₦airaland Forum

CatfishBilly:
You're not a medical person and you have the right to question the opinions of a medical doctor?


End of discussion ladies and gentlemen. This dude isn't qualified.

butterflylion:
Isn't it a shame that knowledge isn't restricted to you? I am a sharp minded individual and same way you always refer to medical journals poorly understood by you I do same but with a better understanding.

If you wish to cop out simply say and do so rather than this your appeal to sympathy.

Where is your pathophysiology for spontaneous remission which you claimed you had. By the time you post it here then you will know just how knowledgeable I am. Go ahead.

CatfishBilly:
I'm not going through this with you again. You and your illiterate friend go and open a thread in the Health section then we'll discuss that topic so that your ignorance will be laid bare to the world.

Pushing at 4cm would be the least of your blunders, trust me.

CatfishBilly:
I'm not going through this with you again. You and your illiterate friend go and open a thread in the Health section then we'll discuss that topic so that your ignorance will be laid bare to the world.

Pushing at 4cm would be the least of your blunders, trust me.

butterflylion:
Claiming Braxton Hicks is a misdiagnosis for actual labour when Braxton Hicks does not cause dilation which occurs in actual labour would be the least of your blunders trust me.

Claiming you have a pathophysiology for spontaneous remission would be the least of your blunders trust me.

Claiming stroke does not have degrees would be the least of your blunders trust me.

Need I go on? Your herbalist knowledge is too dim for actual medical science. No wonder all you do are make assumptions and have medical fantasies of things not medically available.

Where is your pathophysiology for spontaneous remission of cancer.

CatfishBilly:
I have explained Braxton Hicks and labour 2 times on this page. You're too dumb to comprehend it, that's why you go around making ridiculous Medical statements.


Since you're too dumb to understand Braxton Hicks and labour, it's a given that you'll be too dumb to understand sarcasm even if it's fuckkking you in the arse.


Go to the health section naa, why are you scared? Don't you trust your brain anymore Mr Dumb fellow that doesn't even know the definition of labour but wants to argue immunology and oncology.


Fuckkking retard.

Let me use labour as an example. Labour is defined as a regular uterine contraction with gradual effacement and dilation of the cervix leading to complete expulsion of the contents of the uterus.
So, a woman comes in with uterine contraction, a diagnosis of labour is made, but after 2 days, no change in the length of the cervix, cervix is still closed then labour was misdiagnosed, the diagnosis now changes to false labour/Braxton Hicks contractions and she's sent home

CatfishBilly:
Illiterate friend go and open a thread in the Health section then we'll discuss that topic so that your ignorance will be laid bare to the Medical world.

Pushing at 4cm would be the least of your blunders, trust me.


You are not even a medical personnel, you're not qualified to engage me, you said so yourself.

butterflylion:
Felixomor again when caught he runs and hides behind sarcasm. He just lied again about his own comment. Let me show what he calls sarcasm

Catfishbilly said the below



Now when his Braxton Hicks error is exposed the same person who emphatically used it as an example now calls it sarcasm.

Hahahahahahahaha what a jumbo dumbo

[img]https://media./images/989d9a0eddd5019dcf4d6e7803dd1f23/tenor.gif[/img]

CatfishBilly:
The post you quoted clearly states, labour was misdiagnosed, the diagnosis now changes to false labour/Braxton Hicks.
It is fuckkking there you illiterate retardddddd. Person with medical knowledge that encourages women to push at 4cm. That's how you'll tear their cervix and ake them give birth to dead babies.
Now I know why you don't like journals. You don't fuckkking read. Your education made you so.




Go to the health section and open a thread, let the whole world see your ignorance.

Half baked illiterate.

butterflylion:
Shut up ogbonu jati jati! This your herbal medical practice is really a big problem to you.

WHY AND HOW WOULD ANY MEDICAL PRACTITIONER FIRST MISDIAGNOSE WHEN THERE WAS NO CHECKS PRIOR TO CONFIRMATION OR DENIAL?

ONLY LAY MEN WOULD FIRST MISDIAGNOSE. WHY USE A LAY MANS OPINION AS A MISDIAGNOSIS WHEN THE RIGHT DIAGNOSIS IS BRAXTON HICKS WHEN THE PATIENT IS OBSERVED?

RIGHT DIAGNOSIS IS BRAXTON HICKS WHEN CHECKED AND THERE WAS NO INITIAL MISDIAGNOSIS BY A COMPETENT MEDICAL PERSONNEL.

I hope you can see as I deliberately and clearly showed you your medical shenanigan.

You are medically inept and just wish to lie your way through an argument.

Where is your pathophysiology for spontaneous remission of cancer?

CatfishBilly:
Wow, so a woman shows up with contraction and after no dilation is noted at initial check, she's immediately called Braxton Hicks despite it being shown that labour starts at 0cn dilation.


You're outdoing yourself. Clap for yourself. Don't say this rubbish at the health section when you eventually open your thread. Free advice.

So, a woman comes in with uterine contraction, a diagnosis of labour is made, but after 2 days, no change in the length of the cervix, cervix is still closed then labour was misdiagnosed, the diagnosis now changes to false labour/Braxton Hicks contractions and she's sent home

The post you quoted clearly states, labour was misdiagnosed, the diagnosis now changes to false labour/Braxton Hicks.

felixomor:
The op has demonstrated more medical and even clinical knowledge than you since the beginning of this thread.

The joke is on u

butterflylion:
Shut your odour reeking mouth. These are your very words in two places. First:



[/b]

What medical personnel would first diagnose labour prior to checks? Any credible gynaecologist would use these words of mine in quote "LETS CHECK HER AND SEE" or "LETS SEE IF SHE HAS BEGUN LABOUR". Then checks are done to determine labour.

Second post of yours:

[/b]

ONLY A NON MEDICAL PERSON WOULD FIRST MISDIAGNOSE PRIOR TO CHECKS. A woman begins to feel what she thinks is labour but is she medically qualified to confirm? So she goes to her gynaecologist and says "SIR I THINK I AM IN LABOUR".

Her gynaecologist in accordance with proper medical procedures would ask certain questions after which he would ask her to lay down on the examination table for cervical check. Then and and only after then can he declare full labour or Braxton Hicks (which he never diagnosed in the first place as a misdiagnosis)

I hope your herbal brain can wrap itself around all I just said.

You are a Fvvcking medical shenanigan!

Free advice to you as well right here and now. Help the medically ignorant by posting your ground breaking pathophysiology for spontaneous remission of cancer here so you can help our illiteracy.

CatfishBilly:
Like I said, keep out doing yourself.
False labour is never diagnosed at presentation, the woman is first of all observed over a period of time before it could be said that she has false labour.



You don't read scratch that, do you even know how to read?
This small thing is proving too tough for you and you want to discuss immunology and oncology.
Laughable.

butterflylion:
Do you even realise you are a jumbo dumbo? If forced labour is never diagnosed at presentation is actual labour also diagnosed at presentation without duly laid down medical checks required carried out?

I can see you head isn't in the right place. Herbs have done a number on that medical shenanigan brain of yours.

CatfishBilly:
I know I sound like a broken record but it has been shown that you have to repeat things for dumb people before they get it, so I don't mind repeating.

A woman presents with regular uterine contraction with cervical dilation at 0cm is admitted under the provisional diagnosis of labour. Cervical dilation of 0cm doesn't preclude labour because Latent phase of labour is from 0cm to 4cm.
If cervical dilation progresses, then the woman is in true labour but if cervix remains at 0cm after observation, then she's diagnosed as having Braxton Hicks.

I repeat, no one says False Labour at presentation.
Do you want me to repeat it for you again so that you can get it?


This simple thing is messing you up, you now want to discuss immunology and oncology.




Your personal Lord and Savior wasn't brain dead.
He had his NDE as he was regaining cortical function.
Dude totally made up his 7 days as per Tupac Shakur wey him be because it's been proven that people with NDE lose perception of time.

butterflylion:
Allow me jump-start your herbal brain.

Now you change the language to PROVISIONAL DIAGNOSIS OF LABOUR ba?

Labour isn't diagnosed based on dilation alone is it?

Latent phase :
Cervix less than 4 cm dilated.

Active phase
Cervix between 4 cm and 10 cm dilated
Rate of cervical dilatation at least 1 cm/hour
Effacement is usually complete
Fetal descent through birth canal begins.

The diagnosis of labour is made when these criteria are met:

history of regular, painful contractions: in well-established labour, a uterine contraction lasts for about 50-60 secs and occurs every 2-4 minutes.
There is a show or breaking of waters and
progressive dilation of the cervix.

I hope you know what A SHOW is.

Dilation must match with the history of contraction as I already mentioned and not dilation alone.

You just got set up and you fell for it as the herbal doctor you actually are.

Regular uterine contraction is different from actual established labour contraction which is why the spacing and frequency are ALWAYS TIMED as I already stated.

You are a medical shenanigan!

Where is your pathophysiology for spontaneous remission of cancer oga herbalist?

CatfishBilly:
Oh, you want to go technical?
Dumbo that doesn't know that it's possible for a woman to reach full dilation during labour without rupturing her membranes which will now be ruptured artificially using an amniotomy hook called Artificial Rupture of Membranes.

Dumbo that doesn't know that women can be in active phase of labour before seeing SHOW.

Watch out for the technical areas beofe you say women push at 4cm, bloody liar.

I can repeat it for you again, like I said, repetition is needed for dumb people to get things.

A woman presents with regular uterine contraction with cervical dilation at 0cm is admitted under the provisional diagnosis of labour. Cervical dilation of 0cm doesn't preclude labour because Latent phase of labour is from 0cm to 4cm.
If cervical dilation progresses, then the woman is in true labour but if cervix remains at 0cm after observation, then she's diagnosed as having Braxton Hicks.

I repeat, no one says False Labour at presentation.
Do you want me to repeat it for you again so that you can get it?


This simple thing is messing you up, you now want to discuss immunology and oncology.




Your personal Lord and Savior wasn't brain dead.
He had his NDE as he was regaining cortical function.
Dude totally made up his 7 days as per Tupac Shakur wey him be because it's been proven that people with NDE lose perception of time.




Go to the health section and open your thread. I can't view your Medical ignorance alone.
Colleagues have to see it.

butterflylion:
Felixomor again when caught he runs and hides behind sarcasm. He just lied again about his own comment. Let me show what he calls sarcasm

Catfishbilly said the below



Now when his Braxton Hicks error is exposed the same person who emphatically used it as an example now calls it sarcasm.

Hahahahahahahaha what a jumbo dumbo

[img]https://media./images/989d9a0eddd5019dcf4d6e7803dd1f23/tenor.gif[/img]

Ranchhoddas:
You have not demonstrated any medical knowledge on this thread.
What kind of doctor are you?

felixomor:
The guy is a jester who lives in denial.
Honestly

felixomor:
Says 3 idiots I pass

felixomor:
Says 3 idiots I pass

Ranchhoddas:
You don dey fear me abi?
Very good.
Oya contribute to the discussion. Stop hiding behind lame attempts at witticism.

felixomor:
Fear what?
You wish.
The above discussion wasnt your level.
So dont bother

felixomor:
Fear what?
You wish.
The above discussion wasnt your level.
So dont bother

Ranchhoddas:
You have not contributed anything to the discussion so far. Is it my level that is preventing that?

butterflylion:
Knock knock.
Who is there?
It's me Cat.
Cat who?
Catfishbilly the shenanigan herbalist!

Catfishbilly where is the pathophysiology for spontaneous remission of cancer? I am growing old waiting for you here o.

felixomor:
Hehehe unfortunately, majority who read the thread
Think otherwise.

You may need some eye glassess to correct the eye defect