Many SANs, including Saraki's lawyers have critically complained about the CCT's disregard for the authority of the Federal High Court.

Let us ignore the fact that they later shot themselves in the feet when they realised their mistake and ran back to institute exactly the same matter at the Court of Appeal.

Apparently, Saraki's lawyers did not realise the following and may need to be schooled further on why their action at the Federal High Court was a nullity:

1. When you are charged to a court....any court at all....and you wish to challenge it's jurisdiction, you do so right in that same court.

2. If the CCT ignores your application and rules that it has jurisdiction, then you appeal its ruling.

3. The constitution has already clarified which court is capable of reviewing the Ruling of the CCT.

4. No where in jurisprudence, is a plaintiff permitted to sue a court as a party to the case, the only provision is to appeal its ruling.

5. The CCT is a specialized court similar to the Election petition Tribunals. Appeals from them go directly to the Court of Appeal. These tribunal panels comprise high court judges of coordinate jurisdiction.

6. An invitation of the high court judge to both parties, asking for them to show reason why they feel the high court should not issue an interlocutory injunction stopping CCT is no way an Interlocutory Injunction already.

7. Saraki's disregard of a substantive court summon in the absence of an Interlocutory Injunction was a direct request for a bench warrant.

While it is very clear that the CCT has given Saraki and his lawyers utmost respect and regard by withholding the bench warrant, believing that as a responsible citizen, he will honour the summons on Tuesday, let no one be in doubt about the CCT's utmost power to arrest, detain and lock behind bars, any accused person who shows open brigandage and disregard for the court's authority, no matter how highly placed.

... Wetin concern me.. ..

Dis guy is very stubborn oh lol

Hehehehehehehehehehe

Hmmm

Another barcanista wannabe.

You make alot of sense

fake barcanista....original one go call other wailers
.
you are on point sha

Hmm naija which way

.....almost one year o...
nothing dey happen for 9ja.

Is this the original Barcanista or the fake one

Demmzy15:
Guy you don come with your mushroom analysis! It's getting boring and baseless, I'll advice you take the back sit.

Pa Shukwudi Saraki's shoeshiner/buttlicker, we're expecting you here. Come and spew venom as usual!

Chai!... Sense you no get. So you believe this is the REAL barcanista

This guy is so on point.

8.) You don't call a judge that presides over your case "incompetent". I am sure joseph Daudu will regret ever calling a hausa/fulani Judge "incompetent".

The same "incompetent" Justice Danladi Umar will be the one he and his paymaster(Saraki) will face tomorrow.

..After two lines, I know it can't be Barcanista ..

barcanista can be truthful sometimes

T0nyeBarcanista:
Many SANs, including Saraki's lawyers have critically complained about the CCT's disregard for the authority of the Federal High Court.

Let us ignore the fact that they later shot themselves in the feet when they realised their mistake and ran back to institute exactly the same matter at the Court of Appeal.

Apparently, Saraki's lawyers did not realise the following and may need to be schooled further on why their action at the Federal High Court was a nullity:

1. When you are charged to a court....any court at all....and you wish to challenge it's jurisdiction, you do so right in that same court.

2. If the CCT ignores your application and rules that it has jurisdiction, then you appeal its ruling.

3. The constitution has already clarified which court is capable of reviewing the Ruling of the CCT.

4. No where in jurisprudence, is a plaintiff permitted to sue a court as a party to the case, the only provision is to appeal its ruling.

5. The CCT is a specialized court similar to the Election petition Tribunals. Appeals from them go directly to the Court of Appeal. These tribunal panels comprise high court judges of coordinate jurisdiction.

6. An invitation of the high court judge to both parties, asking for them to show reason why they feel the high court should not issue an interlocutory injunction stopping CCT is no way an Interlocutory Injunction already.

7. Saraki's disregard of a substantive court summon in the absence of an Interlocutory Injunction was a direct request for a bench warrant.

While it is very clear that the CCT has given Saraki and his lawyers utmost respect and regard by withholding the bench warrant, believing that as a responsible citizen, he will honour the summons on Tuesday, let no one be in doubt about the CCT's utmost power to arrest, detain and lock behind bars, any accused person who shows open brigandage and disregard for the court's authority, no matter how highly placed.

Signed:

Point of correction, Saraki is not challenging the jurisdiction of the CCT but the administrative process of his charge. He is very much in order in the eyes of the law.

The points are valid and salient.
Saraki can't run away from this than to appear before CCT and defend himself.
The CCT should not succumb to the usual delay tactics of his lawyers as the whole process should be done as fast as possible because many more are still out here that needs to face the music.
One fact people tend to forget is that this administration has the VP as one of the best criminal justice lawyer and Prof. Sagay a foremost constitutional lawyer. Any thief brought out will hardly have any escape route because Falana will soon join them to put fire on all their buttocks.

sunnyb0b0:


Point of correction, Saraki is not challenging the jurisdiction of ye CCT but the administrative process of his charge. He is very much in order in tge eyes of the law.

Don't forget the law is blind and thus nothing in order in the eyes of the law. Lol

sunnyb0b0:


Point of correction, Saraki is not challenging the jurisdiction of ye CCT but the administrative process of his charge. He is very much in order in tge eyes of the law.

According to the constitution...."The question of whether or not such protocol as mentioned above has been followed shall not be asked"


The constitution already took care of that.

Notwithstanding, if a defendant has any complains about the writ of summons, he can only table it before the trial judge as he honours the summons. Just like challenging jurisdictions, challenging the technicality of the case is a matter of jurisprudence very well recognised.

Many cases have been struck out on technical grounds alone.

He was wrong to file that challenge in a different court, treating the trial court with utter disregard.

midolian:
This guy is so on point.

8.) You don't call a judge that presides over your case "incompetent". I am sure joseph Daudu will regret ever calling a hausa/fulani judge incompetent.

If a judge is incompetent, then the best place to rub it is in his face.

dunkem21:



If a judge is incompetent, then the best place to rub it is in his face.

Ok, tomorrow is not far. I pray he repeats it tomorrow

midolian:
Ok, tomorrow is not far. I pray he repeats it tomorrow

Tomorrow or Sept.30th

https://www.nairaland.com/2615574/federal-high-court-fixes-sept

dunkem21:



Tomorrow or Sept.30th

its as if you are typing from a dream o! he is to appear before the "incompetent" CCT judge tomorrow by 10am.

dunkem21:



Tomorrow or Sept.30th

its as if you are typing from a dream o! he is to appear before the incompetent CCT judge tomorrow by 10am.

nyc

Brilliant.
Nigerian lawyers are expert in twisting and misinterpreting the constitution to suit their pay master. Its very glaring even to the blind mind that Saraki err. You don't need to seek any black injunction if ur hands are clean...

midolian:
This guy is so on point.
8.) You don't call a judge that presides over your case "incompetent". I am sure joseph Daudu will regret ever calling a hausa/fulani Judge "incompetent".
The same "incompetent" Justice Danladi Umar will be the one he and his paymaster(Saraki) will face tomorrow.

Person wey hin head go buru, na neck e go first start..

dunkem21:

If a judge is incompetent, then the best place to rub it is in his face.

Na una +PDP senators dey advise am abi? Issokay.

midolian:
Ok, tomorrow is not far. I pray he repeats it tomorrow

Haba, dem nor go use cobra do neck chain , neither will they use dry pepper do mary kay...

Saraki waited too long because of inordinate ambition!

Guy change your moniker to who you are supposed to be and stop trying to be who you are not. Dim-witted ass nigga
We only no Tonyebarcanista
Which one be T0nyebarcanista
I bet you will soon get tired of posting with this fake moniker.

made in China barcanista