Bring me a lens, i wan buy news. Op, u go sell?

impossible27:
He is right. I use Good news bible. Very complete. Some books are missing in KJV, Seems like those that compiled the KJV were sleeping for omitting some books, good books for that matter




But the pastor is wrong in insulting it. They are all God words

SMH

hemartins:
The Bible is the same. There are just different versions.
New international version is more comprehensive than the King James Version doesn't make it a gay's version.
The gate of hell will never prevail on God's Word.

K

impossible27:
He is right. I use Good news bible. Very complete. Some books are missing in KJV, Seems like those that compiled the KJV were sleeping for omitting some books, good books for that matter




But the pastor is wrong in insulting it. They are all God words

Good news isnt complete.

King4Roller:

Good news isnt complete.

Which one is complete

b

emeijeh:
Tell this Ghanaian I said HE IS A FOOL

Him case even pass like that. God have mercy, these ones are devils advocate

Segadem:
SMH

What?

i just stop to read the trend when i saw that the news is coming from a ghananian,,,
Effect of too much of eating bananna and red oil,,,nigerian pastors are battling on how to made their millions this idiot is trying to get hell notification,,,,,
history tell me that king james was the defender of the gospel but who know you?

impossible27:

Which one is complete

Voice of God

gay KJV he no make sense at all
a word gay no dey KJV self
nonsense

King4Roller:

Voice of God

Lol funny

kerryjossy:
Funny

its not! this is pure madness

Hope Mr President is hearing this... Homosexual Bible. It's time to cast out Illumnati Christian comot from this our Obodo Naija

Thank God he is from Ghana

Rastafarian Rev.

princetom1:


Him case even pass like that. God have mercy, these ones are devils advocate

Don't mind him

Comfirm ni apart were

You are talking rubbish mr man, why not quote the verses of both versions to back up your desperate attention seeking.

The King James Version of the Bible is 406 years old.

In 1604, King James I of England gathered 54 scholars at the Hampton Court Conference, all member of the Church of England, to translate the Bible into English. The King was concerned about problems in the available translations of the Bible. Out of the 54 scholars gathered, 47 finished the work in 1611.

The scholars were divided into six groups. Each group was responsible for a different part of the Bible. Some were based in Oxford, some in Cambridge while others were in London. They based their work on the Tyndale Bible, the first printed Bible translation into English from Hebrew and Greek, and on the Bishop’s Bible of 1568. The John Wycliffe Bible was the first English translation of the Bible in a manuscript form. It was banned in 1409 but its texts showed up in the Latin Vulgate. Tyndale Bible was succeeded by the Great Bible of 1539. The Reformed Protestants based in Geneva under John Calvin revised the Tyndale Bible and the Great Bible to produce the Geneva Bible.

The King James Version became the third printed translation of the Bible into English.

King James’ instruction to the translators was to make sure that the new Bible conformed with the ecclesiology of the Church of England. He was also interested in getting a Bible that would reflect the Church’s belief on the ordination of clergy. The other available Bibles at that time had divergent views. The King James Version was seen as ‘a document of political and theological compromise.’

Though the first edition claimed that it was translated “out of the Original tongues,” it was clearly based on the two previous English translations. Scholars were correcting grave errors on the margins of the previous translations like one in the Great Bible where, ‘They were not obedient;’ was translated into ‘They were not disobedient.’

The scholars made draft of changes they recommended on the margins of specially printed Bishop’s Bible. They compared and revised these works. A general committee made general changes with the Archbishop of London having the final say.

The 1611 print was made before the standardization of the English language. Spelling of words, punctuation and grammar were later revised. In the preface, the translators stated that their goal was not to make a bad translation good but to make a good translation better.

Initially the new Bible was rejected by leading Bible scholars of the time. They still preferred the Latin Vulgate. It took a long time for the King James Version to become universally accepted. It reached that height in early 18th century. That was when a challenge to its text was seen as an assault on the Holy Scripture. For over 250 years, the King James Version was the dominant Bible.

Though dominant, thousands of changes have been made in the course of time. From 1638 to 1762 the text had a lot of printers’ errors. In 1631, the Eight Commandment read: “Though shall commit adultery.” That edition is often referred to as the Wicked Bible. In 1653 another error in 1 Corinthians stated that the unrighteous shall inherit the earth. That edition is called the “Unrighteous Bible.” There are greater mistranslations noticed over the years. It is so widespread that each reinterpretation seems to lead to yet another version of the Bible.

Though the King James Version of the Bible was the most influential, it was, like others before and after it, aimed at satisfying its own interest group – in this case, the Church of England. It is not impartial and its translation has been questioned over the years. As our understanding of the world of the biblical age increases, so are questions about the translations. Archaeological excavations have unearthed ancient documents that question the understandings and translations of the texts. The Bible’s continuing translation problems remain us that it a book of other people who lived in other times and spoke other languages

karnafiu03:
Homosexual and Rastafarians....

He forgot to add Biafrans

EVEN FOGET TO ADD THE AFONJAS, INSPIRED SKUL MINERS

if it's for homosexuals, so fucking what?



R homosexuals not human
mmmttcchheewww.........

That so called pastor is an Antichrist!

Hmmmm......King James Version was translated by a gay.... how did he know that?.... but he never said NIV was not translated by a gay...was it? Should one day his mouth be permanently disabled ...he should know why.

I think this man is crazy

sonoforogun:



This is trying to turn truth on it's head, pastor.

I don't know about the gay thing, but King James Version (KJV) appears more credible than New International Version (NIV), where
it is been proven that so many Bible verses were deleted. Even the word sodomy does not exist in the NIV.

An example is Matthew 17:21, "Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting" [/b]which was COMPLETELY removed.
[also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"].

Another is, Matthew 18:1, also COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What did the verse say?
[b]"For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost."

I John 5:7 -- Vitally important phrase COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. In the NIV it says,

"For there are three that testify:"

Compare the NIV reading with the following Jehovah's Witness reading--

"For there are three witness bearers,"

What are you NIV readers missing? What does the real Bible say?

"For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." I John 5:7 (KJV)

To authoritatively make comparison it is only to be expected that you could have read the original manuscripts from which the Bible was translated. Have you read anyone?

If you have not, do you really think you have a basis for saying one translation is better or something is omitted? Or as usual you are relying on what your pastors told you or on the opinion of your so-called men of god!

prof1990:
Crazy people everywhere

hahahaha

The Bible was written for homosexuals, Rastafarians, liers, thieves, fornicators and all other sinners for them to read and understand God's word and know the way to Salvation. Though I know the man probably didn't mean it this way. Only the sick need a physician.

SmartchoicesNG:
1Timothy 4 Vs 7
7 People tell silly stories that don’t agree with God’s truth. Don’t follow what these stories teach. But teach yourself to be devoted to God.

Meanwhile he should have been referring to the Queen James Bible.... Not the king James version..
I don't trust bloggers

you may be right, maybe the blogger meant 'Queen'

diplomat058:
This is the problem I have with most custodians of the several religions. They will leave substance and chase after shadows.
The Rev. Father, for instance isn't concerned on how biblical teachings of the whatever approved versions can translate to better social welfare for christian adherents in this era of economic turbulence that can make one backslide or better still advocate the elimination of corruption and economic disparity in the society.
But then, can they really do that when they are the ones using their members' hard earned cash to fly private jets around.
Rather this man is concerned about who and who is a gay bible author, smhhh.

I felt like to strangle the man with my bare hands, but then your comment became a chill pill... tell me if that's the problem we are currently facing

GMBuhari:
The way So called Priests are insulting God with their blasphemy , I am surprised Thunder hasn't been striking people down

It's because bible thunders striking people down is a lie. God ALMIGHTY who created Yahweh and His Brothers don't strike people down with thunder for expressing their opinions.