₦airaland Forum

pickabeau1:
Google Walcott and football brain

That should be clear

My friend keep quiet. You might as well tell me to google ''PickAbrain and football brain.'' Tell us why Walcott should not be called a striker, he is telling me to google Walcott and football brain.

What a shame.

Stoke City are having problems defensively, don't know if Shawcross will start, he if does, Ramsey would not want to play.

pickabeau1:
Google Walcott and football brain

That should be clear

Dude wat are u saying na
I can't even defend u, no fall my hand oo
Tell him na joke

sod09:

Dude wat are u saying na
I can't even defend u, no fall my hand oo
Tell him na joke

Do u class Walcott as a striker yes or no

pickabeau1:
Do u class Walcott as a striker yes or no

no he's not...nd yes he can play d position
But he's still better Dan giroud in dat position
Because of his striking rate.....Walcott can convert 8/10 chances
Dats y spy360 said he was d best striker, I would av agree wit him if Walcott has d strength nd height...
Aguero doesn't av height but he got strenght nd eye for goal

Pataki:
My friend keep quiet. You might as well tell me to google ''PickAbrain and football brain.'' Tell us why Walcott should not be called a striker, he is telling me to google Walcott and football brain.

What a shame.

Gbe enu e soun

Na fufu full your skull

raumdeuter:
Gbe enu e soun

Na fufu full your skull

lmao

raumdeuter:
Gbe enu e soun

Na fufu full your skull

LOL! Ode! You don wake-up for America abi? After dem don hammer your empty skull well well for that Manure thread yesterday.

Next time you will keep your trolling limit to shekpe thread.

pickabeau1:
Do u class Walcott as a striker yes or no

Do you class Henry as a striker yes or no? What about RvP, Rooney?

What if I told you Bale started as a left back, Gerald right back, Drogba centre back, Yobo striker, Enyeama striker etc numerous to mention.

Summary, you are what you play.

Walcott is a striker.

Take it or leave it.

here we go again, una don forget say una be people papa?

sod09:
no he's not...nd yes he can play d position
But he's still better Dan giroud in dat position
Because of his striking rate.....Walcott can convert 8/10 chances
Dats y spy360 said he was d best striker, I would av agree wit him if Walcott has d strength nd height...
Aguero doesn't av height but he got strenght nd eye for goal

Walcott may convert his chances better than Giroud.. but I doubt he is involved in as many chances

Spy360.. leave wetin
Are u not the dude saying Walcott is better than Aguero

Yeye dey smell

Pataki:
My friend keep quiet. You might as well tell me to google ''PickAbrain and football brain.'' Tell us why Walcott should not be called a striker, he is telling me to google Walcott and football brain.

What a shame.

see as you finish pickabum sorry... Pickabrain...

Spy360:
Do you class Henry as a striker yes or no? What about RvP, Rooney?

What if I told you Bale started as a left back, Gerald right back, Drogba centre back, Yobo striker, Enyeama striker etc numerous to mention.

Summary, you are what you play.

Walcott is a striker.

Take it or leave it.

Just passing by sir...curious...who is the bolded?

AncientJerk:
Just passing by sir...curious...who is the bolded?

Pardon wrong spelling

Steven Gerrard

pickabeau1:
Walcott may convert his chances better than Giroud.. but I doubt he is involved in as many chances

Spy360.. leave wetin
Are u not the dude saying Walcott is better than Aguero

Yeye dey smell

I did not say Walcott is better than Aguero, I said by my own rating he is a better 'finisher'. I may be right or wrong, but that is my opinion.
If you check their conversion rates, you would appreciate my view.

Please keep things within context.
Thanks.

Spy360:
I did not say Walcott is better than Aguero, I said by my own rating he is a better 'finisher'. I may be right or wrong, but that is my opinion.
If you check their conversion rates, you would appreciate my view.

Please keep things within context.
Thanks.

Dude is perceived conversion to be contemplated independently of effectiveness?

Season stats

Spy360 90 chances 30 goals... 3 chances per goal

Spy404 3 chances 3 goals..1 chance per goal.


Yet the second is 'better'..

I personally don't think the argument should be about whether Giroud or Walcott is better as top striker. Both have very different styles which and the opposition set up should determine who should play.
In the EPL, a lot of teams are set up to defend and frustrate the top striker. You'll find CBs kicking and holding and doing all sorts. Giroud's strength and general hold up play helps us in this regard as he gives our other players room to move whilst the attention is on him.
Walcott on the other hand cannot play with his back to goal. He's also easily hassled off the ball and generally prefers teams that make the mistake of coming at us rather than sit back. He needs to learn to play with the ball at his feet. That said, I've seen enough of Walcott to know that a confident and match fit Theo is an excellent finisher.

In majority of matches in the EPL, I'll start Giroud upfront and Walcott on the right.

I pray we win today and other matches also go in our favour.

COYG!

pickabeau1:
He still lacks the basic rudiments of playing football

He lacks the basic rudiments of playing football yet features as a professional footballer for England and Arsenal eh?

In the attempt to make a point you make yourself look quite silly with this pointless hyperbole.

Two things we need for this game:

1. Utmost concentration and mental alertness from each player on the field.

2. A strong attacking bite from those selected to lead our attack today.

COYG!!

pickabeau1:
Dude is perceived conversion to be contemplated independently of effectiveness?

Season stats

Spy360 90 chances 30 goals... 3 chances per goal

Spy404 3 chances 3 goals..1 chance per goal.


Yet the second is 'better'..

My dear the second is better because by implication,

Spy360 - 1/3 ie 33%
Spy404 - 1/1 ie 100%

So that if given equal chances, Spy404 will get 90goals out of 90.

Spy 404 is therefore the better finisher. You don't just consider effectiveness, you also look at efficiency.

*E be like say pepper soup and isi ewu go dey very plenty for shekpe joint this afternoon.*

Come with your cup, e fit no reach.

Spy360:
My dear the second is better because by implication,

Spy360 - 1/3 ie 33%
Spy404 - 1/1 ie 100%

So that if given equal chances, Spy404 will get 90goals out of 90.

Spy 404 is therefore the better finisher. You don't just consider effectiveness, you also look at efficiency.

so with ur conclusion
I think poldoski should be d best striker for arsenal den cos he matched ur 100% stat

Spy360:
*E be like say pepper soup and isi ewu go dey very plenty for shekpe joint this afternoon.*

Come with your cup, e fit no reach.

make d DJ day test hin instruments oooo

Spy360:
My dear the second is better because by implication,

Spy360 - 1/3 ie 33%
Spy404 - 1/1 ie 100%

So that if given equal chances, Spy404 will get 90goals out of 90.

Spy 404 is therefore the better finisher. You don't just consider effectiveness, you also look at efficiency.

Ok..bro


Na wa

Upright twice

Walcott The Striker!

Okay it was on this thread somebody said walcot is a better finisher to CR7. CR7 just scored hat trick under 19mins while walcot can't even poke into an open net. Shame.

Finally..

WALCOTT!!!!!!!!!

Walcott just did what Giroud wouldn't do, RUN WITH THE BALL

sod09:
so with ur conclusion
I think poldoski should be d best striker for arsenal den cos he matched ur 100% stat

There are several qualities that make a good striker, finishing is just one of them. Podolski may not be a great striker but he surely is a great finisher.

Meanwhile maybe it is too early though, but I am starting to enjoy this Bosscielny and Gabo combo in defence.

UniqueGem:
Okay it was on this thread somebody said walcot is a better finisher to CR7. CR7 just scored hat trick under 19mins while walcot can't even poke into an open net. Shame.

Your logic is faulty.
Naismith scored a hatrick against Chelsea, does that equate him with Ronaldo?

Meanwhile I never said Walcott is a better player than Ronaldo, that an exageration, I said 'I rate him as a better finisher'.

Think again.

Spy360:
Your logic is faulty.
Naismith scored a hatrick against Chelsea, does that equate him with Ronaldo.

Meanwhile I never said Walcott is a better player than Ronaldo, that an exageration, I said 'I rate him as a better finisher'.

Think again.

You're even complicating yourself.
BTW, where in my post did i say you said walcot is a better player?