₦airaland Forum

jcross19:
is that hate? Condemning the act of isis is now hate against islam why can't muslims round the globe match against this cruelty if this is not part of your religion. I could remembered a cartoon of mohamMAD depicted in Denmark caused uproar round the globe , even aboki protested because of it then let muslims troop out round the globe in masses to match against this evil but you people can only condemn them on media , deep inside an average muslims they love what isis are doing. Isis are the real muslims that's why no muslim have publicly denounce the act. Allah you are doom.

smartesboys:
When you want to qoete from qur'an, you must write the whole verse.

YourMain:
I didn't say so ? I said I've loads of people who hate Islam as friends as well. She clearly hates Islam.

Well I think people need to be tolerant. You can't be making fun of someone's faith it's plain rude and it is obviously going to cause uproar. You can hardly expect them to just sit there and not care...

Like one super smart guy I once knew said, you can't just pick one part of the story and claim it's the whole story. I'm Muslim and I didn't do any evil. And neither did any of the Muslims I know.

Lol Hitler was a Catholic last time I checked and I don't go around saying Catholics are like Hitler. And it's sad because Islam and Christianity preach pretty much the same thing. Just that Islam's is more "implemented" and all of its teachings are only seen as evil because of how " advanced" the world is today.

Empiree:
ifeann is fraud. If given a chance she could also print her own Quran like those scumbags evangelists in Lagos, who came to debate muslims with manufactured "Quran". They were bursted when they asked Daee (muslims preacher) to open a verse of Quran. Then the evangelists read the verse but in fact he was reading something else they made up themselves. Muslim preacher grew suspicion and asked to see the Quran, he found "IYANA IPAJA" in the verse.

They did that to cajole masses that Quran is also different. Right there they held evangelists and called police for them for fraud. That's exactly what this evangelist ifean aka parisbooaddict tries to do. In fact, those evangelists (their superior) were actually warned in 1984 and were banned from printing Quran without license from proper authority. By the time police arrived, evangelists fled and forgot someof the books and fake Quran they printed. Muslims seized those book as evidence for future reference. This happened around Imushin, lagos probably last year.

9jaforlife:
[size=14pt]
I said it earlier, Ifeann aka parisbookaddict, your sickness has no cure!

I didn't post those verses for your sake. Your heart is sealed with evil and no amount of good reasoning can save your diseased soul from doom. Whoevever has eyes will see that your lies have been bursted, that's ALL I care about


As for spending a fifth of war booty in the way of Allah:

1) It has exposed your LIE- ie, making it seem as if the verse was talking about women.

2) Wars naturally come with plunders. Setting aside a part of lawful earnings to spend in the way of Allah is part of Islam, this one is no exception.

---

Islam regards captives and ENCOURAGED marriage to them for the purpose of giving them a chance of freedom and good life. I'm sure you were blind to this part of my comment...

Q4:24...
24"And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. Lawful unto you are all beyond those mentioned, so that ye seek them with your wealth in honest wedlock, not debauchery. And those of whom ye seek content (by marrying them), give unto them their portions as a duty. And there is no sin for you in what ye do by mutual agreement after the duty (hath been done). Lo! Allah is ever Knower, Wise"



Ifeann aka parisbookaddict, why MUST you think that it's all about sex and r*ape??

Here's why: This is what your buyboo has taught you all your miserable life

true2god:
'The underlined says "One-fifth of the booty belongs to Allah", meaning that a fifth should be set aside for the propagation of Islam'.

What? Am I seeing double? One-fifth of stolen materials, war booty, are used for the propagation of Islam. Whaoooo!

Mohammed is surely an arab criminal.

parisbookaddict:
Mr muslim your foul mouthed comment won't hide the fact that your lie was exposed and i floored you. ..


War booty to propagate a islam.
Women spoils of war for muslim men to sleep with even if they are already married.

Smh for u ..

9jaforlife:
Ifeann aka parisbookaddict aka hypocrite, that hole in your face is 'specially designed' to lie. Whatever nonsense you spew doesn't make any difference

parisbookaddict:
Mr muslim your foul mouthed comment won't hide the fact that your lie was exposed and i floored you. ..


War booty to propagate a islam.
Women spoils of war for muslim men to sleep with even if they are already married.

Smh for u ..

So this is where it is happening while I was waiting on Ifeann.

@Ifeann, I see your works in parisbookaddict... https://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-angelic002.gif



Observing...

true2god:
Do you actually say that 20% of mohammed's war booty was meant for the propagation of Islam? You are actually right, going by the history of Islam. Aside from some part of the booty mohammed usually keep for himself, he sold some stolen items (what you muslims technically call war booty) and FULLY engage in slave trade and the collection of zakat and jizya.

The money made from these criminal legal activities (by mohammed) is usually invested in buying spears, horses and other war materials, to fight the 'infiidels' and collect another round of war booties. Mohammed must be a good business man for Allah

In this modern age and time, mohammed will be serving a life sentence for all these criminal activities.

Isaiah 13:15-18   "Anyone who is captured will be run through with a sword.  Their little children will be dashed to death right before their eyes.  Their homes will be sacked and their wives raped by the attacking hordes. For I will stir up the Medes against Babylon, and no amount of silver or gold will buy them off.  The attacking armies will shoot down the young people with arrows.  They will have no mercy on helpless babies and will show no compassion for the children"

https://cdn1.englishbaby.com/dynamic/slang_lessons/image/0000/0001/1423/1423019_1250909831_590724.jpg

Dear Ifeann (parisbookaddict),

While I thought you were away, some legislators tried to pull the wool over our eyes with the sudden passage of some ambiguous Bill.

I was glad when a man as outspoken and courageous as you spoke out against the legislation inimical and destructive to the welfare of the Girl-Child!
[img]http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTQeATiSpagrjGlavEAv8RzaUA2XBFTXkacqSvXSOFAYQtneXf5vFc3u9Y-[/img]
As if with 'one voice', I couldn't help but notice how you both express your stands with similar explicit wordings; below are excerpts:

If I had been able to join you, I would most certainly have asked you for help. It has to do with the nation’s latest alleged legislative stance against sexual abuse – molestation, rape, paedophilia etc etc. I am only a layman, not a “learned brother”, so any help from the learned is earnestly solicited. The question on my mind is this: is that legislative reinforcement not merely a case of rubbing vaseline on leprosy?

In this supposedly progressive bill, sponsored by the respected Senator Chris Anyanwu, I could not help but notice a reiteration – as if to ensure that there is no ambiguity – of the word “child”, near superfluously.
Well, we understand “child” as defined in most dictionaries. There is however also child as defined by the Nigerian legislature. This definition is contained in a prior Bill, sponsored, no less, by a notorious serial paedophile and cross-border sex trafficker, yet lawmaker – one Ahmed Yerima.
Does Yerima’s Bill, gleefully assented to by his peers, not simply vitiate this latter, supposedly humane concern for the protection of the child? Again, I confess to being only a ‘bloody layman’ in such matters. However, reading both bills, it strikes me that all the new bill does is empower the clique of paedophiles. All you need do is “marry” even a six-year old under any local laws, and do whatever you want with her. Through marriage, she is already an “adult”. Her “defiler” is now fully protected by this law. She is not. The current Bill is the ancient story of locking the stable door after the horse has bolted. End of story? Yerimah and his fellow perverts are having the last laugh.
...Perhaps those legislators think that vaginal fistula is something thought up arm-chair critics with nothing better to occupy their minds. - Prof. WOLE SOYINKA

Finally,
@Ifeann who is also known as parisbookaddict, the Prof. was calling on the likes of you when he said:

No matter, let those who profess a genuine concern declare their stand on this. On my part, I find unacceptable any effort to build a nation on perversions that merely minister to man’s sexual appetites. This is a sordid appeasement of a minority who actually require psychiatric help.

President Buhari should not give his assent to the Bill without amendments that address the earlier Yerima gift to the nation. It’s a trap!

YourMain:
...because of how "advanced" the world is today.

Taken in isolation, this your statement is nothing but pure truth from a keen observer which- at the risk of digressing- I mustn't fail to acknowledge and accentuate.-

"Advanced" World:
They speak of the emergence of a free independent humanity, of a development of inner stability, of physical culture, the beauty of the nude, ennobled sports... laying aside all "prudery".

What is being preached today under the fine guise of "progress" is nothing but a veiled encouragement of utter shamelessness, the poisoning of every noble intuition in man. And strange: it seems as if so many had only been waiting for a plausible excuse to debase themselves. To countless people it is very welcome!

Let's look around us! Observe what we read, how we dance, how we dress!

The woman of today is certainly ashamed to wear a long dress if fashion decrees a short one, but she is not ashamed to expose almost three-quarters of her body, offering it to the glances of all on festive occasions. And of course not only to their glances but also, when dancing, unavoidably to their hands! Without hesitation she would also uncover still more if fashion required it, probably even everything judging by present experiences! It was not a wrong but, alas, only too true a saying that “woman begins to dress herself when she retires for the night”!

So many men consider themselves very clever and wise, even highly developed spiritually, when they know how to conceal their thoughts and their actual volition behind their words, never permitting their fellow-men to see their true face in spite of lively conversation. This method is called diplomatic, as a soothing expression for the strange mixture of crafty cheating, of hypocrisy and falsehood, and of the greed which is always lying in wait triumphantly to create advantages for oneself at the expense of weaknesses discovered in others.

One is tagged as "old fashioned" should s/he refuse to kiss or hug the opposite gender in greeting...

9jaforlife:
For your understanding of what is meant by Propagation of Islam, I'm re-posting this comment here...

Fighting is justified for legitimate self-defense to aid Muslims. It's also permitted after a violation in the terms of a treaty, but should be stopped if these circumstances cease to exist.

Never forget that the Muslims never started ANY war.  All of the wars that the Muslims fought were wars of defense imposed upon them by the enemy:

The Muslims did not invade people intentionally to pillage their towns and villages and to take the booty. They fought legal wars. It is completely justifiable what they did.


Also, the Muslims did not fight and take the spoils of war for their own personal gain. They used it to help the needy and the poor and to establish a system. As a matter of fact, NO army in the world spent the spoils of war in such a generous and beautiful way as the Muslim armies did during the time of the Prophet (PBUH)


[color=#000099] The Prophet (PBUH) ESTABLISHED and ENSURED that etiquettes of war were observed.

Among other restrictions (of NOT fighting women and children, etc), Muslims have been instructed by the Prophet not to pillage or plunder or destroy residential areas, nor harm the property of anyone not fighting. It has been narrated in the Hadith: "The Prophet has prohibited the Believers from loot and plunder" (Bukhari, AbuDawood).

plainbibletruth:
[s]
Are you serious about all these?
Muslims never started Any war? Really?
How was Islam chiefly propagated or do you want to re-write history?

No spoils of war for personal gain?
And Mohammed could take some for himself?

No pillage or plunder?

[b]Maybe you live in Mars! [/b [/s]

YourMain:
What? Are you trying to preach feminism ?

My earlier post had nothing to do with feminism. Like I said, I quoted that phrase of yours in isolation, just to buttress a point.

However, I'm not an advocate of "feminism" in the sense that: "What a man can do a woman can do it even better." IMO, that's an aberration of what was intended ab initio... they both have their God-assigned roles which shouldn't be mixed up. BUT that is not to say that the female gender is of any lesser worth than the male gender; even to the dehumanising point of objectifying her.

Let me summarise this as I can't say all there's on this issue on this thread:

In reality, the female is just as strong as the male on earth, only in a different way. Man is not the stronger sex but only the coarser sex, i.e., the denser one; womanhood, however, is not the weaker sex, but merely the more delicate, the more “loosened” one, which has nothing to do with weaknesses.

These work either actively or passively side by side, and yet they constantly strive towards one another, since the two species can only achieve something which is perfect through their joint activity. However, it only becomes perfect when the two work with equal strength and strive for one goal...

Alas, man in his advancing dullness abused this "Divine Order"; rather than protect and respect, he took advantage of and abused womanhood, turning her into a sex object and a baby-making animal-mother all for the indiscriminate gratification of his morbid sensual appetite.

Is it any wonder that the female folks, over time, rose to the occasion with the aberration known as "feminism"?!

Feminism IMO, is a retroactive offshoot of that break in that original Order; the marginalisation of the female folks... beginning with the girl-child.

parisbookaddict:
Soyinka was smart in his assessment and write up. ..

There is a rumor going on that Sanusi lamido emir and former cbn governor. .a man i admire and will vote for any day should he run for political office is currently about to take a 17 year old as a wife. .

I really doubt this because i am of the view that he is to well educated and too widely exposed to do this...

But this immoral behaviour is common with even the educated muslims...especially the northerners. They are quick to use culture and religion to feed their desires like yerima..

This is where the current president is different. .. a man who is monogamous and has been with aisha for years after the divorce from his first wife. A man accused of begin a pro sharia bigot but had been with less women than the "Christian" ex president obasanjo...

So while i condemn the over sexed pro child sex deviants like empir.ee 9jafor.life to.la9ja rilwan.ye001 etc who copy/ intend to copy mohammed i acknowledge that a lot of Muslims don't follow the more eccentric teachings of Mohammed. .

Empiree:
What's your noise all about? hun?. I would prefer someone marry "underage" girl (depends on how you define it) than father having sex with his own daughter and fathered children from her at the same time, as it's currently done in the western world aka christian nations and no law bare such practices. Also it's common knowledge that Rabbis sleep around with boys, commonly practiced western world and Israel. So it's high time you shut up for good on this topic. Alaafin Oyo's youngest wife is said to be 16-17 according to naijagists website. Go and question him why he did what he did and see if you scot-free.

1] http://naijagists.com/alaafin-of-oyo-wives-arrive-abuja-for-son-prince-akeem-adeyemi-inauguration/

2] http://naijagists.com/alaafin-of-oyo-his-oyinbo-naija-wives-rock-aso-ebi-in-abuja-photos/

3] http://naijagists.com/alaafin-of-oyo-wife-spotted-in-aso-rock-abuja-to-meet-president-jonathan/

4] http://naijagists.com/photos-alaafin-of-oyo-lamidi-adeyemi-wives-storm-baptist-church-for-pa-akinyemis-thanksgiving/

Here is a christian man married 10 yr old girl. he claim it's justified according to Bible.
http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/07/man-married-10-year-old-and-said-it-was-biblically-justified/
Man Married 10 Year Old and said it was Biblically Justified

You need to get a life. Start think ing about something positive rather wasting your time on irrelevancies. Everything oin your brain appears to be se.x se.x se.x and ra.pe ra.pe ra.pe.

9jaforlife:
[b] Please don't blame Evilgelist Ifeann aka parisbookaddict...

It's not really her fault; her buyboo is so full of hardcore p*orn.



Genesis 19:33-35
"33That night they got their father to drink wine, and the older daughter went in and had s*ex with him. He was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.
34The next day the older daughter said to the younger, “Last night I slept with my father". Let’s get him to drink wine again tonight, and you go in and have s*ex with him so we can preserve our family line through our father.” 35So they got their father to drink wine that night also, and the younger daughter went in and had s*ex with him. Again he was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up"

9jaforlife:
Ezekiel 23:20-21
"20There she lusted after her lovers, whose [size=14pt] genitals (p*enis) were like those of donkeys and whose emission (s*perm) was like that of horses. [/size] 21So you longed for the lewdness of your youth, when in Egypt your [size=14pt] bosom was caressed and your young breasts fondled" [/size]

How in heaven's name could a 'holy' book take time to describe private parts


With a copy of the buyboo, no one needs p*orn [/b]

Empiree:
What the heck!. Never came across this before. WoooooW, in the "holy book" smh. This is really por.n. I see. Those Hollywood por.nstars replicate the BIBLE and wannabe Nollywood hip pop se.x addicts got different styles from Bible as well. Bernard Shaw was correct when he said Bible is dangerous and should be taken away from reach of children. Children should not be reading this stuff

This is really comical. I'm sure ifean/parisbookaddict probably never came across this. Or she saw it and that's why she's addicted talking about it

parisbookaddict:
Soyinka was smart in his assessment and write up. ..

There is a rumor going on that Sanusi lamido emir and former cbn governor. .a man i admire and will vote for any day should he run for political office is currently about to take a 17 year old as a wife. .

I really doubt this because i am of the view that he is to well educated and too widely exposed to do this...

But this immoral behaviour is common with even the educated muslims...especially the northerners. They are quick to use culture and religion to feed their desires like yerima..

This is where the current president is different. .. a man who is monogamous and has been with aisha for years after the divorce from his first wife. A man accused of begin a pro sharia bigot but had been with less women than the "Christian" ex president obasanjo...

So while i condemn the over sexed pro child sex deviants like empiree 9jaforlife tola9ja rilwanye001 etc who copy/ intend to copy mohammed i acknowledge that a lot of Muslims don't follow the more eccentric teachings of Mohammed. .

Very well said. With many, religious zeal blinds them to the truth... but not with you. You're not one-sided in your assertions and that is what makes you worth listening to.

seemples:
Was waiting for Ifeann too oo...

even the tug of war participants don switch sides just in case but result is still same same.

You're quite observant. Let's say the flipped version depicts the recognition of the person of Ifeann in parisbookaddict.

That has had the effect of also making the scenario tilt in contradistinction to the original version.

Also observe a change of the last two participants; depicting the current trend where some "contenders" are missing in action.
https://cache3.asset-cache.net/gc/109349477-white-queen-chess-piece-surrounded-by-fallen-gettyimages.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=ksIrl4cUkopg71ikgPuwJ7trNSTpx3WD03V30Zw6P7a2CdwRHerHeG6BZT1nihun
They have proven themselves to be the "Pawns" who -realizing how hollow/lacking were their insults and assault- had to bow out. They weren't worthy "contenders"... they missed the point from the onset.

Observing...

channelz:
You're quite observant. Let's say the flipped version depicts the recognition of the person of Ifeann in parisbookaddict.

That has had the effect of also making the scenario tilt in contradistinction to the original version.

Also observe a change of the last two participants; depicting the current trend where some "contenders" are missing in action

channelz:
They have proven themselves to be the "Pawns" who -realizing how hollow/lacking were their insults and assault- had to bow out. They weren't worthy "contenders"... they missed the point from the onset.

Observing...

seemples:
I see, I seeee!!!





You're the authentic umpire, true! Any other name that sounds close (emp.iree dem), is a learner - wannabe!

Empiree:
How may I help you, maam?