₦airaland Forum

KnownUnknown:
I heard the governing council just received a telegram from your imaginary friend telling them that blood transfusion is now copacetic. Which one of those goofballs needed a blood transfusion?

Who told you blood transfusion is safe?
Instead of asking us what we believe you just sit in the corner of your room assuming things!🥱

QuinQ:
And what religion would that be? Islamist believe it is Islam.

In other words you're not interested in the one and only true religion so stop calling me i'm not interested in aimless arguments!🥱

DeepSight:
How dare you.

Please i hate irreputable people so if you are not sure of what you want to say don't mention me again because i love people who always stand up for whatever they say not those who are ashamed of being quoted!🥱

MaxInDHouse:
Please i hate irreputable people so if you are not sure of what you want to say don't mention me again because i love people who always stand up for whatever they say not those who are ashamed of being quoted!🥱

Your utterances may amount to treason.

THE BIBLE IS THE WORD OF GOD AND IS GOD.
JESUS IS THE LORD, OUR SOVEREIGN, HOW MAJESTIC IS HIS NAME.
EVERYONE AND ALL OF THE ACADEMIC HISTORY BOOK IS PRECIED AND CONTAINED IN THE BIBLE.
SO THE BIBLE IS AN ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ALL WISDOM, KNOWLEDGE, DIRECTIVES, DIRECTION, DISCERNMENT, UNDERSTANDING AND LIFE OF HEAVEN AND EARTH AND ALL CREATIONS LIVING IN THEM.

MaxInDHouse:
Who told you blood transfusion is safe?
Instead of asking us what we believe you just sit in the corner of your room assuming things!🥱

You must have missed the memo.

As of September 18, 2026, the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses updated its medical guidance so that individual members can personally decide whether to accept transfusions of primary blood components (red blood cells, white blood cells, plasma, and platelets).

LordReed:
Anybody who starts questioning reality because they need to defend a position has lost the argument. You are giving up your own ability to pronounce any statement of knowledge. Stop doing it.

It is not a matter of questioning reality at all.
It is a matter of seeing that a complex enough AL's consciousness is indistinguishable from human consciousness.

DeepSight:
I often fear it is. I have a strong feeling we live in a generated simulation and our heads are a biological visor and transmission set.

LordReed

Of course we could be (see screenshorr above). just as extremely complex AI will think it has "true" consciousness while the simpler systems it creates doesn't!

LordReed:
It is irrelevant if scientist fully understand it or not, your submission clearly states these are neural nets processing information. It is not intelligent. At least not yet.

Human intelligence is also "neural nets processing information". When a system becomes complex enough, it becomes indistinguishable from human intelligence

QuinQ:
Of course we could be (see screenshorr above). just as extremely complex AI will think it has "true" consciousness while the simpler systems it creates doesn't!

I don't think AI thinks.

DeepSight:
I don't think AI thinks.

Neither do humans.
See, you must first define "think".
Example: don't think of pink elephant. Your mind immediately produces a pink elephant. Thoughts happen. You can force yourself to focus on certain thoughts - so can AI

sonmvayina:
my question is why is Jesus not mentioned in academic history books.....

why??

Because academic history books are not religious books..
Jesus was a prophet and founder of a religion.

Do people go to school to study religion?
We know schools are meant to study history, not religion.

If you want to know more are Jesus, Muhammed, God, African juju, etc, please go their appropriate religious centres

QuinQ:
Neither do humans.
See, you must first define "think".
Example: don't think of pink elephant. Your mind immediately produces a pink elephant. Thoughts happen. You can force yourself to focus on certain thoughts - so can AI

You are gravely mistaken. Accept the schooling provided by LordReed and KnownUnknown.
AI works with prompts and will produce based on programming. By contrast, you have an imagination.

DeepSight:
Your utterances may amount to treason.

Do you know what it means when you shy away from your own comment?
Why do you think politicians have issues with comments?
Well it's because people do quote them later so if you can't stand up for what you said with your own mouth or what you typed with your own fingers surely you shouldn't be welcomed in the gathering of people commenting on serious matters.

That is what you have become to me so keep on arguing aimlessly without being accountable for whatever you type which you could deny anytime!🥱

KnownUnknown:
You must have missed the memo.
As of September 18, 2026, the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses updated its medical guidance so that individual members can personally decide whether to accept transfusions of primary blood components (red blood cells, white blood cells, plasma, and platelets).

That is why i asked you if you're aware of what you are saying.

God said we must not eat blood {Genesis 9:4; Act 15:28-29} but God never condemned the eating of eggs which contains fractions of blood.
So we updated our understanding that since eggs contains fractions of blood and it's not bad for consumption that means fractions of blood in not bad rather it's the whole blood from another body that's not good for our body.
So when you see information ask adherents to break it down for you not just carrying rumors that you can't explain to details!😟

MaxInDHouse:
Do you know what it means when you shy away from your own comment?
Why do you think politicians have issues with comments?
Well it's because people do quote them later so if you can't stand up for what you said with your own mouth or what you typed with your own fingers surely you shouldn't be welcomed in the gathering of people commenting on serious matters.

That is what you have become to me so keep on arguing aimlessly without being accountable for whatever you type which you could deny anytime!🥱

I stand by my comment. I enjoyed my time with JWs and have huge respect for them still. I have told you my issues, which include the matter of shunning, something which has broken many familes.And my irritation has long been that you answer every criticism by going to produce quotes of where you or JWs were praised. And you do this ad infinitum ad nauseum.

DeepSight:
I stand by my comment. I enjoyed my time with JWs and have huge respect for them still. I have told you my issues, which include the matter of shunning, something which has broken many familes.And my irritation has long been that you answer every criticism by going to produce quotes of where you or JWs were praised. And you do this ad infinitum ad nauseum.

I'm not asking you whether you respect a group or not that's your own personal business what i hate is when you are quoted as a REPUTABLE INDIVIDUAL for others to see what we are trying to establish but you then come up complaining about being quoted then whatever you say or type is no longer to be considered as you cannot stand up for it.

Quote me a million times anywhere because whatever i've said remains my word anytime, anywhere and before anybody!

See what a real man said when a group of hopeless men wanted him to shy away from his own words:

“What I have written, I have written.” John 19:22

But when you are ashamed of your own comment then you're not in anyway reputable before me.


So continue arguing aimlessly with whoever takes you seriously as for me please stop quoting or mentioning me that's what you say to me therefore obey your own rule at least!🥱

MaxInDHouse:
I'm not asking you whether you respect a group or not that's your own personal business what i hate is when you are quoted as a REPUTABLE INDIVIDUAL for others to see what we are trying to establish but you then come up complaining about being quoted then whatever you say or type is no longer to be considered as you cannot stand up for it.

Quote me a million times anywhere because whatever i've said remains my word anytime, anywhere and before anybody!

See what a real man said when a group of hopeless men wanted him to shy away from his own words:

“What I have written, I have written.” John 19:22

But when you are ashamed of your own comment then you're not in anyway reputable before me.


So continue arguing aimlessly with whoever takes you seriously as for me please stop quoting or mentioning me that's what you say to me therefore obey your own rule at least!🥱

At least the spamming has stopped. Thank you for that. Good day.

DeepSight:
At least the spamming has stopped. Thank you for that. Good day.

So please stop quoting or mentioning me since that's what you demanded from me.
I only relate with REPUTABLE INDIVIDUALS.
Meanwhile anytime you mention or quote me i will bring back that comment as your own quote therefore if you want to bury it try never quoting or mentioning me on this forum again.

Farewell! 🥱

MaxInDHouse:
So please stop quoting or mentioning me since that's what you demanded from me.
I only relate with REPUTABLE INDIVIDUALS.
Meanwhile anytime you mention or quote me i will bring back that comment as your own quote therefore if you want to bury it try never quoting or mentioning me on this forum again.

Farewell! 🥱

Will you sharrap and kneel down at once, how dare you address your elder, prince and imperial master in such a careless manner.

DeepSight:
Will you sharrap and kneel down at once, how dare you address your elder, prince and imperial master in such a careless manner.

Guy i no be your friend, try not to be funny now because i mean every word i type.

Stop mentioning or quoting me if you don't want me to quote your comment again!

DeepSight:
You are gravely mistaken. Accept the schooling provided by LordReed and KnownUnknown.
AI works with prompts and will produce based on programming. By contrast, you have an imagination.

That's because they're not thinking deeply enough.
AI has "imagination" (which yiu didn't define) too! And an advanced enough AI has vastly more and better imagination than a human.
See, there is NOTHING a human can do that an advanced enough AI can't do.
The only thing you can say is that AI doesn't have a soul. But then what is "soul" and how are you sure all humans have it? And how are you sure AI can't develop a "soul"along the way?

Scientists who pioneered AI say they're not sure how it works, but you folks, from watching a YOUTUBE video, know everything about AI and thst it is just a language tree! (We all know most stuffs on YouTube are half-truths or garbage)

QuinQ:
That's because they're not thinking deeply enough.
AI has "imagination" (which yiu didn't define) too! And an advanced enough AI has vastly more and better imagination than a human.
See, there is NOTHING a human can do that an advanced enough AI can't do.
The only thing you can say is that AI doesn't have a soul. But then what is "soul" and how are you sure all humans have it? And how are you sure AI can't develop a "soul"along the way?

Scientists who pioneered AI say they're not sure how it works, but you folks, from watching a YOUTUBE video, know everything about AI and thst it is just a language tree! (We all know most stuffs on YouTube are half-truths or garbage)

I stopped reading where you said an AI can have better imagination than a human. I dont think you know what imagination is.

DeepSight:
I stopped reading where you said an AI can have better imagination than a human. I dont think you know what imagination is.

Unfortunately for those without imagination or ability ai slop looks like a Hollywood masterpiece

GloriousGbola:
Unfortunately for those without imagination or ability ai slop looks like a Hollywood masterpiece

You can say that again!

DeepSight:
I stopped reading where you said an AI can have better imagination than a human. I dont think you know what imagination is.

See below. Note the word "currently". We DON'T know! (Like countless other things we don't know)

QuinQ:
See below. Note the word "currently". We DON'T know! (Like countless other things we don't know)

Even your own attachment defeated you.

DeepSight:
Even your own attachment defeated you.

No it didn't. It says AI already has "artificial imagination" and MAY eventually develop imagination that is indistinguishable from humans'. The only difference is physically "lived experience" and complexity. The former can be simulated and the later acquired with time!

QuinQ:
No it didn't. It says AI already has "artificial imagination" and MAY eventually develop imagination that is indistinguishable from humans'. The only difference is physically "lived experience" and complexity. The former can be simulated and the later acquired with time!

One thing no machine can ever have is self conscious lived experience and no, AI cannot imagine anything.

DeepSight:
One thing no machine can ever have is self conscious lived experience and no, AI cannot imagine anything.

How are you sure you're having "self conscious lived experience"? How are you sure you're not basically a machine (or "a brain in a jar"} being fed experiences?

QuinQ:
How are you sure you're having "self conscious lived experience"? How are you sure you're not basically a machine (or "a brain in a jar"} being fed experiences?

Our experience is only available to a living being. Now, it may be a simulation (as I strongly suspect), it could be a "brain in a jar" - whatever it is, there must be a living being involved for self conscious lived experience to garner.