₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,331,151 members, 8,448,872 topics. Date: Tuesday, 21 July 2026 at 12:52 AM

Toggle theme

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (266) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsTechnical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1177459 Views)

1 2 3 ... 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 10:24pm On Sep 26, 2017
nemesis4u:
bro now we r talking
pretty naaked ladies for u and me grin
very very exciting grin grin grin
grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:33pm On Sep 26, 2017
Odunayaw:
grin grin
grin

i can tell u confidently right now henry is calling me a pervert grin grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:51pm On Sep 26, 2017
PINAKA COMMAND POST

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:13pm On Sep 26, 2017
INS Tarasa is a Water Jet Fast Attack Craft

The ship can do a maximum speed of 35 knots, which makes it ideal for intercepting fast-moving vessels, and is is equipped with shoulder-launched Igla surface-to-air missiles for low-altitude anti-air warfare. The 30 mm main gun can fire 550 rounds a minute for a maximum range of 4,000m.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:05am On Sep 27, 2017
nemesis4u:
one reason they dont export is becz extensive work has to be done to ensure compatibility of sensors ie networking side with non NATO members systems

plus u have to sign CISMOA LEMOA LSA BECA agreements with US government which many countries dont want to.

but American companies make up for the discrepancy by supplying at component level ie maine engines, radars, CMS , weapons , etc

this is very good businesses as it allows for higher profit margins

anyways south korea japan have their destroyers based on american destroyers
The bolded is not completely related to what I asked, I was referring to key ship builders (the guys who fabricate the hull) not companies that supply and integrate subsystems like radars, power plant and cannons.

I’m talking about the Ingalls and co as opposed to Raytheon or BAE.

I think cost is the major issue and the numerous agreements potential customers have to sign.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:05am On Sep 27, 2017
iblawi:
Usually too expensive to compete with ships from other exporters.
yeah this was my initial thought.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:08am On Sep 27, 2017
TU-95MS

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:08am On Sep 27, 2017
...

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:47pm On Sep 27, 2017
last of the series recently inducted

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:01pm On Sep 27, 2017
jakeporeshenko:
The bolded is not completely related to what I asked, I was referring to key ship builders (the guys who fabricate the hull) not companies that supply and integrate subsystems like radars, power plant and cannons.

I’m talking about the Ingalls and co as opposed to Raytheon or BAE.

I think cost is the major issue and the numerous agreements potential customers have to sign.
i dont think cost is that much of an issue , the issue is clearance from the US government , the Americans r loath to give others access to their naval platforms since they r paranoid about their no 1 position in naval dominance.

Indian destroyers costs around 1 billion dollars each , so IN will be pretty happy to lay their hands on top notch destroyers , reasonable cost dont matter perse problem lies with sale clearance and agreements and operational restrictions

operational clerance means u will need US permission to use the platform in offensive role or for any modifications.

eg F16 which US is trying to sell to india comes with a rider that it cannot be used to deliver nukes and this is one of the sticking points as it negates operational independence.

plus 3rd party modification is being restricted .

rafale sales went through becz french gave full access to their nuclear delivery optimized rafales .
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:07pm On Sep 27, 2017
lol the MI35 flew away grin

the boyz r from para SF

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:16pm On Sep 27, 2017
army para SF

they also indulge in underwater activities

though naval MARCOS is the primary force to deal in such activities

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:19pm On Sep 27, 2017
SFF aka Establishment 22

classified as paramilitary which they r definitely not grin

full of Tibetans

anyways FN P90 for mountain warfare , i be damned grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:28pm On Sep 27, 2017
NSG

SAG (special action group) most probably

what rifle is it grin

Taiwanese ? grin grin grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Du-YXHvX-dE

complete video on IA commando training

importantly GHATAKS r chosen from among these fellows after combat performance in operational areas

as far as i know GHATAKS (concept and mandate) have no other equivalents in other armies , these r regular infantry perse but meant for spear heading ops/ clearing obstacles outside the capability of regular infantry

they r embedded in every infantry unit, around 12 guys specializing in mountain warfare , special weapons tactics etc
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:49pm On Sep 27, 2017
i remember 57 trainees from a commando training establishment had run away during the last stages as they could not take the hard regime

one of the guys on his way to his home in another state ran into police who tried to arrest him

he smashed up 31 of them before they managed to subdue him grin

in the police lock up he manged to get out of his cell and destroy the whole poilce station along with everybody inside

they later fired .303s at him and managed to hit his legs and thus end his rampage grin

guy was then arrested by MPs and later served imprisonment before continuing his training

he did this becz one policeman had using slang on him

need less to say the local population thoroughly enjoyed the thrashing of the police grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:44pm On Sep 27, 2017
grin grin grin

man i wish i was inside the tank sad

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:03pm On Sep 27, 2017
kalyani


the 48km range with HE-BRFB BB rounds at sea level will easily reach around 60-70 km or so in the mountains due to the rarefied air shocked

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:33am On Sep 28, 2017
oracle of Arochukwu shocked shocked shocked

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 12:46am On Sep 28, 2017
nemesis4u:
oracle of Arochukwu shocked shocked shocked
Hahahahaha
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:46am On Sep 28, 2017
delhi class destroyers

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:48am On Sep 28, 2017
project 28 ASW corvettes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:54am On Sep 28, 2017
b
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 8:53am On Sep 28, 2017
kikuyu1:
Anyone seen this?



On the 19th US specops actually tried to capture their Russian counterparts in Syria!

https://youtu.be/q9MfeqUrsWE

Imo,the vid has the ring of truth.
That was only the beginning!

By now many of you must have heard the news: a Russian Lieutenant-General, Valery Asapov, and two Colonels have been killed in what appears to be a very precisely targeted mortar attack. Just as in the case of the Russian military police unit recently attacked near Deir ez-Zor, the Russians are accusing the Americans of being behind this attack. To make things even worse, the Russians are now also officially accusing the Americans of actively collaborating with ISIS:
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=158403

Imo,the Zio Elite are fighting back against the America First faction,the Patriotic deep state faction within the Pentagon,tri services,CIA,FBI,State dept who created the Drumpf. The AFF primary objectives-was and is no more (losing) wars for Israel.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:28am On Sep 28, 2017
China s aircraft crareer

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:33am On Sep 28, 2017
Algerian1:
China s aircraft crareer
this is the old one or the new one
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:46am On Sep 28, 2017
nemesis4u:
this is the old one or the new one
its the Liaoning aircraft carrier start service in 2011 , ex Riga then Varyag (Kuznetsov-class aircraft cruiser) built in ukraine by union sovietic but not completed and bought by china in 1998
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:18am On Sep 28, 2017
India set for another rendezvous with Moon, Chandrayaan 2 to lift off in March 2018

New Delhi: Almost a decade after Chandraayaan 1 was launched, India is aiming for the Moon again, as Indian Space Research Organisation’s (ISRO) second unmanned moon mission, Chandrayaan 2, is set to lift off in March 2018, as per reports. Chandrayaan 2 will be launched aboard GSLV Mk 2, from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre in Sriharikota in Andhra Pradesh. ISRO credits GSLV Mk 2 as its largest launch vehicle as it has several successful missions in its kitty and the Indian space organisation is hopeful that India's second lunar probe will also take off with a bang.

Chandrayaan 2 would consist of an orbiter, lander and rover and would weigh about 3,250 kg.

As per reports, the orbiter would be launched into a lunar orbit where the lander will separate, make a soft landing on the moon and deploy the rover. India's second lunar probe would be an advanced version of ISRO's landmark mission of Chandrayaan 1. With Chandrayaan 1 launch, India became the fourth country to set foot on the Moon and with this advanced version, it is surely going to set a benchmark in the space world.

Chandrayaan 2 is expected to cost ISRO a bit above its predecessor.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 1:44pm On Sep 28, 2017
nemesis4u:
NSG

SAG (special action group) most probably

what rifle is it grin

Taiwanese ? grin grin grin
I recognise the distinctive fore end;its the Excalibur or Trichu.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:42pm On Sep 28, 2017
kikuyu1:
I recognise the distinctive fore end;its the Excalibur or Trichu.
i asked a friend

he told me it is Franchi SPAS-15
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:08pm On Sep 28, 2017
New J-20 start service in chinese AF


5 J-20 (S/n : 78272 to 78276 )

source: twitter: East Pendulum/ HenriKenhmann

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:28pm On Sep 28, 2017
US Secretary of Defence Jim Mattis visited India a few days ago and some discussed points over the meeting.


Guaranteed sharing of approximately 70% components commonality between F16 Block 7F and F35s with a intended target to make it 75%.

This is the chief challenge as the specification of Block 7F is getting further upgraded for Indian needs and the sharing of technology for commonality parts is a challenge.

Rest of the technology which can be shared without any hassles is submitted by LM for due consideration which includes all present tech upto UAE block 60 and classified tech not pertaining to F35s.

The CFTs are getting further enhanced to reach a combat radii as needed by IAF

Globally F16 availability rate is around 70% (just a tad below it actually).

For India specifically a 75% availability rate as advised will be undertaken and a Performance based Logistics and Support deal is also being planned to meet it stringently.

About Investments for full fledged Line transfer (every process) from Fort Worth to Indian TASL, some suggestions include
Sharing costs between two parties GOI-IAF & TASL-LM for full line transfer and the whole chain
This will lead to minimum production rate of 3-4 F16s per Month from TASL
Also it will showcase commitment from India and its seriousness to facilitate full transfer of the ecosystem
Need to strengthen the IPR regime and the proprietary tech to certain vendors who are part of teh supply chain,
In such places, a 74% stake to be held via US entity is envisioned

Technology for local MIC includes -
On board Central Pedestral Display
Improved Programmable Display Generator
Common Color Multifunction Displays
CPU and core technology behind them
Slots kept free for more core additions which can enhance and give additional performance of the system upto 50% based on multiple new scan systems taken from F35s
APG-83 SABR Air cooled AESA radar with terrain following, Radar common data link and ISAR (inverse SAR)
APG-83 is Northrop product so can be shared completely if the commitment for India is clearly there. (including all codes and software behind)
Complete software codes for all hardwares onboard
Targeting system for A2A and A2G - whole process of hardware, software and countermeasures etc

Mattis also stressed this whole F16 ecosystem will become global hub for all spares, upgrades and orders and USA will leave the whole F16 ecosystem with India only.

Mattis also stressed that owing to commonality of 70% between F16 Block7F and F35s and targeted 75%, it will lead to easier transition to F35s at a later stage.

Mattis also clarified that Block 7F is superior to Block 60 by a big margin owing to F35 tech. The block 52s that IAF knows inside out of Singapore AF is further behind.

Mattis also emphasized that PAF operated F16s is entirely different and generation behind the Block 7F. In terms of capability, the present 7F is more than twice then what Block 52 so PAF F16s are further beyond the curve.

Its also added by a LM representative later that A2G mode of APG 83 can scan upto 290 kms and A2A mode is roughly 180 km for a 3m2, ~120km for 1m2 based on various factors and IRST will track in the range of ~80km

Defence minister said the same will be evaluated and considered as per the quick process planned

i cannot verify the claims made above though......
1 2 3 ... 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 ... 669 Reply

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President TrumpPhotos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian.@elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday234

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - LiveAmerican Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President!Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .