₦airaland Forum

Grundig:
I don't understand.

It is only days to tbe elevtion and jegede's prayers is for the court to allow him appeal Okon abang's judgement.

Does that mean INEC is going to stop the election?

The cases would all be concluded before the elections

A bang did not allow Jegede to be represented during the said judgement.

It was Poroye lawyer that stands for plaintiff and defendant before A bang high court

The Appeal court has given all to file their appeals within 24hours for hearing and ruling

Next Matter Makarfi and Ben Obi vs Poroye and ORS

NFFGG:
Grudid, jegede will rely on this to file for his restatement since he was deny fair hearing abinitio

Na wa oo.

The judgement doesn't explicitly say jegede's name should be in the ballot box.

Bro, abeg clarify this matter.

Grundig:
I don't understand.

It is only days to tbe elevtion and jegede's prayers is for the court to allow him appeal Okon abang's judgement.

Does that mean INEC is going to stop the election?

If it goes according to Markarfi's authentic leadership or even esttopel, status quo will be maintained which essentially means Eyitayo will be the candidate until supreme court decides. Then Eyitayo will contest the election as PDP's candidate.

The Panel has also adopted in this case its earlier ruling dismissing the application by Nwofor SAN. Seeking for the disbandment of appeal panel

The special panel of the Appeal Court sitting on the Ondo Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Governorship candidate tussle has dismissed the application of sacked factional chairman, Biyi poroye challenging it’s jurisdiction and asking for its disbandment.

Justice Salauwa says poroye’s application is stinking, has no merit and hereby dismissed.

Two other justices on the panel, Ignatius Agube and George Baba agreed with justice Salauwa that the application is absurd, blackmail, utmost mischief, abuse of court process aimed at annoying the appellant and obstructing justice.

The appeal Court justices added that it is a misnomer for the Appeal Court President to consult with parties before setting up any panel which would undermine his administrative powers as enshrined in the constitution.

The special panel also granted Mr Eyitayo Jegede’s application to appeal justice Okon Abang judgement which ordered the substitution of his name with that of Jimoh Ibrahim as the pdp governorship candidate.

In his lead ruling, justice Salauwa said the application is of merit having critically examined the grounds of appeal and supporting affidavits as well as counters from the other parties.

He said Eyitayo Jegede clearly established with copious evidence that he was affected by the ruling though not a party to the suit having successfully gone through a primaries in Akure.

The two other Justices concurred with justice Salauwa ruling.

The special panel of the Appeal Court sitting on the Ondo Peoples Democratic Party Governorship candidate tussle has dismissed the application of sacked factional chairman, biyi poroye challenging it’s jurisdiction and asking for its disbandment.

Justice salauwa says poroye’s application is stinking, has no merit and hereby dismissed.

Two other justices on the panel, Ignatius Agube and George Baba agreed with justice Salauwa that the application is absurd, blackmail, utmost mischief, abuse of court process aimed at annoying the appellant and obstructing justice.

The appeal Court justices added that it is a misnomer for the Appeal Court President to consult with parties before setting up any panel which would undermine his administrative powers as enshrined in the constitution.

The special panel also granted Mr Eyitayo Jegede’s application to appeal justice Okon Abang judgement which ordered the substitution of his name with that of Jimoh Ibrahim as the pdp governorship candidate.

In his lead ruling, justice Salauwa said the application is of merit having critically examined the grounds of appeal and supporting affidavits as well as counters from the other parties.

He said Eyitayo Jegede clearly established with copious evidence that he was affected by the ruling though not a party to the suit having successfully gone through a primaries in Akure.

The two other Justices concurred with justice Salauwa ruling.

The judge in his rulling stated that:

"It smacks of gross incompetence and an irritant. The candidate's right has been adversely affected and has the right to ventilate his grievances. To deny him this right is vexatious and oppressive and an attempt to pervert the course of justice. It is a mischief and the application is dismissed. Eyitayo has the right of appeal. The application is absurd and strange. It is unimaginable.

Hence, Eyitayo is hereby granted right of Appeal by this honourable court."

JUST IN: Justice Salauwa tells Jimoh Ibrahim's new lawyer, Badejo SAN "Sit Down & don't disturb this honorable court"

Markafi and obi vs Poroye and others

This uttication came as.

Mr Badejo SAN tried to move a motion after the court had dismissed Poroye's application

Justice Salauwa discribes Badejo SAN as "Absentee Lawyer" standing for "Absentee Client"

engineerboat:
JUST IN: Justice Salauwa tells Jimoh Ibrahim's new lawyer, Badejo SAN "Sit Down & don't disturb this honorable court"

Markafi and obi vs Poroye and others

Is telling someone to sit down an update

i dont even know why im viewing this thread.

Mtcheeeeeeeew

engineerboat:
Justice Salauwa discribes Badejo SAN as "Absentee Lawyer" standing for "Absentee Client"

What kind of rubbish update is this.
Tufiakwa

franchizy:
What kind of rubbish update is this.
Tufiakwa

What else do you want. What else do want.

What update do you want again.

That someone trying to raise an application when ruling had already been given on the said matter.

If you have nothing to say. Get out of this thread

engineerboat:
Justice Salauwa discribes Badejo SAN as "Absentee Lawyer" standing for "Absentee Client"

And who says we don't hv judges who knows their onions... they only make us to beleive we only hv corrupt judges

franchizy:
Is telling someone to sit down an update

i dont even know why im viewing this thread.

Mtcheeeeeeeew

I've been expecting your ranting as usual. So welcome usual visitor.

Are you Poroye and Jimoh Ibrahim that write fitious letter accusing appeal court judges.

But refuse to appear before the CJN and President Court of Appeal but was no where to be found

engineerboat:
What else do you want. What else do want.

What update do you want again.

That someone trying to raise an application when ruling had already been given on the said matter.

If you have nothing to say. Get out of this thread

Spits on thread and walks out. This is a kangaro thread. nothing to inspire anyone.

Mtcheeeeeew.

Appeal Court has directed all parties to file their Appeal within the next three days for substantive hearing and judgement next week

franchizy:
Spits on thread and walks out. This is a kangaro thread. nothing to inspire anyone.

Mtcheeeeeew.

Who your viewing the thread don epp

engineerboat:
Who your viewing the thread don epp

Dont mind him jor. Thanks for the update. You are doing a nice job. Although, you tend to tilt towards dem Jegede atimes with your reporting. But its not much of big deal.

Seunvense:
We need more clarification on this sir

The recent judgement by Justice Okon Abang was hinged on an earlier judgement he gave in June. That judgement he gave in June, Jegede was not a party to it. Which means he cannot appeal the judgement because he was not a party to it.

The implication of that is that he first, has to seek the consent of the court to be joined as a party to a case he was not part of ab initio.

Also, I think (not sure) an appeal is supposed to be filed within 90 days of a judgement. And it is already more that 90 days that the June judgement of Justice Okon Abang was given. He also needs the consent of the court to file an appeal against this Judgement because it is outside of the normal period within which an appeal can be filed.

Seunvense:
So another court case gonna come up before we will know the authentic PDP flagbearer.

Yes of course. The substantive case is not what is been looked into.

agabusta:
The recent judgement by Justice Okon Abang was hinged on an earlier judgement he gave in June. That judgement he gave in June, Jegede was not a party to it. Which means he cannot appeal the judgement because he was not a party to it.

The implication of that is that he first, has to seek the consent of the court to be joined as a party to a case he was not part of ab initio.

Also, I think (not sure) an appeal is supposed to be filed within 90 days of a judgement. And it is already more that 90 days that the June judgement of Justice Okon Abang was given. He also needs the consent of the court to file an appeal against this Judgement because it is outside of the normal period within which an appeal can be filed.

agabusta:
Dont mind him jor. Thanks for the update. You are doing a nice job. Although, you tend to tilt towards dem Jegede atimes with your reporting. But its not much of big deal.

Thanks. I hate when people try to twist information.

He had been silent all the while. Why coming now to screw thrash.

I'm actually trying to update as the case come up ni.

Justice Salauwa has directed all Appealant to file their writen appeal within the next three days for substantive hearing and ruling next week

agabusta:
Yes of course. The substantive case is not what is been looked into.

Oh! Thanks for the clarification sir, now I understand.

Engineerboat, keep up the good work. We know what Sheriff, Abang and Co wants,their Mindset is, if we can't have, no one else should. They are spoilers, that all, but they will fail at the end.
Once again, thanks and keep the flag flying.