₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,345,029 members, 8,515,078 topics. Date: Sunday, 08 November 2026 at 01:17 AM

Toggle theme

Majority Of State Shouldn't Have Been Created In The First Place - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Majority Of State Shouldn't Have Been Created In The First Place (647 Views)

1 Reply (Go Down)

Majority Of State Shouldn't Have Been Created In The First Place by fineboynl(op):
what are the criteria to create a States?


States that can not survived shouldn't have been created, the military really created much problem for the present day Nigeria they never saw the Nigeria freedom as independence but rather a conquered territory. Before the amalgamation we all live separately.

There are critical criteria before creating a state one if which is viability you don't create states because of landmass. Desert are created as States and local government in the far north. During the British area they only created one region in the whole of north because they are simply not viable and cannot stand.

While they the British created 2 region from the southern Nigeria namely the south west and south east. And when they saw edo was viable and can stand on it own they created the Midwest region making it 4 region and of which 3 was in the southern Nigeria before they left.

the north has been poor from inception they never did anything or contributed meaningfully to the country. they have the highest poverty from the beginning and the British saw all that and one of the reason they favour them against the South.


But the northern military took advantage of dictatorship to create 3 region out from this north. They went further to create 19 States out from this same one region because of allocation from the south.

And yet they said south east don't need 6 States because of landmass or population.
If no single state can survive in the north without FG allocation then south east needs States too for fairness. But to me south east don't need anymore states and the north should start folding up their already existing states because its shouldn't have been created in the first place.

Any state or region that cannot survived without bail out funds should as a matter of fact start packing out and surrendered itself and autonomy to the region it was created out from.

the allocation is the ground problem of the country and corruption.
Re: Majority Of State Shouldn't Have Been Created In The First Place by fineboynl(op): 12:16am On Jul 14, 2017
seun, lalasticlala
Re: Majority Of State Shouldn't Have Been Created In The First Place by farouk0403(m): 12:33am On Jul 14, 2017
Mtswww rubbish, come and merge the states if you can and stop bleating.
Re: Majority Of State Shouldn't Have Been Created In The First Place by otosa(m): 12:49am On Jul 14, 2017
fineboynl:
what are the criteria to create a States?


States that can not survived shouldn't have been created, the military really created much problem for the present day Nigeria they never saw the Nigeria freedom as independence but rather a conquered territory. Before the amalgamation we all live separately.

There are critical criteria before creating a state one if which is viability you don't create states because of landmass. Desert are created as States and local government in the far north. During the British area they only created one region in the whole of north because they are simply not viable and cannot stand.

While they the British created 2 region from the southern Nigeria namely the south west and south east. And when they saw edo was viable and can stand on it own they created the Midwest region making it 4 region and of which 3 was in the southern Nigeria before they left.

the north has been poor from inception they never did anything or contributed meaningfully to the country. they have the highest poverty from the beginning and the British saw all that and one of the reason they favour them against the South.


But the northern military took advantage of dictatorship to create 3 region out from this north. They went further to create 19 States out from this same one region because of allocation from the south.

And yet they said south east don't need 6 States because of landmass or population.
If no single state can survive in the north without FG allocation then south east needs States too for fairness. But to me south east don't need anymore states and the north should start folding up their already existing states because its shouldn't have been created in the first place.

Any state or region that cannot survived without bail out funds should as a matter of fact start packing out and surrendered itself and autonomy to the region it was created out from.

the allocation is the ground problem of the country and corruption.
I know its matter 0f time Nigerians will surely wise up. Let me add to this. According to Gowon, he said they created those states to avoid the breaking up of any group from Nigeria. But since this man has been feeding us with his lies nobody never asked him that those states that he created in Northerner, are they wanted to break out from Nigerian too? Infact this man caused alot of damages to this Nation and it shall be my happiness if we can get to where he tool us from before he go.
1 Reply

The Official Peugeot 504 Of Olusegun Obasanjo In 1979 As Head Of State (Photo) • Majority Of Nigerians Are Poor - Buhari Tells New Ministers • Majority Of APC Senators Support Lawan’s Recommendation As Senate President • 2 • 3 • 4

Local Government Chairman In Ekiti State Spoted Drinking Beer With Workers- Pics • “this Big-nosed Minister Of Information Brought Out The Worst In Me” – Femi Fani • Excited Soldiers Rush To Snap Pictures With 2face In Maiduguri, Borno (video)