₦airaland Forum

Richirich713:
Don't u mean Divine

johnydon22:
You may do well to distrust anybody who claims to know so well what God wants or even writes it in a book, i have always noticed it is mostly in coincide to their own ideas and selfish egoistic dogma or sometimes culture.

[b] Similarly the Quran and many other religious books also spark up different interpretation stemming from one source.

With every new interpretation hoping to outwit the old as the better one and with every knew emergence comes more conflict of ideas, dogma and doctrines which ultimately leads to emergence of another in reformation and ends up being exactly what others are.

Every person claims so strongly that theirs is the right one and others are simply deceived, where as in Christianity is spans to almost 40,000 distinct sects and doctrines all hewn from the same source each person interpreting it to suit his own personal ideas or ego.

The funny part is that they all claim some super spirity power is leading their distinct and most time contradicting interpretations.

It is either the spirit is drunk or maybe confused Or there simply was none in the whole saga just MEN interpreting one text to suit their own personal ego or conform to their own ideology of how it should be blaming it on a spirity stuff... [/b]

plappville:
The fact that all other books were copied from The Bible shows the bible the only Divine Book ever.

Thanks for your contribution.

Which other books are you talking about The book i was referring to on my post is the bible itself as a matter of fact.. **Comprehension**

My mention of other books is that they all spark up different interpretations ... seriously you all should always read to comprehend..

So since bible copied from Gilgamesh epic then Gilgamesh epic is divinely inspired?

Seriously i wonder how you all think, these are mere mythological and cultural assimilation

Scholar8200:
I think that goes to establish the fact that it is not the work of man; only the Truth attracts the attention of the father of lies. he has been at it since Genesis 3!

Moreover, another problem is PRIDE!!!

(we are afraid/unwiling to discover that
i) we have been deceived;
ii) our 'exalted' clergy/pastor/priest/church founder did not do a thorough job;
iii) the partial position/teaching satisfies and gratifies our flesh and relieves us of our responsibility and we dont want any contrary but Scripturally sound view that will deny us our pleasure/false assurances.
iv) the man who left a ministry to start his own wants numbers and wants to be different from where he left even at the risk of distorting the Word etc

Besides, if you consider the claims and beliefs of various dissenters, you will notice a holding unto a position/teaching, carved out from a passage ignoring what was said about the same subject in other passages and a movement is born holding to that teaching while ignoring other passages that, if considered, would have set things in the right perspective.

johnydon22:
Which other books are you talking about The book i was referring to on my post is the bible itself as a matter of fact.. **Comprehension**

My mention of other books is that they all spark up different interpretations ... seriously you all should always read to comprehend..

[b] So since bible copied from Gilgamesh epic then Gilgamesh epic is divinely inspired?

Seriously i wonder how you all think, these are mere mythological and cultural assimilation [/b]

DoubleDeeX:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=dhsDjgMR058

Check this out!

Interesting thread. I will comment later!

plappville:
You said the Coran and other books also spark up different interpretation stemming from one source.

I said that source must be a true source. (The bible)
Is there a matter with that?

I don't have to start arguing with you na. Should I?

johnydon22:


The matter is your comprehension of that line...

Biblical conflicting interpretation is from one source (BIBLE)

Quranic conflicting interpretation is from one source (Quran)

Hindu Veda conflicting interpretation is from one source (Veda)

You mistake is that you take the bible as a subject of point when i referred to these books but my assertions was very clear..

" Similarly the Quran and many other religious books also spark up
different interpretation stemming from one source."

it is clear your infusion of bible into this assertion is of your own making and poor comprehensibility.
[size=16pt]
The book i mentioned in the assertion is the subject of my point of that assertion not the bible... Please please understand it..[/size]




Not really you only need comprehend..