₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,326,232 members, 8,425,556 topics. Date: Friday, 12 June 2026 at 05:28 PM

Toggle theme

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (87) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsTechnical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1164311 Views)

1 2 3 ... 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 5:54pm On Nov 21, 2016
nemesis2u:
all five of them grin
grin grin

Are those RA&W agents too? grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:54pm On Nov 21, 2016
now is the right time to take off grin grin grin grin grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
tdayof:
grin grin

Are those RA&W agents too? grin
they are capable of getting as RAWWWW as any super sexy and super hot and super salacious and super seductive ladies can get grin grin grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:03pm On Nov 21, 2016
this plane should have been developed

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:05pm On Nov 21, 2016
pakfa

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:08pm On Nov 21, 2016
grin grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:09pm On Nov 21, 2016
afganistan

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:14pm On Nov 21, 2016
grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:16pm On Nov 21, 2016
grin grin grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 6:23pm On Nov 21, 2016
nemesis2u:
INS CHENNAI COMMISSIONED YESTERDAY a kolkata class destroyer each costs more than half a billion dollars.
imagine a ship labeled a destroyer with only 32 missile.

d ship is a waste
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 7:02pm On Nov 21, 2016
1. RG-35
2. Ugl..iest UAV ever.
don't forsake us nemesis2u we are migrats from a certain thread. cry cry

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:46pm On Nov 21, 2016
MikeCZA:
1. RG-35

2. Ugl..iest UAV ever.

don't forsake us nemesis2u we are migrats from a certain thread. cry cry
You don't understand how much i wish the SANDF can acquire the RG35 to replace our Mamba and Casspir fleets!
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
giles14:
imagine a ship labeled a destroyer with only 32 missile.

d ship is a waste
a ship is labelled as a destroyer generally on the basis of her tonnage and also capability .

it is of the same class as an aegis class destroyer in terms of her sensors.

it has 4 × 8 cell VLS, for a total of 32 barak sam

it has additional space provision for 4 x 8 cell VLS, for a total of 32 barak-ER sam (this one will be lengthier due to addition of booster)

it has 2 × 8 cell UVLM for 16 BrahMos

it has additional space provision for 1 x 8 cell VLS, for a total of 8 nirbhay cruise missile

in addition to
1 × 76 mm gun
4 × AK-630 CIWS
4 × 533 mm Torpedo tubes
2 × RBU-6000 anti-submarine rocket launchers

in the future it will have
SAM -64
SSM/AShM-24
so total load out - 88 missiles

also barak sam is a dual purpose missile it can act as a CIWS/point defense system against sea skimming AShM missiles since its minimum engagement range is < 500 meters in addition to its primary role of air defense . therefor it negates the need for additional point defense missiles like RIM-162 ESSM, Aster 15, CAMM etc.

by ur logic a soldier carrying many guns/ammo/grenades etc will be a better and deadlier soldier ? grin

presently indian navy area of operation is the indian ocean only , and ships r designed keeping the operational requirements. no point in wasting money and resources. indian navy is not going to fight america or russia grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:37am On Nov 22, 2016
MikeCZA:
1. RG-35

2. Ugl..iest UAV ever.

don't forsake us nemesis2u we are migrats from a certain thread. cry cry
grin

homestead rules applies here grin

got to post photos preferably military girls grin grin grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 7:34am On Nov 22, 2016
nemesis2u:
now is the right time to take off grin grin grin grin grin
I watched a video of two ISIS being killed by a sniper with a single bullet.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by ActivateKruger: 8:49am On Nov 22, 2016
jln115:
You don't understand how much i wish the SANDF can acquire the RG35 to replace our Mamba and Casspir fleets!
One word - budget
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by giles14(m): 9:06am On Nov 22, 2016
nemesis2u:
a ship is labelled as a destroyer generally on the basis of her tonnage and also capability .

it is of the same class as an aegis class destroyer in terms of her sensors.

it has 4 × 8 cell VLS, for a total of 32 barak sam

it has additional space provision for 4 x 8 cell VLS, for a total of 32 barak-ER sam (this one will be lengthier due to addition of booster)

it has 2 × 8 cell UVLM for 16 BrahMos

it has additional space provision for 1 x 8 cell VLS, for a total of 8 nirbhay cruise missile

in addition to
1 × 76 mm gun
4 × AK-630 CIWS
4 × 533 mm Torpedo tubes
2 × RBU-6000 anti-submarine rocket launchers

in the future it will have
SAM -64
SSM/AShM-24
so total load out - 88 missiles

also barak sam is a dual purpose missile it can act as a CIWS/point defense system against sea skimming AShM missiles since its minimum engagement range is < 500 meters in addition to its primary role of air defense . therefor it negates the need for additional point defense missiles like RIM-162 ESSM, Aster 15, CAMM etc.

by ur logic a soldier carrying many guns/ammo/grenades etc will be a better and deadlier soldier ? grin

presently indian navy area of operation is the indian ocean only , and ships r designed keeping the operational requirements. no point in wasting money and resources. indian navy is not going to fight america or russia grin
please don't face China with dis ur ship.

but above all its a nice n beautiful ship, good tonnage ,good sensors but poor weaponry.
hope it wouldn't be one of ur CV escort
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107:
China made C919 commercial passenger airplane with CFM LEAP-1C engine targeting AirBus A320 n Boeing 737 grin won't be easy though grin

Russia is likely to compete with PD-14 engine and MC-21
https://image.zzd.sm.cn/7778407918951201356.jpg?id=0&imode=3&itype=63&srv=zzd
https://image.zzd.sm.cn/272100439946515741.jpg?id=0&imode=3&itype=63&srv=zzd

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 3:56pm On Nov 22, 2016
MikeCZA:
1. RG-35

2. Ugl..iest UAV ever.

don't forsake us nemesis2u we are migrats from a certain thread. cry cry
Wonder why it was designed that way. angry
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:00pm On Nov 22, 2016
INS Chennai commissioned monday

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:23am On Nov 23, 2016
Government negligence hurts Indian defence
The Indian government has framed the acquisition of 36 French Rafale Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft for the Indian Air Force (IAF) as a major event. It comes as part of a purported military build-up and wildfire expansion of military spending by the world’s largest importer of arms. But the acquisition represents an abject failure of India’s strategic planning—yet another worrying instance of India’s deficiencies in defence acquisitions.It is significant that the Rafale deal was originally ‘finalised’ for 126 aircraft and included a provision for manufacture in India for all but the first consignment of 18 planes, at a total cost of US$10.2 billion. This has been pared down to the present number of 36 aircraft at a somewhat inexplicable cost of about US$8.7 billion. That aside, the reality is that since three squadrons were phased out in January 2016, the IAF has had just 32 operational squadrons against an authorised capacity of 45.

The Rafale deal will not offset even a fraction of the current attrition. Five squadrons of the early MiG-21 variants — nearly 100 aircraft — will be phased out in early 2017. The first Rafale aircraft in the present transaction will be delivered in 2019, and the last of these two and a half years later. Around this time, unless radical steps are taken to correct the existing anomalies, the IAF may well be down to an operational strength of just 25 squadrons. Even under the most optimistic estimates, the IAF’s capacity can only rise to about 38 squadrons.

Shortly after the conclusion of the agreement to import the 36 Rafale fighters, India floated an offer to purchase 200 combat aircraft from foreign manufacturers under a ‘made in India’ arrangement. 140 indigenously manufactured Tejas fighters are also due for delivery, but the project has been delayed by at least three years and the IAF has currently only received two of the promised aircraft. Wide-ranging negotiations with many international producers are ongoing, but given India’s lackadaisical military acquisition processes and a habitually obstructive and scandal-ridden bureaucracy, it is not clear when these initiatives will bear fruit.

The Air Force is not unique in this regard: all three arms of the Indian Armed Forces are hobbled by enduring and endemic deficits. There are shortages of battleships and submarines through to fighter planes and helicopters (a combined deficit of more than1000), even down to mundane supplies such as ammunition, assault rifles and boots. According to one estimate, the Indian military has a US$400 billion equipment deficit, and even more would be required ‘to raise the military to necessary force levels and to modern standards’.
read more http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2016/11/19/government-negligence-hurts-indian-defence/
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:37am On Nov 23, 2016
BBC Our World: China's Model Army | Documentary
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spmXBkDyTuw
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:54pm On Nov 23, 2016
Galil as a DMR in indian army

draganov as a DMR in indian army

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:14pm On Nov 23, 2016
simple rugged and low cost telescopic sight for insas rifle and LMG

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:27pm On Nov 23, 2016
insas LMG has almost zero recoil , u can fire off all the rounds at one go , and more than 90 % of the rounds will be very tightly clustered on the target.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107:
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:39pm On Nov 23, 2016

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnxp7jhB00g

video of ins chennai trials

@giles14
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:40pm On Nov 23, 2016
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:59pm On Nov 23, 2016
nemesis2u:
looks like SCAR grin
Pic 1 Russia MAcompact
Pic 2 China NORINCO NAR
pic 3 USA Remington ACR

all inspired by SCAR grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:06pm On Nov 23, 2016
chinese8107:
Pic 1 Russia MAcompact
Pic 2 China NORINCO NAR
pic 3 USA Remington ACR

all inspired by SCAR grin
grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:58pm On Nov 23, 2016
grin

1 2 3 ... 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 ... 669 Reply

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President TrumpPhotos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian.@elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday234

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - LiveAmerican Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President!Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .