₦airaland Forum

patches689:
He is saying that the China link may be a dead end because if you are planning a coup the last thing you do is travel to that country and meet those parties infront of the worlds media and before the eyes of your own president.

Its 2017, they could have organised the coup via twitter

ActivateKruger:
In order for the SA to militarily intervene SADC has to approve. Once approved, other countries like Botswana and Zambia should also contribute BUT I don't think they'll bother at this moment. Botswana wants Mugabe gone so the only action you'll see from their side is massive border enforcement just in case Zim refugees run towards it..... As for South Africa, Zuma/ANC has its eyes in the next month's party elections. Chances are, he won't even be South Africa's president by end of January.

NB: South African parliament won't approve the deployment of the SANDF to protect a dictatorship, the President is only stuck with only 400 soldiers.....

So, let's relax and look forward to Black Friday specials.

Covert1:
My hats out to SupremeCourt! I hail Ooo! Everything you bragged against him is now egg on your face. Shame! Here's Zimbabwe you bragged about invading, solve it and we will give you a sit among men. Now run along the Baba in Abuja is now trying to get u out of this one, again. Just this once, after this you will be left to be humiliated by Botswana.

patches689:
French have more combat jets in your region than you do...

overhypedsteve:
that's the last thing that would happen in a sane sub region a sitting head of state should not be left in the hands of vigilantes no matter how bad his crimes are. Following the text book you should know that when you look the other way when such a thing is happening,
It may soon repeat itself. Stake holders in the sub region should go in and free Mugabe and let him answer any case that may be made against him. Oh I forgot, guys in that region are only good for photo ops.

overhypedsteve:
[s]that's the last thing that would happen in a sane sub region a sitting head of state should not be left in the hands of vigilantes no matter how bad his crimes are. Following the text book you should know that when you look the other way when such a thing is happening,
It may soon repeat itself. Stake holders in the sub region should go in and free Mugabe and let him answer any case that may be made against him. Oh I forgot, guys in that region are only good for photo ops.[/s]

overhypedsteve:
Yea and yet we organize the fall of dictators like its our past time.

patches689:
Augustine, did you really just use one account to praise another account?

Seriously though, are you saying RSA should invade to support Mugabe, or shouldent?

Covert1:
Patch if you hadn't canceled my lectures above you'd have learnt something and but be asking this stupid question. When start being honorable and respect an elder I'll dialogue with u like I do with Andrewza.

overhypedsteve:
Yea and yet we organize the fall of dictators like its our past time. A very close friend of South Africa and a member of the SADC is in distress and you want to distract us with France. When has France influence in WA ever stopped us from interventions in any country?
Mugabe is bad, but he headed AU and he is a well know personality in the African struggle against white supremacy, very sympathetic to the cause of black South Africa but he is been caged like a fool right in front of your nose and you can't do anything. SADC is a joke. By now all the SADC president at should be holding a defense council meeting with their Chief of staffs or holding an emergency security meeting. The fact that you would allow rogue men to wield arms and insurance law and order around you tells a lot about your capabilities.

overhypedsteve:
SADC is a joke. By now all the SADC president at should be holding a defense council meeting with their Chief of staffs or holding an emergency security meeting. The fact that you would allow rogue men to wield arms and insurance law and order around you tells a lot about your capabilities.

overhypedsteve:
that's the last thing that would happen in a sane sub region a sitting head of state should not be left in the hands of vigilantes no matter how bad his crimes are. Following the text book you should know that when you look the other way when such a thing is happening,
It may soon repeat itself. Stake holders in the sub region should go in and free Mugabe and let him answer any case that may be made against him. Oh I forgot, guys in that region are only good for photo ops.

tdayof:
You all should take note that during the Gambia invasion, an election was conducted and Barrow won.


2) Yahyha Jammeh took the case to the court and lost.

3) He refused to step down but ECOWAS didn't say anything.

3) ECOWAS then asked him to step down calling a meeting as the court already affirmed Barrow the president in which series of meeting were called.


4) ECOWAS WENT TO uphold the constitutional rights of the Gambia people.


If SADC will interfere, it's not something that will be happening now. We all knew how much time it took ecowas to finally decide on Jammeh.

newafricaken254:
Sudanese soldier ,who was killed last week in Yemen

tdayof:
You all should take note that during the Gambia invasion, an election was conducted and Barrow won.


2) Yahyha Jammeh took the case to the court and lost.

3) He refused to step down but ECOWAS didn't say anything.

3) ECOWAS then asked him to step down calling a meeting as the court already affirmed Barrow the president in which series of meeting were called.


4) ECOWAS WENT TO uphold the constitutional rights of the Gambia people.


If SADC will interfere, it's not something that will be happening now. We all knew how much time it took ecowas to finally decide on Jammeh.

tdayof:
You all should take note that during the Gambia invasion, an election was conducted and Barrow won.


2) Yahyha Jammeh took the case to the court and lost.

3) He refused to step down but ECOWAS didn't say anything.

3) ECOWAS then asked him to step down calling a meeting as the court already affirmed Barrow the president in which series of meeting were called.


4) ECOWAS WENT TO uphold the constitutional rights of the Gambia people.


If SADC will interfere, it's not something that will be happening now. We all knew how much time it took ecowas to finally decide on Jammeh.

tdayof:
You all should take note that during the Gambia invasion, an election was conducted and Barrow won.


2) Yahyha Jammeh took the case to the court and lost.

3) He refused to step down but ECOWAS didn't say anything.

3) ECOWAS then asked him to step down calling a meeting as the court already affirmed Barrow the president in which series of meeting were called.


4) ECOWAS WENT TO uphold the constitutional rights of the Gambia people.


If SADC will interfere, it's not something that will be happening now. We all knew how much time it took ecowas to finally decide on Jammeh.

Xbee007:
The question is, on whose side will SADC fight? Cos everyone, except Mugabe and his family, wants Mugabe gone.
I am certain the Zimbabwean military would never hold unto power for more than few days.

slimthugchimee:
What is the name of that his gun?

patches689:
1. Mugabe has not requested aid - IT WOULD BE ILLEGAL
2. Doctrine of Successful Revolution - IT WOULD BE ILLEGAL

This is SADC bro, not some mickey-mouse part of the world.

tdayof:
You all should take note that during the Gambia invasion, an election was conducted and Barrow won.


2) Yahyha Jammeh took the case to the court and lost.

3) He refused to step down but ECOWAS didn't say anything.

3) ECOWAS then asked him to step down calling a meeting as the court already affirmed Barrow the president in which series of meeting were called.


4) ECOWAS WENT TO uphold the constitutional rights of the Gambia people.


If SADC will interfere, it's not something that will be happening now. We all knew how much time it took ecowas to finally decide on Jammeh.

tdayof:
You all should take note that during the Gambia invasion, an election was conducted and Barrow won.


2) Yahyha Jammeh took the case to the court and lost.

3) He refused to step down but ECOWAS didn't say anything.

3) ECOWAS then asked him to step down calling a meeting as the court already affirmed Barrow the president in which series of meeting were called.


4) ECOWAS WENT TO uphold the constitutional rights of the Gambia people.


If SADC will interfere, it's not something that will be happening now. We all knew how much time it took ecowas to finally decide on Jammeh.

overhypedsteve:
Yea. The SADC convention is a joke then if there is no Clause in it that allows for an intervention by its members when a member state is in distress. Mugabe is under house arrest that alone is enough reason to take to arms. What if tomorrow we wake up to hear that this soldiers are killing and mutilating women and children in the streets of Harare? What if God forbid we begin to use the word "ethnic cleansing " again in Africa cus some "lily livered" head of state is unable to call for an emergency Security Council meeting in his sub region.

Even if SA organised the fall of Mugabe by now a well planned take over would have Mugabe out of Zimbabwe safe and secured waiting to start attending trials at the ICJ. You planned nothing my brother, if truly SA intelligence planned Mugabe's downfall then the guys in SA intelligence are the dumbest people that ever walked the earth. When we deposed Samuel Doe in Liberia we brought him home to Spend the rest of his life in the beautiful beaches of calabar admiring half naked women. That is how to depose a dictator.