₦airaland Forum

Pls wich law skol did u attend?nd u call all dat mere call for secession?based on des statements who are d zoo animals nw?

kingzizzy:
Nigerians don't seem to know that making verbal threats is not a crime. It doesn't matter who Nnamdi Kanu threatend to kill, he cannot be charged unless the threats were actually carried out. You can't charge a person to court just for what they said will do, you can only charge a person to court for what they are alleged to have done. Another thing is that the law on sedition has long been abrogated long ago so no one can be charged for this. Must of these charges are baseless. When it comes to the charge of treason. Calling for secession is not act of treason. If it were treason, Scottish leaders would have been arrested,Catalonian leaders would have been arrested, Hawaiian leaders would have been arrested. Self determination is a legitimate right of man.

All the charges are baseless

[s][/s]abduljabbar4:


... According to a donkeys point of view. Namdi kanus life will soon become the new definition of rubbish[s][/s]

That Senile Brainless, Paedophile Boko.hari will do absolutely nothing to Nnamdi Kanu.

abduljabbar4:
And some mentally challenged people think the west will support this terrorist. Nnamdi kanu is in trouble and the noise of biafrans on nairaland cant save him

Buhari the terrorist has nothing against Nnamdi Kanu, so you can continue fooling yourself!

themilanway:
I wasn't really expecting the federal government to charge him to court because if they do,it will surely upturn the apple cart.

Not that Nigeria will burn down,it will certainly create one too many distractions which honestly nobody needs at the moment.

By the way,why hasn't he meet his bail conditions?No one willing to surety him?

Is the SE that would burn down, and not all part of nigeria.the worst thing that would happen is, u people killing yourselvies.

You may keep listing trash, Biafra is going.

fleshbone:
Seriously?

You mean if you take a record of the threats to the court, it would be disregarded?

Unless that threat was actually carried out, it will not even reach court. Nigerians seem not to understand that you can't charge a person to court for a crime that was never committed in first place. It doesn't matter if Nnamdi Kanu threatend Nigeria or anyone, what matters is if he carried out the threat.

abduljabbar4:
No matter how helpless you are you must beat ur chests. Kai! Please ehn, make good just 5% of ur threats so that we can be convinced that you can burn down the country

Go through some of my post then come back and modify your earlier post.

There is no terrorism crime in all what you write here. You guys are just like running from pole to pillar just to find what to do to him.

he Said they said she said bla bla bla all na wash

Ehm femi.
What are the charges against Oba Akiolu for threatening a nation with lagoon?

winniz:
Buhari the terrorist has nothing against Nnamdi Kanu, so you can continue fooling yourself!

The court doesnt care whether Buhari wants to set Namdi kanu free or not. They will perform their duty

winniz:
That Senile Brainless, Paedophile Boko.hari will do absolutely nothing to Nnamdi Kanu.

The opposite of ur lies always turn out to be true. Gej will win, the court will stop buhari, bla bla bla.

Please just make good 2% of ur threats so that you can convince us. Gej lost and u couldnt set the country on fire. Ipob youths were killed you couldnt do anything. Now namdi kanu has been arrested and ur still giving out threats. Noise makers

kingzizzy:
Unless that threat was actually carried out, it will not even reach court. Nigerians seem not to understand that you can't charge a person to court for a crime that was never committed in first place. It doesn't matter if Nnamdi Kanu threatend Nigeria or anyone, what matters is if he carried out the threat.

what sort of senselessness is this?perhaps you don't know Nigeria has passed its antiterrorism law and according to that law,just thinking about committing a crime or inciting others to commit a crime related to terrorism is treason.not to mention actively encouraging people to kill and maim people.the law now seeks to prevent crimes from been committed by nabbing the would be terrorists before they strike.

I am even surprised KANU was granted bail.he should have been held for 2days,allowed a visit by his attorney and then held indefinitely which would be in accordance with the anti terrorism law of 2011.

all those biafrans that keep listing the examples of Scotland and Catalonia while at the same time advocating violence against the Nigerian state are as ignorant as the people of south Sudan.did Scotland engage in threats of violence?has Catalonia called Spain a zoo with people from other parts been animals?

advocates of a war of secession shouldn't compare 2015 with 1967.in 1967,ojukwu was a GOC of a section of the army with control over arms and men,a pogrom had just happened and tensions were high which saw massive influx of Igbo's back to the southeast which made a large pool of able bodied men available for drafting into the biafran army.this is 2015.we are in a democracy which means the president has absolute control over the military so unless there is a plan for a coup by the Igbo's,followed by a massive return of all Igbo's to the east,I wonder what Magic the ipob expect to perform militarily.

Scotland isn't a good example for biafrans because Scotland already had its own government.it simply wanted to leave the united kingdom and be on its own.and for those ipob people who don't know,the scottish move failed because of the Scots who live within Scotland majority of who are connected to the business of scotch which in reality is almost every major business in Scotland.there are laws in place which were enacted by the united kingdom to protect the scotch industry by making it the exclusive preserve of the people of Scotland to produce Scotch within the UK and all over Europe and the Americas.there were fears that if Scotland breaks away,Salmon and his new government won't have the clout to maintain those treaties which will mean scotch could be produced everywhere else.a move which will destroy the Scottish economy.
I believe a referendum for Biafra will fail just like scotland because those Igbo's who maintain their livelihood in other parts of the country will vote against it.even the Igbo's within proposed Biafra who depend moving their goods to other parts of Nigeria will. vote against it because a break means more conditions before they can sell their goods.

my two cents

hahahaha; Newsrecue? that anti-common sense, glorified blogsite?

Delafruita:
what sort of senselessness is this?perhaps you don't know Nigeria has passed its antiterrorism law and according to that law,just thinking about committing a crime or inciting others to commit a crime related to terrorism is treason.not to mention actively encouraging people to kill and maim people.the law now seeks to prevent crimes from been committed by nabbing the would be terrorists before they strike.

I am even surprised KANU was granted bail.he should have been held for 2days,allowed a visit by his attorney and then held indefinitely which would be in accordance with the anti terrorism law of 2011.

all those biafrans that keep listing the examples of Scotland and Catalonia while at the same time advocating violence against the Nigerian state are as ignorant as the people of south Sudan.did Scotland engage in threats of violence?has Catalonia called Spain a zoo with people from other parts been animals?

advocates of a war of secession shouldn't compare 2015 with 1967.in 1967,ojukwu was a GOC of a section of the army with control over arms and men,a pogrom had just happened and tensions were high which saw massive influx of Igbo's back to the southeast which made a large pool of able bodied men available for drafting into the biafran army.this is 2015.we are in a democracy which means the president has absolute control over the military so unless there is a plan for a coup by the Igbo's,followed by a massive return of all Igbo's to the east,I wonder what Magic the ipob expect to perform militarily.

Scotland isn't a good example for biafrans because Scotland already had its own government.it simply wanted to leave the united kingdom and be on its own.and for those ipob people who don't know,the scottish move failed because of the Scots who live within Scotland majority of who are connected to the business of scotch which in reality is almost every major business in Scotland.there are laws in place which were enacted by the united kingdom to protect the scotch industry by making it the exclusive preserve of the people of Scotland to produce Scotch within the UK and all over Europe and the Americas.there were fears that if Scotland breaks away,Salmon and his new government won't have the clout to maintain those treaties which will mean scotch could be produced everywhere else.a move which will destroy the Scottish economy.
I believe a referendum for Biafra will fail just like scotland because those Igbo's who maintain their livelihood in other parts of the country will vote against it.even the Igbo's within proposed Biafra who depend moving their goods to other parts of Nigeria will. vote against it because a break means more conditions before they can sell their goods.

my two cents

Rubbish, did South Sudan have its own government before they went in their own? You are just beating about the bush, Buhari should take him to court immediately, stup1d people everywhere. Just do the referendum let us see if it will fail, anu mpam. lunatics everywhere. Did Ukraine, Estonia, Georgia etc have their own government be for they left the Soviet union, did Czech republic and Slovakia have separate government be for the went each one his way? British slaves and stogies, yes it is easier to rescue a slave when that slave knows he is a slave. Self determination is a right, of course it is a right you must fight for.

Delafruita:
what sort of senselessness is this?perhaps you don't know Nigeria has passed its antiterrorism law and according to that law,just thinking about committing a crime or inciting others to commit a crime related to terrorism is treason.not to mention actively encouraging people to kill and maim people.the law now seeks to prevent crimes from been committed by nabbing the would be terrorists before they strike.

I am even surprised KANU was granted bail.he should have been held for 2days,allowed a visit by his attorney and then held indefinitely which would be in accordance with the anti terrorism law of 2011.

all those biafrans that keep listing the examples of Scotland and Catalonia while at the same time advocating violence against the Nigerian state are as ignorant as the people of south Sudan.did Scotland engage in threats of violence?has Catalonia called Spain a zoo with people from other parts been animals?

advocates of a war of secession shouldn't compare 2015 with 1967.in 1967,ojukwu was a GOC of a section of the army with control over arms and men,a pogrom had just happened and tensions were high which saw massive influx of Igbo's back to the southeast which made a large pool of able bodied men available for drafting into the biafran army.this is 2015.we are in a democracy which means the president has absolute control over the military so unless there is a plan for a coup by the Igbo's,followed by a massive return of all Igbo's to the east,I wonder what Magic the ipob expect to perform militarily.

Scotland isn't a good example for biafrans because Scotland already had its own government.it simply wanted to leave the united kingdom and be on its own.and for those ipob people who don't know,the scottish move failed because of the Scots who live within Scotland majority of who are connected to the business of scotch which in reality is almost every major business in Scotland.there are laws in place which were enacted by the united kingdom to protect the scotch industry by making it the exclusive preserve of the people of Scotland to produce Scotch within the UK and all over Europe and the Americas.there were fears that if Scotland breaks away,Salmon and his new government won't have the clout to maintain those treaties which will mean scotch could be produced everywhere else.a move which will destroy the Scottish economy.
I believe a referendum for Biafra will fail just like scotland because those Igbo's who maintain their livelihood in other parts of the country will vote against it.even the Igbo's within proposed Biafra who depend moving their goods to other parts of Nigeria will. vote against it because a break means more conditions before they can sell their goods.

my two cents

You are making a lot of mistakes here. There is nowhere in the world, I repeat, nowhere in the world where people are charged to court for a crime that is yet to committed. There is no provision anywhere in the world for charging someone to court over "verbal threats". It simply cannot happen because takes away freedom of speech. Do know the number of people who "threaten to kill" someone on the streets of Nigeria everyday? Why do think nobody has ever been arrested for this? I have never heard anyone being arrested for "thinking" about commiting a crime, that's just laughable. How can you know what a person is thinking in their head. You talked about inciting to acts of terrorism. Do you know what incitement means? It means that Nnamdi Kanu actively equiped people with weapons and sent them out to do harm. What known act of terrorism can you ascribe to Kanu? Is it what he said over the radio? Again, that comes under freedom of speech. If I tell a person to go and commit a crime but that person never did, how can I be charged for something that did not happen? Do you know how many gangster Rapp music are out there using foul language to tell people to take up arms and commit crimes? Have you ever heard about any gangster rapper arrested for this? There isn't one single act of crime that can be ascribed to Kanu. All he did was excercise his constitutionally guaranteed right to free speech. People do not get charged for what they say, they get charged for what they do.


When it comes to secession, Biafra,Ojukwu, using Scotland and Catalonia as examples, the progom and all other things you wrote. There only two important things to consider. That Nigeria is just an artificial and illegal creation of the White man. Nigeria has no legitimacy whatsoever because the consent of the indigenous people of the land such as Igbos was not sought before it was created. Therefore, Nigeria is a fraud.

The second thing to consider is that the Igbo tribe (as do any other tribe) have the God given right to decide for themselves if they want to be Nigerians or not. It is not for Lugard to come Britain to decide for us. These two reasons are why Nnamdi Kanu and his secessionist bid are legitimate. If the Igbos don't want to be with Nigeria, then Nigeria has no business being with Igbos

He's a vulgar, foul-mouthed, hate monger; the West will NEVER like his type.

We abhor uncivilized creatures. He is on his own.

kingzizzy:
Nigerians don't seem to know that making verbal threats is not a crime. It doesn't matter who Nnamdi Kanu threatend to kill, he cannot be charged unless the threats were actually carried out. You can't charge a person to court just for what they said will do, you can only charge a person to court for what they are alleged to have done. Another thing is that the law on sedition has long been abrogated long ago so no one can be charged for this. Most of these charges are baseless. When it comes to the charge of treason. Calling for secession is not an act of treason. If it were treason, Scottish leaders would have been arrested,Catalonian leaders would have been arrested, Hawaiian leaders would have been arrested. Self determination is a legitimate right of man.

All the charges are baseless

How many Hawaiian leaders are calling for the destruction of the United States? Name them. Why don't you concentrate on Africa and stop talking about things you've got no idea about?

"Nigerians don't seem to know that making verbal threats is not a crime. It doesn't matter who Nnamdi Kanu threatend to kill, he cannot be charged unless the threats were actually carried out. You can't charge a person to court just for what they said will do, you can only charge a person to court for what they are alleged to have done." Really?! You must be out of your freaking mind. Why don't you come online and social media continuously and threaten to kill the President of the U.S and watch how Special Forces will come to your shiyythole of a country and hunt you and everyone close to you out just to establish if you're a credible threat or not.

Most of you just come on here and pretend to know when you're really ignorant as all hell.

I repeat the average Nigerian does not have a brain rather he has a mass of meat up his head. if they did have brain (which I doubt) then they would know d difference between terrorism and threats. How can a man be charged to court for making threats? Yet the uneducated oba of Lagos is walking free after making his silly threat against the igbos. Nigeria is a huge joke with lots of comedians and the dull president is heading the party. Let us call a spade a spade. Nigeria does not pratice democracy.

Chibuzor well done.... Keep up with ur drama... But know we re watching you... With ur 23 monikers for Biafra hustling... U will be the next to be picked... Just keep making noise... So threats Nd inciteful languages re no more terrorism ploys.... Ur ethnocentrism is what would be responsible for ur untimely death... We shall see.. Stupid illiterate

winniz:
Another load of rubbish!

Bros na wa for u o....... why all this quote na

ISpiksDaTroof:
How many Hawaiian leaders are calling for the destruction of the United States? Name them. Why don't you concentrate on Africa and stop talking about things you've got no idea about?

"Nigerians don't seem to know that making verbal threats is not a crime. It doesn't matter who Nnamdi Kanu threatend to kill, he cannot be charged unless the threats were actually carried out. You can't charge a person to court just for what they said will do, you can only charge a person to court for what they are alleged to have done." Really?! You must be out of your freaking mind. Why don't you ---continuously-- come online and social media and threaten to kill the President of the U.S and watch how Special Forces will come to your shiyythole of a country and hunt you and everyone close to you out just to establish if you're a credible threat or not.

Most of you just come on here and pretend to know when you're really ignorant as all hell.

What are you talking about? I have watched a Hawaian chief call for the destruction of the the US right on CNN! I have seen an Australian aborigine insult Prince Charles to his face and accused him and his fellow British of coming from nowhere to steal their lands. There are several far right groups in the US calling for the head of Obama and the destruction of the US. No one is being arrested in these countries because they are civilised countries unlike Nigeria. Nobody can be arrested in these countries just for mere utterances, which is what Nnamdi Kanu did. America will never bomb anyone for what they say. They will only bomb someone who is actively involved in terrorism or linked to terrorist groups. I can be in America and shout from the rooftops that I want to kill Obama and destroy America, they won't even take me seriously. Nnamdi Kanu has called Obama and Cameron all sorts of names, yet he travelled to the U.S. and Great Britain just before coming to Nigeria. Nobody disturbed him in those countries because they recognise his right to free speech. But in backward Nigeria, he was arrested for nothing

rose2014

What says you?

phemmyutd:
NewsRescue
Below is a list of some of the charges of
terrorism against the arrested Radio Biafra
director, Nnamdi Kanu (not real name). He was
successfully arrested at the Golden Tulip
Essential Hotel, Ikeja, Nigeria, this Saturday.
As follow the list of charges, the Nigeria’s
2011 anti-terrorism act as amended gives
overreaching powers above the judiciary for
Nigeria’s security officers to arrest and
indefinitely detain terrorist violators. Charges
punishable by death.
1. In a video of November 2013 the director
of Radio Biafra, and Arinze O. went around
Ezu River, the scene of mass murders and
dumping of bodies in Anambra and harassed
and intimidated innocent northern extract
peasants under the bridge. He was never
arrested for the seditious acts in
contravention of Nigeria’s anti-terror laws and
constitutional rights of freedom of assembly.
2. In November of 2013, ‘Nnamdi Kanu,’ the
director of Radio Biafra on his radio
station threatened violent terror against the
UK or any other country that interferes with
his quest for the secession of Biafra.
3. In his 9th January, 2014 broadcast,
Kanu threatened death to any Igbo who
converted to Islam. He said,
“Every Eze that is a Muslim must
be hounded out. They must
leave our land. If they do not
leave our land, they will be
killed. They must leave our land
and go to the North to stay.”
Chief Sylvester O. Dimunah, the vice Chairman
of the Council of Village Heads in Imo State,
notably had converted to Islam, provoking
Kanu’s death threats. Kanu claimed the chief
was pleading for his life and had doubled his
security due to the open threats and the
promotion of terror against the Chief by
Nnamdi Kanu. Kanu had given out the
Chief’s phone number and asked radio
listeners to call and threaten the Eze.
Promoting the PDP then ruling party , Nnamdi
Kanu said, “There will be no mercy, no
pardon, no forgiveness. All traitors must die
and so too their families. This nonsensical
disease of Igbo saboteurs springing up all
over the place in the name of having a
different opinion on Biafra liberation will no
longer be tolerated especially those who claim
they are Biafrans but are supporting APC or
APC candidates.”
4. Support For Murder Of Random
Innocent Hausa In East
In the chilling audio recording of September
1st, 2015, a certain Uchechukwu Madueke in
London’s Heathrow called-in and told Nnamdi
that his brother who “spoke to Nnamdi
yesterday” has left India for Nigeria and has
promised to kill a random Hausa man. The
caller who hails from Enugu says he knows
his brother, Michael, that he will kill the Hausa
person before he returns to India. Nnamdi
Knau supported the promise of terror and said,
“we need all strong people to fulfill this
mission.”
5. Open Support for Manufacturer Of Deadly
Laser Weapons And Call for Murder Of
Nigerian Soldiers
In broadcasts of September 3rd, 2015 A Biafra
zionist called ‘Nnamdi Kanu’ and told him that
he is technically trained and has been
researching how to make deadly weapons for
the past 20 years. He, a technician and
engineering graduate said he can make
microwave lasers that can destroy armored
tanks. He says he has a host of other deadly
friends who are all ready to wage war against
Nigeria. Nnamdi Kanu noted the guys number
and promised he will utilize his skills. In the
same recording as below, several terrorists
called in and promised to terrorize Nigeria.
Some suggested killing Hausas in the East to
provoke chaos across Nigeria. Nnamdi Kanu
in the broadcast directed the murder of
Nigerian soldiers who he blamed for the
alleged murder of protesters at the end of
August.
Listen to chilling clips from the chilling
broadcast:
6. Operation of a seditious, treasonous,
separatist radio station that intimidates the
sitting government of Nigeria and threatens
the nation’s sovereignty and promotes
violence.
Radio Biafra broadcasts on the net, on
shortwave, and on phone Apps
Powers of the Anti-Terror Bill
That Nnamdi Kanu Has Violated
The bill provides a broad
definition of what constitutes an
act of terrorism. An act “intended
or [that] can reasonably regarded
as having been intended” to force
a government or an international
organization to carry out or
abstain from carrying out a
certain act is an act of terrorism.
(An Act to Provide for Measures
to Combat Terrorism and for
Related Matters, §2, Nigerian
National Assembly portal, http://
/6cdsl5f (last visited
Feb. 22, 2011.) Researching or
developing a biological or
chemical weapon without lawful
authority is an act of terrorism.
(Id.) Dissemination of information
(be it true or false) “calculated to
cause panic, evoke violence or
intimidate a government, a
person or group of persons” is
also considered an act of
terrorism. (Id.)
The bill gives broad powers to
government without any judicial
oversight. A Security Intelligence
Officer may enter and search any
place, person, or vehicle without
a warrant if he has “reason to
suspect” that an offense is being
committed and there is evidence
of a commission of an offense
under the bill. (Id. at §23.) The
Officer may also search, detain,
and arrest anyone if he has a
“reasonable suspicion” that the
person has committed or is
about to commit an offense
under the bill (id.) The Director
General of State Security Service
(DG) may use communication
service providers as he deems
fit. (Id. at §24.) The DG also has
the authority to seize funds if he
has reasonable grounds to
suspect that they were obtained
through acts of terrorism, they
belong to a terrorist organization,
or they were intended for use to
further terrorist activities. (Id.
§11.) A Senior Security Officer
has the authority to order the
detention of a terrorism suspect
for 48 hours without access to
anyone, including his/her
attorney. (Id. at §26.)
The bill gives law enforcement
officers immunity from civil or
criminal liability for the use of
force “as may be necessary for
any purpose” that results in
injury or death to any person or
damage or loss to any property.
(Id. at §10.) Law enforcement
officers include employees of the
Defense Intelligence Agency, the
Department of State Services, the
Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission, the National Agency
for the Prohibition of Persons, the
National Drug Law Enforcement
Agency, the National Intelligence
Agency, Nigerian Immigration
Services, Nigerian Customs
Services, and the Nigerian Police
Force. (Id. at §33.) http://
www.loc.gov/lawweb/servlet/
lloc_news?
disp3_l205402537_text
DSS Makes Dangerous Error, Puts Nigeria In
Danger By Granting Kanu Bail
Nnamdi Kanu has surprisingly been granted
bail, though he is yet to fulfill the conditions
set for his bail.
It is recollected that Mohammed Yusuf was
likewise granted bail twice, and reportedly
bailed out by Middle belt professor Jerry
Gana, before going on to become the world’s
deadliest terrorist group.

newsrescue.com/list-of-terrorism-charges-against-arrested-radio-biafra-leader-nnamdi-kanu/

Boko Haram killings increased after Buhari’s threat to make Nigeria ungovernable


http://www.npr.org/2015/04/04/397450758/president-elect-buhari-tells-nigerians-not-to-expect-miracles

http://www.channelstv.com/2015/04/05/do-not-expect-miracles-buhari-tells-nigerians/
==============================================
http://dailypost.ng/2015/01/03/boko-haram-killings-increased-buharis-threat-make-nigeria-ungovernable-fasehun/

http://pointblanknews.com/pbn/exclusive/insecurity-buhari-promised-blood-if-he-lost-presidency/

http://www.punchng.com/news/govt-blasts-buhari-for-comment-on-insecurity/
===================================
http://www.thenigerianvoice.com/news/31972/1/buhari-warns-there-may-be-no-nigeria-in-2011.html

================================================================
http://dailyindependentnig.com/2012/06/making-nigeria-ungovernable-for-president-jonathan/

Chanchit:
I still think the guy is mentally challenged, and also lacks the strategy to lead a secession.

Leave am make he dey form Nelson Mandela for prison

kingzizzy:
Nigerians don't seem to know that making verbal threats is not a crime. It doesn't matter who Nnamdi Kanu threatend to kill, he cannot be charged unless the threats were actually carried out. You can't charge a person to court just for what they said will do, you can only charge a person to court for what they are alleged to have done. Another thing is that the law on sedition has long been abrogated long ago so no one can be charged for this. Most of these charges are baseless. When it comes to the charge of treason. Calling for secession is not an act of treason. If it were treason, Scottish leaders would have been arrested,Catalonian leaders would have been arrested, Hawaiian leaders would have been arrested. Self determination is a legitimate right of man.

All the charges are baseless

continue to educate the useless yoruba bloggers

ValentineMary:
I repeat the average Nigerian does not have a brain rather he has a mass of meat up his head. if they did have brain (which I doubt) then they would know d difference between terrorism and threats. How can a man be charged to court for making threats? Yet the uneducated oba of Lagos is walking free after making his silly threat against the igbos. Nigeria is a huge joke with lots of comedians and the dull president is heading the party. Let us call a spade a spade. Nigeria does not pratice democracy.

Whenever your ignorant self is fortunate enough to get on a plane coming towards the West just say "I'll blow up this plane" or "Bomb" and then when you get sent to Leavenworth or Florence, CO for 100yrs complain to the world how making a threat and inciting fear and terror is different from actually carrying it out.

Some of you are just crazy beyond redemption.

kingzizzy:
What are you talking about? I have watched a Hawaian chief call for the destruction of the the US right on CNN! I have seen an Australian aborigine insult Prince Charles to his face and accused him and his fellow British of coming from nowhere to steal their lands. There are several far right groups in the US calling for the head of Obama and the destruction of the US. No one is being arrested in these countries because they are civilised countries unlike Nigeria. Nobody can be arrested in these countries just for mere utterances, which is what Nnamdi Kanu did. America will never bomb anyone for what they say. They will only bomb someone who is actively involved in terrorism or linked to terrorist groups. I can be in America and shout from the rooftops that I want to kill Obama and destroy America, they won't even take me seriously. Nnamdi Kanu has called Obama and Cameron all sorts of names, yet he travelled to the U.S. and Great Britain just before coming to Nigeria. Nobody disturbed him in those countries because they recognise his right to free speech. But in backward Nigeria, he was arrested for nothing

You're ignorant. I don't even know if it will be worth it explaining anything to you.

Actually, I think I do, it won't.

themilanway:
I wasn't really expecting the federal government to charge him to court because if they do,it will surely upturn the apple cart.

Not that Nigeria will burn down,it will certainly create one too many distractions which honestly nobody needs at the moment.

By the way,why hasn't he meet his bail conditions?No one willing to surety him?

yes!
#2 million from grade level civil servant.