₦airaland Forum

OMEGA009:
FTC!!!!!!!
What can a girl say? Momma, I made it. I haff arrove. I dedicate this FTC to all my fans, air conditioners and even “akupes”.

Now, wia is Lala and my FTC prize money?

I’m no money grabbing Baby mama and I ain’t no farm implement used in making ridges so I need my frackking money.

Please

dvee2:
Executive order 6 is about proceeds of corruption. In simple terms money/property that is under investigation for corruption would be frozen until a final verdict by a competent court of law is declared.
This would stop cases whereby an accuse would sell out identified property or loot before the case is completed.
Looters hate this executive order because it doesn't give then access to be withdrawing money from an account which is already a subject of litigation.

OMEGA009:
FTC!!!!!!!
What can a girl say? Momma, I made it. I haff arrove. I dedicate this FTC to all my fans, air conditioners and even “akupes”.

Now, wia is Lala and my FTC prize money?

I’m no money grabbing Baby mama and I ain’t no farm implement used in making ridges so I need my frackking money.

Please

Mynd44:
That once you have been charged to court on suspicion of corruption, the EFCC or ICPC can freeze your bank account(s)

janefblog:
The Chairman, Daar Communications, Dr Raymond Dokpesi; Senator Bala Mohammed and Ambassador Bello Mohammed have dragged President Muhammadu Buhari and the Attorney General of the Federation, before a Federal High Court sitting in Lagos.


The men are challenging the constitutionality of Executive Order No 6 of 2018.

Daar Communication Chairman, and others in the suit, are demanding the court to declare that the Presidential Order 6 issued by the President unlawful.

They want the law to be declared null and void and of no effect whatsoever, having regard to the fact that the said order constitutes an attempt by the president to exercise to the detriment of the plaintiffs’ judicial and legislative powers not vested in him by the constitution.

They are also praying the court for an order nullifying the the Presidential Executive Order on the ground that it scandalizes the plaintiffs by stigmatizing them as corrupt and labelling their assets as proceeds of corruption liable to forfeiture.

They are further demanding for an order of the court nullifying the Presidential Executive Order no 6 of 2018, on the ground that it constitutes a violation of the rule against self-help and that the president purports to take action detrimental to the plaintiffs in respect of assets subject to pending litigation between the Government and the plaintiffs.

https://janefblog.com/3848-2dokpesi-senator-bala-mohammed-other-drag-buhari-to-court/

3kay945:
Thanks bro. I just got lectured.

dvee2:
The thing they hate most about this order is that there usual tactics of deliberately prolonging case in court for many years pending when a favourable government comes on is detrimental to them.
The longer you seek for adjournment the longer your money remain frozen.
Most SAN have perfected this art in Nigeria hence some cases would be in court for ten years, during that time the person still hv access to the money, isn't that tragic?

dvee2:
The thing they hate most about this order is that there usual tactics of deliberately prolonging case in court for many years pending when a favourable government comes on is detrimental to them.
The longer you seek for adjournment the longer your money remain frozen.
Most SAN have perfected this art in Nigeria hence some cases would be in court for ten years, during that time the person still hv access to the money, isn't that tragic?

Dov3:
Finally someone is standing up to unconstitutional orders. This tyranny if left unchecked will eat us all

This is the dictatorship. The strength of democracy lies in separation of powers. The moment one arm of government feels to big to comply with democratic conventions, then we have failed completely

docadams:
Do you know what comprises executive order? Of course no
Do you know what executive order 6 is? If you do I'll delete.

hollywater:
In a normal country, yes they will win,but in Zoo anything can happen .

icon8:
Lazy journalism!

What is Executive Order No 6 of 2018 and what is Article XI?

OMEGA009:
FTC!!!!!!!
What can a girl say? Momma, I made it. I haff arrove. I dedicate this FTC to all my fans, air conditioners and even “akupes”.

Now, wia is Lala and my FTC prize money?

I’m no money grabbing Baby mama and I ain’t no farm implement used in making ridges so I need my frackking money.

Please

Dov3:
Oga, if i didn't know, what will it take me to read about it? If you have an important response please shoot. Or else get buzy with your life. I have been following constitutional law for years before you learnt to type. I have less than 10 comments in months on this forum so you should know I won't want to waste my words on frivolous questions

On a second thought, Buhari is asking for the right to hold citizen's asset indefinitely without courts and formal trial. Is there separation of powers there? Does that remind you of a dictator or democracy ?

OMEGA009:
FTC!!!!!!!
What can a girl say? Momma, I made it. I haff arrove. I dedicate this FTC to all my fans, air conditioners and even “akupes”.

Now, wia is Lala and my FTC prize money?

I’m no money grabbing Baby mama and I ain’t no farm implement used in making ridges so I need my frackking money.

Please

docadams:
Your comment
"Finally someone is standing up to unconstitutional orders. This tyranny if left unchecked will eat us all

This is the dictatorship. The strength of democracy lies in separation of powers
You mentioned in one breath
- tyranny
-unconstitutional
-dictatorship

What is an executive order
"A presidential policy directive that implements or interprets a federal statute, a constitutional provision, or a treaty.[b/] - legal dictionary

'Executive Orders are orders issued by a president and directed towards officers and agencies of the government. [b]Executive orders have the full force of law, based on the authority derived from statute or the Constitution itself or implied acts of the legislature' The ability to make such orders is also based on express or implied Acts of the Legislature that delegate to the president some degree of discretionary power.[/b] - sunnews

Therefore execution orders are
1. Constitutionally backed
2 have full force of the law
3.within presidential discretionary powers

Section 315 of the 1999 constitution says the President 'make such modifications in the text of any existing law, as the appropriate authority considers necessary or expedient to bring that law into conformity with the provisions of this Constitution'

So, unless you can justify your earlier jaundiced claims, I will be left with no choice than to classify.you an un-/mis-./ill-informed partisan apostate

Dov3:

It is Unconstitutional

In Section 36 (5) of the 1999 constitution says every person is presumed innocent until a competent court finds him/her guilty

… the power to confiscate assets does not lie with the President, but with the judges. No party in a criminal case is allowed to take any actions during the legal process. Not even talk about it.

For Buhari with his array of lawyers directing agencies to act against the provisions of the constitution, then it is clearly tyrannical.

Taking into consideration all his other violations, it is clear that he is now a full fledged dictator

dvee2:
Executive order 6 is about proceeds of corruption. In simple terms money/property that is under investigation for corruption would be frozen until a final verdict by a competent court of law is declared.
This would stop cases whereby an accuse would sell out identified property or loot before the case is completed.
Looters hate this executive order because it doesn't give then access to be withdrawing money from an account which is already a subject of litigation.

docadams:
From your submission it is obvious you don't know the essence of executive orders. Heads of governments at all levels - local,state and federal run government through at least one executive order. All past Presidents at one point promulgated executive orders. So they were tyrants based on your definition.

dvee2:
The thing they hate most about this order is that there usual tactics of deliberately prolonging case in court for many years pending when a favourable government comes on is detrimental to them.
The longer you seek for adjournment the longer your money remain frozen.
Most SAN have perfected this art in Nigeria hence some cases would be in court for ten years, during that time the person still hv access to the money, isn't that tragic?

Teacher1776:
Well your explanation appears quite smooth and harmless. On the other hand, this order could bring about the reign of impunity. Nigerian partisan politicking is a blend of madness and irrational. Anyone who opposes those in the helm could have their assets confiscated pending the determination of the court which could take years. In essence, it amounts to declaring a person guilty even before the court tries the case. And meanwhile, the rule of law stipulates that until a person is pronounced guilty by the court, he is still innocent.
And you can agree that not all arraigned since buhari became president are truly guilty.
And not everyone who is opposing this order is a looter.
An order such as this, if not put in check, is capable of breeding tyranny.

Dov3:
Wrong again. The constitution empowers Presidents to use orders as long as the orders does not go against extant laws. I am done here

maoolakanm:
WHY ARE THEY AFRAID OF THE ORDER.ALL THEY NEED TO DO IS TO TELL THE JUDGE HOW THE ACQUIRED THOSE PROPERTIES IN QUESTION IF THERE ARE DOUBT OVER THEM.