₦airaland Forum

oyb:
dude, you are running round in circles. by that argument the us should be going after assad as he has also used chemical weapons on his own people.

using wmd on your own people or even on your enemies [as long as they are not aligned with us] has never been an issue. the us lost the moral high ground on chemical weapons when they looked the other way during the iran iraq wars

My point is, Bush had more reasons to go to war cos America was attacked under his watch

Obama had very little reason, whatever reason you can proffer for Obama covers Bush too

So it take a hypocrite to knock Bush on wars and give Obama a pass which is what you have been trying to do for the past week

raumdeuter:
EVeryone has a reason even a man who rapeed a 2month old baby will give reasons.
9-11 or any terrorist act is inexcusable and the perpetrators deserved severe punishment

Kudos to George Bush for handing that out to them, But we havent found Obamas excuse for intervention in Syria and Libya

But the cycle didn't start with 9/11 did it?

raumdeuter:
Obviously you are not very informed, What did Saddam use on the Kurds?

Bush did not give a fvck about the Kurds, instead he invented non-existent weapons of mass destruction. That's the point genius. But keep giving him kuddos for lying to you.

raumdeuter:
My point is, Bush had more reasons to go to war cos America was attacked under his watch

Obama had very little reason, whatever reason you can proffer for Obama covers Bush too

So it take a hypocrite to knock Bush on wars and give Obama a pass which is what you have been trying to do for the past week

Yeah, he had more reasons, like non-existent weapons of mass destruction.

raumdeuter:
Lordreed, Can you read this liberal and Obama defenders opinion? Yet these people are questioning George Bush for defending America after it was attacked

Same way you are questioning Obama's motivations for giving a hand to regime change in Libya and Syria. Fact is American foreign policies dictate their actions, it doesn't matter who is President.

LordReed:
Same way you are questioning Obama's motivations for giving a hand to regime change in Libya and Syria. Fact is American foreign policies dictate their actions, it doesn't matter who is President.

Bush foreign policies were dictated by the 9-11 attacks. If the terrorists didnt attack US then Bush might not have gone to war

Hera77:
Yeah, he had more reasons, like non-existent weapons of mass destruction.

I know you want to be thick, There was a matter called 9-11 where US was attacked

Hera77:
Bush did not give a fvck about the Kurds, instead he invented non-existent weapons of mass destruction. That's the point genius. But keep giving him kuddos for lying to you.

Point is Obama had very little reason to go into Syria, Bush had more reasons as America was attacked

raumdeuter:
Bush foreign policies were dictated by the 9-11 attacks. If the terrorists didnt attack US then Bush might not have gone to war

No they were not. Same way Trump huffed and puffed about Syria and what does he do when he gets into office? Steps up the drone strike program and continues to intervene in Syria. You should understand by now that this is beyond who's President, this is American policy.

Hera77:
Even Don jr. admitted that it was inappropriate. Keep living in denial.

Yea 'inappropriate' is the word not collusion. Read and edify yourself..

happney65:
Did i hear your messiah claim he would replace obamacare asap..As of yesterday,The repeal and replace is dead at least for now even with a GOP dominated house.I guess trump would come and blame my father here in Nigeria for that as he is found of blaming the other person but himself..Yeye Man with Yeye Supporters

He is only 6months into his admin just sit back and observe

LordReed:
No they were not. Same way Trump huffed and puffed about Syria and what does he do when he gets into office? Steps up the drone strike program and continues to intervene in Syria. You should understand by now that this is beyond who's President, this is American policy.

What evidence do you have for this?

Did W Bush attack anyone before 9-11

stanech:
Yea 'inappropriate' is the word not collusion. Read and edify yourself..

They (Libtards) are trying to criminalize it Lol, when the DNC colluded with Ukraine then it's a no big deal. I have said it here already Trump Jnr. was only being naive in attending that meeting, but to say it's illegal, treason, or criminal is 'Final Fantasy'

obixcel:
They (Libtards) are trying to criminalize it Lol, when the DNC colluded with Ukraine then it's a no big deal. I have said it here already Trump Jnr. was only being naive in attending that meeting, but to say it's illegal, treason, or criminal is 'Final Fantasy'

You can say that again broda..

These people are trying to give a whole new meaning to the word 'collusion'..

Besides even if there is collusion, it would be a crime is if and only if it affected the election directly. i.e if the ballots were altered..Or if he received money from Russia


I remember when Obama interfered in Israels election, where was the outcry then:?

raumdeuter:
Point is Obama had very little reason to go into Syria, Bush had more reasons as America was attacked

Very little reason? and what reason might that be?

The guy had no reason whatsoever to invade either Libya or Syria

stanech:
He is only 6months into his admin just sit back and observe

Thought he said he would do it on day one?You have being scammed and would be continuously scammed by trump..

happney65:
Thought he said he would do it on day one?You have being scammed and would be continuously scammed by trump..

Is that what he said? I thought he said he would start the repeal from day one.

stanech:
You can say that again broda..

These people are trying to give a whole new meaning to the word 'collusion'..

Besides even if there is collusion, it would be a crime is if and only if it affected the election directly. i.e if the ballots were altered..Or if he received money from Russia


I remember when Obama interfered in Israels election, where was the outcry then:?

No ballots were altered, no information exchanged (even if there was info..still not a crime), and most importantly there was no financial transaction. They can't give a whole new meaning to ''collusion'' just because their candidate lost, forgetting that they were and are also guilty of the same and even worse.

obixcel:
No ballots were altered, no information exchanged (even if there was info..still not a crime), and most importantly there was no financial transaction. They can't give a whole new meaning to ''collusion'' just because their candidate lost, forgetting that they were and are also guilty of the same and even worse.

They do not see beyond their hatred for DJT. Truth is the guy is winning despite their obstructionist ideas..

President Donald J. Trump gave remarks ahead of the first meeting of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.

“More than 30 states have already agreed to share the [voter] information with the commission … If any state does not want to share this information, one has to wonder what they’re worried about,” the president said.

raumdeuter:
What evidence do you have for this?

Did W Bush attack anyone before 9-11

History. History is my evidence. Since WW2 every President of the US has had to fight or intervene somewhere. Do you consider that a coincidence?

LordReed:
History. History is my evidence. Since WW2 every President of the US has had to fight or intervene somewhere. Do you consider that a coincidence?

That is not acceptable. You are only held responsible for what you do not what others did.

So if every make I know from Village A is a thief, Can I also condemn Mr Z and put him in jail not because he stole or I caught him stealing but because historical evidence says every male in his village once stole?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4FB1x0n-mQ

A journalist report on The Trump Empire....

raumdeuter:
That is not acceptable. You are only held responsible for what you do not what others did.

So if every make I know from Village A is a thief, Can I also condemn Mr Z and put him in jail not because he stole or I caught him stealing but because historical evidence says every male in his village once stole?

But Mr Z was caught stealing with a pen (using your analogy) so you'll say he's not like the others because those ones were armed robbers? It doesn't matter what instrument or style they use, they are all thieves.

stanech:
President Donald J. Trump gave remarks ahead of the first meeting of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.

“More than 30 states have already agreed to share the [voter] information with the commission … If any state does not want to share this information, one has to wonder what they’re worried about,” the president said.

At least 44 states have rejected the Trump voter fraud commission’s sweeping data request. 44 out of 50, let that sink in a bit.

obixcel:
They (Libtards) are trying to criminalize it Lol, when the DNC colluded with Ukraine then it's a no big deal. I have said it here already Trump Jnr. was only being naive in attending that meeting, but to say it's illegal, treason, or criminal is 'Final Fantasy'

Are you still looking for those facts backing your fake news? I'm still waiting.

LordReed:
But Mr Z was caught stealing with a pen (using your analogy) so you'll say he's not like the others because those ones were armed robbers? It doesn't matter what instrument or style they use, they are all thieves.

Fact is Bush did not attack or interfere anywhere before 9-11

President Trump met with Putin twice during the G20, fake media go nuts! Forgetting that that is what Presidents do, They meet, They talk with whoever they want to meet with. Why is this even an issue? Who cares?

LordReed:
At least 44 states have rejected the Trump voter fraud commission’s sweeping data request. 44 out of 50, let that sink in a bit.

That is old news

stanech:
That is old news

Yesterday is old news?

Sen. John McCain has brain cancer, aggressive tumor surgically removed

(CNN) Sen. John McCain, 80, has been diagnosed with a primary glioblastoma, a type of brain tumor, Mayo Clinic doctors directly involved in the senator's care told CNN exclusively. The doctors spoke directly to CNN Chief Medical Correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta.

The senator underwent surgery to remove a blood clot on Friday at Mayo Clinic Hospital in Phoenix. Lab results from that surgery confirmed the presence of brain cancer associated with the blood clot.

Glioblastoma is a particularly aggressive tumor that forms in the tissue of the brain and spinal cord, according to the American Brain Tumor Association.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/19/health/gupta-mccain-glioblastoma/index.html