₦airaland Forum

obixcel:
You are a fool! Better crawl back to your safe space u slowpoke!

Lucasbalo:
Piece of garbage. You are not worth a rat in your village. Trampy could poo in your mouth and your brain is so charred you will think it's chocolate bars. You are a disgrace to humanity.

obixcel:
Fish Brain Even my village is more safer than your crime-infested ghetto Chicago.

obixcel:
Fish Brain Even my village is more safer than your crime-infested ghetto Chicago.

armyofone:
Truth be told, Russia has their own agenda based on those connections.

obixcel:
You are a fool! Better crawl back to your safe space u slowpoke!

obixcel:
You just commented with a clear mind, the truth is that He (Donald Trump Jr.) was naive and should have considered that meeting inappropriate, but then again does it offer evidence of Russia collusion? or prove Treasonous? No. A lot of but hurt folks are blowing this out of proportion. It was inappropriate but not criminal or treasonous, simple.

LordReed:
Imagine a husband telling his wife "Oh baby I did nothing wrong, I only wanted to meet her for sex but she didn't agree, that's all!"

obixcel:
Him meeting with her was inappropriate, but an incriminating offense? No. Because no actual crime (sex)was committed. What if the initial agenda was for sex and as they met it turned out that the Lady only used that to lure him to the meeting so as to deal with a totally different agenda. The man would be pissed off but has the crime (sex) been committed? No. A private Russian Citizen meeting with a Private American citizen to offer damaging info about a targeted US citizen (Hillary) who is running for office, It turned out that the meeting agenda had nothing to do with any supposed info (No exchange of information or bribery whatsoever) but instead was used as a ploy to discuss about the adoption of Russian children. Meeting ends instantly - nothing to see here. Was the meeting appropriate? No. Was Donald Trump Jr. just been naive about the meeting agenda? Yes. Had a crime or Treason been committed? NO. As a Private citizen should he had reported the meeting with the Trump campaign? Not compulsory.

obixcel:
Russian Lawyer Who Met with Donald Trump Jr. Denies Kremlin Links, Clinton Info

“I never had any damaging or sensitive information about Hillary Clinton. It was never my intention to have that,” she said.

“It is quite possible that maybe they were longing for such an information. They wanted it so badly that they could only hear the thought that they wanted.”
“The question that I was asked was as follows: whether I had any financial records which might prove that the funds used to sponsor the DNC were coming from inappropriate source,” she told NBC

obixcel:
Him meeting with her was inappropriate, but an incriminating offense? No. Because no actual crime (sex)was committed. What if the initial agenda was for sex and as they met it turned out that the Lady only used that to lure him to the meeting so as to deal with a totally different agenda. The man would be pissed off but has the crime (sex) been committed? No. A private Russian Citizen meeting with a Private American citizen to offer damaging info about a targeted US citizen (Hillary) who is running for office, It turned out that the meeting agenda had nothing to do with any supposed info (No exchange of information or bribery whatsoever) but instead was used as a ploy to discuss about the adoption of Russian children. Meeting ends instantly - nothing to see here. Was the meeting appropriate? No. Was Donald Trump Jr. just been naive about the meeting agenda? Yes. Had a crime or Treason been committed? NO. As a Private citizen should he had reported the meeting with the Trump campaign? Not compulsory.

obixcel:
Him meeting with her was inappropriate, but an incriminating offense? No. Because no actual crime (sex)was committed. What if the initial agenda was for sex and as they met it turned out that the Lady only used that to lure him to the meeting so as to deal with a totally different agenda. The man would be pissed off but has the crime (sex) been committed? No. A private Russian Citizen meeting with a Private American citizen to offer damaging info about a targeted US citizen (Hillary) who is running for office, It turned out that the meeting agenda had nothing to do with any supposed info (No exchange of information or bribery whatsoever) but instead was used as a ploy to discuss about the adoption of Russian children. Meeting ends instantly - nothing to see here. Was the meeting appropriate? No. Was Donald Trump Jr. just been naive about the meeting agenda? Yes. Had a crime or Treason been committed? NO. As a Private citizen should he had reported the meeting with the Trump campaign? Not compulsory.

Mindfulness:
@bold

You are making progress eventually. Better late and slow than never.

The rest of your post is denial.

Trump's evolving story:

There wasn't a meeting.

There was a meeting, but it wasn't substantial.

It was substantial, but it wasn't collusion.

It was collusion, but it wasn't treason.



And your analogy with the man who had no s.ex eventually is pretty laughable. Can this man be trusted even though someone else prevented him from doing wrong? Even though he would do it if he could and wasn't denied it?

ABEG!

How low can your standards be?

Mindfulness:
@bold

You are making progress eventually. Better late and slow than never.

The rest of your post is denial.

Trump's evolving story:

There wasn't a meeting.

There was a meeting, but it wasn't substantial.

It was substantial, but it wasn't collusion.

It was collusion, but it wasn't treason.



And your analogy with the man who had no s.ex eventually is pretty laughable. Can this man be trusted even though someone else prevented him from doing wrong? Even though he would do it if he could and wasn't denied it?

ABEG!

How low can your standards be?

LordReed:
Imagine it was a woman who admitted she went to someone apart from her husband for sex, the hue and cry about how much of a slut she is would be so deafening but here it's simply inappropriate. LoL. That woman would be like a democratic party candidate. LMAO!

oyb:
lock him up!
lock him up!
lock him up!
lock him up!

you hear that mr trump? that is the sound of karma and inevitability

Lucasbalo:
With that clown named Obi, nothing rational about him when he couldn't even admit that trump and his aides including his son are just a laughing stock in America. How warped can someone be to keep defending the indefensible. We have had over 40 Presidents in America and there's no single one as pathetic as the Clown in Chief in the Oval Office now. Trampy is a 'useful idiot' to the republican establishment now and they will get rid of him when they don't need him anymore the same way Sen James Baker, Everet and co did when they went to WH and told Nixon it's time to go. Never in my life seen a White House in such a mess. God help America from this worthless bunch.

Lucasbalo:
There is nothing about you that is rational when it comes to Trampy. When NY Times came out with the information, Don The Little Mafioso said his discussion with the Russian Emissary was about adoption which was a lie and took it back to avoid perjuring himself when he's called to testify under oath. That's how sleazy the guy his. An Apple doesn't fall far from the tree. He's just a pathological liar like his clownish father. I hate to get on your case but when it comes to tramp, you have sold your brain for a pot of porridge. Joseph Goebles as bad as he was at least had more sense than you. Defending the indefensible. Republicans and Democrats are wildly condemning the latest sleaze and you know what, the Special Prosecutor is on the case. For a cave lapdog like you, you don't count in the scheme of things and your relevance ends on nairaland.

Mindfulness:
@bold

You are making progress eventually. Better late and slow than never.

The rest of your post is denial.

Trump's evolving story:
The
There wasn't a meeting.

There was a meeting, but it wasn't substantial.

It was substantial, but it wasn't collusion.

It was collusion, but it wasn't treason.



And your analogy with the man who had no s.ex eventually is pretty laughable. Can this man be trusted even though someone else prevented him from doing wrong? Even though he would do it if he could and wasn't denied it?

ABEG!

How low can your standards be?

Charles Krauthammer characterized Donald Trump Jr.'s defense for meeting with a Russian lawyer as "incompetence," saying it's not a good justification.

Krauthammer said Trump Jr's explanation for why the meeting was not suspicious collusion was that "it didn't work out."

Trump Jr. said Natalia Veselnitskaya promised to have what amounted to opposition research on Hillary Clinton in Spring 2016.

He called the meeting a "waste of 20 minutes" and not particularly memorable.

Krauthammer said he's defended Trump Jr. and his father against accusations of collusion because there "wasn't [any] 'there' there."

"[But] the denial of collusion is very weak right now because it looks as if Don Junior was receptive to receiving this information," Krauthammer said.

"It's a hell of a defense to say your collusion wasn't competent and it didn't work out," he said.

Trump, Jr. talks exclusively with Sean Hannity tonight at 10 PM ET on Fox News Channel.

Watch the clip above.

Andy Serkis Reading Donald Trump’s Tweets As Gollum Is So Precious

Mindfulness:
Whatever he said about Hillary, he did it.


And now we also know why he was trying so hard to discredit the media.

Thank you failing NEW YORK TIMES! You are failing and Donald's clan is winning.

GREAT JOB!

LordReed:
Even more incriminating. Here is someone saying they asked me for such info not me volunteering it. That means they were desperately searching for it that the red flags were ignored to the point where they didn't care if it came from Russia or not.

oyb:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64mWOoj68qo



donald trump, the gift that keeps on giving

obixcel:
Like using a hammer to purge her emails, also using a bleacher? Lol. Donald Trump Jr. did what your miserable candidate couldn't do with her emails. At least he was honest about it.

obixcel:
The DNC latest campaign slogan for 2018 had been titled: I MEAN, HAVE YOU SEEN THE OTHER GUYS? hahahahaha.....CONFUSED PARTY, CONFUSED LEADERSHIP. What a slogan!

obixcel:
Like using a hammer to purge her emails, also using a bleacher? Lol. Donald Trump Jr. did what your miserable candidate couldn't do with her emails. At least he was honest about it.

Lucasbalo:
You can't expect better from a village clown who worship a bigoted demagogue. Imagine Obama with all the sleaze we are seeing now and the cave hunters will be going through mental organisms. Bunch of losers that are used to be controlled and ruled by despotic and authoritarian leaders.