₦airaland Forum

KingEbukasBlog:
This is the problem with the atheists on these forum. All these have been rebutted ad nauseum .

You guys just go to the internet without actually understanding what is contradicting what , or what context , just copy and regurgitate .

Lol. Religious apologetics.
The bible is a joke

Lennycool:
You can't provide proof that Zeus or Odin or Aphrodite or Santa clause or leprechauns don't exist. Yet I'm sure you believe firmly that they don't.
I can't prove that there's not a fat man watching Netflix on mars, yet we will all agree that there is non.
You made an outstanding claim, so you should provide equally outstanding evidence. Not me.
So prove with evidence that your God exist

You are the one who claimed that the Creator/God/Supreme Being is a product of man's ignorance and it is incumbent on you to prove it .

Please click on the link I provided and read the arguments between CoolUsername and I . The dude ran away anyway .

Lennycool:
Lol. Religious apologetics.
The bible is a joke

Repudiating bible stories =! proving that God does not exist .

When will this ever sink in ? When ?

KingEbukasBlog:
Like I said , Luke was a notable Historian like Josephus , and he gave a reliable account of Jesus' life on earth . If you have archives of Roman History that controverts Luke's account of Jesus life , please bring it here for scrutiny .



I'm sure you say the phrase "the sun has risen" sometimes .



Can you provide proof that Noah's flood account is a facsimile of an older text ? You also committed the post hoc fallacy - because the bible's account of flood came after an older text therefore the bible's account must have copied it .



Logical fallacy : pooh pooh

It is fallacious to dismiss someone's argument as foolish



Logical fallacy : pooh pooh



I am yet to see this contrary evidence that controverts the veracity of bible stories .

SMH Lost cause. Believe what you want. If you're serious conduct your own unbiased research, if you even know the meaning of the word unbiased.

KingEbukasBlog:
You are the one who claimed that the Creator/God/Supreme Being is a product of man's ignorance and it is incumbent on you to prove it .

Please click on the link I provided and read the arguments between CoolUsername and I . The dude ran away anyway .

And mine is not an outstanding claim as several Gods are widely accepted to be non existent.
Yours however is quiet outstanding, hence you need to prove it.

Lennycool:
SMH Lost cause. Believe what you want. If you're serious conduct your own unbiased research, if you even know the meaning of the word unbiased.

I love reading and making researches , as you can see my thoughts about God evolve continually . You atheists think disproving bible stories (though I have not seen any worthy rebuttal) means impugning God's existence ? How ludicrous ! To a deist , you've insulted his intelligence . To a pandeist you know nothing , To a panentheist you are not okay , To people who see bible stories as allegories , you have made no sense etc

Honestly , the more I read widely , the more foolish atheism appears - vapid bs mehn.

KingEbukasBlog:
You are the one who claimed that the Creator/God/Supreme Being is a product of man's ignorance and it is incumbent on you to prove it .

Please click on the link I provided and read the arguments between CoolUsername and I . The dude ran away anyway .

I lost interest because I hate repeating myself. I don't try to 'win', I try to show my line of thinking while considering that of the person in arguing with. Once I have my fill, I stop. There's just no point in repitition.

Until you get that into your head, you'll keep making childish students line this one and I won't take you seriously.

CoolUsername:
I lost interest because I hate repeating myself. I don't try to 'win', I try to show my line of thinking while considering that of the person in arguing with. Once I have my fill, I stop. There's just no point in repitition.

Until you get that into your head, you'll keep making childish students line this one and I won't take you seriously.

Lmao.

Your evidence to support your argument was weak . Seriously ? A woman who induces her hallucinations gets examined by scientists and the results prove that you have no understanding of OBEs .

I'm very sure you didnt even understand the examination she went through , you just rushed to the site , felt it was a worthy contrary evidence then presented it . Pathetic .

Please take your time to understand my arguments next time Plus you continued repeating yourself because you ran out of anything reasonable to say .

KingEbukasBlog:
This is the problem with the atheists on these forum. All these have been rebutted ad nauseum .

You guys just go to the internet without actually understanding what is contradicting what , or what context , just copy and regurgitate .

not surprising, u are perhaps the most cunning Christian on this site

KingEbukasBlog:
Lmao.

Your evidence to support your argument was weak . Seriously ? A woman who induces her hallucinations gets examined by scientists and the results prove that you have no understanding of OBEs .

I'm very sure you didnt even understand the examination she went through , you just rushed to the site , felt it was a worthy contrary evidence then presented it . Pathetic .

Please take your time to understand my arguments next time Plus you continued repeating yourself because you ran out of anything reasonable to say .

So what do you have to say about certain regions in the brain being stimulated? The same ones that give us spatial awareness?

Stop obfuscating the point with emojis and telling the person to read again and again. Rather, address the issue at hand. Anyway, the thread is there for everybody to see.

CoolUsername:
So what do you have to say about certain regions in the brain being stimulated? The same ones that give us spatial awareness?

Stop obfuscating the point with emojis and telling the person to read again and again. Rather, address the issue at hand. Anyway, the thread is there for everybody to see.

I addressed the nonsense you posted as a rebuttal , you have not replied the post

1. Are you an atheist? Yes/no.
2. Do you believe in God Yes/no.
If the answer to question 2 is No, Do you think the Bible is meant for you. Yes/no.
If No, then why worry that those given the Bible dont read.
Please the Bible is not meant for the atheist, your answer above will signify that. if you want to discern what is contained in the Bible be ready to be like a baby. Until you discern what it means to be like a 'baby', understanding the deep things of God will continually be beyond your comprehension.