₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,325,398 members, 8,421,736 topics. Date: Saturday, 06 June 2026 at 10:32 PM

Toggle theme

JAMB Rejects Three Years Result Validity - Education - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralEducationJAMB Rejects Three Years Result Validity (1725 Views)

1 Reply (Go Down)

JAMB Rejects Three Years Result Validity by Hardeysolution(op):
The Registrar of the Joint Admission Matriculation Board (JAMB) Prof. Ishaq Oloyede has asked the House of Representatives to quash the bill that validates three years JAMB result usage.

The JAMB boss stated this at the University of Ilorin in Kwara State while answering questions from journalists, that the bill when passed will only hurt the students rather than help them.

He noted that JAMB sets achievement tests and not aptitude test, therefore, such system will not work in Nigeria.


Professor Oleyede says the bill is a product of acrimony and if passed would be counter-productive.
While urging President Muhammadu Buhari not to assent to the bill, he further noted that the country does not have a stable curriculum.

He appealed to members of the House of Representatives to critically look at the issues before taking a stand, as it is harmful to the future of the students.

Senate Recommends Three Year Validity

The Nigerian Senate had extended the validity of the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) examination results for three years from the date of the examination.

Lawmakers of the upper chamber took the decision to amend the JAMB Act during Thursday’s legislative proceedings.

The Chairman of the Senate Committee on Tertiary Institutions and TetFund, Senator Jibrin Barua, read the report of the committee which was mandated to work on the act.

The committee recommended that a candidate who meets the requirements for admission and is duly qualified shall remain so qualified for three years.

The committee also recommended that a candidate awaiting admission shall be given preference in the succeeding year over fresh applicants who shall only become eligible when the backlog has been cleared

.https://www.channelstv.com/2016/10/21/3-year-result-validity-jamb-boss-asks-reps-to-quash-bill/
Re: JAMB Rejects Three Years Result Validity by nobilis: 12:44pm On Oct 22, 2016
Does JAMB know that NASS can repeal the act establishing it?
Re: JAMB Rejects Three Years Result Validity by Spartanville(m): 1:11pm On Oct 22, 2016
Who said dy shuld acept b4...it is already a law
Re: JAMB Rejects Three Years Result Validity by DesChyko: 1:15pm On Oct 22, 2016
I like the three-year validity.

While waiting for admission, they can engage themselves in vocational training without fear of not doing well should need arise for retaking another jamb Immediately.

Too much emphasis being placed on University education.
Re: JAMB Rejects Three Years Result Validity by iOluwaMichael(m): 4:18pm On Oct 22, 2016
The committee recommended that a candidate who meets the requirements for admission and is duly qualified shall remain so qualified for three years.
The committee also recommended that a candidate awaiting admission shall be given preference in the succeeding year over fresh applicants who shall only become eligible when the backlog has been cleared.
Op, where is the sauce.
I like the last part of the bill.
Re: JAMB Rejects Three Years Result Validity by Hardeysolution(op): 4:20pm On Oct 22, 2016
iOluwaMichael:
Op, where is the sauce.
I like the last part of the bill.
channelstv
Re: JAMB Rejects Three Years Result Validity by iOluwaMichael(m): 4:22pm On Oct 22, 2016
Hardeysolution:
channelstv
Add the link.
Re: JAMB Rejects Three Years Result Validity by Hardeysolution(op): 4:24pm On Oct 22, 2016
Re: JAMB Rejects Three Years Result Validity by iOluwaMichael(m): 4:26pm On Oct 22, 2016
Re: JAMB Rejects Three Years Result Validity by Nobody: 9:01pm On Oct 22, 2016
grin grin angry angry
Re: JAMB Rejects Three Years Result Validity by Kirinwa: 10:58pm On Oct 22, 2016
60 000 candidates applied to an institution and 7 000 are selected. Each year more candidates take jamb and you want them to wait until remaining 53 000 candidates secure admission?

This is not realistic.
Re: JAMB Rejects Three Years Result Validity by Hardeysolution(op): 7:16pm On Oct 26, 2016
Lalasticlala
1 Reply

Senate Suspends JAMB 3-Year Validity PlanExtension Of JAMB Result Validity: What Are The Possible Implications?Senate Extends JAMB Result Validity To 3 Years234

Can Some One On Third Class(2.00) Still Make A First Class?Yabatech Admission GuideN10,000 To Best Graduating Medical Student - UNN Replies On Facebook Page