₦airaland Forum

Kachisbarbie:
Who is T.Orji to ask questions?
Gerrahere mehn! What was his own policy in terms of 'collapsing Aba' ?

MizMyColi:
Anyone please.

What is the name of the woman who questioned Amina J. Mohammed on what she intends to do about Buhari's apparent indifference to women in governance?

stancydg:
I am watching with utter dismay the ongoing charade tagged screening by our senators, where assumptions(which I understand to be the lowest level of knowledge) is the order of the day. Imaginary portfolios have bn assigned to the candidates in a process that otherwise should have been a detailed, precise and coincise interview of the nominees. This goes to show the lack of depth of thought of our leaders, beginning from our President, who took so long to come up with this list without corresponding reasons to show for the time taken. In a serious clime, where the change mantra has been spuriously bandied, the nominees should be making to the nation today, precise presentations of their solutions to the challenges in their assigned but yet to be confirmed ministries. In a serious nation, the senate should forward that list back to the presidency requesting more details to enable her carry out a thorough process, as soon as Senator Ben Bruce described the process as based on assumptions and a danger. I am so grossly disappointed because these nominees will take a bow today and go ahead to again require another six to twelve months, just like their principal, to first and foremost understand their portfolios, when it is eventually assigned before even coming up with blueprints to tackling the various challenges. And the masses will have to wait almost until the electioneering year, which by the way is less than 36months from now, to experience this elusive change. Going by history, nothing much is usually done in the electioneering year in terms of development. So sad hearing a lot of 'ifs' during this sham tagged screening.

Here is our call to duty, as great minds to take action beyond the rhetorics of our grand independence day events, to push this failure of leadership in the face of our government and to suggest practical methods, ideas and concepts of doing things in a series of ways that will bring about the desired change. Otherwise, we ourselves will be grand hypocrites that talk more and act less.

dunkem21:
Long time ..

..I dey vex personally for T.A Orji ..

TonyeBarcanista:
The Senate once again proved that they are nothing but glorified rubber stamp

ikorodureporta:
..u 2 shld know tradition na...1st tin 1st-wey cake?

ikorodureporta:
..u 2 shld know tradition na...1st tin 1st-wey cake?

stancydg:
I am watching with utter dismay the ongoing charade tagged screening by our senators, where assumptions(which I understand to be the lowest level of knowledge) is the order of the day. Imaginary portfolios have bn assigned to the candidates in a process that otherwise should have been a detailed, precise and coincise interview of the nominees. This goes to show the lack of depth of thought of our leaders, beginning from our President, who took so long to come up with this list without corresponding reasons to show for the time taken. In a serious clime, where the change mantra has been spuriously bandied, the nominees should be making to the nation today, precise presentations of their solutions to the challenges in their assigned but yet to be confirmed ministries. In a serious nation, the senate should forward that list back to the presidency requesting more details to enable her carry out a thorough process, as soon as Senator Ben Bruce described the process as based on assumptions and a danger. I am so grossly disappointed because these nominees will take a bow today and go ahead to again require another six to twelve months, just like their principal, to first and foremost understand their portfolios, when it is eventually assigned before even coming up with blueprints to tackling the various challenges. And the masses will have to wait almost until the electioneering year, which by the way is less than 36months from now, to experience this elusive change. Going by history, nothing much is usually done in the electioneering year in terms of development. So sad hearing a lot of 'ifs' during this sham tagged screening.

Here is our call to duty, as great minds to take action beyond the rhetorics of our grand independence day events, to push this failure of leadership in the face of our government and to suggest practical methods, ideas and concepts of doing things in a series of ways that will bring about the desired change. Otherwise, we ourselves will be grand hypocrites that talk more and act less.

MizMyColi:
Anyone please.

What is the name of the woman who questioned Amina J. Mohammed on what she intends to do about Buhari's apparent indifference to women in governance?

drss:
Apart from amina mohammed who is more credible, all d rest dem na**** ogbpakako materials.
infact liar mohammed was asked to bow n go cos dem senate know say d guy empty for head completely. Na only lies remain for him brain. Dem no wan make e disgrace dem with more lies.

Gogetta:
Abiodun Olujimi, former Ekiti deputy governor.

Aminat508:
we rock

nobeku:
Lai Mohammed was not even asked any pertinent question..The house was dazzled by his presence.That guy is one smart old cock..

MizMyColi:
Anyone please.

What is the name of the woman who questioned Amina J. Mohammed on what she intends to do about Buhari's apparent indifference to women in governance?

ibisko04:
Abiodun Olujimi from Ekiti

TonyeBarcanista:
The Senate once again proved that they are nothing but glorified rubber stamp

nigeriancuban:
you are out off point just like the people giving you likes

mactoni91:
LAI MOHAMMED...
Still giving pdp nightmares even in the senate's hallow chamber...
Man gather mind o!
Hehehehe...
Ah swear...
CHIBUIKE ROTIMI AMAECHI, bow and go!
Hit the like button if u think LAI MOHAMMED gave the wailers food for thought...

stancydg:
I am watching with utter dismay the ongoing charade tagged screening by our senators, where assumptions(which I understand to be the lowest level of knowledge) is the order of the day. Imaginary portfolios have bn assigned to the candidates in a process that otherwise should have been a detailed, precise and coincise interview of the nominees. This goes to show the lack of depth of thought of our leaders, beginning from our President, who took so long to come up with this list without corresponding reasons to show for the time taken. In a serious clime, where the change mantra has been spuriously bandied, the nominees should be making to the nation today, precise presentations of their solutions to the challenges in their assigned but yet to be confirmed ministries. In a serious nation, the senate should forward that list back to the presidency requesting more details to enable her carry out a thorough process, as soon as Senator Ben Bruce described the process as based on assumptions and a danger. I am so grossly disappointed because these nominees will take a bow today and go ahead to again require another six to twelve months, just like their principal, to first and foremost understand their portfolios, when it is eventually assigned before even coming up with blueprints to tackling the various challenges. And the masses will have to wait almost until the electioneering year, which by the way is less than 36months from now, to experience this elusive change. Going by history, nothing much is usually done in the electioneering year in terms of development. So sad hearing a lot of 'ifs' during this sham tagged screening.

Here is our call to duty, as great minds to take action beyond the rhetorics of our grand independence day events, to push this failure of leadership in the face of our government and to suggest practical methods, ideas and concepts of doing things in a series of ways that will bring about the desired change. Otherwise, we ourselves will be grand hypocrites that talk more and act less.

nigeriancuban:
you are out off point just like the people giving you likes

Aminat508:
we rock

dunkem21:
Though the second list looks more like it, there is no justification whatsoever for wasting almost six months to get this task done..

..The Senate itself has not deviated from the same take a bow approach ..


..We need young vibrant men that will take this nation to envious heights .. and pay our elders N50k monthly to watch and give their opinions ..

stancydg:
I am watching with utter dismay the ongoing charade tagged screening by our senators, where assumptions(which I understand to be the lowest level of knowledge) is the order of the day. Imaginary portfolios have bn assigned to the candidates in a process that otherwise should have been a detailed, precise and coincise interview of the nominees. This goes to show the lack of depth of thought of our leaders, beginning from our President, who took so long to come up with this list without corresponding reasons to show for the time taken. In a serious clime, where the change mantra has been spuriously bandied, the nominees should be making to the nation today, precise presentations of their solutions to the challenges in their assigned but yet to be confirmed ministries. In a serious nation, the senate should forward that list back to the presidency requesting more details to enable her carry out a thorough process, as soon as Senator Ben Bruce described the process as based on assumptions and a danger. I am so grossly disappointed because these nominees will take a bow today and go ahead to again require another six to twelve months, just like their principal, to first and foremost understand their portfolios, when it is eventually assigned before even coming up with blueprints to tackling the various challenges. And the masses will have to wait almost until the electioneering year, which by the way is less than 36months from now, to experience this elusive change. Going by history, nothing much is usually done in the electioneering year in terms of development. So sad hearing a lot of 'ifs' during this sham tagged screening.

Here is our call to duty, as great minds to take action beyond the rhetorics of our grand independence day events, to push this failure of leadership in the face of our government and to suggest practical methods, ideas and concepts of doing things in a series of ways that will bring about the desired change. Otherwise, we ourselves will be grand hypocrites that talk more and act less.