₦airaland Forum

True life Experience That i witnessed, A case Study;

Ahmadu-Bello University Zaria 1994

It was behind Amina Hall, Discussion ensued among some boys christian and moslems explaining religious things.... according to an eye witness, But what i saw was that two guys dressed in white kaftan with their trousers like five-inch shorter than their Ankle held a boy with a tight grip from the back and several people followed.

Even though the boy was saying repeatedly and louder that; ''what i said was 'peace be upon him' 'peace be Upon him' they(Muslims) still dont leave him and said 'No' its a lie 'baabu'.

A lecturer passing-by stopped them and ask what the problem was, the two boys in Kaftan said the other boy who was a christian has committed Blasphemy by insulting Prophet Mohammed by saying... 'piss' be upon him' But the christian boy said clearly that 'why would i say 'piss' be upon prophet mohhamed when i am not sick? and said further that; that the two guys in white kaftan 'misrepresents his uterrance' as what he mean is 'peace' as in 'calm' and not what they are trying to paint. The lecturer ask how the Accusers could differentiate 'peace' from 'piss' and the Accusers reply promptly that ''They Can Discern from the pronounciation Without anybody telling them'' and So the Accusers did not provide further explanation for clarification 'other than' what they perceived 'on their own Volition'.

The lecturer demand that they release the christian boy but this time we have A loud Chorus saying ''A-ah, Baba mu da keshi'' meaning; No We are not releasing him! he was beating and dragged on the floor when he refuses to move not until the security people came in two motorcyles and took the boy away.

The issue here is that; Most Accusations of Blasphemy in Moslem environs 'are often established without clarification from alledged offenders'
A mere mention of 'Mohhamed' is enough to earn a non-believer ''a twisted story version'' geared towards blasphemy

Without insults, Cant Our Moslem brothers also Allow an accused to explain him/herself? at least let us hear from the accused-own mouth and Not ''what the Accused was said to have uttered'' which is Not the 'first information report' Before we can Trully establish 'Guilt of Blasphemy'

I can see that Nobody is questioning how 'Guilt of Blasphemy' is also established by our moslem brothers that is 'what was actually said' in horse's mouth, and Not just 'Assuming blasphemy' based on accusers claims.

Valid Explanations pls.

I do not know what thy talk about
I leave every thing to God









long live

wolfslair:
I do not know what thy talk about
I leave every thing to God









long live

how 'Guilt of Blasphemy' is established by our moslem brothers that is; 'what was actually said' in horse's mouth, and Not just 'Assuming blasphemy' based on accusers claims.