₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,345,200 members, 8,516,039 topics. Date: Tuesday, 10 November 2026 at 03:05 AM

Toggle theme

APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy (3768 Views)

1 2 3 Reply (Go Down)

APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Racoon(op): 12:17pm On Aug 25
In his inaugural address to the nation, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu declared that the fuel subsidy scheme had ceased to exist. “Fuel subsidy is gone,” he said, and then ‘fuel subsidy’ peaked at number two on Nigeria’s Twitter trend table.

For over a decade, previous administrations considered eliminating fuel subsidies but failed in implementation, owing largely to popular opposition. Now backed by the law, it is still an emotive topic, and many are curious about the president’s stance.

Although it is predicted that the elimination of subsidies will lead to momentary economic hardship, it is being received rather warmly, in contrast to 11 years ago, when just the mention of it was met with fierce opposition.

“A president has just announced he’s removing subsidy and nobody wants to occupy Nigeria?” One Twitter user asked in reference to the new disposition.

WHY SHOULD THE REMOVAL OF FUEL SUBSIDY MAKE ANYONE WANT TO OCCUPY NIGERIA?
On January 1, 2012, former President Goodluck Jonathan abruptly ended fuel subsidies, sparking the Occupy Nigeria protest.


Occupy Nigeria was an anti-subsidy removal campaign, which was later propagated to unseat Jonathan and his People’s Democratic Party (PDP). It was also one of the corridors through which the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) was installed.

Some of the leading protesters, all APC supporters, now hail the decision to eliminate subsidies as significant and advantageous for the Nigerian people. Ten years ago, this rationale was widely contested.

-1). "N65 OR NOTHING" BASHIR AHMAD
In protest of Jonathan’s 2012 fuel subsidy removal policy, Bashir Ahmad, the digital media aide to Muhammadu Buhari, the immediate past president, wrote, “N65 or nothing.”


Ahmad was a front-runner of the #OccupyNigeria protest in Kano State and on social media. He agitated not just against the removal of fuel subsidies but also openly expressed his desire to remove Jonathan and his government.

However, in a 2016 tweet, Ahmad quoted President Tinubu as saying, “I can swear that President Muhammadu Buhari will not misappropriate the funds saved from the removal of subsidy.”

With petrol prices at N185 per litre, more than double his N65 baseline, and expected to more than triple after fuel subsidies are gone, Ahmad appears to have lost interest in occupying Nigeria..He wrote a congratulatory message to Tinubu after his swearing in as president, when he explicitly said that there would be no further subsidies.

-2). "CUT COST BEFORE REMOVING SUBSIDY" - JAPHET OMOJUWA
In 2011, the Jonathan-led administration budgeted N245 billion for fuel subsidies, but by the end of the year, the administration said it had spent N2.6 trillion subsidising fuel.


When the administration ended fuel subsidies on January 1, 2012, Japhet Omojuwa, a popular social media critic, led a protest against Jonathan, using the hashtag ‘Occupy Nigeria’, his gripe being that the former president failed to curb the corruption in his cabinet and now sought to make common Nigerians pay for their actions.

In multiple tweets from 2012, when Jonathan removed subsidies, to the 2015 presidential election campaigns, Omojuwa called for the sack of Jonathan and his cabinet members.

“Nigerians will fight to keep the subsidies until public officers make certain commitments, the most telling of which is their salaries and allowances. Until then, the shutdown of Nigeria, or ‘Naijacalypse'”, he wrote in his 2012 CNN opinion piece.


Post-Jonathan, the tides seemed to have turned. Despite increased budgets for NASS members from 2012’s N71 billion and multiple corruption scandals linked to the APC-led government, Omojuwa has extended his support for Tinubu’s “Fuel subsidy is gone”, stating that the president’s statement was to show that he didn’t intend to bring the dead back.]

-3). "SAY NO TO CRIPPLING IMF POLICIES" - OGBENI DIPO AWOJIDE
On Monday, Ogbeni Dipo Awojide, a UK-based Nigerian, quoted President Tinubu as saying, “There is no budgetary allocation for fuel subsidy. Fuel subsidy is gone.”

Eleven years ago however, Awojide heralded the Occupy Nigeria protest in London against the fuel subsidy removal policy. Ogbenidipo's Occupy Nigeria protest against fuel subsidy removal


-4). "FROM OCCUPY NIGERIA TO PATRIOTIC ACT" - LAURETTA ONOCHIE
In the aftermath of the Occupy Nigeria protests, Lauretta Onochie, the chair of the Niger Delta Development Commission and aide to Buhari, wrote: “The fear of #OccupyNigeria is the beginning of wisdom for the Jonathan administration. June 2012 has come and gone, and no fuel hike.”


By 2016 however, Onochie, whose party was now at the helm of affairs, described subsidy removal as a patriotic act made in the long-term interest of Nigerians.

In justification of her new choice, Onochie explained, “Looting was the reason I did not trust the administration of Jonathan to remove the fuel subsidy in 2012. It was made up of more than 40% thieves.”



-5). "TACKLE REFINERIES FIRST" - ABIKE DABIRI EREWA.
During the Occupy Nigeria protests, Abike Dabiri, the pioneer chair of the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NIDCOM), instituted during Buhari’s administration, tweeted, “#Fuelsubsidy Tackle the issue of refineries first before even talking about removing the subsidy.”


Subsidy payments have risen steadily from N2.09 trillion in 2011 to N4 trillion in 2022, yet prices rose from N65 to N185. In 2021 alone, N100 billion was spent on rehabilitating refineries that never functioned.

Daily Trust reported that Nigeria spent N12.05 trillion on refineries and subsidies in the past seven years, yet the NIDCOM chair has remained silent about the signing into law of the subsidy removal bill and Tinubu’s proclamation. She has instead congratulated the new president.
https://fij.ng/article/apc-occupied-nigeria-in-2012-what-changed-now-that-tinubu-has-removed-subsidy/

Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Racoon(op): 12:23pm On Aug 25
The internet never forgets. What Goodluck Jonathan saw in 2012 is what Tinubu the so called master strategists is just getting to know about it 11yrs later

If they had allowed the subsidy removal back then, Nigerians would have adjusted by now. Tinubu is a liar and selfish man, not to be trusted, he doesn't care about the repercussions of his acts. So no one should think same for him.
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Racoon(op): 12:27pm On Aug 25

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UW1CjiBM4rs?si=Pf_xRNNqTdsjs_N_

See how wicked all these so called Ojota Occupy Nigeria/Save Nigeria Group for who they really are. They were forming patriots, and social crusaders. Thank goodness, history have really exposed them for whom they are; opportunistic hungry hypocrites who mortgaged a nation not because of competence, but their bellies.
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by muyico(m): 12:38pm On Aug 25
We APC were expert campaigners
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Thewrath: 5:22pm On Aug 25
A party without vision,created problems since 2015,reversed itself and decided to campaign with the result of the reversal as achievements!!
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Gotocourt: 5:22pm On Aug 25
Tinubu is after my life, Emilokan must go.
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Racoon(op): 5:23pm On Aug 25
"Removal of oil subsidy: President Jonathan breaks social contract with the people. [Tinubu noted that with the subsidy removal, the people would become “enslaved to greater misery.”
FLASHBACK: "How Tinubu Criticised Jonathan Over Petrol Subsidy Removal. "
https://dailytrust.com/FLASHBACK-How-Tinubu-criticised-Jonathan-over-petrol-subsidy-removal

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on Friday said the removal of fuel subsidy by his administration saved the country from imminent bankruptcy and laid the foundation for the gradual recovery of the nation’s economy.
"Fuel Subsidy Removal Saved Nigeria From Bankruptcy" - Tinubu.
https://statehouse.gov.ng/fuel-subsidy-removal-saved-nigeria-from-bankruptcy-says-president-tinubu/
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Kukutente23: 5:24pm On Aug 25
The funny thing is when Jonathan removed subsidy in 2012, fuel price moved from N87 to N145 which was 60% increase. A barrel of crude was $110 per barrel then and we didn't have local refining capacity

Tinubu and his goons rejected it

In 2023 when Tinubu removed subsidy, fuel price moved from N198 to N600 and today, it is N1300 making it 656% increase. Today, a barrel of crude is $95 and we have full local refining capacity.

Tinubu simply ran a scam on Nigerians to enrich his cronies and governors
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by AMINDA: 5:24pm On Aug 25
This is why Obi should have kept mum on the subsidy saga instead of falling for the APC gaslighting and trying to prove that he is consistent. You don't urinate on your political opponents when they are on fire. APC came into power riding on populism.

The problem with Peter Obi's position is that apart from a few points he may get for consistency, which rarely translates to electoral fortunes, his defense of subsidy removal is neither good politics nor good policy. The political sentiment in Nigeria has soured on subsidy removal because Nigerians have seen and are groaning from its aftermath. And the policy side of subsidy removal too is now in tatters, discredited by the failure of any of its many promised benefits to materialize.
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Jakpon: 5:24pm On Aug 25
Liar !!!. APC did not occupy Nigeria in 2012. APC was created in 2014
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by givedemwotowoto: 5:24pm On Aug 25
Tinubu supporters are cowards who can't take half of what they dish out
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Flangelo12: 5:25pm On Aug 25
This subsidy matter is not the hot button issue you would like to make it.

Why not concentrate on Tinubu's certificate or the alleged drug related distractions that you've been broadcasting for years?

huh
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by DropsMic(m): 5:25pm On Aug 25
What has changed is that the US government now supports this regime. So if Nigerians take to the streets to protest and are slaughtered, nothing will happen, just like nothing happened to Ruto in Kenya after his government killed its own citizens during the Finance Bill protests..

The point is, when the white man stands with you, even God treads carefully, and the devil himself becomes your shadow.
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Tenses: 5:25pm On Aug 25
Over 180 million Nigerians are now below poverty lane.
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Sirseedorf(m): 5:25pm On Aug 25
Some people are still crying more than goodluck Jonathan, claiming they are concerned about the country, in all they are just hiding under obident claiming to be fighting for the country.

Country most of them hate hearing good news about, hypocritical people.
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Jakpon: 5:25pm On Aug 25
Stop lieing. Nigerians both home and in the diaspora took part in the 2012 occupy Naija protest. APC was not in existence then.
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by AdolfHitlerxXx: 5:28pm On Aug 25
So .... You want APC to Occupy Nigeria for you ?

You too do the same nah! grin
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by anonimi: 5:28pm On Aug 25
muyico:
We APC were expert campaigners
What kind of balablu change of scammers to campaigners is this huh




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4x5IMzjHPug


anonimi:
Petrol should never cost more than N70 per litre, says APC

January 19, 2015

The All Progressives Congress (APC) has described as mere tokenism the reduction of petrol price from N97 to N87 per litre, saying the petroleum product ordinarily should sell for N70.

On Sunday, the federal government announced the reduction of petrol price, citing the fall of global crude oil price.

But the APC through Lai Mohammed, its spokesman, on Monday accused the government of making a show out of deceit, saying “a 10.3 per cent slash in the price of petrol was a mere tokenism at a time the price of crude oil has crashed by about 60 per cent”.

It argued that the pump price of a litre of petrol should not be more than 70 Naira, alleging that at N87 per litre, the government was forcing Nigerians to subsidise the massive corruption in the oil sector by N17 for every litre of fuel.

https://www.thecable.ng/petrol-never-cost-n70-per-litre-says-apc/
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by dettolgel: 5:29pm On Aug 25
What do you expect from tribal politics?
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by givedemwotowoto: 5:29pm On Aug 25
AMINDA:
This is why Obi should have kept mum on the subsidy saga instead of falling for the APC gaslighting and trying to prove that he is consistent. You don't urinate on your political opponents when they are on fire.
I have to say I am disappointed with Atiku on reverting back to petrol subsidy.

We just can't go back there, we have to focus our conversation on what the savings should be used for.

I'm with PO 100% on this. Stick to subsidy removal but come up with a plan of what to do with the money. Tell us your plan. Lay it out.

When GEJ removed petrol subsidy back in 2012, they had a plan to build 3 refineries with the savings, each was estimated around $3 billion at the time. This time I say commit that money to Job creation (funding businesses to create jobs so people can have steady income) to raise the standard of living so people can afford the petrol price.
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by oneMalik: 5:29pm On Aug 25
No news again na NONSENSE remain.

How this kind headline wan take change the price of rice
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Lastmankc(m): 5:29pm On Aug 25
Sirseedorf:
Some people are still crying more than goodluck Jonathan, claiming they are concerned about the country, in all they are just hiding under obident claiming to be fighting for the country.

Country most of them hate hearing good news about, hypocritical people.
What is this one even saying
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Sleekfingers: 5:31pm On Aug 25
Jakpon:
Liar !!!. APC did not occupy Nigeria in 2012. APC was created in 2014
APC was officially created in 2013.
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Kukutente23: 5:33pm On Aug 25
muyico:
We APC were expert campaigners
Or rather expert hypocrites
That's why the country can't move forward with you guys at the helm
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Angelfrost(m): 5:35pm On Aug 25
Lol... ADC, AAC, NDC, CDC, etc, should go and occupy their own na.
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by AMINDA: 5:35pm On Aug 25
givedemwotowoto:
I have to say I am disappointed with Atiku on reverting back to petrol subsidy.

We just can't go back there, we have to focus our conversation on what the savings should be used for.

I'm with PO 100% on this. Stick to subsidy removal but come up with a plan of what to do with the money. Tell us your plan. Lay it out.

When GEJ removed petrol subsidy back in 2012, they had a plan to build 3 refineries with the savings, each was estimated around $3 billion at the time. This time I say commit that money to Job creation (funding businesses to create jobs so people can have steady income) to raise the standard of living so people can afford the petrol price.
What plan can Obi come up with that will significantly differ from what Tinubu is currently doing? The constitution limits you in so many ways and Obi will still not dictate to the governors on how to spend their money or constitutionally be able to deny them their share. Subsidy is the only thing all Nigerians collectively benefit from government. If you are saying Obi has integrity, so did Buhari, but the system limits you even if you are a Saint. Obi has fumbled his campaign.
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by oloriooko(m): 5:36pm On Aug 25
Tinubu will still win come 2027 cuz many Nigerians are gullible and illiterate voters and poverty has been weaponized against them.
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Kukutente23: 5:36pm On Aug 25
Flangelo12:
This subsidy matter is not the hot button issue you would like to make it.

Why not concentrate on Tinubu's certificate or the alleged drug related distractions that you've been broadcasting for years?

huh
Why are you then pleading for diversion
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Gerrard59(m): 5:36pm On Aug 25
You even omitted the tweet where Bashir threatened to repeat what happened in 1967 if GEJ doesn't revert to subsidy.

It was sheer ethnic gang up against Jonathan who came from a minority ethnic group. Also, the protests only happened in the southwest, a bit in parts of Benin and the north. There were literally no protests East of the River Niger (Anambra to Cross River). I recall Ngozi Okonjo made a remark that the country lost circa 350BN or million (I cannot fully recall the exact figure) daily because of the protests. That the economy would have lost greater sums if the protests were nationwide as those in the East didn't participate.

Basic economics supported the removal of subsidy. I did support it then and still support it now. But the crude hypocrisy and ethnic gang-up was terrible. One of the ills of living in an ethnically heterogeneous country.

Some will say Jonathan was weak, but when two-thirds of the country are against you as an ethnic minority, with only one major ethnic group behind you, what can you do? In 2015, the same Nigerians campaigned and voted for a strong man in the name of Buhari. How did that turned out?

Nigerians got what they wanted. It's only painful that some people are stuck with results they never contributed to producing.
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Flangelo12: 5:37pm On Aug 25
Kukutente23:
Why are you then pleading for diversion
How many threads on this matter without any traction?

You sef check am.

grin
Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by anonimi: 5:40pm On Aug 25
Sirseedorf:
Some people are still crying more than goodluck Jonathan, claiming they are concerned about the country, in all they are just hiding under obident claiming to be fighting for the country.

Country most of them hate hearing good news about, hypocritical people.
No one hates Nigeria more than the master strategist who begged Buhari in 2015, to make Jonathan a one term president after his party imported terrorists to destroy our country.

Re: APC ‘Occupied Nigeria’ In 2012. What Changed Now That Tinubu Has Removed Subsidy by Kukutente23: 5:40pm On Aug 25
AMINDA:
What plan can Obi come up with that will significantly differ from what Tinubu is currently doing? The constitution limits you in so many ways and Obi will still not dictate to the governors on how to spend their money or constitutionally be able to deny them their share. Subsidy is the only thing all Nigerians collectively benefit from government.
Obidients simply don't get it
You have to tilt the scale
If you like climb the tallest mountain and announce to Nigerians that you'll share the proceeds of subsidy removal to each household, it won't make any meaning to them. Why? Because there's nothing you've said that the man sitting there can't do as well. So why change the president because you promise you can manage money better. They simply don't get what "alternative" means in opposition politics
1 2 3 Reply

Tinubu Removed Subsidy Without Thinking About Next Election – Gbajabiamila • Peter Obi Accommodating Flood Victims From Kogi State In 2012 (Throwback Video)) • Video Of Nnamdi Kanu Supporting One Nigeria And Northerners In 2012 • 2 • 3 • 4

How Much Can You Sacrifice For Nigeria? • JTF Destroys Illegal Refineries In Edo, But Why? • Amaechi's Kinsmen Reels Out Jonathan's Developmental Projects In Rivers State