₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,326,307 members, 8,425,977 topics. Date: Saturday, 13 June 2026 at 12:36 PM

Toggle theme

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (15) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsTechnical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1164918 Views)

1 2 3 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 7:23pm On Aug 13, 2016
nemesis2u:
what logic ?

you can post nonsense because it seems sensible to u .

i asked u to remove the comments only not the complete article , because that amounts to trolling
u follow rules
if u want to bash or dislike any weapon u are free to do so , u can also post articles supporting ur view why the weapon is not good , but u cannot post the comment section here .
because it will start a flame war .
follow the rules

new rules



now remove the comment section from the post i mentioned .
dont destroy the thread
I am not destroy this thread,feel free to express your point of view .I post related comments only.If you think it's trolling .New rules can be added but for following posts ,why previous
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:27pm On Aug 13, 2016
Henry240:
I just can't wait for this fighter to enter full operational service.
if they manage to get all the goodies working, it will end up being a potent system , i am particularly interested in the the plasma stealth , this will be implemented last because it will require enormous power which can only be supplied by the latest engines which is still in development.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:32pm On Aug 13, 2016
chinese8107:
I am not destroy this thread,feel free to express your point of view .I post related comments only.If you think it's trolling .New rules can be added but for following posts ,why previous
i thought u are a good and sensible person who is interested in defense and weapons ,
but u proved me wrong ,

u interested in dick measuring contest .

in future get ready to taste your own medicine
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 7:48pm On Aug 13, 2016
nemesis2u:
i thought u are a good and sensible person who is interested in defense and weapons ,
but u proved me wrong ,

u interested in dick measuring contest .

in future get ready to taste your own medicine
I am not against any paticular target. contest for what?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:56pm On Aug 13, 2016
nemesis2u:
i thought u are a good and sensible person who is interested in defense and weapons ,
but u proved me wrong ,

u interested in dick measuring contest .

in future get ready to taste your own medicine
Man, please dail down your attacks on the Chinese guy. He brings diversity to the thread, that's not a d1ck-measuring contest.


I'm quite sure he's "heard" you on the posting of other individual's comments.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:01pm On Aug 13, 2016
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 8:08pm On Aug 13, 2016
4000 rounds/min with MANPADS

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:10pm On Aug 13, 2016
nemesis2u:
if they manage to get all the goodies working, it will end up being a potent system , i am particularly interested in the the plasma stealth , this will be implemented last because it will require enormous power which can only be supplied by the latest engines which is still in development.
The thing with the current T-50 engines they give off 147 kn of thrust each , which is only 9 kn less thrust compared to the F-22.


also , those engines proppel the Pak-Fa at 2600 km/h (faster
than F-22) which is very decent , and give it a range of 3500
km (more than f22)which is really good , plus it has 3d TVC .



I'll have to read further on the Plasma Stealth, however the Russians are going full-spectrum on Stealth like the Americans, i don't think so.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:14pm On Aug 13, 2016
Henry240:
Man, please dail down your attacks on the Chinese guy. He brings diversity to the thread, that's not a d1ck-measuring contest.


I'm quite sure he's "heard" you on the posting of other individual's comments.
u go through my post to see that i humbly requested him in details on why he was wrong not once but twice

and if he "heard" me why he continue to argue ?

diversity is good but not if it brings in idiocracy

would u tolerate somebody if he/she derails the thread you care for at the expense of diversity ?

no disrespect but i know what i was saying and i was justified .
why u always baby sit the chinese ? grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:23pm On Aug 13, 2016
nemesis2u:
why u always baby sit the chinese ? grin grin
LOL... "And why would i do that?".


Let's not derail the thread.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:24pm On Aug 13, 2016
Russian typhoon-k Armored personnel carrier

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 8:26pm On Aug 13, 2016
nemesis2u:
u go through my post to see that i humbly requested him in details on why he was wrong not once but twice

and if he "heard" me why he continue to argue ?

diversity is good but not if it brings in idiocracy

would u tolerate somebody if he/she derails the thread you care for at the expense of diversity ?

no disrespect but i know what i was saying and i was justified .
why u always baby sit the chinese ? grin grin
I only post
at least related thing,derail or not, can anyone support a point of view without any reference?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:28pm On Aug 13, 2016
attention copy and paste
The improved version of Russian Mi-28NM attack (top) helicopter was spotted at Mil Moscow Helicopter Plant.

The Russian Helicopters company produced the first prototype of the improved helicopter in 2015. According to the company’s report, helicopter tests should be carried out during 2016, and then the Russian Defense Ministry will receive the first delivery.

The improved version of Mi-28NM has been equipped with surveillance radar and a new control system, the RIA Novosti news agency reported earlier, citing the managing director of the Russian Helicopters (Rosvertol) company, Petr Motrenko. The new attack helicopter also has received improved rotor blades that will increase the cruising speed of the machine by 13% and the top speed – by 10%. According to rumors, the new version will be able to reach speed of 600 km/h (370 mph). The Mi-28NM attack helicopter is producing at the Rosvertol plant in Rostov. The machine was designed to find and destroy tanks and other armored vehicles in conditions of active fire and electronic countermeasures. The helicopter also can hunt for low-speed air targets and infantry.

The letter ‘N’ (‘night’) in the name of the Mi-28NM shows the helicopter’s ability to work equally effectively at any time of a day. The helicopter modernization project provides for the installation of the radar antenna over the flapping hinge. In addition to the circular view it will enable the crew to monitor the situation, hiding in the folds of the terrain. “The radar is able to process information from multiple channels at the same time that helps to improve accuracy of the measurement of the coordinates and parameters of obstacles. The number of simultaneously tracked targets has been increased, new modes have been developed. Performance-board computer has been increased ten times,” Pavel Budagov, the Director of the Ryazan instrument factory, where the radar was developed, said.

The Mi-28NM has also been equipped with a dual control system – the machine can also be operated by the navigator-operator. ™@mighty_russia

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107:
Henry240:
The thing with the current T-50 engines they give off 147 kn of thrust each , which is only 9 kn less thrust compared to the F-22.


also , those engines proppel the Pak-Fa at 2600 km/h (faster
than F-22) which is very decent , and give it a range of 3500
km (more than f22)which is really good , plus it has 3d TVC .



I'll have to read further on the Plasma Stealth, however the Russians are going full-spectrum on Stealth like the Americans, i don't think so.
I agree, hard for current Russian technology. And also the so-called full-spectrum may still find some counter-measures.And Russian are smart they know plasma stealth may find some counter-measures,they don't urgent need.while the F-22 use because not every country can have counter measures against plasma stealth
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:36pm On Aug 13, 2016
https://i.imgur.com/t6x7Y.jpg

identify the aircraft grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by M14A1: 10:04pm On Aug 13, 2016
nemesis2u:
https://i.imgur.com/t6x7Y.jpg

identify the aircraft grin
F111
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by M14A1:
the horizontal strake on the nose to create lift and balance the jet.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:18pm On Aug 13, 2016
Beauty Pak-Fa prototype T-50-5R

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 10:23pm On Aug 13, 2016
China 122mm truck howitzer,a low cost weapon to make up numbers.

China do not always use advanced weapons for 2nd line force,as it has the biggest army on earth.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107:
Japan ShinMaywa US-2 Amphibious plane
(flying boat)

General characteristics

Crew: 11
Capacity: 20 passengers or 12 stretchers
Length: 33.46 m (109 ft 9 in)
Wingspan: 33.15 m (108 ft 9 in)
Height: 9.8 m (32 ft 2 in)
Wing area: 135.8 m2 (1,462 sq ft)
Empty weight: 25,630 kg (56,504 lb)
Gross weight: 43,000 kg (94,799 lb) water take-off
Max takeoff weight: 47,700 kg (105,160 lb) land take-off
Powerplant: 4 × Rolls-Royce AE 2100J turboprop, 3,424 kW (4,592 hp) each
Powerplant: 1 × LHTEC T800 turboshaft Boundary layer control compressor, 1,017 kW (1,364 hp)
Propellers: 6-bladed Dowty R414
Performance

Maximum speed: 560 km/h (348 mph; 302 kn)
Cruising speed: 480 km/h (298 mph; 259 kn) at 6,000 m (20,000 ft)
Range: 4,700 km (2,920 mi; 2,538 nmi)
Service ceiling: 7,195 m (23,606 ft)
Takeoff distance on ground at MTOW: 490 m (1,610 ft)
Landing distance on ground at MTOW: 1,500 m (4,900 ft)
Takeoff distance on water at Loaded weight: 280 m (920 ft)
Landing distance on water at Loaded weight: 330 m (1,080 ft)

--x/xxxxxxxxxx

India is planing to buy it.price estimated around $1.65
billion for 12 units.This is overpriced I think

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107:
China build AG600 in respond of Japan US-2

General characteristics

Capacity: 50 passengers
Length: 36.9 m (121 ft 1 in)
Wingspan: 38.8 m (127 ft 4 in)
Max takeoff weight: 53,500 kg (117,947 lb)
Powerplant: 4 × WJ-6 turboprops, 3,805 kW (5,103 hp) each
Propellers: 6-bladed constant speed propellers
Performance

Maximum speed: 570 km/h (354 mph; 308 kn)
Range: 5,500 km (3,418 mi; 2,970 nmi)
Service ceiling: 10,500 m (34,449 ft)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by ValerianSteel(m): 11:54pm On Aug 13, 2016
MikeCZA:
No, it's the S400! Not just any SAM.
I didn't imply it wasn't the S-400 did I.

The S-400 is trash to the IAF,and when Israel starts flying the F-35Adir in Syria,it would be reduced to dust.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by ValerianSteel(m): 11:59pm On Aug 13, 2016
chkil:
Beauty Pak-Fa prototype T-50-5R
Missy89 grin grin grin grin am sure you know why I'm laughing undecided
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by M14A1: 12:48am On Aug 14, 2016
The leading edge is fixed in place, this was to keep the cost down though it does slightly reduce take off and landing abilities.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by M14A1: 12:50am On Aug 14, 2016
incredibly overbuilt main gear to allow rough field operations.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by M14A1: 12:52am On Aug 14, 2016
the intake has splitter plates just separated from the body at the jet intakes to avoid stagnant boundary layer air, that is air that sticks to the plane and causes drag

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by M14A1: 12:54am On Aug 14, 2016
Horizontal strake on tail fin is to control airflow and increase angel of attack abilities

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:34am On Aug 14, 2016
M14A1:
Horizontal strake on tail fin is to control airflow and increase angel of attack abilities
I am not bashing anying,simply something technical.
This is mainly a trainer but not a fighter I think ,though it do have some attack ability.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107:
M14A1:
incredibly overbuilt main gear to allow rough field operations.
rough field operation ? grass land or sand road? If yes it's really competitive. as previously only some light basic trainer can do.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:31am On Aug 14, 2016
M14A1:
Horizontal strake on tail fin is to control airflow and increase angel of attack abilities
nice photographic walk through , enjoyed it grin grin grin

plz post similar things very informative like this one grin grin grin

a small detail u missed
the horizontal strake on the nose also helps in better spin recovery cool
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by M14A1: 6:38am On Aug 14, 2016
chinese8107:
I am not bashing anying,simply something technical.
This is mainly a trainer but not a fighter I think ,though it do have some attack ability.
I am not even in disagreement, the alpha is a trainer, countries like Nigeria are just leveraging on its light ground attack abilities
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:45am On Aug 14, 2016
1 2 3 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 669 Reply

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President TrumpPhotos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian.@elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday234

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - LiveAmerican Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President!Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .