₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,326,096 members, 8,424,970 topics. Date: Thursday, 11 June 2026 at 09:50 PM

Toggle theme

Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsWhy Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration (1356 Views)

1 Reply (Go Down)

Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by VirginFinder(op): 5:49pm On Apr 06, 2015
Apart from the fact that there are no APC senators from the South East, the original zoning formular provides for rotation of positions between the north and the south and NOT tribes.

Let's analyse it.

From 1999-2007 when Obasanjo was president we had this arrangement in place;

1. President - South - South West (Olusegun Obasanjo)

2. Vice President - North - North East (Atiku Abubakar)

3. Senate President - South - South East (Chuba Okadigbo & 4/5 others)

4. Speaker - North - North West (Ghali Umar Na'Abba)

From 2007-2011 which was supposed to be Yar'Adua first term until death cut it short and GEJ completed it, we had;

1. President - North - North West (Umar Musa YarAdua)

2. Vice President - South - South South (Goodluck Jonathan)

3. Senate President - North - North Central (David Mark)

4. Speaker - South - South West (Dimeji Bankole)

The above is the exact form the zoning arrangement ought to take and has always taken since the inception of the democracy in 1999 until GEJ ran and won in 2011.

I dont see APC digressing from the direction of common sense.

Going by the zoning arrangement as it has always been, the arrangement for the incoming administration should take this form:

1. President - North - North West (Muhammadu Buhari)

2. Vice President - South - South West (Yemi Osinbajo)

3. Senate President - North - North Central (The odds favour Kwara - Bukola Saraki)

4. Speaker - South - South South/South South East (The odds favour Edo)

Please let us be realistic and reason beyond emotions.

Thank you for reading.
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by VirginFinder(op): 7:09pm On Apr 06, 2015
.
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by VirginFinder(op): 11:10pm On Apr 06, 2015
We shall see
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by djfox: 11:21pm On Apr 06, 2015
What the fvck is with all this talk over Senate Presidency? Is the position supposed to directly affect anyone but the Politicians that want it and wanna use their region and tribe as an excuse to seek it undecided

I mean aside from the line of succession (which would Never even reach the Senate Presidency realistically) whats the big deal with it?!
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by Nobody: 11:39pm On Apr 06, 2015
Igbos are slaves in Nigeria and thus can't be made our senate president. QED!
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by VirginFinder(op): 9:47am On Apr 07, 2015
djfox:
What the fvck is with all this talk over Senate Presidency? Is the position supposed to directly affect anyone but the Politicians that want it and wanna use their region and tribe as an excuse to seek it undecided

I mean aside from the line of succession (which would Never even reach the Senate Presidency realistically) whats the big deal with it?!
Then why are ibos clamouring for it?
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by truefact: 9:52am On Apr 07, 2015
The simple question is why do the Yoruba and Hausa still keeping Igbos in Nigeria? Why can't they let Igbos go since it's obvious you lot hated them with passion?
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by VirginFinder(op): 5:51pm On Apr 16, 2015
truefact:
The simple question is why do the Yoruba and Hausa still keeping Igbos in Nigeria? Why can't they let Igbos go since it's obvious you lot hated them with passion?
You are a learner!

It is God Almighty that is keeping Nigeria one.
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by Malawian(m): 6:00pm On Apr 16, 2015
the funny thing about all these is that if the igbo go militant for one week, the whole world would be here to solve us.
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by VirginFinder(op): 5:05pm On Apr 17, 2015
Malawian:
the funny thing about all these is that if the igbo go militant for one week, the whole world would be here to solve us.
Why are ibos so unnecessarily full of themselves?
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by Nobody: 6:32pm On Apr 17, 2015
Emeka - Landlord.

Segun - Tenant.

Adamu - Gateman.

One Nigeria is lovely
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by Twistaray(m): 6:36pm On Apr 17, 2015
BuddahMonk:
Emeka - Landlord.

Segun - Tenant.

Adamu - Gateman.

One Nigeria is lovely
grin looool

Sheath your swords Hahahahaha, what a joke . Why don't you bring out your arsenals and make war if you're so certain of winning. With a few exceptions, the majority of ibos leaders keep making political miscalculations both in federal and state levels that hinder their progress as a people, and then blame everybody else but themselves when the consequences of their choices come into play. Yorubas might be friendly but they aren't stüpid; they might be patient but they are deadly - as deadly as a venomous belcher’s sea snake. Mess with this tribe at your own peril. So it is now they know that they have economic interests and assets in Lagos worth protecting, yet always eager to disrupt the fragile political and social status quo in place that begets a peaceful and prosperous coexistence. Is this not self-sabotage? Do you think for a moment the Yorubas are blind to the subtle and tactical aim for a gradual takeover of Lagos State the Ibos are planning and acting out? No, the Yorubas have x-ray vision in this case and can see your plans to the bones. It's just right now the sensible Yoruba leaders are still busy with clearing out the "omoale" leaders (as they call it) from their zones and building a solid political foundation for a brighter future for the Yoruba region and its people. Once they are through (and they are almost through), then the ibos case will be opened and addressed thoroughly. What is happening right now that the Yorubas seem to "overlook" certain anomalistic behavior of the ibos is best described by their idiom that says "Iya yin owa ninu cooler" - hope I got it right. That is, your punishment is still inside the cooler; and you will eat it hot in due time, unless there's a change.

Lagos State is a very complex society, it is like the New York of America; and every tribe in Nigeria have significant populations in Lagos. Whether it is Binis, Hausas, Ijaws, Idomas, Itshekiris, calabars...or whether peoples from Warri, makurdi, maiduguri, Kabba and other places etc! Lagos State as a society is a perfect microcosm of the totality of the Nigerian society at large. However, it has become commonplace for only the ibos (who subconsciously due to the unfortunate civil war continue to see the Yorubas as their social, economic and political enemies) to want to rigorously compete against the Yorubas as if a battle for conquest and Lagos State is one of the spoils of war. That's why you can already witness the ibos designating Lagos as a "no-mans land" on one hand; but yet on other hand methodically trying to take over the so-called no-man's land. This is totally wrong and unacceptable. Lagos state can never be converted to Ibo land, not now and not in a trillion years from now. Every Nigerian tribe I believe have a part of the land no matter how small that is theirs or rather they are the custodians of due to ancestry, conquest or what have you. But the era of conquests is over and no individual tribe has the moral or legal right, or political might to encroach or seize another tribe's accustomed lands. Only the federal government can further share lands to/from tribes as they see fit, and even with all the federal might this can't be done with impunity anymore because fortunately for everyone the era of military rule is over. No federal government will ever share Lagos to any tribe other than Yorubas. It is their inheritance in Nigeria. The ibo inhabitants in Lagos need to understand this: Lagos was, is and always will be a Yoruba State. So the earlier you drop your scheming of "conquering" Lagos, the better for you.


Now, regarding taxation and the DEVELOPMENT of Lagos State, many ibos keep making erroneous claims. They say stuff like: without ibos Lagos State would not have developed the way it has; ibos pay the most taxes; ibos built Lagos; Lagos can't survive without ibos...blah blah blah! Seeing how far this fallacy is spreading, it's best the matter is addressed for the sake of clarity and peace. First off, taxation of businesses and individuals in Lagos State isn't peculiar or exclusive to ibos alone. Everyone pays tax, irrespective of tribe - heck, even Yorubas pay tax and are not exempted. The Lagos State government doesn't have a discriminating taxation policy. Its tax policy is blind to tribe. Ibos don't pay more than everybody else and Yorubas don't pay less that everybody else. The tax percentages are at fixed rates. If we're talking about "amount" of taxes being generated on a tribal basis, unless you're the accountant general of Lagos State, it remains arguable which tribe brings in the highest percentage of taxes. Quantity doesn't necessarily translate to bigger amounts. For example, one company's tax returns in VI can be greater than the tax returns of 100,000 businesses tax returns in Oshodi and Agege combined. So tax revenues can't be estimated based on "quantity" of businesses. Therefore, because there is a proliferation of businesses by ibos across Lagos doesn't necessarily mean or translate that ibos are the largest contributors of taxes. Also, taxes aren't collected along tribal lines; so it will be really difficult for any tribe to indisputably PROVE that they are the largest tax contributors. All the noise ibos keep making claiming to be the ones are unfounded assumptions originating from the most unrealistic parts of their figments of imagination. They have no documented facts with figures from the Lagos state government to legitimize such false claims. It just might be the Hausas, Binis, Ijaws or some other tribe - who knows!

As for development, whether economic and social, Lagos state even before it became a federal capital has always been thriving and prosperous. This is one of the major reasons Lagos later was selected to be a federal capital in the first place. It was an exceptionally promising state booming with exponential economic and social development potential vital for Nigeria's nation building. Lagos wasn't selected out of the blues or by raffle draw to become the federal capital. It was political genius to have done so. I can't dwell so much on this and anyone in doubt can look through the established history books and educate themselves. Development is progressive; it never stops or isn't meant to stop. After Lagos became a Federal capital, the development continued. After it lost that status, the development still continued and federal capital or no federal capital, one thing you could never strip from Lagos State is its super-economic potential. It was a state destined for greatness and nothing could stop it. Economically speaking, Lagos State was like the hand of Midas and everything that touches it turns to gold. To make money, isn't that the foremost reason all tribes have migrated to Lagos? Can't money be made elsewhere? Yes, but certainly not at the speed and success rate Lagosians seem to do it in Lagos. The economic potential was what brought the ibos to Lagos - it's all about coming to make money! Yes, just like everybody else that came, the ibos came to make money and make a life. Now that they have done so, the rest of the tribes can't rest again because the ibos feel they have arrived and arrogantly act as if they now own the state forgetting they met people here when they came. Ibos weren't the first tribe to prosper in Lagos, and ibos won't be the last; ibos aren't the first billionaires in Lagos, and ibos won't be the last. So why all the braggadocious display of economic arrogance towards other tribes, especially your hosts? Dangote (a billionaire in $$$$$) lives in Lagos and a considerable chunk of his business empire is in Lagos but he's not making noise and disturbing the peace in the land, so why must the ibos be harassing others and causing commotion just because they have attained some measure of wealth and every other tribe in Lagos should bow to you. It will never happen. This arrogant character has to stop. No one is intimidated by the ibos wealth because as far as Lagos is concerned, there are wealthy people from all tribes living there. Now, some more history, ibos didn't bring money to Lagos; rather they came to make money from Lagos. And ibos did, some legally and some illegally. Regarding taxes, whatever monies paid to the Lagos government wasn't made in Onitsha, Aba, Owerri, or Umuahia etc. It was made in Lagos and through Lagos. So it's only reasonable and proper that the taxes due be remitted to Lagos. If ibos are paying tens of billions naira in taxes to Lagos, then it's because they have already made hundreds of billions naira. And this is the same for all other tribes, so why are the ibos making a big deal out of this as if they're doing what nobody else is doing in Lagos. Businesses only pay taxes based on what you earn in the state and through the state. You don't pay what you didn't earn. So why are ibos talking as if the taxes they pay to Lagos was earned in Onitsha and they were compelled by the government to bring the money to Lagos; wasn't it earned in Lagos?

Regarding the social development of Lagos, did ibos develop Lagos? No! The ibos developed themselves. The ibos didn't build Lagos roads, bridges, schools, rail, or other public infrastructure. Who built all these? The federal and state governments using national and state resources respectively. So am I saying the ibos built nothing in Lagos? No, i'm not. Then what exactly did the ibos build in Lagos? Well, the ibos built THEIR homes, built THEIR houses, built THEIR businesses...etc! So essentially, the ibos built themselves in Lagos - no more, no less. You didn't build for Lagos, you built for yourselves in Lagos, same thing with other tribes, but the ibos keep talking blindly as if they are charity and what they built was handed over to society. Now you might want to say, What of the taxes they paid, didn't the government use taxpayers money to develop Lagos? Well, ibos are not the only ones who paid taxes. Hausas, ijaws, igallas, idomas, binis, urobos...also did too! Every tribe paid taxes in Lagos, heck even foreigners too. But yet, it's only the ibos making silly noise that they developed Lagos. This childish stupidity is annoying, and you should grow up mentally. If ibos built houses, you built it so that you can enjoy; if you built businesses, you built it so that you can enjoy...and so on! You built yourselves in Lagos, you didn't build Lagos. You developed yourselves in Lagos, you didn't develop Lagos. Lagos State is a natural economic magnet attracting investments from investors locally and globally. Those who bring in money are bringing in money to make more money or other benefits - and not for charity. There's always something to gain from Lagos. If all ibos and ibos assets were to be relocated from Lagos to the SE, would it destroy the Lagos economy? No, not in any way in reality. That "vacuum" (whether properties or investments) created will be filled almost instantly. As it is, there are thousands upon thousands of people rushing to get here daily, and millions more (both locals and foreigners) would come settle here if such a vacuum existed. Lagos is already in shortage of lands and many settlement projects are being built on the seas, like the Eko Atlantic city. I could go on but even this is enough to prove the versatility of the economic prosperity of the land flowing with milk and honey called Lagos state. For several years, the OBJ administration deprived Lagos of federal funds, yet Lagos didn't even feel it one bit. Lagos is a hub of prosperity on its own, take it or leave it. So the ibos shouldn't get it twisted, Lagos will continue to prosper with or without you. Nigeria needs the ibos and the ibos need Nigeria. But Lagos doesn't need the ibos; it's the ibos that need Lagos. Now stop creating any more conflict drama in Lagos than you already have and appreciate your hosts and other tribes. If the ibos are disgusted about paying taxes to Lagos and coexisting peacefully with mutual respect for the Yorubas hosts and other tribes inhabiting Lagos, then well the South East needs further development, the South East governments need taxes too to perform their obligations, so you're free to go to your home states and do the needful.
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by drtwist(m):
Don't know why the yorubas can't mind their business and leave the igbo to be. Have any igbo senator signifies his/her interest on the seat? NO. So y the ranting from other tribe? David Mark was the senate president for 8yrs what development have he brought to his people!!? Nothing. pls wen will you guys understand that no matter what you do igbo will no regret supporting Gej
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by VirginFinder(op): 8:15pm On Apr 17, 2015
BuddahMonk:
Emeka - Landlord.

Segun - Tenant.

Adamu - Gateman.

One Nigeria is lovely
That arrangement may be the case in iboland. It's ok.
No Yoruba man no matter how rich wants to settle in iboland.

One Nigeria is truely lovely.
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by Nobody: 11:26pm On Apr 17, 2015
truefact:
The simple question is why do the Yoruba and Hausa still keeping Igbos in Nigeria? Why can't they let Igbos go since it's obvious you lot hated them with passion?
Let me give u an assignment.

Draw a map of ibos alone showing only d 5 states and show me how it will be

You will still be surrounded by nigeria grin grin grin or other people that will not be part of your country grin
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by mensdept: 11:42pm On Apr 17, 2015
Who cares about senate president. We need responsible senators in this country that are not going abroad for medical checkup every time like David Mark
Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by Nobody: 11:49pm On Apr 17, 2015
A Vulture visits his parents.

Re: Why Ibos Cannot Have The Senate Presidency In The Incoming Administration by ki02020(m): 12:03am On Apr 18, 2015
Abeg u guys should leave the igbos alone na must they produce the senate president?na wa o.all everyone want, is a nigeria that works for all
1 Reply

Top 10 Contenders For The Presidency In 2019 If President Buhari Fails To RunIkoyi $43 Million: Magu, Presidency In Dilemma Over The Discovered CashTinubu Prepares To Run For Presidency In 2019, Lists Running Mates - ThisDay234

#kebbi2015 - S.Y. Bello For GovernorDare Not Vote For Apc - Agbaje Tells Igbo'sPresident Jonathan's Message To Nigerians Ahead Of Tomorrow's Elections.