₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,331,252 members, 8,449,423 topics. Date: Tuesday, 21 July 2026 at 06:30 PM

Toggle theme

Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . - Foreign Affairs (288) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsBattle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . (3739989 Views)

1 2 3 ... 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 ... 2287 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 10:11pm On Jul 22, 2017
jakeporeshenko:
Egypt is seriously no joke embarassed
Not smiling @ all...... grin

What IFV his in the 1st picture huh
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 10:19pm On Jul 22, 2017
bidexiii:
With the present governing military administration its 2-3 years max.
What? That's quite unfair on any soldier. Not being prescriptive but here's how we do it:
1) On external deployment - 12 months: 1 battalion in the field (DRC); 1 training to replace/rotate; 1 having come back and busy with courses as per career planning and R&R;
Which means 3 battalions not available for any new developments for 12 months as per UN requirements.

2) Internal deployments on border patrol - 6 months: almost 4 battalions in the field;
Leaves only 2 battalions on rapid deployment for new developments; hence the chronic calls for expansion, not because of "hegemonic agendas" and wanting to check so-called "giant of this and that".

The Motorised Infantry Orbat I've outlined above proves we need 3 more battalions to remain faithful to our doctrine of 1 battalion and 2 in reserve.

Of course, we've ameliorated this somewhat with our Reserve Forces.
And as someone in uniform, I can not conceive a 2-3 year deployment. I really hope and pray your government pays better attention to the social welfare of all these selfless men and women.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 10:22pm On Jul 22, 2017
bidexiii:
Not smiling @ all...... grin

What IFV his in the 1st picture huh
It’s called EIFV/AIFV, basically a modified M113
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 10:25pm On Jul 22, 2017
frumentius:
What? That's quite unfair on any soldier. Not being prescriptive but here's how we do it:
1) On external deployment - 12 months: 1 battalion in the field (DRC); 1 training to replace/rotate; 1 having come back and busy with courses as per career planning and R&R;
Which means 3 battalions not available for any new developments for 12 months as per UN requirements.

2) Internal deployments on border patrol - 6 months: almost 4 battalions in the field;
Leaves only 2 battalions on rapid deployment for new developments; hence the chronic calls for expansion, not because of "hegemonic agendas" and wanting to check so-called "giant of this and that".

The Motorised Infantry Orbat I've outlined above proves we need 3 more battalions to remain faithful to our doctrine of 1 battalion and 2 in reserve.

Of course, we've ameliorated this somewhat with our Reserve Forces.
And as someone in uniform, I can not conceive a 2-3 year deployment. I really hope and pray your government pays better attention to the social welfare of all these selfless men and women.
Unfair...........lol grin grin shocked grin grin

Thanks to the present military administration, before it was unspecified or let me even indefinite grin
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 10:26pm On Jul 22, 2017
jakeporeshenko:
It’s called EIFV/AIFV, basically a modified M113
Tanks wink
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 10:29pm On Jul 22, 2017
#victory
#NA

Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 10:53pm On Jul 22, 2017
bidexiii:
Unfair...........lol grin grin shocked grin grin

Thanks to the present military administration, before it was unspecified or let me even indefinite grin
That's not correct.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 10:55pm On Jul 22, 2017
bidexiii:
Unfair...........lol grin grin shocked grin grin
2-3 year deployment? Trust me, I substantially toned it down from my initial expletive-laden formulation.
2-3 years?!!! shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 10:57pm On Jul 22, 2017
frumentius:
What? That's quite unfair

Of course, we've ameliorated this somewhat with our Reserve Forces.
And as someone in uniform, I can not conceive a 2-3 year deployment. I really hope and pray your government pays better attention to the social welfare of all these selfless men and women.
Unfortunately, not the same situation. The vast majority of the troops deployed spend 2 years on average.

Sacrifices for the greater good have to be made, the military is also very stretched as it is. It is Nigerians who would bring peace and fight the fight for Nigerians, no one else.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 11:04pm On Jul 22, 2017
frumentius:
2-3 year deployment? Trust me, I substantially toned it down from my initial expletive-laden formulation.
2-3 years?!!! shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked
Given the circumstances of where we are, that deployment is not out of place.

It is an necessary evil. It is unfair doesn't quite mean it is bad.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 11:06pm On Jul 22, 2017
Henry240:
Sacrifices for the greater good have to be made, the military is also very stretched as it is. It is Nigerians who would bring peace and fight the fight for Nigerians, no one else.
Spoken as someone who's never put on the uniform. Soldiers are humans too, you know. Why should their conditions of service be any more onerous than anyone else in public service? Would you expect the same of say a doctor in public service? Have you any idea what this does to morale, up and down the ranks?
Until you've served, please don't try and justify how 2-3 years deployment can make any kind of sense.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 11:11pm On Jul 22, 2017
Henry240:
Given the circumstances of where we are, that deployment is not out of place.

It is an necessary evil. It is unfair doesn't quite mean it is bad.
As an officer and gentleman, I shall withdraw gracefully before I lose it completely. Suffice it to say, you sir, have no idea of what you speak.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 11:12pm On Jul 22, 2017
frumentius:
Spoken as someone who's never put on the uniform. Soldiers are humans too, you know. Why should their conditions of service be any more onerous than anyone else in public service? Would you expect the same of say a doctor in public service? Have you any idea what this does to morale, up and down the ranks?
Until you've served, please don't try and justify how 2-3 years deployment can make any kind of sense.
Would you come from South-Africa to come replace the lads?

You have the luxury of doing cross-country motorbike trips, i'm sure the blokes on deployment in the NE also want that too, but who would protect defenceless Nigerians from marauding fanatics?

Would you come over and do it?

Like i said, it is not good, that doesn't make it bad. Circumstances are not the same.

You need to first take that into account. Have you taken out time to understand why deployments last that long?

Was this the same before Boko-Haram?
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op):
Henry240:
That's not correct.
What's not true... huh

Before the present military administration, soldiers complained of spending more than 3 years in the frontline and was part of the problem the present military chief faced when they just came in.

True the military is overstretched and there is nothing that could be done to salvage the situation on time.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 11:20pm On Jul 22, 2017
frumentius:
As an officer and gentleman, I shall withdraw gracefully before I lose it completely. Suffice it to say, you sir, have no idea of what you speak.
I'll go no further. But never speak of my own experiences with authority.

I know the costs on a personal level.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by peterphd(m): 11:37pm On Jul 22, 2017
bidexiii:
Note not all AFSF where in the N.E, when they came from the northeast Europe. Some served in other part of conflict area and some instructors but majority served in the N.E immediately they came from Europe.

They will be greatly missed for there experience, especially when the COAS has given the theatre commander a deadline to kill or capture shekau.... angry
Please what makes the 72SF battalion so special like jakesporeshenko noted? Aren't they the same AFSF?
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 11:45pm On Jul 22, 2017
peterphd:
Please what makes the 72SF battalion so special like jakesporeshenko noted? Aren't they the same AFSF?
They are not the same sir.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by bidexiii(op): 11:50pm On Jul 22, 2017
peterphd:
Please what makes the 72SF battalion so special like jakesporeshenko noted? Aren't they the same AFSF?
No, they are not the same .

The AFSF comprises of the army,navy,airforce and the police. And they where trained in Russia & Belarus.

The 72MSF where trained Here in Nigeria by a PMC.

The reason why @ jajesporeshenko made mentioned of the 72msf is that majority of the AFSF has spent over two active years on the frontline and they are due for rotation or to come home.

Now the 72msf would probably saddled with the task or role of the AFSF.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 12:27am On Jul 23, 2017
.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 12:28am On Jul 23, 2017
bidexiii:
No, they are not the same .

The AFSF comprises of the army,navy,airforce and the police. And they where trained in Russia & Belarus.

The 72MSF where trained Here in Nigeria by a PMC.

The reason why @ jajesporeshenko made mentioned of the 72msf is that majority of the AFSF has spent over two active years on the frontline and they are due for rotation or to come home.

Now the 72msf would probably saddled with the task or role of the AFSF.
Spot on, however it’s important to note that the 72 existed before the few weeks of training by the PMC, look at is as conversion training, learning to fight a different type of enemy.

There are also men of Army headquarters strike group also know as AHQSG.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Odunayaw(m): 12:35am On Jul 23, 2017
bidexiii:
No, they are not the same .

The AFSF comprises of the army,navy,airforce and the police. And they where trained in Russia & Belarus.

The 72MSF where trained Here in Nigeria by a PMC.

The reason why @ jajesporeshenko made mentioned of the 72msf is that majority of the AFSF has spent over two active years on the frontline and they are due for rotation or to come home.

Now the 72msf would probably saddled with the task or role of the AFSF.
Before we begin to confuse ourselves there are 3 known SF battalion in public space
• The 72nd SF Bn based at makurdi
• 111 SF bn
• 133 SF bn
Furthermore the 72 Strike force
As far as I know they are under NASOC which was established circa 2014
However because the DHQ refuses to comment on these warriors we r left to scavenge for information

in the theatre (both North central-North East) we've heard of the AH SG(Strike group)- I am led to bliv these is where the Rangers a'la 72MSF fall under
We've also heard of 133SF bn which had an IED experience of recently.
However we have the AFSF which is the Tri-service SF and they take their orders and missions from ONSA

I just wish they could make things clearer


N.B My submission isn't based on superior knowledge of the subject matter
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Odunayaw(m): 12:37am On Jul 23, 2017
jakeporeshenko:
The new tip of the spear to replace AFSF will probably be the guys who just returned from Pakistan.

Bear in mind the above statement does not apply to elite forces like the 72 and SBS.
the matter wey de scratch my head be say

The ones that were in Pakistan r they new bloods-I mean newly selected fellows or they r picked from the SF brigade for additional training
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Odunayaw(m): 12:39am On Jul 23, 2017
komekn:
The Nigerian police should have at least 300 of these BRT 60.

These are obviously used and cleaned up and painted over. They should really have the modern turrets with 30mm cannons.

The entire eastern block is awash with these vehicles they cost a lot cheaper than a brand new soft skinned pick up truck.
Police + BTR + 30mm cannon = syntax error!!!
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 12:50am On Jul 23, 2017
Odunayaw:
the matter wey de scratch my head be say

The ones that were in Pakistan r they new bloods-I mean newly selected fellows or they r picked from the SF brigade for additional training
They are new, because I know a navy sailor who was among the guys that went to Pakistan, they weren’t selected from SF.
And the reason I want to assume that the guys fresh from Pakistan are replacing the AFSF Bn is because they are entering the NE same time AFSF Is being rotated out of that area.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Odunayaw(m): 1:03am On Jul 23, 2017
jakeporeshenko:
They are new, because I know a navy sailor who was among the guys that went to Pakistan, they weren’t selected from SF.
And the reason I want to assume that the guys fresh from Pakistan are replacing the AFSF Bn is because they are entering the NE same time AFSF Is being rotated out of that area.
Sailor? I was here thinking it was for only army
but jeez 440 operators..that's quite a lot- E b like say awa EBA don harden dz ones pass selection grin

Methinks they'd be shared into the three SF Bns and thereafter thrust In the business..of course that will be at the discretion of NASOC
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 1:34am On Jul 23, 2017
.
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Odunayaw(m): 1:37am On Jul 23, 2017
jakeporeshenko:
many are sailors while some are airman In fact I am sure they are the replacement for AFSF Pic 1&2 airmen among the 440 trained in Pakistan
Pic 3&4 arrive Borno state, can you see the hats ?? Guess I was right.
I will be deleting this post after your reply
Seen..doubts cleared See young men! God bless them
What about those ones that graduated from BOC-C of the SBS some months earlier?
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 1:45am On Jul 23, 2017
Odunayaw:
Seen..doubts cleared
See young men! God bless them

What about those ones that graduated from BOC-C of the SBS some months earlier?
The guys who graduated with some Ghanaian charles ?
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Odunayaw(m): 1:48am On Jul 23, 2017
jakeporeshenko:
The guys who graduated with some Ghanaian charles ?
Nope..some 45 fellows like this drawn from the 3 services
The Charleys still de naija?
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 1:53am On Jul 23, 2017
Odunayaw:
Nope..some 45 fellows like this drawn from the 3 services
The Charleys still de naija?
Nah they are gone, maybe another batch will come for the next round.
I don’t know what 45 guys you’re referring to though, when did the navy graduate them?
Link Dey?
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Odunayaw(m): 2:06am On Jul 23, 2017
jakeporeshenko:
Nah they are gone, maybe another batch will come for the next round.
I don’t know what 45 guys you’re referring to though, when did the navy graduate them?
Link Dey?
Na im b dz
https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2017/05/22/insurgency-armed-forces-trains-45-as-special-defence-forces-disqualifies-three/
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 2:21am On Jul 23, 2017
Odunayaw:
Na im b dz
https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2017/05/22/insurgency-armed-forces-trains-45-as-special-defence-forces-disqualifies-three/
This is interesting, either I’m suffering from dementia or I just never saw this.
So the navy trained army and Air Force guys ?
“The graduands drawn from the Nigerian Navy, Nigerian Air Force and Nigerian Army, were trained on Tactical Riverine Operation and Fast Rope Insertion and Extraction System (FRIES).”
1 2 3 ... 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 ... 2287 Reply

“If Mugabe Dies, We Will Field His Corpse As A Candidate For Election” - WifePhotos: What Some Countries Gives Their Soldiers To Eat On The Battle Field.Video Of Frightened Black Man Forced Into A Coffin By White Man Sparks Outrage234

Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?African Militaries/ Security Services Strictly Photos Only And Videos ThreadKenya Is Ahead of Nigeria In All Aspect (Facts Don't Lie)

Viewing this topic: 2 guest(s)