.

Nice one

Nice thread

nice analogy

SCENE ONE

Person 1: I have a GOD. He created all that is seen and unseen. He predated matter, space and time. No one can see Him. He is a Spirit and, thus, invisible. However people who are pure in heart will see Him one day.

Person 2: Because I cannot see GOD, He does not exist.

Person 1: Really? Do you know that you just committed a logical fallacy? It is called "appeal to ignorance."

Person 2: ...

Person 1: Anyway, GOD has made Himself seen in the Person of Jesus Christ. Anyone who has encountered Jesus has encountered the Person of GOD.

Person 2: (starts shouting) GOD does not exist! GOD does not exist! GOD does not exist! GOD does n...(light fades)

SCENE TWO

(Person 1 enters and meets Person 2 still yelling...)

Person 2: (on top of his voice) ...ot exist! I can't see GOD! Therefore He does not exist. GOD does not exist!

Person 1: Okay, Okay Okay. I have a question for you: does the electron exist?

Person 2: (almost immediately) Yes of course.

Person 1: Have you seen an electron before?

Person 2: (stammers...) Erm... Scientists have seen the electron.

Person 1. If scientists have seen the electron: is it a zero-radius point or does it have a radius? What is its radius?

Person 2: ... (starts shouting after 10 seconds) GOD does not exist! GOD does not exist! GOD does not...

*light fades*

DoctorAlien:
Person 1: I have a GOD. He created all that is seen and unseen. He predated matter, space and time. No one can see Him. He is a Spirit and, thus, invisible. However people who are pure in heart will see Him one day.

Person 2: Because I cannot see GOD, he does not exist.

Person 1: Really? Do you know that you just committed a logical fallacy? It is called "appeal to ignorance."

This is highly unfortunate that you of all apologists on parade here, will still be romancing this " appeal to ignorance" argument, which has been consigned to conclusive invalid ground.

DoctorAlien:
SCENE ONE

Person 1: I have a GOD. He created all that is seen and unseen. He predated matter, space and time. No one can see Him. He is a Spirit and, thus, invisible. However people who are pure in heart will see Him one day.)

Before you gallop into meaninglessness, the first question is: by what means did you "know" this your outrageous claims?

akintom:


Before you gallop into meaninglessness, the first question is: by what means did you "know" this your outrageous claims?

By the means of my encounter with GOD.

please visit the site to see the reality of life
https://islamhouse.com/en/videos/450006/

DoctorAlien:


By the means of my encounter with GOD.

Encounter of this nature i guess?
https://www.nairaland.com/3538407/what-encounter-god

You certainly expected me to take seriously, your singular experience, that can possibly be a symptoms of some psychedelic behavior secondary to organic damage or chemical intercourse with some brain centers?

akintom:



Encounter of this nature i guess?
https://www.nairaland.com/3538407/what-encounter-god

You certainly expected me to take seriously, your singular experience, that can possibly be a symptoms of some psychedelic behavior secondary to organic damage or chemical intercourse with some brain centers?

You have said it all: my encounter with GOD could be real and genuine.

Or not.

You can't tell. But it will become fallacy on your part to label it alse false/delusion when you really can't tell.

DoctorAlien:
SCENE ONE

Person 1: I have a GOD. He created all that is seen and unseen. He predated matter, space and time. No one can see Him. He is a Spirit and, thus, invisible. However people who are pure in heart will see Him one day.

DoctorAlien:


You have said it all: my encounter with GOD could be real and genuine.
.

You don't get. How did you come about or "know", that what you interacted with in your "encounter" is named God?

DoctorAlien:

You can't tell. But it will become fallacy on your part to label it alse false/delusion when you really can't tell.

When you come up with the assertion of yours, that i quoted above, without empirical evidence, even a toddler will define you as lower in intelligence compared to him/her.