prettyboi1989:

u should see this

prettyboi1989:

baba no talk that kind thing with reference to usa, u shouldnt make uninformed statements here without facts, see the images below.

africaken254:
a recent article i read said obama is the one stopping america to act aggressively against assad in syria ,there are advisers who have actually proposed bombing of assad airforce and critical military infrastructure to stop him from bombing civilians. Hillary is in support of such measures to deter assad and assert america authority.its said Hillary and some members of the congress believe Obama weak foreign policies have made america to be ridiculed around the world.

SuperSupremo:
Nice breakdown, and I hope you know NATO is an organization and not a country right?

The fire power of the organization is minimal compared to any powerful country.


The NATO Organization has its own arsenals weapons but does not mean all the countries that are within will submit all their national arsenals to fight for NATO as a group.


Hope you get me bro.

SuperSupremo:
Nice breakdown, and I hope you know NATO is an organization and not a country right?

The fire power of the organization is minimal compared to any powerful country.


The NATO Organization has its own arsenals weapons but does not mean all the countries that are within will submit all their national arsenals to fight for NATO as a group.


Hope you get me bro.

jpphilips:



Hillary proposed a no fly zone likely to target most of the Syrian Air Force and strategic installations, the bad news is that for you to maintain a no fly zone, you need flying assets in the zone, in 2014, Russia deployed the SAM 300/400 to protect most of Syria's airspace except the border region with Turkey. Hillary's proposal will be exposing American air force to one of the world's best air defense systems, just yesterday, the US spy chief in an interview called Hilary's proposal "childish", in his words, "Hillary thinks Russia is Chechnya".
Donald Trump has the best foreign policy amongst the candidates, a failed foreign secretary can not make a good president, all talk no action.

jpphilips:


You seem not to understand what NATO stands for, NATO's article 5 makes its defense capability a collective responsibility of all member countries, in other words, should Russia piss off the least member, everything the 28 member bloc has will be deployed in defence of one, why do you think weaker countries run to NATO for protection.

MEILYN:
The USA spends more money on things the Chinese and Russians can build without wasting much money. The Russians build better and stronger planes and Tanks cheaper than the US...

Secondly, the US spends more money because they have bases all over the world. What do you expect?

I forgot to say, the Russians have the best air defense systems in the world.

Google, 'The Plutonium deal between US and Russia'. The Russians were able to build a technology that would get rid of this chemical weapon, while the US complained about the cost of building the same system. They found another alternative and told Russia that they would mix another chemical with it and bury it in the ground. Lol, Russia was not taking any of that though....

HAH:
Mumu go and check alawite is a branch of shia

MONITZ:


Most times these weapons only serve as deterrents and may not really be used... That is y they keep building so as not to left behind and taken for a ride if ur weapon is not up to date like Russia witnessed before they started to modernise.

edudguy:


Dude do you watch news at all. Everyday clips in CNN and Aljazera Russia bombs Aleppo everyday. Children dying, becoming orphans Assad and Russia drops barrel bombs and they say they are fighting terrorists. G.K Chesterton once said that Men do not disagree from what they will evil but which evil they will call excusable.

Russia and Assad sees their evil as excusable

mansakhalifa:
slowpoke,you
always fail to get the drift.Slow-poke.

MEILYN:
First of all, Russia is not the aggressor. It's the US that's using NATO allies to anger Russia.

Here is a YouTube video of a US general saying Russia would easily defeat NATO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjiqTzug8zM

You see, Russia has the fastest military in the world. They have the ability to transport weapons and troops in a limited time. If a war breaks out, it would take NATO allies a number of days to deploy troops, Russia would have destroyed neighboring NATO allies by then. Lol

phranklyn92:
chai! some people with satanic spirit sha! they will not think of how to make lives better rather all they think of is how to create weapons of mas destruction. God is watching y'all

kizzken:


my broda your head they there, its only childish brainwashed people that don't know that America is fighting a losed war in Syria, if America puts its soldiers or air force in Syria its putting them in harms way and direct conflict with Russia, America had 3 to 4 years to solve the Syrian conflict but its greediness get the better of it.

HAH:


My friend am a news junkie, and I know that every media outfit has it interest hence they tune your though.

Outfits like, CNN, aljazeera, bbc and france24 mostly have same view and represent the view of the US and it allies. Out fit like RT and press TV, are always countering the news you get from cnn and it likes, while outfits like cctv and deautchwelle are neither here nor there, so to get a balance view I always watch all and make my judgment.

Please don't be brainwashed by the media. As regards those pictures you always see on cnn and aljazeera of children being bomb, truth is they are mostly being used as human shield by their parent who are the terrorist tormenting the assad regime. Do you know that there is no war in damascus and it can be easily be compared to some europen countries. Why are cnn and alzeera not showing the world how well people are living in damascus but always focusing on the terrorist enclave in. Aleppo and raqqa?

IamOdin:

After reading ur response i sighed.
Assad is not a dictator, ghadaffi is not a dictator, hussein is not a dictator. These are great rulers.
U.S just wanted regime change in those countries for their national interest.

If u may, brief me on what u think is happening in syria and also who founded ISIS and their motive for doing so, bro.

bettercreature:
It wont take AMERICA OR UK 6 months to build a missile 50x more powerful than this shiiit if the need arises beside Non of this shiiit can reach Uk or USA before they are shot down
Putin always use this shiits to score political points

jpphilips:



I don't engage in petty talks without requisite background knowledge, I only told you what will be mobilized by NATO when you misinterpreted the NATO treaty, if you are looking for who to argue Russia VS NATO, by all means excuse my mention, I only corrected the false impression that NATO members mobilize their arsenal in part.
If you think NATO is a piece of cake, ask yourself, why Russia did not retaliate when their plane was shot down by Turkey, what do you think will happen if Turkey wasn't NATO? learn from real life experience not comic books and documentaries!

africanusvu:
The major reason why i am afraid of emergence of Biafra under nnamdi kanu is this.Biafra may end up as extension of Rusia in Africa.Putin heart may be too soft compare to that of kanu.they may av strong link to israel and rusia and african leaders knws this.an avarage igbo man is more jew than the jews.wit a nation lik BIAFRA in africa.tension wil remain.I AM TOO SU ;DRE OF THIS.BELIV IT OR NOT

bettercreature:
It wont take AMERICA OR UK 6 months to build a missile 50x more powerful than this shiiit if the need arises beside Non of this shiiit can reach Uk or USA before they are shot down
Putin always use this shiits to score political points