriously? Because they will always complain. They will always find negatives in every positives but ask them the solution, just like Peter Obi, they will tell you that they don't want to reel out the solutions they have in mind so that it won't be stolen. Before now, if you had asked this writer to come up with comprehensive plans to reform and reposition the NYSC, he would say the scheme is better the way it's right now. But here he is looking for negatives from this well thought out plans from the FG to reform reposition the NYSC.
Tinubu is a reformer and he is already reforming Alot of abnormalities that previous presidents refused or failed to do just because they were scared of losing votes (mostly votes from northerners)

Dem no do, una go complain! Dem do, una go still complain! Let the reforms start first. If there're challenges, we try to solve them as we go. The first thing is to start not complain.

TaofeeqAA:
[b][/b]

A reform can sound beautiful in Abuja and still fail inside a crowded camp in Iyana Ipaja, Kubwa, Awgu, or Katsina. That is the first problem with the new NYSC reform approved by the Federal Executive Council. On paper, it sounds ambitious: six weeks of orientation, civilian operational leadership, specialised career streams, skills-based primary assignments, professional certification, a new uniform, and a graduation ceremony to replace the Passing Out Parade. But policy is not judged by the grammar of its announcement. Policy is judged by what happens when it meets water shortage, bad hostels, weak budgets, insecurity, and Nigerian reality.

Let us start with the six-week orientation camp. Extending camp from three weeks to six weeks may look like a serious investment in young people, but it becomes dangerous if the facilities remain the same. Many NYSC camps are already overstretched. In May 2026, as reported by Punch Newpaper, corps members at the Lagos orientation camp complained of persistent water shortage, inadequate storage facilities, irregular electricity, and overcrowding. Some reportedly woke as early as 1 a.m. to queue for water. If three weeks already tests the health and patience of young graduates, six weeks without massive investment in hostels, toilets, water, clinics, ventilation, food, and security is not reform. It is punishment with a policy title.

No young person learns civic values properly while struggling to bathe, sleep, eat, and stay healthy. A hungry corper listening to financial literacy under poor conditions is not being empowered; he or she is merely enduring another Nigerian survival course. If government wants six weeks, then the budget must speak before the slogan speaks. More days in camp means more feeding, more medical care, more staff, more sanitation, more electricity, more security, and more monitoring. Without that, the reform will simply double the duration of discomfort and reduce the quality of welfare.

The second issue is the shift to civilian operational leadership. This is not automatically bad. NYSC was never supposed to be a military barracks. A civilian-led structure can make the scheme more developmental, more flexible, and more aligned with skills and employment. But Nigeria must be honest about one thing: weak civilian systems are easier to bend. The military presence in camp, for all its harshness, gives NYSC a certain immediate discipline. Everyone wakes up early. Everyone lines up. Everyone wears the same white shorts. The child of a politician and the child of a mechanic can both be corrected in the same parade ground.

If that authority is reduced without a strong replacement, camp may become another Nigerian space where connection defeats discipline. Wealthy corps members may lobby their way out of duties. Influential parents may pressure officials. Some may sleep outside camp while ordinary graduates remain under stricter rules. That is why civilian leadership must come with clear enforcement rules, independent monitoring, transparent sanctions, and public reporting. A civilian-led NYSC should not mean a weaker NYSC. It should mean a more accountable one.

There is also a human management question that government should not pretend away. Thousands of young adults living together for six weeks need firm safeguarding, not moral speeches. Even under the existing military-style camp structure, discipline issues still occur. Extending camp to six weeks increases the responsibility of the state to protect corps members from harassment, exploitation, abuse of authority, bribery, and unsafe private arrangements. This is not about policing people’s private lives. It is about making sure power is not abused inside camp. Civilian officials must therefore be trained, monitored, and held accountable. If not, the reform may create new spaces for compromise and misconduct.

The third problem is the illusion of the six-week crash course. Nigeria must stop pretending that a broken education-to-work pipeline can be repaired with short camp training. A graduate who spent four or five years in an underfunded tertiary system cannot become a strong tech professional, agribusiness operator, infrastructure specialist, or entrepreneur because of a few weeks of lectures. Real skills require time, tools, mentorship, practice, assessment, and industry exposure. Germany’s respected dual vocational system, for example, is built around training in both companies and vocational schools, with apprentices employed by companies and trained over two to three and a half years depending on the occupation. That is a system, not a seminar.

If the new NYSC skills streams are serious, they must go beyond PowerPoint slides and certificates. The training must be practical, assessed by real industry standards, and linked to actual employers or enterprise support. Otherwise, Nigeria will produce another certificate economy: more paper, less competence. We must also ask uncomfortable questions. Who designs the curriculum? Who selects the trainers? Who pays the certification bodies? What happens to corps members who fail the assessment? Will they be forced to repeat training? Will certificates become another backdoor business for vendors and politically connected firms?

The certification angle deserves special attention. “Globally recognised professional certification” sounds attractive, but in Nigeria it can quickly become a contract bazaar. If not properly regulated, private training firms may begin to chase NYSC contracts, camp officials may control access, and corps members may be pressured into paying hidden fees. The government must publish the certification partners, selection criteria, cost per corps member, procurement process, assessment method, and complaint channels. A reform that claims to fight unemployment must not become another marketplace for insiders.

The fourth issue is the claim that NYSC can help build a $1 trillion economy. There is nothing wrong with ambition. A country without ambition is already tired. But advanced economies are not built by forcing graduates into state-designed career streams for one year. They are built by fixing basic education, strengthening universities and polytechnics, providing stable electricity, reducing business costs, supporting manufacturing, expanding infrastructure, and allowing the private sector to create real jobs. NYSC can support national development, but it cannot replace economic fundamentals.

The global examples also require care. Singapore has mandatory National Service, but it is rooted mainly in defence and security; full-time National Service is treated as a national security institution. South Korea’s compulsory service is also tied to national defence obligations. Germany’s vocational strength comes from long-term company-school training, not a six-week camp experiment. Nigeria appears to be mixing national mobilisation, civic training, military discipline, civilian administration, professional certification, entrepreneurship, and job placement into one overloaded scheme. That may sound innovative, but it is also risky. When one policy tries to do everything, it often ends up doing little well.

The fifth problem is the PPA reality. Skills-based primary assignment sounds good, but where are the receiving institutions? Many corps members already struggle to secure meaningful places of primary assignment. Some schools, companies, and government offices reject corps members because they lack space, funding, supervision capacity, or willingness to pay local allowance. If an organisation cannot absorb a regular corps member, calling the person “Digital Corps” or “Medical Corps” will not magically create a desk, a supervisor, internet access, equipment, or salary support. The reform must therefore include a serious employer partnership framework. Without that, the new streams will become new labels on old frustration.

The sixth issue is the Passing Out Parade. Scrapping or redesigning POP may look minor, but symbols matter. The POP is one of the few rituals that gives corps members a shared sense of completion. It is not perfect, but it is memorable. Replacing it with a formal graduation ceremony may be useful if the ceremony genuinely reflects skills acquired, projects completed, and communities served. But if it becomes another long government speech day, corps members will simply lose one emotional part of service and gain another boring protocol event.

The biggest weakness in this reform is the apparent distance between policymakers and present-day corps members. Many people designing NYSC reform still carry memories of a different Nigeria: when the scheme was more prestigious, the economy was less punishing, and allowance had real value. Today’s corps member is serving in a country of high living costs, insecurity, weak infrastructure, digital frustration, and deep uncertainty. A policy designed for an imaginary Nigeria will collapse in the real one.

This does not mean the reform should be rejected completely. Some parts are sensible. A technology-driven call-up process can reduce manipulation. Risk-sensitive deployment is necessary in a country facing serious security challenges. Skills-based PPA can make service more meaningful. Civilian leadership can modernise the scheme if properly governed. Camp grading can improve standards if it is transparent and tied to funding. The problem is not the ambition. The problem is the missing foundation.

Before implementation, government should answer five questions clearly:
1. what is the actual additional budget for six-week orientation?
2. Which camps currently meet the minimum standard for six weeks of residence?
3. Who will train, certify, and monitor the specialised streams?
4. What safeguards will prevent corruption, favouritism, and exploitation inside camp?
5. Which employers and institutions have formally agreed to accept corps members under the new PPA model?

Nigeria does not need another reform that looks powerful at announcement and weak at implementation. NYSC is too important to be treated as a laboratory for half-built ideas. If government wants to turn the scheme into a serious national development platform, it must first fix the camp, protect the corps member, fund the programme, involve the private sector, and publish the implementation plan.

A six-week camp without water is not innovation.
A certificate without skill is not empowerment.
A civilian-led system without accountability is not modernisation.
And a $1 trillion economy will not be built by slogans.

It will be built by honest policy, disciplined execution, and respect for the young Nigerians who are always asked to sacrifice first.

Sermwell:
Nothing good can come out of this useless APC government!! . Jubilate over this nonsense at your own peril!!

Cynic spotted. What you refused to understand is that that you don't like the government does not mean everything they do is bad. This is a good reform

Aptly put

I would suggest they use this additional funds to increase the stipends of corpers..

instead of extending the duration on camp..

Lifestone:
How is this crappy. One of the best reforms witnessed in any Nigeria institution in recent time. Refocusing youth to more productive programs serves better than the current arrangement.
Let's give this new look a chance

The fact you labelled the boldened on this upgrade tells me i should not bother engaging further. I wish you can see this is not against youth productivity. Rather this is baseless if existing problems and factors are not in the equation of reality right now.

Thanks anyways

Lifestone:
Cynic spotted. What you refused to understand is that that you don't like the government does not mean everything they do is bad. This is a good reform

They'll pump more money into the program and it won't get to the corpers..

just another avenue for some to loot

why not increase the allawee once
they can save and venture into entrepreneurship after service

This write up is good...not those people that criticize without good reason.

SINCE na this REGIME na WEAK FOUNDATION abi? OGA MAKE UP ARTIST shift... u people are so BL!ND u dont see any thing GOOD from this regime..

I call this leaving the leprosy to cure the ringworm. Nigeria never ceases to baffle me , first of all, only the sick needs a physician, if engine No spoil , na only maintenance . Who is complaining about NYCS or who is not satisfied with the modus operandi that these people are trying to change the system? I hope it doesn’t become a whack nonsense in years to come and eventually collapse . We have more pressing matters , and I hope they will Put such effort towards insecurity and food security than all these unnecessary stuffs that people are not even asking for

You expect me to read this AI slop?

"It is not about this, it is that"

What sort of nonsense is this?

Why outsourcing your intelligence to a machine?

Don't you know how to use a humanizer?

Ahhhhh

I honour you to be the president for 24hrs as a model to young aspiring candidates who wish to govern this country and also teach the present ones on how to go about the administration affairs.

Ur likes are what we need in this era.

Kudos.

If you listen to Nigerians, you won’t get anything done

Professional Critic Spotted! Have you heard of Action-in-Motion?

How is nysc a way to know the traditional affairs of your country!
Those reconciliation ideas has fade away. No longer working.

When the country is working with roads and security effectively aiding our productive lives, we can travel and meet new people in our line of career or business.

SixSeven:
Before implementation, government should answer five questions clearly:
1. what is the actual additional budget for six-week orientation?
2. Which camps currently meet the minimum standard for six weeks of residence?
3. Who will train, certify, and monitor the specialised streams?
4. What safeguards will prevent corruption, favouritism, and exploitation inside camp?
5. Which employers and institutions have formally agreed to accept corps members under the new PPA model?


Opportunities for contracts and to spend money my friend.

I think we will lose the reason for national unity et cetera when they make these changes. NYSC in my opinion is still one of the best ways Nigerians get to know their country though it still has its fault but our sense of nationalism is dying everyday and government is not helping it.

1. **Technology-driven call-up process**
* Digitalizing the call-up process can reduce errors and improve efficiency.
* However, the biggest complaints from prospective corps members are delays in mobilization, technical glitches on the portal, and uncertainty around postings. Technology alone won't solve these unless the underlying administrative issues are addressed.

2. **Scheme now to be headed by a civilian**
* A civilian Director-General could bring a different management style.
* However, leadership changes by themselves do not guarantee better outcomes. Success depends on governance, funding, transparency, and execution rather than whether the head is military or civilian.

3. **Camps to get grading certifications**
* Standardizing camp facilities is a positive goal.
* Yet many orientation camps have long-standing issues such as inadequate accommodation, poor sanitation, inconsistent water supply, and limited medical facilities. Certification should lead to measurable improvements rather than become a paper exercise.

4. **Graduation ceremony replacing the Passing Out Parade (POP)**
* This is largely symbolic.
* Critics may argue that changing the ceremony does little to improve the welfare, safety, or employment prospects of corps members.

5. **Six-week orientation with greater focus on leadership, entrepreneurship, and digital skills**
* More skills training could benefit corps members.
* However, extending camp means additional costs and logistical demands. The effectiveness will depend on the quality of trainers, curriculum, and whether participants gain practical, marketable skills rather than attending more lectures.

6. **Skills-based primary assignments**
* Matching graduates to roles aligned with their qualifications is widely viewed as a worthwhile objective.
* The challenge is implementation. Many organizations accept corps members based on their own staffing needs, and suitable placements may not exist in every state or locality.

7. **Redesigned NYSC uniform**
* A new uniform may improve appearance or professionalism.
* But many would argue that uniform redesign should not take priority over issues like the monthly allowance, accommodation, camp facilities, and security.

8. **Risk-sensitive deployment**
* This directly addresses one of the biggest concerns: corps members' safety.
* The key question is implementation. Clear criteria, transparency, and ongoing security assessments will matter more than the policy announcement itself.

### Broader Criticisms

Many observers believe the reforms do not fully address the issues corps members raise most often, including:

* The adequacy of the monthly allowance given inflation.
* Security concerns in parts of the country.
* Better accommodation and welfare during service.
* Stronger links between NYSC service and long-term employment opportunities.
* Timely payment of allowances and state stipends where applicable.
* Modernizing the scheme to better reflect current labour market needs.

### Overall Assessment

Most of the announced reforms appear to focus on **administration, branding, and training**. Those are worthwhile areas to improve. However, many Nigerians would likely judge the reforms by whether they produce tangible improvements in corps members' **safety, welfare, employability, and quality of service**, rather than by changes to ceremonies or uniforms. Ultimately, the effectiveness of these reforms will depend less on the announcements and more on consistent implementation and measurable results.

Some Nigerians need to die b4 nigeria will become better for real

Nigeria doesn't have an announcement problem; it has an implementation problem.

We've seen many well-packaged reforms over the years. The real questions are: Is there funding? Are the camps ready? Will welfare improve? Will corps members be safer? Will these reforms actually increase employability?

Good policies deserve applause. Great implementation deserves trust.

PDPdestroyer:
If you listen to Nigerians, you won’t get anything done

You will need to tell me a reform that productively transform the life of an average citizen in nigeria made by tinubu.

A civil and diplomatic discussion pls.

Sugarboyy:
You know why most times I don't even bother to take most Nigerians seriously? Because they will always complain. They will always find negatives in every positives but ask them the solution, just like Peter Obi, they will tell you that they don't want to reel out the solutions they have in mind so that it won't be stolen. Before now, if you had asked this writer to come up with comprehensive plans to reform and reposition the NYSC, he would say the scheme is better the way it's right now. But here he is looking for negatives from this well thought out plans from the FG to reform reposition the NYSC.
Tinubu is a reformer and he is already reforming Alot of abnormalities that previous presidents refused or failed to do just because they were scared of losing votes (mostly votes from northerners)

Policy announcements are the easy part. Implementation is where Nigeria usually struggles.

A six-week orientation sounds impressive, but will camps have enough water, beds, clinics, electricity, and food? A new uniform won't solve overcrowded hostels. Skills training won't create jobs if employers aren't ready to absorb corps members. Before celebrating the reform, let's see the budget, implementation plan, and measurable outcomes.

Reforms shouldn't be judged by beautiful graphics—they should be judged by the experience of the average corps member.

Sugarboyy:
You know why most times I don't even bother to take most Nigerians seriously? Because they will always complain. They will always find negatives in every positives but ask them the solution, just like Peter Obi, they will tell you that they don't want to reel out the solutions they have in mind so that it won't be stolen. Before now, if you had asked this writer to come up with comprehensive plans to reform and reposition the NYSC, he would say the scheme is better the way it's right now. But here he is looking for negatives from this well thought out plans from the FG to reform reposition the NYSC.
Tinubu is a reformer and he is already reforming Alot of abnormalities that previous presidents refused or failed to do just because they were scared of losing votes (mostly votes from northerners)

while a agree with the development , I still believed NYSC to me should be scraped

Will you keep quiet. What has peter obi got to do with this topic

Sugarboyy:
You know why most times I don't even bother to take most Nigerians seriously? Because they will always complain. They will always find negatives in every positives but ask them the solution, just like Peter Obi, they will tell you that they don't want to reel out the solutions they have in mind so that it won't be stolen. Before now, if you had asked this writer to come up with comprehensive plans to reform and reposition the NYSC, he would say the scheme is better the way it's right now. But here he is looking for negatives from this well thought out plans from the FG to reform reposition the NYSC.
Tinubu is a reformer and he is already reforming Alot of abnormalities that previous presidents refused or failed to do just because they were scared of losing votes (mostly votes from northerners)

Sugarboyy:
You know why most times I don't even bother to take most Nigerians seriously? Because they will always complain. They will always find negatives in every positives but ask them the solution, just like Peter Obi, they will tell you that they don't want to reel out the solutions they have in mind so that it won't be stolen. Before now, if you had asked this writer to come up with comprehensive plans to reform and reposition the NYSC, he would say the scheme is better the way it's right now. But here he is looking for negatives from this well thought out plans from the FG to reform reposition the NYSC.
Tinubu is a reformer and he is already reforming Alot of abnormalities that previous presidents refused or failed to do just because they were scared of losing votes (mostly votes from northerners)

Some people need to complain, lament, condemned and attack everything they hear, just to reduce small toxic from their body, it's evidence even in this platform