₦airaland Forum

felixomor:
@bolded
Just look at u making absolute statements again.

No wonder KingEbukasblog is doubting u here.
Mscheww

I dont know which school you attended, but every single doctor took a hematology course and hemoglobinopathies was one of the topics.
Your medical school didn't teach hematology?

CatfishBilly:
I dont know which school you attended, but every single doctor took a hematology course and hemoglobinopathies was one of the topics.
Your medical school didn't teach hematology?

Sharrap my Friend and take correction.
How many doctors have u interacted with?
U keep making absolute statements u cant back up.

felixomor:
Kudos.
I must say I am impressed by your level of knowledge of physiology.

Thank you so much sir . I appreciate .

I got to know of the protection offered by sickle cell against malaria in my third year in med school.

To be honest, some doctors dont know it.

Well if that's the case then he has been forgiven .

felixomor:
Sharrap my Friend and take correction.
How many doctors have u interacted with?
U keep making absolute statements u cant back up.

Oh shittt, I forgot. It's felixomor.
Never mind.

CatfishBilly:
Oh shittt, I forgot. It's felixomor.
Never mind.

I remember your response was the reason I created this thread . So what's your answer ?

seggzz:
I can really relate with it...All his points shows where he belongs. I know my sheep and my sheep knows me...

I'm not a deist . Christ is my personal Lord and Savior . I use deism to disassociate religion from God . And to show anyone who cares that we can know there's a creator without religion .

KingEbukasBlog:
(1)No sir . I'm not a deist . I can take whatever position to object any atheist's argument .



(2)I want to have one of these things . Please sir , where can I sign up ?



(3)God accepted human sacrifices ? Please can you adduce a bible verse to support this claim ?

(4)Why do you think Judgement is evil ? Is the justice system evil for prosecuting morally errant people ? Do you think God is subject to moral laws ?

I have numbered your statements above and I would give an answers as numbered below;

(1) You mean you can take whatever stand you feel as far as it is against atheist? Can you take your normal stand now that you're dealing with agnostic deist like me ? Are you a chameleon? You need to define your stand...Don't you think not defining your stand in a debate is deceitful? It seems you are confused about your stands.. Are you a Christian? Should I take you as a Christian?

(2) You can drop your e-mail or any means of contact so that I book a meeting point with you in Lagos...Still, you need to state your stand.

(3) Check one of my thread where I gave one example of human sacrifices bible God accept in this link --->>https://www.nairaland.com/3345593/unbelievable-bible-god-accepts-human

(4) Why do you think your all powerful, all knowing and all merciful god of the bible needs to lack moral standard he set for his people to follow? Is it morally justify for a killer to judge another killer? Well, your god behave like human. He gets angry anytime they provoke him; he repents; tell lies and many countless others...

KingEbukasBlog:
No sir . I'm not a deist . I can take whatever position to object any atheist's argument .



I want to have one of these things . Please sir , where can I sign up ?



God accepted human sacrifices ? Please can you adduce a bible verse to support this claim ?

Why do you think Judgement is evil ? Is the justice system evil for prosecuting morally errant people ? Do you think God is subject to moral laws ?

(1) check the link where I gave example where your Bible God accept human sacrifices--->>>https://www.nairaland.com/3345593/unbelievable-bible-god-accepts-human
(2) Your all knowing, all powerful and all merciful god lack moral justice to judge. Is it morally justify for a killer to judge another killer? Well, your god behaves like human- he destroy people whenever they provoke him; he repented; he tell lies and others.

(3) drop your contact so that I can book a meeting point with in Lagos.

KingEbukasBlog:
Catfishbilly ran to JackBizzle 's thread and accused me of lying after telling him that diseases like sickle cell anemia are spin offs of the evolutionary process and SS offers resistance against malaria . He calls himself a doctor . An atheist ... and a quack doctor ... what a combo !

savage:

I never knew that these atheists all along have been driven by contrary spirits.

Before checking the posts here, I had come across a write up that connected Darwin to spiritism. He traveled to America, was initiated there, came back to Britain and turned out worse.

Otherwise, how would we explain evolution theory that defies every reasonable science, shrouded in unfathomable backward times of impossible climatic vagaries which he madly espoused his 'amagi' ihe' to?

flamingREED:
I never knew that these atheists all along have been driven by contrary spirits.

Before checking the posts here, I had come across a write up that connected Darwin to spiritism. He traveled to America, was initiated there, came back to Britain and turned out worse.

Otherwise, how would we explain evolution theory that defies every reasonable science, shrouded in unfathomable backward times of impossible climatic vagaries which he madly espoused his 'amagi' ihe' to?

Evolution theory doesn't defy reasonable science. It is generally accepted because it agrees with reasonable science.
Ever heard of peer review? What it means is that your rivals study your submissions and try to rubbish it. If they are successful, your theory is thrown into the dustbin but if it withstands the tests, it is generally accepted.
And Darwin's evolution theory withstood the tests and that is why it is generally accepted.

felixomor:
Kudos.
I must say I am impressed by your level of knowledge of physiology.
I got to know of the protection offered by sickle cell against malaria in my third year in med school.

To be honest, some doctors dont know it.

Is sickle cell the reason why some people don't get bites from mosquitoes?

Muafrika2:
Is sickle cell the reason why some people don't get bites from mosquitoes?

They get bitten.
Its just that the malaria parasite cannot survive properly in their blood cells due to the problem with their hemoglobin.

felixomor:
They get bitten.
Its just that the malaria parasite cannot survive properly in their blood cells due to the problem with their hemoglobin.

Alright.

So why don't some people get bitten?

CatfishBilly:
Evolution theory doesn't defy reasonable science. It is generally accepted because it agrees with reasonable science.
Ever heard of peer review? What it means is that your rivals study your submissions and try to rubbish it. If they are successful, your theory is thrown into the dustbin but if it withstands the tests, it is generally accepted.
And Darwin's evolution theory withstood the tests and that is why it is generally accepted.

Trash.

flamingREED:
Trash.

Yeah, I know how it feels when your position has been totally ripped apart. It sucks, bro.
Take heart. Next time come with a better argument.

CatfishBilly:
Yeah, I know how it feels when your position has been totally ripped apart. It sucks, bro.
Take heart. Next time come with a better argument.

Don't ever think you can argue and win.

Moreover,

There's nothing to argue when all you have is 'fossils tell us' and 'from DNA/molecular comparisons we think'..

You don't expect me to consider the so called probabilistic stories they suggest, which does humanity no more good than interesting fiction.

flamingREED:
Don't ever think you can argue and win.

Moreover,

There's nothing to argue when all you have is 'fossils tell us' and 'from DNA/molecular comparisons we think'..

You don't expect me to consider the so called probabilistic stories they suggest, which does humanity no more good than interesting fiction.

It is not probabilistic, it is reproducible by anyone it catches his fancy, including yourself. Far better than anything you can come up with.

seggzz:
I have numbered your statements above and I would give an answers as numbered below;

(1) You mean you can take whatever stand you feel as far as it is against atheist? Can you take your normal stand now that you're dealing with agnostic deist like me ? Are you a chameleon? You need to define your stand...Don't you think not defining your stand in a debate is deceitful? It seems you are confused about your stands.. Are you a Christian? Should I take you as a Christian?

I'm a Christian that's my stand . Let me give you an example of what I mean :

Atheists believe that all Christians accept that the creation was done in seven 24-hour days . That's not true . Now , I'm cognizant of various perspectives of the creation story ; what I'm gona don is to present every perspective of the creation story that I know in detail to prove him wrong . Is that what you guys call confusion ? Because I sense its more like being frustrated and disconcerted that what they once thought are tenable arguments are actually specious and tenuous .

(2) You can drop your e-mail or any means of contact so that I book a meeting point with you in Lagos...Still, you need to state your stand.

Oh no . I don't stay in Lagos

(3) Check one of my thread where I gave one example of human sacrifices bible God accept in this link --->>https://www.nairaland.com/3345593/unbelievable-bible-god-accepts-human

Misinterpretations sir .

(4) Why do you think your all powerful, all knowing and all merciful god of the bible needs to lack moral standard he set for his people to follow? Is it morally justify for a killer to judge another killer?

God is not a killer or murderer . He is the giver and taker of life . Your life is his property and he can do whatever he chooses to do with it in accordance to his nature and laws since He created . Its his prerogative as the creator and this absolves him from any accusations .

Well, your god behave like human. He gets angry anytime they provoke him; he repents; tell lies and many countless others...

That's the concept of anthropomorphism - using human like characteristics to depict God . It was the way the Hebrew writers portrayed this inscrutable being so as to be easily understood by the average human reader . Deists mostly criticize anthropomorphism .

CatfishBilly:
It is not probabilistic, it is reproducible by anyone it catches his fancy, including yourself. Far better than anything you can come up with.

Then transform, at least, your incisors teeth into a cuspid;
Or turn your head bald by those evolutionary mechanisms you people think are daring.

flamingREED:
Then transform, at least, your incisors teeth into a cuspid;
Or turn your head bald by those evolutionary mechanisms you people think are daring.

It's obvious that you're lacking when it comes to discussing evolution.
Get this book Origin of the species by Charles Darwin, it's not a heavy read, something light, digest it, then you'll have a foundational knowledge, then we'll talk cos discussing this with you would be like fighting a man without hands with ankle weights attached.

CatfishBilly:
It's obvious that you're lacking when it comes to discussing evolution.
Get this book Origin of the species by Charles Darwin, it's not a heavy read, something light, digest it, then you'll have a foundational knowledge, then we'll talk cos discussing this with you would be like fighting a man without hands with ankle weights attached.

Get the book 'Science vs Evolution', a heavy reading that flaws evolution in thousands of ways and read.

Thereafter, I'll know you're worth the foolishness you're upholding so gladly.

flamingREED:
Get the book 'Science vs Evolution', a heavy reading that flaws evolution in thousands of ways and read.

Thereafter, I'll know you're worth the foolishness you're upholding so gladly.

Which author? I'm seeing not less than 5 different ones after my Google search.

CatfishBilly:
Which author? I'm seeing not less than 5 different ones after my Google search.

By Vance Ferrel

flamingREED:
By Vance Ferrel

The dude is not even a scientist. He is a Bible nut that hates the 7th Day Adventist. Do you expect him to say anything contrary?.
Bring me a scientist's article that is peer reviewed debunking evolution, then I'll take you seriously.

CatfishBilly:
The dude is not even a scientist. He is a Bible nut that hates the 7th Day Adventist. Do you expect him to say anything contrary?.
Bring me a scientist's article that is peer reviewed debunking evolution, then I'll take you seriously.

Read the book. Neither were the first pioneers of evolution hardcore scientists.

I teach Biology, in case you don't know.
I can tell between facts and sentiments.
Read.
It has over three 3000 scientific and evolutionary loggerheads

flamingREED:
Read the book. Neither were the first pioneers of evolution hardcore scientists.

I teach Biology, in case you don't know.
I can tell between facts and sentiments.
Read.
It has over three 3000 scientific and evolutionary loggerheads

You teach biology? That's great then. So you can appreciate the importance of peer review in research methodology (even though research is practically dead in Nigeria, all we do is retrospective studies)
If Vance's points were earth shattering, trust me, a scientist would have picked it up and written a paper about it that would have been published in a journal.
Do you know how many theories of Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking that have been discarded due to peer review? Peer review exist so that people like Vance won't feed us rubbish.
I've gone to Amazon to read the review of his books. All of them from Bible nuts like himself.
The Catholic Church has already agreed that evolution is real, denying it is just intellectual dishonesty. That's worse than plain ignorance.
Read Origin of the species.

CatfishBilly:
You teach biology? That's great then. So you can appreciate the importance of peer review in research methodology (even though research is practically dead in Nigeria, all we do is retrospective studies)
If Vance's points were earth shattering, trust me, a scientist would have picked it up and written a paper about it that would have been published in a journal.
Do you know how many theories of Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking that have been discarded due to peer review? Peer review exist so that people like Vance won't feed us rubbish.
I've gone to Amazon to read the review of his books. All of them from Bible nuts like himself.
The Catholic Church has already agreed that evolution is real, denying it is just intellectual dishonesty. That's worse than plain ignorance.
Read Origin of the species.

Please Google very Well
There are many Professors of Even Cellular Microbiology that disprove evolution,
Stop Ramming this noise.

Google about Professor Jonathan Wells
He Even released a book recently.

felixomor:
Please Google very Well
There are many Professors of Even Cellular Microbiology that disprove evolution,
Stop Ramming this noise.

Google about Professor Jonathan Wells
He Even released a book recently.

Jonathan Wells that denies AIDS exists? That is an intelligent design advocate? That went to a theology school to disprove Evolution (How can you disprove science with religion?) Just read this.

Of his student days at Unification Theological Seminary (1976–78), Wells said, "One of the things that Father [Reverend Sun Myung Moon] advised us to do at UTS was to pray to seek God's plan for our lives." He later described that plan: "To defend and articulate Unification theology especially in relation to Darwinian evolution.

Wells stated that his religious doctoral studies at Yale, which were paid for by the Unification Church, focused on the "root of the conflict between Darwinian evolution and Christian doctrine" and encompassed the whole of Christian theology within a focus of Darwinian controversies.

You people should bring proper scientists naa with articles in scientific journal that are peer reviewed.
That is how science works. You can't disprove science with religion.

CatfishBilly:
Jonathan Wells that denies AIDS exists? That is an intelligent design advocate? That went to a theology school to disprove Evolution (How can you disprove science with religion?) Just read this.

You people should bring proper scientists naa with articles in scientific journal that are peer reviewed.
That is how science works. You can't disprove science with religion.

THIS IS I ALWAYS USE YES OR NO QUESTIONS FOR YOU
YOUR DISHONESTY SPEAKS TO THE HEAVENS

So Somebody that holds PHD in molecular biology is not a "proper scientist"?
Because He doesn't hold your belief?

I can see

PLEASE WHO IS A PROPER SCIENTIST?
IT MUST BE AN ATHEIST, I GUESS

felixomor:
THIS IS I ALWAYS USE YES OR NO QUESTIONS FOR YOU
YOUR DISHONESTY SPEAKS TO THE HEAVENS

So Somebody that holds PHD in molecular biology is not a "proper scientist"?
Because He doesn't hold your belief?

I can see

PLEASE WHO IS A PROPER SCIENTIST?
IT MUST BE AN ATHEIST, I GUESS

A PhD in molecular biology and he denies AIDS exists?
No you yourself, answer it without making the both of us look stupid.

CatfishBilly:
A PhD in molecular biology and he denies AIDS exists?
No you yourself, answer it without making the both of us look stupid.

AIDS remains a controversial topic in the science world till tomorrow
There are many notable scientists who differ on the topic.
Either sides have their reasons and evidences.
Stop talking like a child.

Looking supid is when u that has only MBBS says a professor is not a proper scientist.
That is looking stupid