Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (15) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Foreign Affairs › Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1164918 Views)
1 2 3 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 7:23pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
nemesis2u:I am not destroy this thread,feel free to express your point of view .I post related comments only.If you think it's trolling .New rules can be added but for following posts ,why previous |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:27pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
Henry240:if they manage to get all the goodies working, it will end up being a potent system , i am particularly interested in the the plasma stealth , this will be implemented last because it will require enormous power which can only be supplied by the latest engines which is still in development. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:32pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
chinese8107:i thought u are a good and sensible person who is interested in defense and weapons , but u proved me wrong , u interested in dick measuring contest . in future get ready to taste your own medicine |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 7:48pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
nemesis2u:I am not against any paticular target. contest for what? |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:56pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
nemesis2u:Man, please dail down your attacks on the Chinese guy. He brings diversity to the thread, that's not a d1ck-measuring contest. I'm quite sure he's "heard" you on the posting of other individual's comments. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:01pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 8:08pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
4000 rounds/min with MANPADS
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:10pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
nemesis2u:The thing with the current T-50 engines they give off 147 kn of thrust each , which is only 9 kn less thrust compared to the F-22. also , those engines proppel the Pak-Fa at 2600 km/h (faster than F-22) which is very decent , and give it a range of 3500 km (more than f22)which is really good , plus it has 3d TVC . I'll have to read further on the Plasma Stealth, however the Russians are going full-spectrum on Stealth like the Americans, i don't think so. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:14pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
Henry240:u go through my post to see that i humbly requested him in details on why he was wrong not once but twice and if he "heard" me why he continue to argue ? diversity is good but not if it brings in idiocracy would u tolerate somebody if he/she derails the thread you care for at the expense of diversity ? no disrespect but i know what i was saying and i was justified . why u always baby sit the chinese ? ![]() |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:23pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
nemesis2u:LOL... "And why would i do that?". Let's not derail the thread. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:24pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
Russian typhoon-k Armored personnel carrier
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 8:26pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
nemesis2u:I only post at least related thing,derail or not, can anyone support a point of view without any reference? |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:28pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
attention copy and paste The improved version of Russian Mi-28NM attack (top) helicopter was spotted at Mil Moscow Helicopter Plant. The Russian Helicopters company produced the first prototype of the improved helicopter in 2015. According to the company’s report, helicopter tests should be carried out during 2016, and then the Russian Defense Ministry will receive the first delivery. The improved version of Mi-28NM has been equipped with surveillance radar and a new control system, the RIA Novosti news agency reported earlier, citing the managing director of the Russian Helicopters (Rosvertol) company, Petr Motrenko. The new attack helicopter also has received improved rotor blades that will increase the cruising speed of the machine by 13% and the top speed – by 10%. According to rumors, the new version will be able to reach speed of 600 km/h (370 mph). The Mi-28NM attack helicopter is producing at the Rosvertol plant in Rostov. The machine was designed to find and destroy tanks and other armored vehicles in conditions of active fire and electronic countermeasures. The helicopter also can hunt for low-speed air targets and infantry. The letter ‘N’ (‘night’) in the name of the Mi-28NM shows the helicopter’s ability to work equally effectively at any time of a day. The helicopter modernization project provides for the installation of the radar antenna over the flapping hinge. In addition to the circular view it will enable the crew to monitor the situation, hiding in the folds of the terrain. “The radar is able to process information from multiple channels at the same time that helps to improve accuracy of the measurement of the coordinates and parameters of obstacles. The number of simultaneously tracked targets has been increased, new modes have been developed. Performance-board computer has been increased ten times,” Pavel Budagov, the Director of the Ryazan instrument factory, where the radar was developed, said. The Mi-28NM has also been equipped with a dual control system – the machine can also be operated by the navigator-operator. ™@mighty_russia
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 8:36pm On Aug 13, 2016*. Modified: 9:01am On Aug 14, 2016 |
Henry240:I agree, hard for current Russian technology. And also the so-called full-spectrum may still find some counter-measures.And Russian are smart they know plasma stealth may find some counter-measures,they don't urgent need.while the F-22 use because not every country can have counter measures against plasma stealth |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:36pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by M14A1: 10:04pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
nemesis2u:F111 |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by M14A1: 10:09pm On Aug 13, 2016*. Modified: 12:45am On Aug 14, 2016 |
the horizontal strake on the nose to create lift and balance the jet.
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:18pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
Beauty Pak-Fa prototype T-50-5R
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 10:23pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
China 122mm truck howitzer,a low cost weapon to make up numbers. China do not always use advanced weapons for 2nd line force,as it has the biggest army on earth.
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 10:42pm On Aug 13, 2016*. Modified: 5:15am On Aug 14, 2016 |
Japan ShinMaywa US-2 Amphibious plane (flying boat) General characteristics Crew: 11 Capacity: 20 passengers or 12 stretchers Length: 33.46 m (109 ft 9 in) Wingspan: 33.15 m (108 ft 9 in) Height: 9.8 m (32 ft 2 in) Wing area: 135.8 m2 (1,462 sq ft) Empty weight: 25,630 kg (56,504 lb) Gross weight: 43,000 kg (94,799 lb) water take-off Max takeoff weight: 47,700 kg (105,160 lb) land take-off Powerplant: 4 × Rolls-Royce AE 2100J turboprop, 3,424 kW (4,592 hp) each Powerplant: 1 × LHTEC T800 turboshaft Boundary layer control compressor, 1,017 kW (1,364 hp) Propellers: 6-bladed Dowty R414 Performance Maximum speed: 560 km/h (348 mph; 302 kn) Cruising speed: 480 km/h (298 mph; 259 kn) at 6,000 m (20,000 ft) Range: 4,700 km (2,920 mi; 2,538 nmi) Service ceiling: 7,195 m (23,606 ft) Takeoff distance on ground at MTOW: 490 m (1,610 ft) Landing distance on ground at MTOW: 1,500 m (4,900 ft) Takeoff distance on water at Loaded weight: 280 m (920 ft) Landing distance on water at Loaded weight: 330 m (1,080 ft) --x/xxxxxxxxxx India is planing to buy it.price estimated around $1.65 billion for 12 units.This is overpriced I think
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 11:32pm On Aug 13, 2016*. Modified: 10:03am On Aug 14, 2016 |
China build AG600 in respond of Japan US-2 General characteristics Capacity: 50 passengers Length: 36.9 m (121 ft 1 in) Wingspan: 38.8 m (127 ft 4 in) Max takeoff weight: 53,500 kg (117,947 lb) Powerplant: 4 × WJ-6 turboprops, 3,805 kW (5,103 hp) each Propellers: 6-bladed constant speed propellers Performance Maximum speed: 570 km/h (354 mph; 308 kn) Range: 5,500 km (3,418 mi; 2,970 nmi) Service ceiling: 10,500 m (34,449 ft)
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by ValerianSteel(m): 11:54pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
MikeCZA:I didn't imply it wasn't the S-400 did I. The S-400 is trash to the IAF,and when Israel starts flying the F-35Adir in Syria,it would be reduced to dust. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by ValerianSteel(m): 11:59pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by M14A1: 12:48am On Aug 14, 2016 |
The leading edge is fixed in place, this was to keep the cost down though it does slightly reduce take off and landing abilities.
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by M14A1: 12:50am On Aug 14, 2016 |
incredibly overbuilt main gear to allow rough field operations.
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by M14A1: 12:52am On Aug 14, 2016 |
the intake has splitter plates just separated from the body at the jet intakes to avoid stagnant boundary layer air, that is air that sticks to the plane and causes drag
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by M14A1: 12:54am On Aug 14, 2016 |
Horizontal strake on tail fin is to control airflow and increase angel of attack abilities
|
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:34am On Aug 14, 2016 |
M14A1:I am not bashing anying,simply something technical. This is mainly a trainer but not a fighter I think ,though it do have some attack ability. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 5:20am On Aug 14, 2016*. Modified: 5:53am On Aug 14, 2016 |
M14A1:rough field operation ? grass land or sand road? If yes it's really competitive. as previously only some light basic trainer can do. |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:31am On Aug 14, 2016 |
M14A1:nice photographic walk through , enjoyed it ![]() plz post similar things very informative like this one ![]() a small detail u missed the horizontal strake on the nose also helps in better spin recovery ![]() |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by M14A1: 6:38am On Aug 14, 2016 |
chinese8107:I am not even in disagreement, the alpha is a trainer, countries like Nigeria are just leveraging on its light ground attack abilities |
| Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:45am On Aug 14, 2016 |
President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump • Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. • @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday • 2 • 3 • 4
Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - Live • American Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President! • Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .

