Wilgrea7:


https://www.nairaland.com/3823066/jesus-nazareth-historical-view

I have read some of the things in the thread. If I haven't seen a bit ahead of physicality, maybe I'd have started doubting what I know. But because of my own personal experience and knowledge, I stand firm.

If Julius Caeser, Pythagoras and Alexander the Great are seeing our world today, they would just be shaking their heads, laughing out loud for us believing that A SON OF GOD actually came down to this world after their own death.

It is like saying that as you are right now on this very very physical earth, someone somewhere in Chile arise and say that he is the son of God and you just swallow it, hook, line and sinker. That's funny. I'm sure you won't accept it.

Atum told me that in the first world of the past homos, that was when gods, dragons, dinosaurs, etc existed physically on earth. But since 200,000 years ago till date, it is not possible for any of these things to come to our own earth. It is a law of nature. Same way ghosts can't physically live on our earth. We can only connect with them in the spirit.

So as I have been saying, Faulkin I know, Yahweh I know, but who is Jesus Sapien?

OtemAtum:


I have read some of the things in the thread. If I haven't seen a bit ahead of physicality, maybe I'd have started doubting what I know. But because of my own personal experience and knowledge, I stand firm.

this is history we're talking about here.. not biblical letters... HISTORY!!

If Julius Caeser, Pythagoras and Alexander the Great are seeing our world today, they would just be shaking their heads, laughing out loud for us believing that A SON OF GOD actually came down to this world after their own death.

It is like saying that as you are right now on this very very physical earth, someone somewhere in Chile arise and say that he is the son of God and you just swallow it, hook, line and sinker. That's funny. I'm sure you won't accept it.

who did Jesus claim to be in the article?? there's a big difference between someone existing and him claiming to be the son of God

Atum told me that in the first world of the past homos, that was when gods, dragons, dinosaurs, etc existed physically on earth. But since 200,000 years ago till date, it is not possible for any of these things to come to our own earth. It is a law of nature. Same way ghosts can't physically live on our earth. We can only connect with them in the spirit.

So as I have been saying, Faulkin I know, Yahweh I know, but who is Jesus Sapien?

history is speaking bro.. history doesn't care about what atum said.. history is history

Wilgrea7:


this is history we're talking about here.. not biblical letters... HISTORY!!



who did Jesus claim to be in the article?? there's a big difference between someone existing and him claiming to be the son of God




history is speaking bro.. history doesn't care about what atum said.. history is history

I'm still looking for the scientifically proven hardware copies of your so-called histories. What I've been seeing so far are links to websites where speculations are made without agreement with one another. Have you laid your hands on any papyri or scrolls of history written 3000-2000years ago? Call me when you have one like that.

Also, if you believe in the book of Genesis but deny the things Atum told me, you are an hypocrite because Moses was not born in Genesis but he wrote the things of the past, though with many lies. How did he get it?

OtemAtum:


I'm still looking for the scientifically proven hardware copies of your so-called histories.

why not take a trip to Palestine?

What I've been seeing so far are links to websites where speculations are made without agreement with one another.

your doctrine doesn't avoid this category.. it remains a mere link to someone else you're trying to share it with.. so don't feel superior

Have you laid your hands on any papyri or scrolls of history written 3000-2000years ago? Call me when you have one like that.

even if i had one.. you'd claim it was authored by Eusebius..

Also, if you believe in the book of Genesis but deny the things Atum told me, you are an hypocrite because Moses was not born in Genesis but he wrote the things of the past, though with many lies. How did he get it?

going from an unbiased point, Genesis and doctufos are claimed revelations.. but then.. when put up against historical evidence.. either one stands or both fail.. I'm not the writer of Genesis.. so i can only but guess the real meaning of the revelation of the author.. i could be wrong.. i could be right.. but you... you're the very author of the doctufos.. you know the meaning of what you're writing.. its cool.. but its just that your book isn't historical accurate and is written based on current knowledge at this point in time.. just like every other book written throughout history.. .. so you or anybody can claim revelation.. but if its wrong... its wrong!

it seems I've started derailing this thread... OP.. my apologies.. i think its best if we all stick to the topic

Wilgrea7:

why not take a trip to Palestine?


your doctrine doesn't avoid this category.. it remains a mere link to someone else you're trying to share it with.. so don't feel superior


even if i had one.. you'd claim it was authored by Eusebius..




going from an unbiased point, Genesis and doctufos are claimed revelations.. but then.. when put up against historical evidence.. either one stands or both fail.. I'm not the writer of Genesis.. so i can only but guess the real meaning of the revelation of the author.. i could be wrong.. i could be right.. but you... you're the very author of the doctufos.. you know the meaning of what you're writing.. its cool.. but its just that your book isn't historical accurate and is written based on current knowledge at this point in time.. just like every other book written throughout history.. .. so you or anybody can claim revelation.. but if its wrong... its wrong!

It's like you don't understand the DOCTUFOS OF TRUTH yet. I have only written according to the things revealed to me from the time of the big bang till about 10million years ago. I haven't written anything within the next 200,000years in the DOCTUFOS yet, but you are telling me it doesn't go with history. Which history if I may ask? I am in still writing the past 10million years history. I haven't written of any single homo sapiens history, so you just wait and see it. However, some people have started seeing things which relates to them already, yet they are still the past things. What of when I start writing about the homo sapiens life? Hmm.