₦airaland Forum

The Head of Presidential Anti-corruption Committee, Prof Itse Sagay, has again voiced his concern over some recent rulings of the Supreme Court on election petitions, particularly those held in Rivers and Akwa Ibom states.

Sagay, who spoke with newsmen at the Olu Palace, Warri on Saturday, warned that the rulings, which allow people who were declared winners without elections in spite of copious evidences of irregularities and heavy human and material casualties, set a dangerous precedent in the history of elections.

“The judgements are very perverse, particularly relating to Akwa Ibom and Rivers. Everybody knows that there were no elections in those two states.
“Everybody knows that people like Wike climbed into the governorship seat over dead bodies and over bloods of human beings. There were no elections, they wrote the results; the evidence is there,” he said.
According to Sagay, what the Supreme Court has done is to set the clock of electoral excellence and fairness and credibility back by, ” I do not want to say a thousand years, but certainly it is taking us back to where we were before Jega came in and sanitize the system.”

“We are going to have primitive and barbaric electoral culture; ‘kill as much as you can, destroy as much as you can, create as much catastrophe, but if you can find yourself on that seat, you are confirmed, regardless of the means by which you got there’.
“That is a very major setback to democracy and the rule of law,” he said.

Similarly, the erudite constitutional lawyer also flayed the present crop of Supreme Court judges, insisting that they have degraded the court from decades ago when the Nigerian Supreme Court was ranked among the best in the world.

“I remember 15, 20 years ago, we had a Supreme Court that is the best in the world – better than the one you have in the US. That was when you had Justices (Kayode) Eso, (Andrew) Obaseki, Anyagolou, (Adolphous) Karibe-Whyte, Bello and so on. Those people brought a culture to the Supreme Court and most of us thought when they left the culture would remain but it hasn’t.

“New people have come, much younger people, and they have different approach to life because I don’t understand why you would have law, which is in conflict with justice and you prefer to apply that law – technical law, which is in conflict with justice. As we have seen in the case of Akwa Ibom and Rivers and a few other cases.

“So I think their orientations are different. I think the older ones who are gone believed that justice was number one. In such a case, you ask where does the justice lies? They now interpreted the law in line with justice.

“But now what we have is a group of people in the Supreme Court, who do not care where their legal interpretation is leading them. Once you have a divorce between law and justice, the whole legal system will break down and that is what has happened,” he added.

Prof Sagay has also called for disciplinary actions against Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs) and other senior lawyers who are seen to be encouraging corrupt politicians and looters of the nation’s treasury.

He said, “There are a group of senior lawyers who have totally departed from anything that the calling of the law profession requires; they have thrown in their lots with the looters and have become, I won’t call them fellow looters, but definitely, they have started enjoying and sharing in the proceeds of crimes of these looters and because of that they are absolutely now against the anti-corruption law.

“There is need to have these Senior Advocates thoroughly disciplined and if they would not accept discipline, they need to be removed from the profession before they bring more disgrace to the profession and at the same time drag this country down economically.”

doctokwus:
Well said, prof Sagay.
I salute the courage of the transition monitoring group and now prof Sagay who have come out openly to lampoon this set of justices of the Supreme Court.
I said it here,that the supreme Court tried to justify their clearly fraudulent ruling by convenienting choosing a technicality that suited its aim.
But u cannot seperate justice from the law as Sagay said.
Where justice is not served,anarchy reigns and that's what these crop of sc judges did in Rivers.
They wud be held responsible for foisting anarchy in rivers because when shi t hits the fan,everyone wud have to account for their part in what caused the shi t to escape from the bowel in the first place.
That they are judges of the SC wud not cow right thinking people from calling a spade by its crooked shape.

LoremIpsum:
Lamentation chapter 1 vs 1.

Why do you guys hail the judiciary when the ruling is in your favour but cry blue murder when its against you? Pfft.

doctokwus:
There was no election in Rivers state and what the SC judges did was to have their wigs,body and soul tainted with the blood of innocents killed and others maimed in order to prevent any election from holding.
Karma is alive and u all just watch what wud happen in Rivers state before this year ends.
Ekitigate wud pale in comparison when souls of those that think they have benefitted from the atrocity in Rivers start to hunt them daily and they are left with the only option of ditching Wike and confessing all what transpired from the no election to the SC court stage.
It's just a matter of time.

doctokwus:
There was no election in Rivers state and what the SC judges did was to have their wigs,body and soul tainted with the blood of innocents killed and others maimed in order to prevent any election from holding.
Karma is alive and u all just watch what wud happen in Rivers state before this year ends.
Ekitigate wud pale in comparison when souls of those that think they have benefitted from the atrocity in Rivers start to hunt them daily and they are left with the only option of ditching Wike and confessing all what transpired from the no election to the SC court stage.
It's just a matter of time.

flokii:
leave them..

bubu will soon deal with those judges and we'll re-visit d cases.... TRUTH will surely prevail

Wike is evil

mynd1:
PMB need to probe those supreme court judges asap.

doctokwus:
Well said, prof Sagay.
I salute the courage of the transition monitoring group and now prof Sagay who have come out openly to lampoon this set of justices of the Supreme Court.
I said it here,that the supreme Court tried to justify their clearly fraudulent ruling by convenienting choosing a technicality that suited its aim.
But u cannot seperate justice from the law as Sagay said.
Where justice is not served,anarchy reigns and that's what these crop of sc judges did in Rivers.
They wud be held responsible for foisting anarchy in rivers because when shi t hits the fan,everyone wud have to account for their part in what caused the shi t to escape from the bowel in the first place.
That they are judges of the SC wud not cow right thinking people from calling a spade by its crooked shape.

truthspeaks:
Infact he shld probe all of their judgements frm 1999. Am sure d economy will improve. Ode .